| ||||||||||||||
MEDIA CRITICISM:Finding a way around Right-wing News Control
Right-wing Media Dominance
Ad-News is also politically right-wing warped. That orientation is not so much explained by the popularity of right-wing content (there's nothing else broadcast to compare it with!) as it is by the outright change in media ownership and/or editorial control. This change-over from predominantly left-wing to right-wing news-anchors and talk-show hosts--and guests, too--is now protected by Republican-controlled House and Senate Communication oversight committees and by the FCC itself, since committee and FCC approvals are required for media ownership changes.The sentiments of said Republican "leadership" was recently proven by their ignoring what should have been overwhelming citizen letter-writing and opinion polls against greater ownership by media conglomerates. Instead, Republicans approved what their media "campaign donation friends" paid them for. With this change, predominantly right-wing conglomerates (Time Warner, Viacom, GE & Microsoft, Clear Channel, and News Corp.) can own more networks and broadcast their special ad-news (and primitive evangelical programming) into more cities.
Scripting the News
You may have also noticed there has been increasing similarity between Ad-News programs on a given day, even down to their saying exactly the same phrases on a topic. That's because many celebrity pundits read the same scripts--or talking points--as supplied to them from the RNC and the Heritage Foundation. (The DNC puts scripts out too, but they are ignored because the media are who they are.) "The Daily Howler," a remarkable website by Bob Somerby (from here in Baltimore, another unheralded celebrity in our midst), provides excellent coverage of this now-standard practice among the the Washington press corp. [See this "Howler" as an illustrative example]The objective of scripted news is to reinforce what is said over and over to make it more a "fact." But what if such "facts" are lies, what then? That is called brainwashing. They are brainwashing you.
It's time to bring back Fairness Doctrine principles!
"This can't be," you may exclaim. "What of the Fairness Doctrine?" Well, there used to be one. The FCC's Fairness Doctrine was enforced (by a committee of presidential appointees) from 1949 until 1987 to require broadcasters, as a condition of getting their licenses from the FCC, to cover controversial issues in their community, and to do so by offering some balancing views. It did not require equal time for opposing views. It merely prevented a station from day after day presenting a single view without airing opposing views (like today's Fox News Channel). Reagan appointed some friends to the Fairness Doctrine enforcement committee, and, in 1987, they voted to disband themselves, saying the rapid expansion in cable and satellite networks would naturally ensure all viewpoints would be aired. Obviously that assumption has been proven wrong.
De-fanging PBS
It gets worse. During the '90s the Republican-led congress reduced public-funding of PBS, forcing it to compete with commercial networks for corporate advertising to survive. This has caused editorial 'softening' of PBS news coverage to avoid losing current or potential corporate ad sponsors. [Ref. F.A.I.R. Exposes Advertiser Influence]
Finding a way around Right-wing Censorship
In frustration to the tightening web of news control, and to circumvent congressional and FCC disapproval, Al Gore recently tried to acquire French-owned Vivendi Universal. Its value was its trained and ready staff of professionals and (limited) cable outlets. But last week Al's deal stalled (and perhaps failed) because a financial backer dropped out. [Ref. Gore TV Deal Is Stalled At The 11th Hour; Major Investor Pulls Out]Al may not have been thinking about using PBS to carry his network's news programming, but perhaps he should. PBS news hasn't yet become as bad as Ad-News. Therefore, since the non-right are handicapped in obtaining media ownership, PBS--though editorially muted to compete for ad sponsors--is perhaps the only broadcast outlet possible for expanding journalistically professional news, a.k.a. Real News. It would appear possible that a professional group, perhaps international, could be organized and dedicated to the production of a 24-7 suite of Real-News programs to rival the warped Ad-News outlets. The Real-News programs could be syndicated singly or as a group to public broadcasting systems world-wide, as the content quality merits. There is no reason to presume Real-News would have lower ratings than Ad-News. Real-News is not inherently more boring than Ad-News: quite the opposite, it could be riveting if the awesome raw detail of what is actually happening were revealed--like CNN was in the very beginning. And further, for discussion programs, you could really spice things up with attractive non-gas-bag celebrities and appearances by academics and other professionals long denied access to presenting ideas directly to the public. It could be a thrilling venue if done right.
Addendum re. sustaining revenue (4/14): Ideally, advertising on Real-News should be infrequent, entertaining and educational infomercials. Copyright © 2004 The Baltimore Chronicle.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on April 13, 2004. |
Local News & Opinion
Ref. : Local Newsbriefs Travel
Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Open Letters:
03.05 Open Letter to Congressman Bart Stupak Health & Environment
Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries 03.20 The Death of American Populism 03.18 Pressure Drop: Brave Sir Dennis Ran Away 03.12 Slick Barry and the $100-Billion Medicaid/Medicare Fraud Claim 03.09 Kill Bill: Death to Obamacare! 03.09 Obama’s Rhetoric May Be “Fiery,” But His Health Care Reform Is Still Lukewarm Media Watching
03.17 CNN Scrapes Bottom of Right-Wing Barrel With Erickson Hire 03.16 WPost Blames Obama First, on Israel 03.16 Letter to the New York Times' Editor: Stovepiping To Persia 03.12 Cud and Complicity: Burying the Alternatives to Empire's Dominion 03.11 NYT and the ACORN Hoax 03.05 Sorry, Rove, Bush Did Lie About Iraq 03.03 It's Snow News 03.03 The Woeful Washington Post Ref. : The Daily Howler Legal Matters
02.26 America's Supremes: Court Over Constitution US Politics, Policy & Culture
03.11 Power Rangers: Policing the System With the "Fightin' Progressives" 03.09 Thinking About Countings 03.07 Unnatural Acts: Breaking the Fever of Militarism 02.25 Future Shock: A Better World Beyond the Imperium High Crimes?
03.19 Israel's Troubling Tilt Toward Apartheid 03.18 The Lawfare Project's Anti-Democratic Agenda 03.16 America's Secret Prisons 03.13 Palestinian Dispossession in East Jerusalem 03.12 Israeli Settlement Expansions Continue 03.11 Brutalizing Palestinian Children 03.08 The Russell Tribunal on Palestine: Barcelona Session 03.05 Targeting Israeli Apartheid 03.01 America's Permanent War Agenda 02.25 Global Sweatshop Wage Slavery Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance
03.19 The Growing Movement For Publicly-Owned Banks 03.19 America's "Houdini Recovery" under IMF-Type Austerity 03.14 The Crisis in America's Telecommunications Network 03.09 The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource 03.05 Is the Recovery Real? 03.04 IMF-Style Austerity Measures come to America: What “Fiscal Responsibility” Means To You 03.04 Barry C. Lynn's "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and Economics of Destruction" 03.01 Thinking About Fees International
03.15 Peace Process Hypocrisy: Stillborn from Inception 03.03 Muslim Disunity 03.02 Funding Israeli Militarism, Belligerence and Occupation 02.26 Iran Captures a 'Good' Terrorist We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
|
| ||||||||||||