Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

03.30 Killing Jesus: Bill O'Reilly's film is touted as history. But facts aren't sacred to him

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

03.31 Instead of Trying for Better Veggie Burgers, Food Technologists Should Create Truly New Flavors

03.31 US set to pledge emissions cuts of up to 28% ahead of global climate treaty

03.31 Naomi Klein and Bill McKibben call on Paris to divest in Le Monde letter

03.31 Pesticide residue in fruits and vegetables associated with low sperm count

03.31 Using polio to kill cancer: A producers' notebook [7:35 video, plus selectable related videos]

03.30 California drought goes from bad to worse as state grapples with heat wave

03.30 Texas city opts for 100% renewable energy – to save cash, not the planet

News Media

03.30 Joe Firestone: The New York Times Soft-Pedals the Dangers of the TPP

03.28 The Reckless Man's Case for Bombing Iran

03.27 Always Remember, the NY Times Pushed, Hard, for War in Iraq

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.31 Jeb Bush Defends Indiana’s Religious Beliefs Law

03.31 Who's pushing the 'religious freedom' legislation in states?

03.30 Republicans see Obama as bigger threat than Putin and Assad, says poll

03.30 Apple's Tim Cook calls out 'religious freedom' laws as discriminatory

03.30 Cutting the cord: a look at the pros and cons of quitting cable [As expensive, commercial-laden shows and movies get stupider, the choice gets easier]

03.29 Fracking Town’s Desperate Laid-off Workers: ‘They Don’t Tell You It’s All a Lie’

03.29 In Vote to Expand Social Security, 42 Democratic Senators Vote Yes While Every Republican Votes No

03.29 War budget might be permanent 'slush fund'

03.29 Which Companies Are Buying the Election?

Justice Matters

03.30 The Radical Humaneness of Norway’s Halden Prison

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

03.31 Barney Frank drops a bombshell: How a shocking anecdote explains the financial crisis

03.31 A Tax Break for Millionaire Yacht Owners

03.30 Class Struggle In The USA

03.30 The GOP has spoken: The wealthy and powerful could use more help | Editorial

03.29 Elizabeth Warren Strikes Back as Citigroup Tries to Blackmail the Democratic Party

International

03.31 The Podemos revolution: how a small group of radical academics changed European politics

03.30 New Age Of Water Wars Portends ‘Bleak Future’ For The Middle East

03.30 Arab states plan joint Middle East force as Yemen conflict continues

03.30 Nigerian laureate Wole Soyinka laments ‘vicious, unprincipled’ election

03.28 Texas man who won hunting auction to be allowed to import black rhino trophy

03.28 Amazon Robot Contest May Accelerate Warehouse Automation

03.28 The Confused Person's Guide to Middle East Conflicts [an Escher-like graphic]

03.28 Portable media players give North Koreans an illicit window on the world

03.28 Saudi planes pound Yemeni capital in second night of bombing, witnesses say

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Thank You, Ron Paul
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

Thank You, Ron Paul

by Sheldon Richman
During the recent Republican debate, Congressman Ron Paul spoke the truth about U.S. Middle East policies and faced down attacks by hostile fellow presidential candidates.
Ron Paul, a Republican congressman running for president, is saying what needs to be said about the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war. Clearly, his rivals and the news media can't handle the truth.

At the most recent Republican debate, Paul not only repeated his opposition to the illegal and unconstitutional war, but he also identified 50 years of U.S. intervention in the Middle East as "a major contributing factor" in al-Qaeda's attacks in 2001.

"Have you ever read the reasons they attacked us? They attack[ed] us because we've been over there; we've been bombing Iraq for 10 years. We've been in the Middle East," Paul said.

Paul thus becomes the first person in mainstream politics--he's been in Congress many years--to acknowledge that U.S. foreign policy has had bad consequences not only for people in the Middle East but for Americans at home as well. A government cannot take sides in so many deep-seated conflicts for as long as the U.S. government has without acquiring enemies and provoking retaliation.

It doesn't take much knowledge of history and human nature--not to mention the official 9/11 Commission report--to see this. It's about time it was said in such a prominent forum.

Of course, the reaction was stunningly absurd.

FOX News questioner Wendell Goler asked Paul a stunningly absurd and disingenuous follow-up question.
FOX News questioner Wendell Goler said in follow-up, "Are you suggesting we invited the 9/11 attack, sir?"

Let's examine the question. To invite something is to desire the thing invited. Paul suggested no such thing. And who is "we"? Goler's question implies that Paul was saying the American people or "America" invited the attacks. But Paul was talking about American policymakers, not the American people. So the question was way off the mark and may have been an attempt to bait Paul.

He wouldn't take the bait. "I'm suggesting that we listen to the people who attacked us and the reason they did it," he said. In other words, the people who masterminded the attack did not say they did it because we Americans are rich or free or non-Muslim. Their grievances relate to systematic U.S. intervention in the region: in particular, the presence of troops near holy sites in Saudi Arabia; a 10-year bombing campaign and killer embargo on Iraq (beginning in 1991), which cost hundreds of thousands of lives; and support for Israel's occupation of Palestinian lands in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Rudolph Giuliani, also running for the nomination, responded demagogically, "That's an extraordinary statement, as someone who lived through the attack of September 11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq.... I would ask the congressman to withdraw that comment and tell us that he didn't really mean that."

"If we think that we can do what we want around the world and not incite hatred," said Congressman Paul, "then we have a problem."
Of course, Paul never said "we invited the attack." And he didn't back down under Giuliani's grandstanding: "I believe very sincerely that the CIA is correct when they teach and talk about 'blowback.' When we went into Iran in 1953 and installed the shah, yes, there was blowback. A reaction to that was the taking of our hostages and that persists. And if we ignore that, we ignore that at our own risk. If we think that we can do what we want around the world and not incite hatred, then we have a problem."

In saying "blowback," Paul was using the CIA's term for the unintended bad consequences of a government operation. He specifically mentioned Iran in 1953, when the Eisenhower administration sent the CIA to help drive an elected secular prime minister from office and return the despotic shah to power. The result was the 1979 Islamic revolution, the seizure of the American embassy, complete with hostages, and close to 30 years of hostility, with war perhaps to come.

U.S. imperialist polices in the Middle East have been good for special interests and power-loving politicians, but bad for the American people. Someone in government has finally had the courage to say so.

Thank you, Ron Paul.


Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation and editor of The Freeman magazine.


Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on May 18, 2007.
 


Public Service Ads: