Newspaper logo  
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education

11.29 The scientists whose garden unlocked the secret to good health

Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

11.30 Gauging a warming world [interactive & animated graphics]

11.30 The greenest city mayors take home the fight against climate change

11.30 Smarter renewable power: six innovations

11.30 World Pollutionwatch: Pain in Spain

11.30 Obama calls Paris climate talks an 'act of defiance' in wake of recent attacks [video]

11.30 Major powers pledge $20bn for green energy research [videos]

11.29 The Paris climate summit is a real test of humanity

11.29 Planned Parenthood on shooting: we will 'never back away' from mission

11.29 Contaminating Our Bodies With Everyday Products

11.28 Smoking high-strength cannabis may damage nerve fibres in brain

11.28 Beijing residents told to stay inside as smog levels soar

News Media Matters

11.27 America Is Too Dumb for TV News

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

11.30 Fiorina: I Will Not Be Bullied Into Telling Truth

11.30 Only three states score higher than D+ in State Integrity Investigation; 11 flunk [interactive map]

11.30 A Wealthy Governor and His Friends Are Remaking Illinois

11.29 GOP’s hell-bent on tearing us apart: A decades-long strategy to win by divisiveness now leads to President Donald Trump [fighting to continue a racist culture...]

11.28 NSA to shut down bulk phone surveillance program by Sunday

11.28 Kabul on the Potomac: How America became the most Corrupt Society in the West

11.28 Three dead after gunman storms Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado [a "pro-life" fundamentalist culture spews its barbarism and hate; video]

11.28 Abortion Clinics, White Christian Terrorism and GOP Candidates [ponder the barbaric and political similarities between Islamic and Christian fundamentalists]

Justice Matters

11.30 Trials of officers in Freddie Gray case begin amid skepticism over process

11.28 The Corrupt System That Killed Laquan McDonald [1:40 video]

High Crimes?

11.30 Japanese whaling fleet to set sail for Antarctic

Economics, Crony Capitalism

11.27 Paris climate talks: powerful business lobbies seek to undermine deal

11.25 Fossil fuel companies risk wasting $2tn of investors' money, study says


11.30 Philippe-Joseph Salazar: the philosopher whose essay on Isis has shocked and enlightened

11.30 Europe split over refugee deal as Germany leads breakaway coalition

11.29 The world wants more 'porous' cities – so why don't we build them?

11.29 This Composer Wants You To Know Who Syrian Refugees Really Are [her music]

11.29 Poll: Muslims actually HATE ISIL/ Daesh

11.29 Turkey reels as Putin imposes Stiff Economic Sanctions

11.28 Putin and Hollande go after Erdogan’s racket

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
This site Web
  Voting Systems Lawsuit Reaches U.S. Supreme Court


Voting Systems Lawsuit Reaches U.S. Supreme Court

SOURCE: Lynn Landes of
It's clear to me that without direct access to a physical ballot and meaningful transparency in the [voting] process, our elections have no integrity whatsoever," says plaintiff Lynn Landis.
A little-noticed voting rights lawsuit has made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court (Docket No. 05-930). It constitutes the first legal challenge to the widespread use of nontransparent voting systems. Specifically, the lawsuit challenges the use of voting machines and absentee voting in elections for public office.

The lawsuit was originally filed by freelance journalist Lynn Landes in July of 2004 in Philadelphia federal court (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Landes on November 2, 2005.

In her lawsuit Landes claims that, as a voter and a journalist, she has the right to direct access to a physical ballot and to observe the voting process unimpeded. Voting by machine or absentee, Landes claims, introduces obstacles and concealment to a process that must be accessible and transparent in a meaningful and effective manner.

Landes is representing herself in this action.

"I tried to get civil rights organizations interested in this case, but had no luck," said Landes in a prepared statement to the press. "Their disregard for this issue is incredible. It's clear to me that without direct access to a physical ballot and meaningful transparency in the process, our elections have no integrity whatsoever."

The defendants in the Landes lawsuit are Margaret Tartaglione, Chair of the City Commissioners of Philadelphia; Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States.

Attorneys for the defendants have successfully fought Landes, claiming that she did not prove an injury and therefore does not have standing. Landes counters that she has the right to challenge the constitutionality of acts of the legislative branch under federal statute and case law, most significantly under Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

It was only after the Civil War, as the elective franchise expanded to minorities and women, that three changes to state and federal election laws were adopted that eventually made the voting process a private and nontransparent enterprise.

Prior to the Civil War, voting was a public and transparent process. It was only after the war, as the elective franchise expanded to minorities and women, three changes to state and federal election laws were adopted that eventually made the voting process a private and nontransparent enterprise: absentee voting was allowed (1870's), the Australian secret ballot method was adopted (1880's), and voting machines were permitted by Congress (1899).

Today, 94.6% of all votes are processed by machines and approximately 30% of all voting is conducted early or by absentee.

The defendants' response is due at the Supreme Court no later than February 24, 2006.

The Landes lawsuit can be found here. (If a password is required to see the document, type in anything and you should get in anyway.)

The case docket no. can be viewed here.

Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on February 6, 2006.


Public Service Ads: