| ||||||||||||||
|
Local Gov’t Stories, Events
Ref. : Civic Events Ref. : Arts & Education Events Ref. : Public Service Notices Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Health Care & Environment
05.29 Women lead the call to arms as anti-fracking fight intensifies 05.29 Florida brewery creates edible beer holders to save marine life 05.28 Could Alzheimer’s Stem From Infections? It Makes Sense, Experts Say 05.28 The Rogue Immune Cells That Wreck the Brain 05.28 Revealed: report for Unesco on the Great Barrier Reef that Australia didn't want world to see 05.28 Trump's climate claims: experts analyze Republican's energy policy remarks 05.27 Trump puts fossil fuels at US energy core [“Stupid is as stupid does.” —Forrest Gump] 05.27 Teen cancer death rate causes alarm [it's from pollution, of course] 05.27 The west country cheddar maker powered by solar and cow dung 05.27 ExxonMobil is in its climate change bunker and won’t let reality in News Media Matters
Daily: FAIR Blog US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'
05.29 If you thought one Bernie Sanders was good, how about 100 of him? 05.29 Is Oklahoma trying to be America’s least progressive state? [captives of a fossil fueled economy] 05.29 Poor polls, scandal, a cussed rival ... how it’s all going wrong for Hillary Clinton 05.29 'Racists!' 'Illegals!' 'Scum!': protesters v Donald Trump supporters 05.28 The Stadium Boondoggle Is Migrating to the Suburbs 05.28 Federal Help for Poor Families With Children Is Evaporating [euthanasia might be more humane] 05.28 Bill Maher And Bernie Sanders Take Down ‘Chicken’ Donald Trump [11:24 video] 05.28 Meet the Bernie-Endorsed Law Professor Trying to Unseat the DNC Chair 05.28 Green Party's Jill Stein on the Feminist Case Against Hillary Clinton 05.28 Green Party's Jill Stein on the Feminist Case Against Hillary Clinton 05.28 How America Lost Its Mojo 05.28 Why the Left will divorce Hillary and the new Democratic Party 05.28 Tavis Smiley interviews Bernie Sanders [26:21 video] 05.28 Trump Says No Debate After Sanders Says Networks Interested 05.28 Protesters clash with police outside Donald Trump rally in San Diego [0:44 video] 05.27 Sanders to Trump: Let's Debate in 'Biggest Stadium Possible' 05.27 Sanders’ DNC platform team pushes for Palestinian rights, blasts Israeli war crimes Justice Matters
05.29 Time to care about damn emails: Hillary Clinton has a serious legal problem High Crimes?
05.28 Argentina's last military dictator jailed for role in international death squad Economics, Crony Capitalism
05.29 Economists overwhelmingly reject Brexit in boost for Cameron 05.28 Austerity policies do more harm than good, IMF study concludes 05.27 Revealed: 9% rise in London properties owned by offshore firms 05.27 Bernie Sanders Easily Wins the Policy Debate International
05.29 A former senior U.S. general again calls for abolishing the nuclear forces he once commanded 05.29 Exclusive: White House Blocks Transfer of Cluster Bombs to Saudi Arabia 05.29 ‘It's like Florence Nightingale’s time’: South Sudan’s public services collapse 05.29 Refugee crisis: 13,000 people rescued in Mediterranean in one week 05.29 Protests grow as Greece moves refugees to warehouses ‘not fit for animals’ 05.29 Over 700 migrants feared dead in Mediterranean this week - UN 05.28 Israeli Ex-Officers Issue Peace Plan, Condemn Gov't Inaction 05.27 Story of cities #future: what will our growing megacities really look like? 05.27 Story of cities #50: the reclaimed stream bringing life to the heart of Seoul 05.27 Riot police crack down on Paris protests against labour reforms We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
You can also mail a check to: Baltimore News Network, Inc. P.O. Box 42581 Baltimore, MD 21284-2581 |
COMMENTARYMartial Law Threat is RealThe looming collapse of the US military in Iraq, of which a number of generals and former generals, including former Chief of Staff Colin Powell, have warned, is happening none too soon, as it may be the best hope for preventing military rule here at home.From the looks of things, the Bush/Cheney regime has been working assiduously to pave the way for a declaration of military rule, such that at this point it really lacks only the pretext to trigger a suspension of Constitutional government. They have done this with the active support of Democrats in Congress, though most of the heavy lifting was done by the last, Republican-led Congress. The 2001 AUMF was followed by the PATRIOT Act, passed in October 2001, which undermined much of the Bill of Rights. Around the same time, the president began a campaign of massive spying on Americans by the National Security Agency, conducted without any warrants or other judicial review. It was and remains a program that is clearly aimed at American dissidents and at the administration's political opponents, since the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court would never have raised no objections to spying on potential terrorists. (And it, and other government spying programs, have resulted in the government's having a list now of some 325,000 “suspected terrorists”!) The other thing we saw early on was the establishment of an underground government-within-a-government, though the activation, following 9-11, of the so-called “Continuity of Government” protocol, which saw heads of federal agencies moved secretly to an underground bunker where, working under the direction of Vice President Dick Cheney, the “government” functioned out of sight of Congress and the public for critical months. It was also during the first year following 9-11 that the Bush/Cheney regime began its programs of arrest and detention without charge-mostly of resident aliens, but also of American citizens-and of kidnapping and torture in a chain of gulag prisons overseas and at the Navy base at Guantanamo Bay. The following year, Attorney General John Ashcroft began his program to develop a mass network of tens of millions of citizen spies-Operation TIPS. That program, which had considerable support from key Democrats (notably Sen. Joe Lieberman), was curtailed by Congress when key conservatives got wind of the scale of the thing, but the concept survives without a name, and is reportedly being expanded today. Meanwhile, last October Bush and Cheney, with the help of a compliant Congress, put in place some key elements needed for a military putsch. There was the overturning of the venerable Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which barred the use of active duty military inside the United States for police-type functions, and the revision of the Insurrection Act, so as to empower the president to take control of National Guard units in the 50 states even over the objections of the governors of those states. Put this together with the wholly secret construction now under way-courtesy of a $385-million grant by the US Army Corps of Engineers to Halliburton subsidiary KBR Inc-of detention camps reportedly capable of confining as many as 400,000 people, and a recent report that the Pentagon has a document, dated June 1, 2007, classified Top Secret, which declares there to be a developing “insurgency” within the U.S, and which lays out a whole martial law counterinsurgency campaign against legal dissent, and you have all the ingredients for a military takeover of the United States. As we go about our daily lives-our shopping, our escapist movie watching, and even our protesting and political organizing-we need to be aware that there is a real risk that it could all blow up, and that we could find ourselves facing armed, uniformed troops at our doors. Bruce Fein isn't an alarmist. He says he doesn't see martial law coming tomorrow. But he is also realistic. “Really, by declaring the US to be a battlefield, Bush already made it possible for himself to declare martial law, because you can always declare martial law on a battlefield,” he says. “All he would need would be a pretext, like another terrorist attack on the U.S.” Indeed, the revised Insurrection Act (10. USC 331-335) approved by Congress and signed into law by Bush last October, specifically says that the president can federalize the National Guard to “suppress public disorder” in the event of “national disorder, epidemic, other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident.” That determination, the act states, is solely the president's to make. Congress is not involved. Fein says, “This is all sitting around like a loaded gun waiting to go off. I think the risk of martial law is trivial right now, but the minute there is a terrorist attack, then it is real. And it stays with us after Bush and Cheney are gone, because terrorism stays with us forever.” (It may be significant that Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for president, has called for the revocation of the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq, but not of the earlier 2001 AUMF which Bush claims makes him commander in chief of a borderless, endless war on terror.) Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has added an amendment to the upcoming Defense bill, restoring the Insurrection Act to its former version-a move that has the endorsement of all 50 governors-but Fein argues that would not solve the problem, since Bush still claims that the U.S. is a battlefield. Besides, a Leahy aide concedes that Bush could sign the next Defense Appropriations bill and then use a signing statement to invalidate the Insurrection Act rider. Fein argues that the only real defense against the looming disaster of a martial law declaration would be for Congress to vote for a resolution determining that there is no “War” on terror. “But they are such cowards they will never do that,” he says. That leaves us with the military. If ordered to turn their guns and bayonets on their fellow Americans, would our “heroes” in uniform follow their consciences, and their oaths to “uphold and defend” the Constitution of the United States? Or would they follow the orders of their Commander in Chief? It has to be a plus that National Guard and Reserve units are on their third and sometimes fourth deployments to Iraq, and are fuming at the abuse. It has to be a plus that active duty troops are refusing to re-enlist in droves-especially mid-level officers. If we are headed for martial law, better that it be with a broken military. Maybe if it's broken badly enough, the administration will be afraid to test the idea. About the author: Philadelphia journalist Dave Lindorff is co-author, with
Barbara Olshansky, of The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from OfficeCopyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on July 27, 2007. |
| ||||||||||||