Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

01.26 The Talking Cure

01.25 7 heinous lies “American Sniper” is telling America

01.25 American Sniper: anti-Muslim threats skyrocket in wake of film's release

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

01.27 Climate change will hit Australia harder than rest of world, study shows

01.27 Judith Rodin's warning for the world: 'Crisis is becoming the new normal'

01.27 Know What's Killing More People in Nigeria Than Boko Haram? Lack of Drinking Water

01.25 Obama's India visit: Hopes for clean energy and climate deals

01.24 Smog journeys: A short film about air pollution in China – video

01.24 The oceans are warming so fast, they keep breaking scientists' charts

01.24 Climate change inaction pushes 'doomsday clock' closest to midnight since 1984

01.24 Swedish school sheds light on dark days of winter

News Media

01.24 Joni, al-Qaida and rich folks: Fox News has a simple playbook for everything Obama says

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & Culture

01.27 Koch brothers set $889m budget for 2016 presidential election

01.26 Senator to Hospitals: Stop Suing Poor Patients

01.26 GOP clown car runs into ditch

01.26 A Quiet Revolution in Helping Lift the Burden of Student Debt

01.25 The Tragedy of the American Military

01.25 Six ways the US is building a people-powered economy

01.25 The Republican abortion bill shows they still believe many women lie about rape

Justice Matters

01.26 The war on leaks has gone way too far when journalists' emails are under surveillance

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

01.27 Exclusive: politicians are supporting Comcast's TWC merger with letters ghostwritten by Comcast

01.27 Free Trade Faults: Europeans Fear Wave of Litigation from US Firms

01.27 Legalized Bribery

01.27 Tax Haven USA: The Vortex-Shaped Hole in Global Financial Transparency

01.27 Tax Haven USA: The Vortex-Shaped Hole in Global Financial Transparency

01.26 Obama Wants You to Have Cheap, Fast Internet, But Many Cities Aren’t Allowed to Provide It

01.26 Obama Wants You to Have Cheap, Fast Internet, But Many Cities Aren’t Allowed to Provide It

01.26 Mitt Romney Has a Koch Problem

01.26 How Bernie Sanders, In New Role, Could Make Wall Streeters Very, Very Unhappy

01.26 Where do the wealthiest 1% live?

01.25 The Davos oligarchs are right to fear the world they’ve made

01.25 All economic activity needs a moral compass

01.24 America's Losing the Currency War

International

01.27 Rising Anti-Semitism: Increasing Numbers of French Jews Moving to Israel

01.27 Democrats Accuse Republicans of a Benghazi Cover-Up

01.27 Netanyahu to American Jews: Get Lost

01.27 Why fragile cities hold the key to stability and development

01.26 Why fragile cities hold the key to stability and development

01.24 How the CIA made Google: Inside the secret network behind mass surveillance, endless war, and Skynet—part 1 [part 2]

01.24 Greece’s solidarity movement: ‘it’s a whole new model – and it’s working’

01.24 Democrats rally around Obama amid furore over Netanyahu Congress visit

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Bipartisanship Is Not The Answer
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

Bipartisanship Is Not The Answer

by Joel S. Hirschhorn
Getting two moderates from both parties to run on the Unity08 ticket cannot erase the greater truth about the loyalties those moderates have had to their parties and their complicity in the destructive actions by those parties.
The recent mainstream media attention given to the new Unity08 group, formed to offer an alternative in the 2008 presidential election, provides the opportunity to rethink the popular belief that somehow bipartisanship offers a solution to what ails our political system.

There are inherent inconsistencies in the ideas of Unity08. It says that “neither of today’s major parties reflects the aspirations, fears or will of the majority of Americans.” Moreover, “both are dominated by money.” Nevertheless, Unity08 wants a ticket based on a Republican and a Democrat for president and vice-president, or vice-versa—politicians who have been loyal to their party but who presumably are too moderate to win the nomination from their own party and are willing to abandon their party (though Unity08 maintains that its candidates would not be asked to leave their party) and run against its candidate. Does this bipartisan ticket offer a real alternative? Even a poll by the group found that “a majority doubt that even a unity team would be able to clear out the corruption and favoritism in Washington.” As to what is really needed, the group explicitly says, “We are not looking to build a new and permanent party.” Never mind the practical aspects of Unity08 succeeding; what matters is their implicit acceptance of the two-party duopoly. Indeed, without challenging the intentions of the founders of Unity08, their effort is the height of destructive political distraction that can be tolerated and even welcomed by the two major parties.

Here is my gut reaction to Unity08’s basic approach. It’s as if I am shopping for a suit and the store has just two that fit me well, but I don’t like the color of each and the compromise solution offered by the salesperson is that I buy both and at any time wear the jacket of one and the pants of the other.

The core problem is that bipartisanship is sheer nonsense. Bipartisanship is not a solution to bitter and destructive partisanship. Bipartisanship inherently accepts the dominance of the Democratic and Republican parties in American politics and protects the two-party duopoly. It’s as if blending two poisons offers a solution. In truth, as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. observed, “The Republicans are 95 percent corrupt and the Democrats are 75 percent corrupt.” Any rational American who sees the longstanding defects of both major parties should reject bipartisanship in any form. What the nation needs is a new competitive third party.

Bipartisanship inherently accepts the dominance of the Democratic and Republican parties in American politics and protects the two-party duopoly. It’s as if blending two poisons offers a solution.
Bipartisanship creates the illusion of choice. At a deep level of reality the two major parties are not all that different. In 2004, Nader called the two presidential candidates “corporate politicians with the choice being between heart disease and cancer” and that we have “one corporate party with two heads.” Those two heads lie to each other and citizens; in secret conversations they work together to keep out third-party competition and split the riches. The system offers the choice of which party gets which corporate dollars. What differs is the set of private, special interests that the Democrats and Republicans are indebted to and then favor when in office. Both major parties sacrifice the public interest through equal opportunity corruption. Bipartisanship betrays American democracy.

The dirty little secret is that bipartisanship is just a mutual protection pact against third parties and greater political freedom for the majority of Americans abandoned by both major parties.
Too few Americans appreciate that historically third parties have brought about real social and political change. A third party called the Republicans helped end slavery. The Greenback-Labor Party helped give women the right to vote. The Socialist Party helped create the Social Security system. The Progressive Party helped bring about direct election of U.S. Senators and spearheaded the use of ballot initiatives, referenda and recalls. So much of the time when the term “nonpartisan” is used, it is a lie, because the correct term should be bipartisan—or better yet “buypartisan.” The dirty little secret is that bipartisanship is just a mutual protection pact against third parties and greater political freedom for the majority of Americans abandoned by both major parties.

A trap that too many people fall into is the belief that on many important issues there are critical differences between the two major parties and especially between Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. The wisdom of Ralph Nader deserves attention: “The parties are polarized on certain social issues. But on the fundamental issues affecting the future of democracy, they’re on the same page. They sell elections to the highest bidder. They are unwilling to challenge John Corporation. To me that’s on the same page of hypocrisy, instead of democracy.”

Interestingly, while Unity08 has identified two tiers of issues—crucial and important, it has not taken any substantive positions on exactly how to address them. In googling for views similar to mine I found only one on the Hammer of Truth web site. Devious David said “This thing is probably financed by the majors in order to get the people to chase their tails and think that they are doing something. Nothing worthwhile would come from this. And that’s what the powers that be want!”

Getting two moderates from both parties to run on the Unity08 ticket cannot erase the greater truth about the loyalties those moderates have had to their parties and their complicity in the destructive actions by those parties. This is what must always be remembered: Republicans are more open than Democrats about being corporate whores—as they practice compassionate corporatism. At most, the two major parties offer near-term incremental change to tweak things, rather than more radical, systemic and status quo-busting change. And that is also the inevitable problem with the Unity08 approach to providing a safety valve for the high blood pressure of many millions of Americans who are angry as hell about the current political system.

We desperately need a new third party, and until a kosher competitive one is created to appeal to Americans across the entire left-right political spectrum, based primarily on restoring American democracy, the best action for angry Americans is to withdraw their votes and support from both Democrats and Republicans. What may do more to bring about necessary fundamental change in our system is reducing the fraction of eligible voters participating in elections in which clearly a Democrat or Republican will win. When a president of the United States wins with, say, just 20 percent of eligible voters, the legitimacy of America’s delusional democracy will finally vanish.

Now is not the time for frustrated Americans to compromise. The nation is increasingly ready for a new third party. Just say No! to both Democrats and Republicans—all of them, even the moderates. Yes, we need unity, but unity for restoring American democracy.
Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy—Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government, to be released soon by Common Courage Press. He can be reached through his web site, sprawlkills.com.


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on June 14, 2006.
 


Public Service Ads: