Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

05.07 YouthWorks Campaign Needs Support for Summer Jobs

Books, Arts & Education

05.15 Frances Fox Piven's "Challenging Authority"

05.15 Major Omissions Flaw Book on Global Economics

05.14 George W. Bush’s Other Undeclared War: NCLB

05.13 New Buchanan Book: Anglo-American Ascendancy Lost in Unnecessary Wars

04.30 A Litany of Horrors

04.17 Peter Hallward's "Damming the Flood" (Part II)

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health & Environment

05.12 The World above 350 ppm CO2

04.28 Green Scare State Terrorism

04.21 Hunger Plagues Haiti and the World

04.16 WORLD FACING HUGE NEW CHALLENGE ON FOOD FRONT

Ref. : Single-Payer FAQ

Ref. : Environmental Health News

Ref. : Sundance Channel's THE GREEN

Ref. : What is Global Warming, and what can citizens do about it?

Ref. : Global Warming Links

Ref. : Health & Nutrition Links

Media Watching

05.06 US Media Trivializes Campaign 2008

05.06 Death's Factotum: Michael Gordon and the Times Pour Pentagon Poison into Nation's Ear

05.05 TV News Blackout on Pentagon Pundits

05.05 Color-Coded: Jeremiah Wright and the Real Deal on Race

05.02 The Right's America-Hating Preacher

04.23 Pentagon Pundits

04.22 US News Media's Latest Disgrace

04.18 ABC's Debate Debacle

04.16 Reprising the Genocidal Fury of Thomas Friedman

US Politics, Policy & Culture

05.16 Danger: Tough Talk & Wishful Thinking

05.14 Bush Operative Pushes Voter-ID Law

05.13 Hillary Clinton, John McCain and the "Stupid" Vote

05.13 McCain and the 'Unitary Executive'

05.09 The Democratic Presidential Race: A View from Pennsylvania

05.08 Serving the System: Corporate Control of U.S. Would Continue Under Obama

05.06 A Republican for Barack

05.05 Thinking About Voter Registrations

05.05 'Beware the Terrible Simplifiers'

05.01 U.S. Military Coordinated Day Of Prayer Events With Christian Right Group

04.30 John McCain Won’t Be Looking for the Union Label

04.30 Put Him Out With the Pastor!

04.25 Clinton Courted Racists in the Pennsylvania Primary

04.24 Groundbreaking Book Documents Widespread Election Fraud; Warns Elections Vulnerable to Theft

04.24 Triviamongering in the U.S. presidential race

04.24 Campaign 1988 Lives!

04.23 Hillary Clinton's Monstrous Threat

04.21 Brilliant Disguise: Bush Torture, Obama and The Boss

04.19 The Clintons, Triangulating with China

04.18 American Hegemony Is Not Guaranteed

04.18 Are the Clintons Playing Joe McCarthy?

04.17 The Weather Underground 'Theme'

US “High Crimes” & Incompetence

05.16 Election Fraud, not Voter Fraud, is a National Security Threat

05.16 Constitution’s Checks, Balances Failing As Bush Prepares Iran Attack

05.14 Falling Cedars: Fomenting War in Lebanon -- and Beyond

05.12 Armed Truce: Surging Into Slaughter on Sadr City's Jerusalem Street

05.10 Lost E-Mails Obscure 'Plame-gate'

05.09 Fallujah Revisited: Bush, Petraeus Prepare 'Cleansing' of Sadr City

05.09 Shoot, Kill, Lie, Repeat: America's New Moral Universe

05.07 Willing Executioners: America's Bipartisan Atrocity Deepens in Somalia

05.05 The Terror Master: Bush Orders Covert 'Surge' Against Iran, with Dem Support

05.01 American and Israeli War Crimes: Same Atrocities, Different Responses

04.30 Halliburton Bribe Case Haunts Cheney

04.29 Getting Over Scalia

04.29 The Iraq War Morphs Into The Iranian War

04.28 The Torture Election

04.28 The Clock is Ticking for A US Attack on Iran

04.28 The Bush Team's Geneva Hypocrisy

04.25 New Terror War Atrocity: Beheading the Innocent for Bush in Somalia

04.23 Glorious Fruits of the War for Civilization

04.22 VA Tried to Conceal Extent of Attempted Veteran Suicides, Email Shows

04.21 What About the War, Benedict?

04.18 Updating Sami Al-Arian - His Ordeal Continues

04.16 Would Obama Hold Bush Accountable?

Economics & Business

05.12 Thinking About Strategies

05.08 Portrait of an Oil-Addicted Former Superpower

04.28 Thinking About Subtleties

04.23 The Oil Vice

04.22 The US Economy and the Costs of War

04.21 Thinking About Shakiness

International

05.16 Africa Must Produce or Perish

05.16 Grow Them Young, Pay Them Well - Anti-Chavistas, That Is

05.12 Disturbing Stirrings - Ratcheting Up For War on Iran

05.05 Sixty Years of Palestinian Displacement, Occupation and Suffering

05.02 Feeding Moloch: Last Barriers to War on Iran Come Down

05.01 The Iranian Chessboard

05.01 Blood Diamonds, Blood Oil and Blood Food

05.01 Denying Palestinians Free Movement in the West Bank

04.30 The Ignored Lessons on the Stupidity of War

04.24 Breaking the Silence - Israeli Soldiers Speak

04.23 What the Iraq War is about

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 
  New York Times Explains Winter Soldier Blackout
Newspaper logo

MEDIA REVULSION ALERT:

New York Times Explains Winter Soldier Blackout

Public editor responds to concerns raised by FAIR

SOURCE: Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)

The New York Times' D.C. bureau editor had "not been aware" of the under-covered Winter Soldier hearings.
04/08/08—New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt has offered a response to media activists who wrote to the paper about its non-coverage of last month's Winter Soldier hearings. Hoyt's explanation is that reporters at the Times had "not been aware of the group or its meeting," but likely wouldn't have covered it if they had been aware of the event.

The idea that the Times was unaware of Winter Soldier is remarkable; the paper's D.C. reporters were repeatedly sent press releases about the events, the same ones that other media outlets received that did manage to cover the event, ranging from Pacifica Radio's Democracy Now! to the New York Times' corporate sibling the Boston Globe.

Hoyt's letter in full:
Dear Reader,

Thank you for writing about the Winter Soldier event in Maryland last month and its lack of coverage by the Times.

My assistant checked with various editors at the Times to see if there was any discussion about covering the Winter Soldier meeting. The editor in the Washington bureau who oversees national security coverage said he had not been aware of the group or its meeting. The Times normally has three Pentagon reporters. The meeting fell within their area of coverage, and one of them probably would have been assigned had editors chosen to staff the event. But one is on book leave, one was traveling with the secretary of defense, and one was in Iraq covering the war. The Times also did not cover an announcement the following day by Vets for Freedom, a group supporting the war and claiming more than 13 times the membership of Iraq Veterans Against the War, the group which organized Winter Soldier.

One group was emphasizing what it charged were war crimes, war profiteering and war mismanagement. The other group was protesting what it charged was the failure of the media to report more fully on signs of progress in Iraq, such as rebuilt schools and infrastructure.

News organizations like the Times, with its own substantial investment in independent reporting from Iraq tend to prefer their own on-scene accounts of the war, rather than relying on charges and counter-charges at home by organizations with strongly held political viewpoints about the war.

Sincerely,
Clark Hoyt
The Times’ D.C. bureau editor’s claim to have not heard of the hearings is remarkable, given that the AP newswire carried a story on the hearings, and IVAW has confirmed to FAIR that the D.C. bureau had been sent three separate rounds of different IVAW press releases. In addition, at least 150 Times staffers were sent press releases about Winter Soldier by the Institute for Public Accuracy, a group that encourages inclusion of overlooked facts and progressive perspectives in media coverage. Given that media organizations operating on a small fraction of the Times' budget were aware of and able to find the resources to cover these hearings, the Times’ D.C. bureau’s plea to ignorance about the hearings is all the more disappointing.

Meanwhile, Hoyt’s justification of the Times failure to cover Winter Soldier on the grounds that they also did not cover “an announcement the following day by Vets for Freedom, a group supporting the war and claiming more than 13 times the membership of Iraq Veterans Against the War, the group which organized Winter Soldier,” draws a far-fetched parallel between a group presenting eyewitness testimony about atrocities in Iraq and a group releasing a press release about media bias. (As a group that often puts out press releases about media bias that don't get covered by the Times, the comparison strikes us as rather absurd.) Further, the size of IVAW and Vets for Freedom are not directly comparable, as IVAW is a group of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, whereas anyone can sign up on the Vets for Freedom website, which stipulates that “non-veterans can also be members of Vets for Freedom.”

Hoyt's claim that “news organizations like the Times, with its own substantial investment in independent reporting from Iraq, tend to prefer their own on-scene accounts of the war” is akin to asserting that reporters on the police beat prefer to write about crimes they have seen themselves rather than talking to eyewitnesses. Given that Times reporters, like all Western journalists in Iraq, have great difficulty travelling freely outside the Green Zone, it is hard to imagine that they could provide a full and accurate picture of the war without interviewing people who have participated in it. And of course the paper does often interview U.S. military personnel about what they've seen, though when they are whistleblowers trying to call attention to what they describe as "the human consequences of failed policy," the Times suddenly has much less interest in what they have to say.

The New York Times’ decision to assign one of its two available correspondents to tour with the Secretary of Defense instead of hearing the first-hand accounts of the Winter Soldiers demonstrates a very strange notion of “independent reporting.”
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting is a nonpartisan media watchdog organization. Visit http://fair.org for more information, or share your opinion about this story by writing to fair@fair.org. Republished in the Chronicle with permission from F.A.I.R.


Copyright © 2008 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on April 8, 2008.

 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland