Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

08.15 RIDE FOR THE OVERRIDE

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

12.08 How Do American Students Compare to Their International Peers?

12.07 What America Can Learn About Smart Schools in Other Countries

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

12.08 Portland's Answer to Climate Denial? Local Action

12.08 Meet the High-Tech Buses of Tomorrow [perhaps smaller, non-polluting buses can come twice as often, too]

12.08 Mapping the Inundation of New York City

12.08 Leonardo DiCaprio meets Trump as climate sceptic appointed

12.08 Trump picks climate change sceptic Scott Pruitt to lead EPA

12.07 Trump’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Full-on Privatization Assault

12.07 Trump advisors aim to privatize oil-rich Indian reservations [drill, pump, burn, breathe, die]

12.07 Thousands of snow geese die in Montana after landing on contaminated water

12.07 Five west African countries ban 'dirty diesel' from Europe

12.07 London mayor to double funding to tackle air pollution

12.07 Donald Trump supports 'clean coal' – but does it really have a future?

12.07 Google, Apple, Facebook race towards 100% renewable energy target

12.07 Google Says It Will Run Entirely on Renewable Energy in 2017

12.05 Trump's pick for key health post known for punitive Medicaid plan

12.05 Asleep at the Wheel: German Leaders at Odds with Industry over Electric Cars

12.05 Dakota Access Pipeline Permit Denied

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

12.07 Democrats Need to Embrace Progressivism or Else Move Out of the Way

12.07 Forget Air Force One, Pentagon Wastes Billions and Billions Every Month

12.06 Why Does Donald Trump Lie About Voter Fraud?

12.06 FIGHTING FOR THE POOR UNDER TRUMP

12.06 Want to Bring Back Jobs, Mr. President-Elect? Call Elon Musk [dare to be smart]

12.06 Jamie Raskin Has a Fierce, Funny Message for Dispirited Democrats

12.06 Career of Trump's Top Ethics Lawyer Marred by Questionable Ethics

Justice Matters

12.07 President Obama’s Last Chance to Show Mercy

12.06 Did Trump’s Son-In-Law Finance Israeli Extremists and Illegal Settlements?

High Crimes?

12.05 Sea Shepherd activists set sail for Antarctic to battle Japanese whalers

Economics, Crony Capitalism

12.08 Who Won the 'Make the Most Meaningless Thomas Friedman Graph' Contest? [humor with graphs, because we need some!]

12.08 In the UK, Pfizer and a partner hiked anti-epilepsy drug price 2600% overnight [bring out the guillotine]

12.08 “We’ll Look at Everything”: More Thoughts on Trump’s $1 Trillion Infrastructure Plan

12.04 TRUMP SETS PRIVATE PRISONS FREE

12.04 WHY TRUMP SHOULD SPEND OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY

International

12.08 After Choi-gate

12.08 France's honest tax system crusader convicted for hiding millions of euros

12.06 FAIR’s big play: Onetime fringe group hopes to drive Donald Trump’s immigration policy

12.06 Brazil's Senate president ousted over embezzlement charges

12.06 Brazil grapples with lynch mob epidemic: 'A good criminal is a dead criminal'

12.06 Before the article 50 court battle, there was May v Merkel

12.06 Austrians celebrate far right defeat: 'the first good election result this year'

12.05 Euro falls to 20-month low after Italy government's referendum defeat

12.05 'A storm is gathering on the horizon': Chinese scholars fret about Trump

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Voting Systems Lawsuit Reaches U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL NEWS:

Voting Systems Lawsuit Reaches U.S. Supreme Court

SOURCE: Lynn Landes of ecotalk.org
It's clear to me that without direct access to a physical ballot and meaningful transparency in the [voting] process, our elections have no integrity whatsoever," says plaintiff Lynn Landis.
A little-noticed voting rights lawsuit has made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court (Docket No. 05-930). It constitutes the first legal challenge to the widespread use of nontransparent voting systems. Specifically, the lawsuit challenges the use of voting machines and absentee voting in elections for public office.

The lawsuit was originally filed by freelance journalist Lynn Landes in July of 2004 in Philadelphia federal court (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Landes on November 2, 2005.

In her lawsuit Landes claims that, as a voter and a journalist, she has the right to direct access to a physical ballot and to observe the voting process unimpeded. Voting by machine or absentee, Landes claims, introduces obstacles and concealment to a process that must be accessible and transparent in a meaningful and effective manner.

Landes is representing herself in this action.

"I tried to get civil rights organizations interested in this case, but had no luck," said Landes in a prepared statement to the press. "Their disregard for this issue is incredible. It's clear to me that without direct access to a physical ballot and meaningful transparency in the process, our elections have no integrity whatsoever."

The defendants in the Landes lawsuit are Margaret Tartaglione, Chair of the City Commissioners of Philadelphia; Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States.

Attorneys for the defendants have successfully fought Landes, claiming that she did not prove an injury and therefore does not have standing. Landes counters that she has the right to challenge the constitutionality of acts of the legislative branch under federal statute and case law, most significantly under Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

It was only after the Civil War, as the elective franchise expanded to minorities and women, that three changes to state and federal election laws were adopted that eventually made the voting process a private and nontransparent enterprise.

Prior to the Civil War, voting was a public and transparent process. It was only after the war, as the elective franchise expanded to minorities and women, three changes to state and federal election laws were adopted that eventually made the voting process a private and nontransparent enterprise: absentee voting was allowed (1870's), the Australian secret ballot method was adopted (1880's), and voting machines were permitted by Congress (1899).

Today, 94.6% of all votes are processed by machines and approximately 30% of all voting is conducted early or by absentee.

The defendants' response is due at the Supreme Court no later than February 24, 2006.


The Landes lawsuit can be found here. (If a password is required to see the document, type in anything and you should get in anyway.)

The case docket no. can be viewed here.



Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on February 6, 2006.

 

Public Service Ads: