Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

02.08 Sailing ships back in vogue as a green alternative to conventional shipping [Cool! New ships to be automated—think motorized sails]

02.08 UN agency seeks to end rift on new aircraft emission rules

02.08 The deadly toll of city smog

02.08 Surge in privatisation threatening free NHS treatment, unions say

02.07 New York investigates radioactive leak in groundwater near city

02.06 Swansea Bay tidal energy scheme 'must go ahead', say Lib Dems

02.06 If you thought solar was going to hurt utilities, get a load of solar+storage

02.06 Obama using final budget request to push for action against climate change

News Media Matters

02.05 It Takes a Movement to Create Fundamental Change [is change possible given the corporate-fawning orientation of news media]

02.05 Press Versus Liars: Doing Good Journalism in These Trying Times

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

02.08 In the age of all-American anger: Bernie Sanders, “The Big Short” & a nation that’s had it up to here

02.06 The Big Money Question at the Sanders-Clinton Debate

02.06 Bernie Sanders can beat Hillary Clinton, and Conservatives should take note

02.06 Elizabeth Warren Recalls a Time When Big Donors May Have Changed Hillary’s Vote [5:05 video]

02.06 ‘Something smells’: Top Iowa paper calls for ‘complete audit’ of Clinton’s win over Sanders [0:50 video]

02.06 The Vampire Squid Tells Us How to Vote

02.06 Speeches That Earned Clinton Millions Remain a Mystery [1:38 video]

02.06 Iowa Democratic party altered precinct's caucus results during chaotic night

Justice Matters

02.07 Holding Sentencing Reform Hostage

02.07 British American Tobacco faces call for bribery allegations inquiry

High Crimes?

02.08 Flint’s Crisis Is About More Than Water

02.05 FGM: number of victims found to be 70 million higher than thought

Economics, Crony Capitalism

02.05 Oil nations face years of pain, says IMF chief Christine Lagarde

02.05 Norway's oil-based wealth fund sells out of more fossil fuel companies

International

02.08 Brexit could lead to Jungle camp moving to England, No 10 to warn

02.07 The waterless toilet that turns your poo into power [3:40 video]

02.07 Jeremy Corbyn: UK can push for 'a real social Europe' by staying in EU

02.07 ‘Pay to stay’ trap will force working families out of council homes [it's a Tory government, so...]

02.07 30,000 North Korean children living in limbo in China

02.07 EU urges Turkey to open its borders to Syrians fleeing war-torn Aleppo

02.06 Ban Ki-moon adds to pressure on UK to stop arms sales to Saudis

02.06 Aleppo siege looms as pro-Assad forces cut opposition supply lines

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Is the United States serious about Iran?

COMMENTARY:

Is the United States serious about Iran?

by Amil Imani
Bombing Iran will not help the cause. In fact, it will probably create either civil war, or some kind of desperate, lethal unity inside Iran. The more effective way to achieve regime change is to spend Iranian assets in the right way.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently asked Congress for $85 million to support pro-democracy groups inside Iran and also to assist Iranian groups outside Iran who oppose the Islamic regime in Tehran.

It is a very kind gesture from President George W. Bush’s administration, but this program will not change anything in Iran. And it is not likely the $85 million (if Secretary Rice indeed receives it) will be used effectively and wisely.

Yet, there is no denying Bush’s intent of support. In his 2005 state of union address, he again pledged his support for the Iranian people: “And to the Iranian people, I say tonight: As you stand for your own liberty, America stands with you.”

In Iranian polls, Bush won the 2004 election by a landslide, even though in America, Bush won by only a few hundred votes. Today, Bush is sinking in American polls, but his popularity continues to climb in Iran.

Persian-speaking people have found a friend who says he cares about them. But, at this point, we must ask how serious is President Bush about Iran? Is it all words, with no action?

For five years, President Bush has consistently supported the Iranian people in his state of the union addresses. But it’s been simply a big carrot on a long stick. Or, as they say in Texas, it’s all hat and no cattle. While we have supported the president’s efforts to liberate Iraq and bring democracy to the region, we know the key to peace in Iraq and the region is in the hands of the Iranian people. As long as they are powerless to overthrow the Islamic terrorist regime in Iran, Iraq will never see the light of democracy.

America is spending over $200 million a day for the war in Iraq. In contrast, an $85 million proposal to bring change in Iran, administered over five years or more, is utterly unrealistic. After all, we are talking about the Islamic Republic of Iran—"the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism," according to the U.S. State Department.

So, how do we understand the money problem?

According to the Iranian Studies Group, an independent academic organization at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), more than one in four Iranian-Americans hold a master's or doctoral degree, the highest rate among 67 ethnic groups studied. Iranians are among the most highly educated people in the U.S. and annually contribute over $600 billion into the U.S. economy.

It would be a travesty for the Iranian opposition groups to accept a mere $85 million while the Iranian-Americans are such large contributors to the U.S. economy.

Yet, Iranian-Americans have not given big money to the cause of liberating their fellow Iranians in Iran, and the U.S. government hasn’t given any significant amount for the eradication of the world terrorist regime—the Islamic Republic of Iran. So, we’re back to square one.

But consider this: the United States holds billions of dollars of Iranian assets in U.S. banks. Why not use this financial source to support the Iranian opposition groups who will actively seek regime change in Iran? This money must be returned to its legitimate heirs, the Iranian people, inside Iran and outside Iran.

If the U.S. is serious about a regime change in Iran, if the U.S. is hoping for a democratic form of government in Iran, and if the U.S. truly advocates a broader democracy in the Middle East, the White House must turn the Iranian assets over to all the Iranian opposition groups who want democracy Iran. After all, Iranians know Iranian mentality better than any foreign governments.

It is time for the U.S. government to get serious about regime change in Iran. Bombing Iran will not help the cause. In fact, it will probably create either civil war, or some kind of desperate, lethal unity inside Iran. The more effective way to achieve regime change is to spend the Iranian assets in the right way.

We can create a secular, democratic Iranian nation with our own Iranian money, and obliterate the venomous theocratic regime in Iran—which the majority of Iranians consider to be alien occupiers. The clock is ticking and the majority of Iranians want to be free from the oppressors now. The Bush administration must stop the useless, wasteful bureaucracy and get down to the business of regime change, immediately.


Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American Citizen and pro democracy activist living in the United States of America. Imani is a columnist, literary translator, poet, and novelist who speaks out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. His website is amilimani.com.


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on April 24, 2006.

 


Public Service Ads: