| ||||||||||||||
COMMENTARY:Evolution or Intelligent Design? It's none of the Government’s Business.
When asked recently if the concept of “intelligent design” should be taught alongside Darwinian evolution, President Bush remarked that he “felt like both sides ought to be properly taught. I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, and the answer is yes.” This is not an abstract question about the open marketplace of ideas. It is a concrete query concerning the science curriculum in the government’s schools. If Bush can’t see this vital distinction, perhaps he ought not to meddle in the issue. Those of us who think that the government should not be involved in these issues have long warned that such a role would take it where it ought not to go. There is no such thing as value-free education, so any governmental control of schools is tantamount to its imparting values to children. Look at the politicians and bureaucrats with whom you are familiar. Do you want them imparting values to your kids? Neither do I. Behold what government control of education has wrought. Science is based on the idea that evolutionary processes account for the origin of species. There is debate at the margins, but the core theory is well supported. A number of people, however, believe that certain phenomena are too complex to be explained by evolution and can only be understood through the study of intelligent design.
I am tempted to state my reasons for casting my lot with the evolutionists, but this tangent would distract me from my main point, which is that this realm is none of the government’s business. Because the nation's public school system is sustained by tax dollars, the debate between science and religion inevitably becomes a political war. It's ironic that government schooling was originally touted as the path to social harmony! In a free, depoliticized educational environment, there would be no need to fight over the origin of species at school board meetings. In the current system, if your side doesn’t control the curriculum, the other side will; Darwin's theories are not lost here: it is a fight for survival of the fittest. Since the stakes are so high, people invest a lot of effort to gain and keep curriculum control. In a free educational environment, no one is threatened. Parents send their children to the schools that best reflect the world views they themselves hold. There is no need to fight for power and control, as both are irrelevant. Thus education proceeds peacefully. We often distrust simple solutions, but in this case, simplicity is best. Take government out of schooling and return responsibility and financial control to parents. Once we learn to value freedom and social cooperation, we will realize that there is no way to intelligently design a government school system. Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine.
Reader responses:
Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on August 28, 2005. |
Local News & Opinion
Ref. : Local Newsbriefs Travel
Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Open Letters:
03.05 Open Letter to Congressman Bart Stupak Health & Environment
Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries 03.18 Pressure Drop: Brave Sir Dennis Ran Away 03.12 Slick Barry and the $100-Billion Medicaid/Medicare Fraud Claim 03.09 Kill Bill: Death to Obamacare! 03.09 Obama’s Rhetoric May Be “Fiery,” But His Health Care Reform Is Still Lukewarm Media Watching
03.17 CNN Scrapes Bottom of Right-Wing Barrel With Erickson Hire 03.16 WPost Blames Obama First, on Israel 03.16 Letter to the New York Times' Editor: Stovepiping To Persia 03.12 Cud and Complicity: Burying the Alternatives to Empire's Dominion 03.11 NYT and the ACORN Hoax 03.05 Sorry, Rove, Bush Did Lie About Iraq 03.03 It's Snow News 03.03 The Woeful Washington Post Ref. : The Daily Howler Legal Matters
02.26 America's Supremes: Court Over Constitution US Politics, Policy & Culture
03.11 Power Rangers: Policing the System With the "Fightin' Progressives" 03.09 Thinking About Countings 03.07 Unnatural Acts: Breaking the Fever of Militarism 02.25 Future Shock: A Better World Beyond the Imperium High Crimes?
03.19 Israel's Troubling Tilt Toward Apartheid 03.18 The Lawfare Project's Anti-Democratic Agenda 03.16 America's Secret Prisons 03.13 Palestinian Dispossession in East Jerusalem 03.12 Israeli Settlement Expansions Continue 03.11 Brutalizing Palestinian Children 03.08 The Russell Tribunal on Palestine: Barcelona Session 03.05 Targeting Israeli Apartheid 03.01 America's Permanent War Agenda 02.25 Global Sweatshop Wage Slavery Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance
03.19 The Growing Movement For Publicly-Owned Banks 03.19 America's "Houdini Recovery" under IMF-Type Austerity 03.14 The Crisis in America's Telecommunications Network 03.09 The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource 03.05 Is the Recovery Real? 03.04 IMF-Style Austerity Measures come to America: What “Fiscal Responsibility” Means To You 03.04 Barry C. Lynn's "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and Economics of Destruction" 03.01 Thinking About Fees International
03.15 Peace Process Hypocrisy: Stillborn from Inception 03.03 Muslim Disunity 03.02 Funding Israeli Militarism, Belligerence and Occupation 02.26 Iran Captures a 'Good' Terrorist We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
|
| ||||||||||||