Newspaper logo  
 
 
  The Fraud of Physician-Assisted Suicide

SPEAKING OUT:

The Fraud of Physician-Assisted Suicide

by Sheldon Richman

How can there be "death with dignity" when the patient must humbly petition the doctors, then meekly wait for a unanimous ruling?
Freedom is so little understood in this "land of the free" that it is often confused with its opposite. Case in point: Oregon's 1994 Death With Dignity Act, which a federal appeals court recently shielded from attack by US Attorney General John Ashcroft.

The law permits what has come to be known as physician-assisted suicide. It and the appellate ruling have been hailed as victories for patient autonomy and the right to commit suicide. Indeed, the New York Times, in praising the ruling, editorialized. "The voters of Oregon acted with great humanity when they decided to allow terminally ill people to determine when they have suffered enough."

But did the voters really do that? A closer look at the law shows they did not.

In fact the law lets a patient who is expected to die within six months ask his doctor for lethal drugs. The doctor can say no, as he has every right to do. But since a patient cannot end his own life without the doctor's consent, the law is no milestone on the road to individual freedom.

What happens when a patient makes such a request of his doctor? The state's requirements are "stringent," according to Dr. Peter Goodwin, a long-time family physician and an emeritus associate professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University. They include, Goodwin writes, "the attending physician's diagnosis/prognosis and determination that the patient is informed, capable and acting voluntarily."

Note that the attending physician must be convinced that the patient knows what he's doing. Whether or not you think doctors have a special ability to see the absence of volition in an action (I don't), this requirement is hardly consistent with "allow[ing] terminally ill people to determine when they have suffered enough."

But there's more. The law states, "A consulting physician must examine the patient and the medical records and concur with the attending physician's diagnosis/prognosis and assessment of the patient."

Dr. Goodwin comments: "If the attending physician or the consulting physician thinks the patient may suffer from a psychological disorder causing impaired judgment, the physician must refer the patient for evaluation and counseling. No medication may be prescribed unless it is certain the patient's judgment is not impaired" (emphasis added).

Although these requirements are called "stringent," they are actually elastic and stacked against the patient. What terminally ill patient in great pain could not be said to have impaired judgment? What's the difference between a judgment that's impaired and one that clashes with the doctor's? In a conflict between a patient who sees no better future and wants to die and a physician (perhaps supported by the patient's family) who sees the future differently, who will prevail? The doctor, of course. Yet the law is considered a blow for patient autonomy. How can there be "death with dignity" when the patient must humbly petition the doctors, then meekly wait for a unanimous ruling?

Whatever one thinks of the legal merits of Attorney General Ashcroft's attempt to use federal anti-drug laws to thwart Oregon's voters, physician-assisted suicide is a fraud. As Dr. Thomas Szasz writes in his book Fatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of Suicide, "The term 'physician-assisted suicide' [PAS] is intrinsically mendacious. The physician is the principal, not the assistant. In the normal use of the English language, the person who assists another is the subordinate; the person whom he assists is his superior.... However, the physician engaging in PAS is superior to the patient: He determines who qualifies for the 'treatment' and prescribes the drug for it."

In other words, the Oregon law has nothing to do with the freedom of the individual and everything to do with the power of doctors. If freedom were the concern, we would simply repeal the drug and prescription laws, and recognize each adult's right to buy any kind of drugs.

Why empower doctors? Suicide isn't a medical issue. It's a moral issue.


Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation (fff.org) in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine.


Copyright © 2004 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on June 28, 2004.
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

07.27 ETS would be more cost-effective than higher renewables target, analyst says

07.27 Alaskan villages imperiled by global warming need resources to relocate

07.26 A Millennial Named Bush

07.26 'Beepocalypse Not': Alec lobbyists abuzz in defense of pesticides amid die-offs [Koch bros. lobbying group expands its willful ignorance of science beyond climate change]

07.25 The nine green policies killed off by the Tory government

07.25 Marshall Islands urge Australia to follow its ambitious climate goals

07.25 Queensland plans 1,600km string of fast-charging stations for electric cars

07.25 UK suspends ban on pesticides linked to serious harm in bees

07.25 Tory attacks on green policies signal dark times ahead for the environment

07.25 Needle-sized mechanical wrist gives surgery a new angle [We need a tiny vacuum cleaner with spinning brushes to suck out plaque]

07.25 Poison in the sky: Even low air pollution can be lethal, Israeli study finds

News Media

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

07.27 Socialism, American-Style [Bernie Sanders wants more efficient or profitable public programs to make the U.S. competitive again]

07.27 Hillary Clinton aides' Wall Street links raise economic policy doubts

07.27 Rand Paul pushes to defund Planned Parenthood as group cites 'smear' effort

07.27 Rick Perry calls for more guns in cinemas following Lafayette shooting

07.26 Is this how the Establishment takes down Outsiders like Bernie Sanders? [4:20 video]

07.26 Between the World and Me: 10,000 Years From Tomorrow [We must treat all people as family, and kick ourselves everytime we don't]

07.26 Are Americans More Pessimistic About Race—or More Realistic?

07.26 Puerto Rico debt crisis: austerity for residents, but tax breaks for hedge funds [another government by and for the rich, paid for by the poor]

07.26 Obama’s Evolving Outrage on Guns

07.25 Should There Be a Criminal Investigation Into Hillary Clinton's Email?

Justice Matters

07.27 35 women accusing Bill Cosby of sexual assault told their stories to New York Magazine

07.27 Fiat Chrysler Faces Record $105 Million Fine for Safety Issues

07.24 “If you don’t want to get shot, just do what I tell you”: American cops are on a dangerous power trip

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

07.27 Greece rocked by reports of secret plan to raid banks for drachma return

07.27 How the Euro Turned Into a Trap [If loans are denominated in euros and dollars how would using and devaluing the drachma help?]

07.25 Investors could lose $4.2tn due to impact of climate change, report warns [EIU's "The Cost of Inaction" report]

International

07.27 Is the Ugly German Back? Flames of Hate Haunt a Nation

07.27 Who’d be young and Greek? Searching for a future after the debt crisis

07.27 Turkey agrees plan for 'Isis-free zone' along Syrian border

07.26 The Insecure World of Freelancing

07.26 Zimbabwean authorities hunt Spaniard accused of killing Cecil the lion [immoral]

07.26 Turkey sends in jets as Syria’s agony spills over every border

07.26 Solar is bringing a new world to women in Zimbabwe

07.25 When Public Art Meets a Stupid Construction Mistake

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web


Public Service Ads: