Newspaper logo  
 
 
  States Should End the Drug War

SPEAKING OUT:

States Should End the Drug War

by Sheldon Richman

It is worth recalling that the Constitution had to be amended before the federal government could prohibit alcohol in the 1920s. Why then has it been able to ban drugs without an amendment?
“Medicine by regulation is better than medicine by referendum.” US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said that during last week’s arguments over the much-watched medical-marijuana case. Breyer, in other words, prefers that any change in the government’s prohibition of marijuana use be accomplished by an appeal to the federal drug-enforcement authorities rather than by a public vote in the states, such as occurred in California.

But he is really saying that medical oppression by an elite is better than medical oppression by the mob. Are those our only choices? Why must we have medical oppression at all? Why not medicine by free individual choice? That this is not even on the table shows how far our society has moved from its individualist foundations.

The case Ashcroft v. Raich has two dimensions, procedural and substantive, and it is important to consider them separately. People who approve of “medical marijuana” — that is, empowering doctors to prescribe pot to certain sick people — tend to favor letting the states partially nullify the federal drug ban. And people who disapprove of medical marijuana tend to favor having the federal government veto such state nullification. But a mix and match is coherent and even sensible. That is, one can oppose the federal government’s effort to stop states from enacting medical-marijuana laws while also opposing those laws. I shall explain.

Since the New Deal, federalism has essentially been abolished by the Supreme Court’s permissive attitude toward Congress and the Constitution’s “commerce clause.” That has begun to change.

The Founders of the United States understood the threat to liberty from concentrated political power, so they tried to divide power not only among the three branches of the national government, but also between the national and state governments. Back then, people saw their respective states as sovereign and never would have assented to a scheme in which the states became mere administrative subdivisions of the national government. As a result, the Congress was delegated a few defined powers (to use James Madison’s term) and the states retained other powers by default. (See the Tenth Amendment.)

Unfortunately, the eminently sensible division of powers, called federalism but mislabeled “states’ rights,” acquired a bad name, primarily because of the violations of blacks’ rights after the War between the States. (Before the war, the slave states were not consistent advocates of states’ rights; they self-righteously objected when northern states passed personal-liberty laws that in effect nullified the federal fugitive-slave act.)

Since the New Deal, federalism has essentially been abolished by the Supreme Court’s permissive attitude toward Congress and the Constitution’s “commerce clause.” Until recently, Congress could get away with passing any law as long as it claimed authority under that clause. That has begun to change. In recent years the Court has found two cases in which Congress’s resort to the commerce clause was just too transparent to tolerate.

Now it has to contend with Raich and state medical marijuana. Here’s the rub: most people who say they like federalism want no part of anything that looks like a loosening of the marijuana laws. And those who embrace medical marijuana dislike states’ rights in most other cases. It’s a topsy-turvy world! The indications at last week’s Court session were that federalism will take a hit.

Here’s what ought to happen: The Court should endorse federalism and stop the Bush administration from interfering with the states on medical marijuana. It should also recognize that the federal government has no constitutional authority to regulate drugs. It is worth recalling that the Constitution had to be amended before the federal government could prohibit alcohol in the 1920s. Why then has it been able to ban drugs without an amendment?

Once the feds are disarmed in the war on drug makers and consumers, the states should repeal their own laws against production, sale, and possession. All prescription laws should also be repealed. Then we will have real individual freedom and self-responsibility. Self-medication is as inalienable a right as self-education. Medical marijuana does not advance liberty. It only empowers doctors. The idea that government should decide whether marijuana is medicine or not and whether doctors should be permitted to give it to sick people ought to be offensive to any self-responsible American.


Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine.



Copyright © 2004 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on December 9, 2004.

 
Local News & Opinion

07.03 Notice for Extension of Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Travel

07.02 A Cost-Saving Way to Travel: Rent a House

Books, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

06.30 An Open Letter to Barack Obama

Health & Environment
Media Watching

07.17 Corporate Media Blackouts Continue as Iran War Looms and Impeachment Moves Ahead

07.17 The Pentagon and the Hunt for Black Gold

07.16 Washington Post's McCain-Friendly Poll

07.15 You Can’t Tell a Magazine by Its Cover Or A Candidate by His Rhetoric

07.09 The Forgotten: Somalia's American-Made Road to Perdition

07.03 Press distorts Clark’s comments

06.30 Iran-Contra's 'Lost Chapter'

06.27 Robert McChesney's The Political Economy of Media (Part II)

06.25 Robert McChesney's The Political Economy of Media (Part I)

06.20 Remembering Russert

US Politics, Policy & Culture

07.18 Making Americans Unsafe

07.18 I Was a Victim of the Government’s Absurd and Over-Hyped War on Terror

07.15 Thinking About Safety

07.15 The High Cost of Bush's Iraq Gambit

07.11 McCain's Nomination - A Possible September Surprise?

07.07 Is Barack Obama Patriotic? Is Any Politician?

07.07 Obama's FISA Statement is a Mess (Just like his Stand on Faith-based Programs)

07.07 Campaign Notes: Of Flip-Flops and Fly-Bys

07.07 Supreme Court, Inc.: Supremely Pro-Business

07.03 The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July

07.03 Three Amigos: Bush, McCain, Obama Draw a Blood-Red Line on Iran

07.02 Rep. Ron Paul Assails Congress's "Virtual Iran War Resolution

07.02 How Ignorant Are We?

06.28 Primary Season Over, Barack Channels Hillary

06.27 Senate Overwhelmingly Approves Bill to Fund Iraq War Until Mid-2009

06.27 Defending the President as Tyrant

06.25 Critical Malfunction: Misreading Gore Vidal

06.23 Campaign Finance Reform Has Failed

06.23 Thinking About Flip-Flops

06.23 Heat Waves: Burning Off the Fog of the FISA Fiasco

06.23 Alarm over 'Unfair' Campaign Money

06.23 The Supreme Court, Habeas, John Yoo and Murdoch's Wall Street Journal

06.20 Keeping America Safe from Child "Terrorists"

06.20 SuperCorridor Defeat? Don't Bet On It

US “High Crimes” & Misdemeanors

07.19 'Justifying' Torture: Two Big Lies

07.18 Torture As Official US Policy

07.16 Bush Asserts Exec Privilege; Blocks DOJ From Releasing CIA Leak Documents

07.16 Impeachment Hearings: A Win is a Win

07.15 Torture for the Torturers

07.14 Imperial Wizards: The Nangarhar Massacre and U.S. Plans for Central Asia

07.12 Kucinich Pushes on Impeachment

07.11 Disorderly Conduct: Subverting the Bipartisan Paradigm on Iraq

07.10 Mukasey: Bush's New 'Mr. Cover-up'

07.09 Legitimizing Permanent Occupation of Iraq

07.08 Buchanan, MacDonogh, Pilger Books Explode Illusion Of American Exceptionalism

07.07 Bush-Cheney Crony Got Iraq Oil Deal

07.07 Keeping Count (When Ours Goes Down, Theirs Goes Up)

07.02 Iraq Oil Deals Fulfill Cheney's Goals

07.02 Bush's 'Wonderland' Logic

06.30 Operation Horse's Head: U.S. Raid Sends Message on Iraq "Agreement"

06.30 Invisible Hand: Washington Role in Iraq Oil Deal Revealed

06.27 It Was Oil, All Along

06.27 Big Dog, Little Tail: The American Elite Resolves on War With Iran

06.26 A Totally Lawless Regime

06.23 Top Dems Hand Bush Key Victories

06.23 Democrats Legalize Bush's Crimes

06.20 Torturegate: Truth, But No Consequences

06.20 Bomb Iran? What's to Stop Us?

Economics & Business

07.11 Running on Empty

07.10 A Work Force Betrayed

07.08 Paul Krugman and Blindness About the War and the Economy

07.07 Thinking About Turnarounds

06.30 Thinking about Dependence

06.26 Health-Care Crisis Endangers Economy

International

07.17 Renunciation and Escalation: Conflicting Tides in the Terror War

07.16 Maliki's 'Timetable' Shakes Iraq Debate

07.16 Drought and Israeli Policy Threaten West Bank Water Security

07.14 Enabling Tyranny—Brigitte Bardot And Other Victims

07.14 Duce Bags: Italy Leads Fascist Revanche in Western Democracies

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland