Newspaper logo  
 
 
  The Fraud of Physician-Assisted Suicide

SPEAKING OUT:

The Fraud of Physician-Assisted Suicide

by Sheldon Richman

How can there be "death with dignity" when the patient must humbly petition the doctors, then meekly wait for a unanimous ruling?
Freedom is so little understood in this "land of the free" that it is often confused with its opposite. Case in point: Oregon's 1994 Death With Dignity Act, which a federal appeals court recently shielded from attack by US Attorney General John Ashcroft.

The law permits what has come to be known as physician-assisted suicide. It and the appellate ruling have been hailed as victories for patient autonomy and the right to commit suicide. Indeed, the New York Times, in praising the ruling, editorialized. "The voters of Oregon acted with great humanity when they decided to allow terminally ill people to determine when they have suffered enough."

But did the voters really do that? A closer look at the law shows they did not.

In fact the law lets a patient who is expected to die within six months ask his doctor for lethal drugs. The doctor can say no, as he has every right to do. But since a patient cannot end his own life without the doctor's consent, the law is no milestone on the road to individual freedom.

What happens when a patient makes such a request of his doctor? The state's requirements are "stringent," according to Dr. Peter Goodwin, a long-time family physician and an emeritus associate professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University. They include, Goodwin writes, "the attending physician's diagnosis/prognosis and determination that the patient is informed, capable and acting voluntarily."

Note that the attending physician must be convinced that the patient knows what he's doing. Whether or not you think doctors have a special ability to see the absence of volition in an action (I don't), this requirement is hardly consistent with "allow[ing] terminally ill people to determine when they have suffered enough."

But there's more. The law states, "A consulting physician must examine the patient and the medical records and concur with the attending physician's diagnosis/prognosis and assessment of the patient."

Dr. Goodwin comments: "If the attending physician or the consulting physician thinks the patient may suffer from a psychological disorder causing impaired judgment, the physician must refer the patient for evaluation and counseling. No medication may be prescribed unless it is certain the patient's judgment is not impaired" (emphasis added).

Although these requirements are called "stringent," they are actually elastic and stacked against the patient. What terminally ill patient in great pain could not be said to have impaired judgment? What's the difference between a judgment that's impaired and one that clashes with the doctor's? In a conflict between a patient who sees no better future and wants to die and a physician (perhaps supported by the patient's family) who sees the future differently, who will prevail? The doctor, of course. Yet the law is considered a blow for patient autonomy. How can there be "death with dignity" when the patient must humbly petition the doctors, then meekly wait for a unanimous ruling?

Whatever one thinks of the legal merits of Attorney General Ashcroft's attempt to use federal anti-drug laws to thwart Oregon's voters, physician-assisted suicide is a fraud. As Dr. Thomas Szasz writes in his book Fatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of Suicide, "The term 'physician-assisted suicide' [PAS] is intrinsically mendacious. The physician is the principal, not the assistant. In the normal use of the English language, the person who assists another is the subordinate; the person whom he assists is his superior.... However, the physician engaging in PAS is superior to the patient: He determines who qualifies for the 'treatment' and prescribes the drug for it."

In other words, the Oregon law has nothing to do with the freedom of the individual and everything to do with the power of doctors. If freedom were the concern, we would simply repeal the drug and prescription laws, and recognize each adult's right to buy any kind of drugs.

Why empower doctors? Suicide isn't a medical issue. It's a moral issue.


Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation (fff.org) in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine.


Copyright © 2004 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on June 28, 2004.
 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

05.26 Pollution From Canadian Oil Sands Vapor Is Substantial, Study Finds

05.26 Australia's dirtiest power station may be closed or sold, French owner says

05.26 FDA to announce whether it will approve implant for opioid addicts

05.25 Interview: CO2 'Air Capture' Could Be Key to Slowing Global Warming [Algae?]

05.25 Up against strict laws, Texas women learn do-it-yourself abortions [Is this what "conservatives" want?]

05.25 World War III will be fought over water

05.25 Coastal flooding: a sign of the damage our economy is wreaking on our fragile environment

05.25 My father warned Exxon about climate change in the 1970s. They didn't listen

05.25 How cracking down on America's painkiller capital led to a heroin crisis [As seen in Portugal and elsewhere, physicians prescribing safer, dosage-controlled drugs to addicts would save lives and suppress illegal drug cartels]

05.24 World could warm by massive 10C if all fossil fuels are burned

05.24 Single-payer health care is more popular than ever. Here are 10 questions for its future.

05.24 Largest U.S. Water Reservoir Shrinks to Record Low Amid Major Drought

05.23 New Solar Plants Generate Floating Green Power

05.23 There Is So Much More Food Poisoning Than We Thought

05.23 Official advice on low-fat diet and cholesterol is wrong, says health charity

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

05.26 The Hourly Wage Needed to Rent a 2-Bedroom Apartment Is Rising

05.26 Elizabeth Warren labels Trump 'money-grubber' who rooted for financial crash [videos]

05.26 “Come with me if you want to live”: Morning Joe panel gets weird, claims white men trust Trump to protect them from robots [governments, as yet, have no plan, policy or response to rapid robotic automation that's certain to replace millions of workers]

05.26 State Department audit finds Hillary Clinton broke agency rules with private email server

05.25 Here’s the Full List of Companies & Organizations That Paid Hillary Clinton From 2013-2015

05.25 Protests at Donald Trump rally overshadow Washington primary win [1:09 video]

05.24 Disposable Americans: The Numbers are Growing

05.24 Hillary Clinton’s Energy Initiative Pressed Countries to Embrace Fracking, New Emails Reveal

05.24 Sanders names Cornel West, Keith Ellison to DNC platform committee

05.24 'I'm not with her': why women are weary of Hillary Clinton

05.23 Untold Damage: America’s Overlooked Gun Violence

05.23 4 Gun Safety Initiatives to Watch in Election 2016

05.23 Blowing the Whistle: Former US Official Reveals Risks Faced by Internal Critics

Justice Matters

05.24 Machine Bias

05.23 #AirBnBWhileBlack and the Legacy of Brown vs. Board

High Crimes?

05.23 Attacking Doctors in Conflict Zones is a War Crime. So Why is No One Prosecuted For It?

Economics, Crony Capitalism

05.26 Average CEO Raise Last Year Amounted to 10x What Most Workers Make in Total

05.25 The Pentagon’s War on Accountability

05.24 IMF tells EU it must give Greece unconditional debt relief

05.23 Panama Papers Confirm Miami a Disneyland for Fraud

International

05.26 Is this the world’s most radical mayor?

05.26 Operation Condor conspiracy faces day of judgment in Argentina court

05.26 Brazil senate head recorded proposing to weaken bribes investigation

05.26 'There are two governments': Mexican elections held in shadow of the cartels

05.26 Foxconn replaces 60,000 humans with robots in China

05.25 Rousseff's impeachment may be about stopping a massive corruption investigation

05.25 Politicians condemn 60% foreign ownership of London skyscraper [the super-rich are pandered to while workers are demonstrably ignored]

05.25 Rockefeller reaches 100 resilient cities target, but 'work is only just beginning'

05.25 Viet Con

05.24 Death of Mullah Mansoor highlights Taliban's links with Iran

05.24 No country for academics: Chinese crackdown forces intellectuals abroad

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: