Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

05.07 YouthWorks Campaign Needs Support for Summer Jobs

Books, Art & Entertainment

05.13 New Buchanan Book: Anglo-American Ascendancy Lost in Unnecessary Wars

04.30 A Litany of Horrors

04.17 Peter Hallward's "Damming the Flood" (Part II)

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health & Environment

05.12 The World above 350 ppm CO2

04.28 Green Scare State Terrorism

04.21 Hunger Plagues Haiti and the World

04.16 WORLD FACING HUGE NEW CHALLENGE ON FOOD FRONT

Ref. : Single-Payer FAQ

Ref. : Environmental Health News

Ref. : Sundance Channel's THE GREEN

Ref. : What is Global Warming, and what can citizens do about it?

Ref. : Global Warming Links

Ref. : Health & Nutrition Links

Media Watching

05.06 US Media Trivializes Campaign 2008

05.06 Death's Factotum: Michael Gordon and the Times Pour Pentagon Poison into Nation's Ear

05.05 TV News Blackout on Pentagon Pundits

05.05 Color-Coded: Jeremiah Wright and the Real Deal on Race

05.02 The Right's America-Hating Preacher

04.23 Pentagon Pundits

04.22 US News Media's Latest Disgrace

04.18 ABC's Debate Debacle

04.16 Reprising the Genocidal Fury of Thomas Friedman

US Politics, Policy & Culture

05.13 Hillary Clinton, John McCain and the "Stupid" Vote

05.13 McCain and the 'Unitary Executive'

05.09 The Democratic Presidential Race: A View from Pennsylvania

05.08 Serving the System: Corporate Control of U.S. Would Continue Under Obama

05.06 A Republican for Barack

05.05 Thinking About Voter Registrations

05.05 'Beware the Terrible Simplifiers'

05.01 U.S. Military Coordinated Day Of Prayer Events With Christian Right Group

04.30 John McCain Won’t Be Looking for the Union Label

04.30 Put Him Out With the Pastor!

04.25 Clinton Courted Racists in the Pennsylvania Primary

04.24 Groundbreaking Book Documents Widespread Election Fraud; Warns Elections Vulnerable to Theft

04.24 Triviamongering in the U.S. presidential race

04.24 Campaign 1988 Lives!

04.23 Hillary Clinton's Monstrous Threat

04.21 Brilliant Disguise: Bush Torture, Obama and The Boss

04.19 The Clintons, Triangulating with China

04.18 American Hegemony Is Not Guaranteed

04.18 Are the Clintons Playing Joe McCarthy?

04.17 The Weather Underground 'Theme'

US “High Crimes” & Incompetence

05.12 Armed Truce: Surging Into Slaughter on Sadr City's Jerusalem Street

05.10 Lost E-Mails Obscure 'Plame-gate'

05.09 Fallujah Revisited: Bush, Petraeus Prepare 'Cleansing' of Sadr City

05.09 Shoot, Kill, Lie, Repeat: America's New Moral Universe

05.07 Willing Executioners: America's Bipartisan Atrocity Deepens in Somalia

05.05 The Terror Master: Bush Orders Covert 'Surge' Against Iran, with Dem Support

05.01 American and Israeli War Crimes: Same Atrocities, Different Responses

04.30 Halliburton Bribe Case Haunts Cheney

04.29 Getting Over Scalia

04.29 The Iraq War Morphs Into The Iranian War

04.28 The Torture Election

04.28 The Clock is Ticking for A US Attack on Iran

04.28 The Bush Team's Geneva Hypocrisy

04.25 New Terror War Atrocity: Beheading the Innocent for Bush in Somalia

04.23 Glorious Fruits of the War for Civilization

04.22 VA Tried to Conceal Extent of Attempted Veteran Suicides, Email Shows

04.21 What About the War, Benedict?

04.18 Updating Sami Al-Arian - His Ordeal Continues

04.16 Would Obama Hold Bush Accountable?

Economics & Business

05.12 Thinking About Strategies

05.08 Portrait of an Oil-Addicted Former Superpower

04.28 Thinking About Subtleties

04.23 The Oil Vice

04.22 The US Economy and the Costs of War

04.21 Thinking About Shakiness

International

05.12 Disturbing Stirrings - Ratcheting Up For War on Iran

05.05 Sixty Years of Palestinian Displacement, Occupation and Suffering

05.02 Feeding Moloch: Last Barriers to War on Iran Come Down

05.01 The Iranian Chessboard

05.01 Blood Diamonds, Blood Oil and Blood Food

05.01 Denying Palestinians Free Movement in the West Bank

04.30 The Ignored Lessons on the Stupidity of War

04.24 Breaking the Silence - Israeli Soldiers Speak

04.23 What the Iraq War is about

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 
  ABC's Debate Debacle
Newspaper logo

MEDIA REVULSION ALERT:

ABC's Debate Debacle

Trivia and biased questions dominate Democrats’ debate

SOURCE: Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)

Ask ABC why debate moderators George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson so often derailed the debate away from issues of concern to voters and framed so many questions from a right wing perspective.
04/17/08—The ABC-sponsored Democratic debate in Philadelphia on April 16 emphasized trivial matters of little concern to voters, while the actual policy questions were often based on misleading right-wing spin.

During the first half of the debate, ABC moderators George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson avoided any mention of policy issues. As the Los Angeles Times noted (4/17/08), "With the moderators and Clinton raising assorted questions about Obama's past for the first half of the debate, issues received relatively short shrift. Not until 50 minutes in was a policy issue-- Iraq--asked about by the moderators."

The trivial line of questioning touched on well-worn campaign non-issues: Clinton's gaffe about Bosnia, Obama's recent characterizations about "bitter" small-town voters, the rhetoric of his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and the fact that Obama rarely wears an American flag pin on his lapel. (This is not the first time ABC has seemed unusually interested in this distraction--see FAIR Media Advisory, 10/10/07.)

Perhaps the most irrelevant line of questioning came when Stephanopoulos asked about Obama's contacts with University of Illinois at Chicago professor William Ayers, who was once a member of the radical Weather Underground group. Obama's "ties" to Ayers have been an obsession of Fox News host Sean Hannity, who reportedly pressed Stephanopoulos to ask about Ayers at the debate (Salon.com, 4/17/08; MSNBC 4/16/08).

Framing the question as a "follow up" on "the general theme of patriotism," Stephanopoulos challenged Obama to "explain to Democrats why it won't be a problem," given that Ayers had never apologized for the bombings the group carried out in the 1970s. "In fact," said Stephanopoulos, "on 9/11 he was quoted in the New York Times saying, 'I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough.'" (Actually, that quote appeared in the Times on September 11, 2001; it was not, as Stephanopoulos seemed to imply, made on the day of the attacks.)

But even when the questions turned to issues of actual substance, things hardly improved. It was not until a full three quarters of an hour into the debate that the candidates were asked the question about what Stephanopoulos
acknowledged was "the No. 1 issue on Americans' minds"-- the
economy.

Stephanopoulos' first question to Clinton, though, was clearly pitched from the right:
"Can you make an absolute, read-my-lips pledge that there will be no tax increases of any kind for anyone earning under $200,000 a year? And if the economy is as weak a year from now as it is today, will you persist in your plans to roll back President Bush's tax cuts for wealthier Americans?"
The assumption would seem to be that there's something economically or politically dangerous about raising taxes, particularly on the wealthy. Charles Gibson picked up on that theme, pressing Obama about his plan to raise capital gains tax rates to levels of the early 1990s—a position that struck Gibson as bizarre, since lowering these taxes increases government revenue:
"In each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased. The government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down. So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?"
This question rests on two false assumptions. The capital gains tax is paid by a small percentage of the population. As Citizens for Tax Justice pointed out (3/16/06), "The wealthiest 10 percent of taxpayers enjoyed 90 percent of the capital gains eligible for this special tax break." Gibson's reference to the 100 million Americans who own stock is irrelevant, since this tax is applied to the sales of stocks and real estate—not the act of having a retirement account.

Gibson's other point--"History shows that when you drop the capital gains tax, the revenues go up"--might be popular in certain conservative circles, but the evidence to support it is thin. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities pointed out (7/12/07), there is little causal relationship between the capital gains tax cuts and increased federal tax revenue. Economist Jason Furman of the Brookings Institute pointed out the the "Joint Committee on Taxation and Treasury both score raising capital gains taxes as raising revenues" (New Republic, 4/16/08).

In addition, both candidates were pressed by Stephanopoulos about whether they would "treat an Iranian attack on Israel as if it were an attack on the United States." Stephanopoulos opened this question with a flagrantly misleading statement, saying to Obama: "Iran continues to pursue a nuclear option. Those weapons, if they got them, would probably pose the greatest threat to Israel." According to the latest National Intelligence Estimate, Iran discontinued its alleged nuclear weapons program in 2003.

Pundits often justify their decision to exclude "second-tier" candidates from debates on the grounds that they distract attention away from the real issues. If presenting a distraction from the real issues is really the problem, perhaps moderators such as Stephanopoulos and Gibson should seriously think of excusing themselves from future debates.

ACTION:
Ask ABC why debate moderators George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson so often derailed the debate away from issues of concern to voters and, in a debate that was supposed to help Democratic voters choose their party's candidate, framed so many questions from a right wing perspective.

CONTACT:
ABC News
Email: netaudr@abc.com
212-456-7777
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting is a nonpartisan media watchdog organization. Visit http://fair.org for more information, or share your opinion about this story by writing to fair@fair.org. Republished in the Chronicle with permission from F.A.I.R.


Copyright © 2008 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on April 18, 2008.

 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland