Newspaper logo  
 
 
  Confusion Reigns at Inauguration

COMMENTARY:

Confusion Reigns at Inauguration

by Fred Cederholm

I must confess that I was left more that a bit confused after reading and re-reading Bush's inaugural address. Just where are "we" headed with this "vision thing"?
I've been thinking about the Inauguration, the oath of office, confidence, elections, and the components of freedom. So much was going through my head as I watched the events unfold on the Capitol steps last Thursday, January 20th.

Central to the oath of office sworn to by both the Vice-President and the President were the words: "...preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." The cornerstone of this Republic's freedom rests in the US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights--as detailed by our founding fathers. Just how do they square with the "protections" enumerated in the Patriot Act(s) and amplified in the Homeland Security Act, or any other terror driven bills yet to come?

We saw a most confident George W. Bush take the oath and deliver an address to this nation and the world. You would expect such an all-powerful personage to exude these traits. Confidence and faith go hand in hand. Both Bush and Carter shared this duality of character strengths in their personas, but Carter's was tempered by a pervasive humility. This was not always the case with Bush in these prior four years.

I followed the Bush address word by word, and took copious notes. Later, I downloaded the complete text--which I have read and read and reread and reread. Concepts of freedom and liberty were central to the speech, but only in the most abstract and obtuse way. I must confess that I was left more that a bit confused-- just where are "we" headed with this "vision thing"? (Kind of the way I felt years back when confronted by his father's "thousand points of light" - and I must point out that I supported him ONCE, too.) What could, would, or should "we" as the remaining global superpower be doing to enhance our security by promoting/encouraging such worldwide freedom and liberties?

Free elections are central to freedom and liberty, but CHOICE also enters into the mix. This administration has a great deal riding on the coming elections in Iraq. While they may be free (or at least freer than those under Saddam), where or what are the choices? Neither individuals nor parties are named, and there has been no campaigning. Rather, the electorate will vote for loosely defined "groups" who will later select specific representatives. This "pig in a poke" indirectness is further diluted by the vagueness of the "pokes." Does this situation meet the historical norms behind OUR understanding of elections, choice, freedom and liberty?

Anybody acquainted with me, or following my columns over this past year and a third; knows that I was underwhelmed by the choices given us in Election 2004. From my perspective, we enjoyed the freedom to pick Brand B, Brand K, or to not vote at all. Some choice! I know there were many hardcore supporters on both sides, but a lot of us were left frustrated on the peripheries. This country, its finances, its currency, and its economic direction need leadership and a plan of action--not open-ended military plans of attack. While it may be good for some businesses, war is really not good business.

The world condemns our military/diplomatic arrogance and our endless global-sucking consumption; while at the very same time, the world depends on US/us to look out for their global interests and to provide a bottomless market for their goods, services, and products. What is wrong with this picture?

The American Experience of our 200-plus-year history has long set the benchmark for freedom and liberty on the planet. Subliminal love/hate envy of our successes and our freedoms of the past is now being supplanted by an overt love-to-hate US/us in these early years of the 21st century. These and many underpinnings of our current situation have got to change, and NOW!

When we depend on about $2 BILLION of new foreign capital a day to keep up our present level of consumptive spending going, when the value and acceptability of our currency is determined by foreign central banks and monopolies, when half of our national debt is held abroad, and when our level of charitable works and aid is nominally determined overseas; are "we" truly free? I'm Fred Cederholm and I've been thinking. You should be thinking, too.


Copyright 2005 Fred Cederholm. All rights reserved. Fred Cederholm is a CPA/CFE, a forensic accountant, and writer who contributes the column "TH*NK*NG" to The Weekly Observer in Creston, (Ogle County) Illinois. He is a graduate of the University of Illinois (B.A., M.A. and M.A.S.). He can be reached at asklet@rochelle.net.


Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on January 24, 2005.

 
Bookmark and Share
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Local Newsbriefs

Travel
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

03.05 Open Letter to Congressman Bart Stupak

Health & Environment

Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries

03.12 Slick Barry and the $100-Billion Medicaid/Medicare Fraud Claim

03.09 Kill Bill: Death to Obamacare!

03.09 Obama’s Rhetoric May Be “Fiery,” But His Health Care Reform Is Still Lukewarm

Media Watching

03.17 CNN Scrapes Bottom of Right-Wing Barrel With Erickson Hire

03.16 WPost Blames Obama First, on Israel

03.16 Letter to the New York Times' Editor: Stovepiping To Persia

03.12 Cud and Complicity: Burying the Alternatives to Empire's Dominion

03.11 NYT and the ACORN Hoax

03.05 Sorry, Rove, Bush Did Lie About Iraq

03.03 It's Snow News

03.03 The Woeful Washington Post

Ref. : The Daily Howler

Legal Matters

02.26 America's Supremes: Court Over Constitution

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.11 Power Rangers: Policing the System With the "Fightin' Progressives"

03.09 Thinking About Countings

03.07 Unnatural Acts: Breaking the Fever of Militarism

02.25 Future Shock: A Better World Beyond the Imperium

“High Crimes?”

03.17 Expecting Gen. McChrystal to Reduce Afghan Civilian Casualties is Like Asking Ted Bundy to Cut Sex Harassment in the Workplace

03.16 America's Secret Prisons

03.13 Palestinian Dispossession in East Jerusalem

03.12 Israeli Settlement Expansions Continue

03.11 Brutalizing Palestinian Children

03.08 The Russell Tribunal on Palestine: Barcelona Session

03.05 Targeting Israeli Apartheid

03.01 America's Permanent War Agenda

02.25 Global Sweatshop Wage Slavery

Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance

03.14 The Crisis in America's Telecommunications Network

03.09 The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource

03.05 Is the Recovery Real?

03.04 IMF-Style Austerity Measures come to America: What “Fiscal Responsibility” Means To You

03.04 Barry C. Lynn's "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and Economics of Destruction"

03.02 Obama's Budget Revealed: Money for Wars and Weapons, While More Americans Face Joblessness and Hunger

03.01 Thinking About Fees

International

03.15 Peace Process Hypocrisy: Stillborn from Inception

03.03 Muslim Disunity

03.02 Funding Israeli Militarism, Belligerence and Occupation

02.26 Iran Captures a 'Good' Terrorist

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland