Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

07.03 Notice for Extension of Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Travel

07.02 A Cost-Saving Way to Travel: Rent a House

Books, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

06.30 An Open Letter to Barack Obama

Health & Environment
Media Watching

07.17 Corporate Media Blackouts Continue as Iran War Looms and Impeachment Moves Ahead

07.17 The Pentagon and the Hunt for Black Gold

07.16 Washington Post's McCain-Friendly Poll

07.15 You Can’t Tell a Magazine by Its Cover Or A Candidate by His Rhetoric

07.09 The Forgotten: Somalia's American-Made Road to Perdition

07.03 Press distorts Clark’s comments

06.30 Iran-Contra's 'Lost Chapter'

06.27 Robert McChesney's The Political Economy of Media (Part II)

06.25 Robert McChesney's The Political Economy of Media (Part I)

06.20 Remembering Russert

US Politics, Policy & Culture

07.18 Making Americans Unsafe

07.18 I Was a Victim of the Government’s Absurd and Over-Hyped War on Terror

07.15 Thinking About Safety

07.15 The High Cost of Bush's Iraq Gambit

07.11 McCain's Nomination - A Possible September Surprise?

07.07 Is Barack Obama Patriotic? Is Any Politician?

07.07 Obama's FISA Statement is a Mess (Just like his Stand on Faith-based Programs)

07.07 Campaign Notes: Of Flip-Flops and Fly-Bys

07.07 Supreme Court, Inc.: Supremely Pro-Business

07.03 The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July

07.03 Three Amigos: Bush, McCain, Obama Draw a Blood-Red Line on Iran

07.02 Rep. Ron Paul Assails Congress's "Virtual Iran War Resolution

07.02 How Ignorant Are We?

06.28 Primary Season Over, Barack Channels Hillary

06.27 Senate Overwhelmingly Approves Bill to Fund Iraq War Until Mid-2009

06.27 Defending the President as Tyrant

06.25 Critical Malfunction: Misreading Gore Vidal

06.23 Campaign Finance Reform Has Failed

06.23 Thinking About Flip-Flops

06.23 Heat Waves: Burning Off the Fog of the FISA Fiasco

06.23 Alarm over 'Unfair' Campaign Money

06.23 The Supreme Court, Habeas, John Yoo and Murdoch's Wall Street Journal

06.20 Keeping America Safe from Child "Terrorists"

06.20 SuperCorridor Defeat? Don't Bet On It

US “High Crimes” & Misdemeanors

07.19 'Justifying' Torture: Two Big Lies

07.18 Torture As Official US Policy

07.16 Bush Asserts Exec Privilege; Blocks DOJ From Releasing CIA Leak Documents

07.16 Impeachment Hearings: A Win is a Win

07.15 Torture for the Torturers

07.14 Imperial Wizards: The Nangarhar Massacre and U.S. Plans for Central Asia

07.12 Kucinich Pushes on Impeachment

07.11 Disorderly Conduct: Subverting the Bipartisan Paradigm on Iraq

07.10 Mukasey: Bush's New 'Mr. Cover-up'

07.09 Legitimizing Permanent Occupation of Iraq

07.08 Buchanan, MacDonogh, Pilger Books Explode Illusion Of American Exceptionalism

07.07 Bush-Cheney Crony Got Iraq Oil Deal

07.07 Keeping Count (When Ours Goes Down, Theirs Goes Up)

07.02 Iraq Oil Deals Fulfill Cheney's Goals

07.02 Bush's 'Wonderland' Logic

06.30 Operation Horse's Head: U.S. Raid Sends Message on Iraq "Agreement"

06.30 Invisible Hand: Washington Role in Iraq Oil Deal Revealed

06.27 It Was Oil, All Along

06.27 Big Dog, Little Tail: The American Elite Resolves on War With Iran

06.26 A Totally Lawless Regime

06.23 Top Dems Hand Bush Key Victories

06.23 Democrats Legalize Bush's Crimes

06.20 Torturegate: Truth, But No Consequences

06.20 Bomb Iran? What's to Stop Us?

Economics & Business

07.11 Running on Empty

07.10 A Work Force Betrayed

07.08 Paul Krugman and Blindness About the War and the Economy

07.07 Thinking About Turnarounds

06.30 Thinking about Dependence

06.26 Health-Care Crisis Endangers Economy

International

07.17 Renunciation and Escalation: Conflicting Tides in the Terror War

07.16 Maliki's 'Timetable' Shakes Iraq Debate

07.16 Drought and Israeli Policy Threaten West Bank Water Security

07.14 Enabling Tyranny—Brigitte Bardot And Other Victims

07.14 Duce Bags: Italy Leads Fascist Revanche in Western Democracies

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 
  Wealthiest Americans Owe Nation a Dividend
Newspaper logo

OPINION:

Wealthiest Americans Owe Nation a Dividend

by Gary Olson
Prof. Singer calculates that if the folks in the top 10 percent gave away between 10 percent to 30 percent of their income, it would raise $404 billion....
"The very rich are different from you and me,'' F. Scott Fitzgerald once observed. Ernest Hemingway's wry reply was, ''Yes, they have more money.'' A less clever but potentially more instructive response might be, ''Why?''

The top 1 percent of Americans are now receiving the largest share of national income since the pre-Great Depression year 1928. The top 10 percent get 48.5 percent of total income, an obscene rate of inequality. According to Princeton University Prof. Peter Singer, the top 0.01 percent of taxpayers, or 14,000 Americans, earn an average of $12.7 million each, with total earnings of $184 billion. The rest of the 0.1 percent, 129,600 individuals, now have an average income of just over $2 million. And the top 0.5, or 575,900, have an average income of $623,000.

Prof. Singer calculates that if the folks in the top 10 percent gave away between 10 percent to 30 percent of their income, it would raise $404 billion, an amount that would eliminate half of global poverty. And they would not be left to scrimp on their sumptous lifestyles. What should we make of these numbers?

I can't quarrel with Adam Smith, the oft-misquoted and misunderstood moral philosopher and economist, who wrote in his monumental book, The Wealth of Nations,' ''Whenever there is great property, there is great inequality. For one very rich man, there must be at least five hundred of the poor, and the affluence of the few supposes the indigence of the many...''

Why not give all the wealth back? Or to be fair and just, give back everything over and above any personal effort expended.
Upon engaging in private philanthropy, some of these plutocrats utter the phrase, ''I just wanted to give something back.'' My reaction: Why not give it all back? Or to be fair and just, give back everything over and above any personal effort expended.

I'm hardly alone in this view. Even robber barons like Andrew Carnegie (eventually) acknowleded that all wealth originates in the community and ''not in the herculean work efforts of lone individuals and hence should be returned to whence it came.'' And, Warren Buffet, the second-richest man in America, concedes that ''If you stuck me down in the middle of Bangladesh or Peru you'll find out how much talent is going to produce in the wrong soil.''

"Societal contribution"—the luck of location—is said to account for at least 90 percent of what people earn in northwest Europe and the United States.
Herbert Simon, a Nobel Prize winner in economics, acknowledges that this societal contribution accounts for at least 90 percent of what people earn in northwest Europe and the United States. Based on this social contribution to wealth, Simon believes that moral grounds exist to warrant a flat income tax of 90 percent. In other words, as Carnegie biographer Steve Fraser urges, if wealth originated as social capital as Carnegie maintained, shouldn't that dictate a public, democratic role on its best use?

But don't the super-rich deserve their fortunes because of their hard work, pluck, and genius? I think not. For example, behind all the modern technology fortunes, one finds taxpayer-funded research and development. Bill Gates wasn't responsible for the crucial technical advances that produced the computer. His ''genius'' was to take advantage of work done at public initiative and expense.

In the case of the Internet, the Pentagon wanted a communications system that could survive a nuclear attack. Private business refused to undertake the risks until public funding guaranteed a ready profit. Even the mouse came from Pentagon-funded research. (A revealing study is Kenneth Flamm's Creating the Computer.)

Chuck Collins, economic expert and heir to the Oscar Mayer fortune, concludes, ''Yet, where would the many wealthy entrepreneurs be today without taxpayer investment in the Internet, transportation, public education, the legal system, the human genome and so on?'' To this, we must add several additional sources for the great fortunes. A partial list includes: piracy, colonial pillage, black African slaves, extermination of first nation peoples, child labor, Chinese and Irish immigrant labor (railroads) indentured servitude, eminent domain, massive (often concealed) taxpayer subsidies, worker massacres, inheritance laws, public land grabs, unfair trade practices, supporting foreign dictatorships to gain cheap labor and resources, tax policy, corporate welfare, and always, underpaid, overworked employees.

Where does this leave us? Personally, I've always been partial to the moral injunction, ''To whom much is given, much is required.'' Today, the ''much'' is rarely given voluntarily while the ''required'' remains an unrequited, vaguely subversive sounding afterthought. I wouldn't presume to improve on scripture but I would suggest a corollary: From whom much is taken, much is owed.

Self-made wealth is a myth. In the words of economic analyst Mike Laphan, ''It takes a village to raise a billionaire. Every taxpayer deserves some credit for the Forbes 400 wealth.'' So, if all production is social, where is society's dividend?


Gary Olson, Ph.D, is chair of the political science department at Moravian College in Bethlehem. His e-mail address is olson@moravian.edu.

This op-ed originally appeared in Allentown, Pa.'s The Morning Call.



Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on May 18, 2007.
 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland