Newspaper logo  
 
 
  The Fraud of Physician-Assisted Suicide

SPEAKING OUT:

The Fraud of Physician-Assisted Suicide

by Sheldon Richman

How can there be "death with dignity" when the patient must humbly petition the doctors, then meekly wait for a unanimous ruling?
Freedom is so little understood in this "land of the free" that it is often confused with its opposite. Case in point: Oregon's 1994 Death With Dignity Act, which a federal appeals court recently shielded from attack by US Attorney General John Ashcroft.

The law permits what has come to be known as physician-assisted suicide. It and the appellate ruling have been hailed as victories for patient autonomy and the right to commit suicide. Indeed, the New York Times, in praising the ruling, editorialized. "The voters of Oregon acted with great humanity when they decided to allow terminally ill people to determine when they have suffered enough."

But did the voters really do that? A closer look at the law shows they did not.

In fact the law lets a patient who is expected to die within six months ask his doctor for lethal drugs. The doctor can say no, as he has every right to do. But since a patient cannot end his own life without the doctor's consent, the law is no milestone on the road to individual freedom.

What happens when a patient makes such a request of his doctor? The state's requirements are "stringent," according to Dr. Peter Goodwin, a long-time family physician and an emeritus associate professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University. They include, Goodwin writes, "the attending physician's diagnosis/prognosis and determination that the patient is informed, capable and acting voluntarily."

Note that the attending physician must be convinced that the patient knows what he's doing. Whether or not you think doctors have a special ability to see the absence of volition in an action (I don't), this requirement is hardly consistent with "allow[ing] terminally ill people to determine when they have suffered enough."

But there's more. The law states, "A consulting physician must examine the patient and the medical records and concur with the attending physician's diagnosis/prognosis and assessment of the patient."

Dr. Goodwin comments: "If the attending physician or the consulting physician thinks the patient may suffer from a psychological disorder causing impaired judgment, the physician must refer the patient for evaluation and counseling. No medication may be prescribed unless it is certain the patient's judgment is not impaired" (emphasis added).

Although these requirements are called "stringent," they are actually elastic and stacked against the patient. What terminally ill patient in great pain could not be said to have impaired judgment? What's the difference between a judgment that's impaired and one that clashes with the doctor's? In a conflict between a patient who sees no better future and wants to die and a physician (perhaps supported by the patient's family) who sees the future differently, who will prevail? The doctor, of course. Yet the law is considered a blow for patient autonomy. How can there be "death with dignity" when the patient must humbly petition the doctors, then meekly wait for a unanimous ruling?

Whatever one thinks of the legal merits of Attorney General Ashcroft's attempt to use federal anti-drug laws to thwart Oregon's voters, physician-assisted suicide is a fraud. As Dr. Thomas Szasz writes in his book Fatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of Suicide, "The term 'physician-assisted suicide' [PAS] is intrinsically mendacious. The physician is the principal, not the assistant. In the normal use of the English language, the person who assists another is the subordinate; the person whom he assists is his superior.... However, the physician engaging in PAS is superior to the patient: He determines who qualifies for the 'treatment' and prescribes the drug for it."

In other words, the Oregon law has nothing to do with the freedom of the individual and everything to do with the power of doctors. If freedom were the concern, we would simply repeal the drug and prescription laws, and recognize each adult's right to buy any kind of drugs.

Why empower doctors? Suicide isn't a medical issue. It's a moral issue.


Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation (fff.org) in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine.


Copyright © 2004 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on June 28, 2004.
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

09.03 Environmental groups take aim at Pat Toomey over carbon pollution [Better too late than never!]

09.03 How China Is Taking Major Steps to Control Shipping Air Pollution

09.03 Bill to divest state's public pensions from coal heads to Gov. Jerry Brown [Better too late than never!]

09.02 In Alaska: Too Many Fires, Not Enough Snow

09.01 Up to 90% of seabirds have plastic in their guts, study finds

09.01 A Lot of American Catholics Have Never Heard of Pope Francis' Most Important New Message [Why?]

08.31 Nature's last refuge: climate change threatens our most fragile ecosystem

08.31 Citi report: slowing global warming would save tens of trillions of dollars

08.31 Young Hands in Mexico Feed Growing U.S. Demand for Heroin

08.31 Why a Mediterranean diet is good for your brain

08.31 Why a Mediterranean diet is good for your brain

08.31 Eni discovers largest known gas field in Mediterranean [will encourage replacing coal power plants faster]

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

09.03 Republicans vs. the Constitution: Would-be presidents endorse Kim Davis’ brazen illegality

09.03 Selling plasma to survive: how over a million American families live on $2 per day

09.02 Bernie Sanders Lays Down 2016’s New Electoral Math

09.02 Video shows Texas officers shooting man who appears to have his hands up

09.02 Georgia police shoot man and kill his dog after responding to wrong house

09.02 ‘Hillary 2016’ Has Never Made Sense for Democrats

09.01 Bernie Sanders’s Surge in Iowa from Attractiveness of His Ideas: Poll [3:42 video]

09.01 The West Point Professor Who Contemplated a Coup

09.01 Republicans are digging themselves a hole over immigration

09.01 Paranoid history of the GOP: How conspiracy theories poisoned the Republican Party

09.01 Walmart Decides to Drop Sale of AR-15 Assault Rifles [sanity happens!]

09.01 Sen. Warren's Criticism Of Joe Biden Complicates Vice President's 2016 Plans

Justice Matters

09.02 Special report: How US police turn drivers into moving targets

09.02 Ex-police chief who shot unarmed black man avoids jail with plea deal

09.01 Murder Rates Rising Sharply in Many U.S. Cities

High Crimes?

09.03 US Special Forces May Have Gone On a Murder Spree in Afghanistan—Did the Army Cover It Up?

Economics, Crony Capitalism

09.03 Quantitative Easing for People: The UK Labour Frontrunner’s Controversial Proposal

09.03 US Wall Street and the Military are Draining Americans High and Dry [A scary summary. We must find smart ways to minimize public costs/deficits and debt at minimum public expense. Single-payer healthcare and pensions are obviously part of the solution. And Wall Street must be made aware that they now stand on their own. Public banks are obviously required too to end paying debt interest to private banks.]

09.03 Fossil Fuel Executives Are Making Obscene Amounts of Money for Wrecking the Planet—and Their Own Companies

09.02 Robert Reich: Economic redistribution isn’t enough

International

09.03 Neo-Nazi Arsonists: Officials Concerned by Growing Far-Right Networks

09.03 Hengameh Golestan’s best photograph: Iranian women rebel against the 1979 hijab law

09.03 Migration crisis: Hungary PM claims Europe is in grip of 'madness' [1:00 video]

09.02 10 Responses to Iran-Deal Skeptics

09.02 Gaza could soon become uninhabitable, UN report predicts

09.02 Migration crisis: bid for united EU response fraying over quota demands [0:52 video]

09.02 Rob Ford and Canadians dismiss Scott Walker's 'off-the-wall' border idea

09.01 Dark Germany, Bright Germany: Which Side Will Prevail Under Strain of Refugees? [Atheists more welcome]

09.01 Dark Germany, Bright Germany: Which Side Will Prevail Under Strain of Refugees?

09.01 A predictable warmonger: Dick Cheney name-checks Hitler & launches credibility-free attack on Iran deal

09.01 What the Arrest of Two Journalists Tells Us About Turkey—and Vice

09.01 Republicans are digging themselves a hole over immigration

09.01 How Christchurch used the earthquake to return the city to its cycling roots

09.01 Mr. Erdogan’s War Against the Kurds

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web


Public Service Ads: