| ||||||||||||||
|
Local News & Opinion
07.03 Notice for Extension of Unemployment Insurance Benefits Travel
07.02 A Cost-Saving Way to Travel: Rent a House Books, Arts & Education
Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Open Letters:
06.30 An Open Letter to Barack Obama Health & Environment
Media Watching
07.17 Corporate Media Blackouts Continue as Iran War Looms and Impeachment Moves Ahead 07.17 The Pentagon and the Hunt for Black Gold 07.16 Washington Post's McCain-Friendly Poll 07.15 You Can’t Tell a Magazine by Its Cover Or A Candidate by His Rhetoric 07.09 The Forgotten: Somalia's American-Made Road to Perdition 07.03 Press distorts Clark’s comments 06.30 Iran-Contra's 'Lost Chapter' 06.27 Robert McChesney's The Political Economy of Media (Part II) 06.25 Robert McChesney's The Political Economy of Media (Part I) 06.20 Remembering Russert US Politics, Policy & Culture
07.18 Making Americans Unsafe 07.18 I Was a Victim of the Government’s Absurd and Over-Hyped War on Terror 07.15 Thinking About Safety 07.15 The High Cost of Bush's Iraq Gambit 07.11 McCain's Nomination - A Possible September Surprise? 07.07 Is Barack Obama Patriotic? Is Any Politician? 07.07 Obama's FISA Statement is a Mess (Just like his Stand on Faith-based Programs) 07.07 Campaign Notes: Of Flip-Flops and Fly-Bys 07.07 Supreme Court, Inc.: Supremely Pro-Business 07.03 The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July 07.03 Three Amigos: Bush, McCain, Obama Draw a Blood-Red Line on Iran 07.02 Rep. Ron Paul Assails Congress's "Virtual Iran War Resolution 07.02 How Ignorant Are We? 06.28 Primary Season Over, Barack Channels Hillary 06.27 Senate Overwhelmingly Approves Bill to Fund Iraq War Until Mid-2009 06.27 Defending the President as Tyrant 06.25 Critical Malfunction: Misreading Gore Vidal 06.23 Campaign Finance Reform Has Failed 06.23 Thinking About Flip-Flops 06.23 Heat Waves: Burning Off the Fog of the FISA Fiasco 06.23 Alarm over 'Unfair' Campaign Money 06.23 The Supreme Court, Habeas, John Yoo and Murdoch's Wall Street Journal 06.20 Keeping America Safe from Child "Terrorists" 06.20 SuperCorridor Defeat? Don't Bet On It US High Crimes & Misdemeanors
07.19 'Justifying' Torture: Two Big Lies 07.18 Torture As Official US Policy 07.16 Bush Asserts Exec Privilege; Blocks DOJ From Releasing CIA Leak Documents 07.16 Impeachment Hearings: A Win is a Win 07.15 Torture for the Torturers 07.14 Imperial Wizards: The Nangarhar Massacre and U.S. Plans for Central Asia 07.12 Kucinich Pushes on Impeachment 07.11 Disorderly Conduct: Subverting the Bipartisan Paradigm on Iraq 07.10 Mukasey: Bush's New 'Mr. Cover-up' 07.09 Legitimizing Permanent Occupation of Iraq 07.08 Buchanan, MacDonogh, Pilger Books Explode Illusion Of American Exceptionalism 07.07 Bush-Cheney Crony Got Iraq Oil Deal 07.07 Keeping Count (When Ours Goes Down, Theirs Goes Up) 07.02 Iraq Oil Deals Fulfill Cheney's Goals 07.02 Bush's 'Wonderland' Logic 06.30 Operation Horse's Head: U.S. Raid Sends Message on Iraq "Agreement" 06.30 Invisible Hand: Washington Role in Iraq Oil Deal Revealed 06.27 It Was Oil, All Along 06.27 Big Dog, Little Tail: The American Elite Resolves on War With Iran 06.26 A Totally Lawless Regime 06.23 Top Dems Hand Bush Key Victories 06.23 Democrats Legalize Bush's Crimes 06.20 Torturegate: Truth, But No Consequences 06.20 Bomb Iran? What's to Stop Us? Economics & Business
07.11 Running on Empty 07.10 A Work Force Betrayed 07.08 Paul Krugman and Blindness About the War and the Economy 07.07 Thinking About Turnarounds 06.30 Thinking about Dependence 06.26 Health-Care Crisis Endangers Economy International
07.17 Renunciation and Escalation: Conflicting Tides in the Terror War 07.16 Maliki's 'Timetable' Shakes Iraq Debate 07.16 Drought and Israeli Policy Threaten West Bank Water Security 07.14 Enabling Tyranny—Brigitte Bardot And Other Victims 07.14 Duce Bags: Italy Leads Fascist Revanche in Western Democracies We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
|
NEWS REPORT:Congress's $3.5 million ''Bake Sale'' for the Boy ScoutsNever before, in the long history of U.S. government-issued commemorative coins, has this benefit been granted to an organization that promotes religion or discriminates based on religion.
May 19, 2008—All right, it isn't actually a bake sale, but it might as well be. On May 15, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5872, an act "To require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint coins in commemoration of the centennial of the Boy Scouts of America, and for other purposes." The other purposes? The sale of the coins by the Secretary of the Treasury, with a surcharge on each coin sold to "be paid to the National Boy Scouts of America Foundation." In other words, this is a congressionally mandated fundraiser for the Boy Scouts. With the act allowing for up to 350,000 of this coin to be issued and fixing the surcharge at $10 per coin, the Boy Scouts could receive as much as $3.5 million from their sale. Never before, in the long history of U.S. government-issued commemorative coins, has this benefit been granted to an organization that promotes religion or discriminates based on religion.
What is a Commemorative Coin and How Does the Program Work?
A 1996 U.S. Mint report titled "Commemorative Coins Could Be More Profitable," described the issuance of commemorative coins as follows: "Every commemorative coin program is authorized by an act of Congress. Congress authorizes commemorative coins primarily as a means of honoring certain events and individuals and raising funds for the coins’ sponsors. On occasion, the proceeds from commemorative coin sales are applied to the national debt. Commemorative coins are legal tender but are purchased and retained by collectors, rather than used as a circulating medium of exchange." The first commemorative coin, authorized by Congress in 1892, was the Columbian Exposition silver half dollar, commemorating Columbus's first voyage to the new world. These coins, priced at twice their face value, did not sell well, and many of them ended up being put into circulation by the banks that held them as collateral against unpaid loans taken out by the Exposition. Over fifty other commemorative coin programs were authorized between 1892 and 1951, and for the first few decades they were all to recognize anniversaries of major historical events or to raise money for legitimate memorial projects. But, of course, any program where money is involved is subject to abuse. By the 1920s things were already getting out of control. At that time, coins issued to fund a particular project were simply minted and then sold by the government to the recipient organization, which would then resell them for a profit, with the selling price set by the organization. This led to a flood of coins commemorating events that were only of local rather than national interest, organizations charging exorbitant prices for their coins, and even instances of coin dealers fabricating anniversaries to obtain a product to sell. In 1936, for example, a group of Ohio coin dealers formed the "Cincinnati Music Center Commemorative Coin Association" and applied to have a coin issued commemorating Cincinnati's "contribution to the art of music for the past 50 years.” This coin was authorized by Congress despite the fact that the Commission of Fine Arts found that nothing of musical significance had occurred in Cincinnati in 1886 to make 1936 a 50th anniversary of anything. In 1939, Congress passed legislation severely limiting commemorative coins, and following the issue of the George Washington Carver-Booker T. Washington half dollar, which was sold from 1951 to 1954, the program was suspended for nearly three decades. The program was revived in 1981 with the authorization of a George Washington 250th Anniversary half dollar to be issued in 1982, the profits from which were applied to the national debt. By 1984, Congress was once again authorizing coins to raise funds for private organizations, but new legislation required that the coins be sold directly to the public by the U.S. Mint, with a fixed surcharge to be paid to the recipient organization. The minting of many of these coins resulted in a loss to the government, although the sponsoring organizations always made a profit. The problem was that the organization received its surcharge beginning with the very first coin sold, before the mint had recovered its set-up and other costs. If a coin sold so poorly that its sales didn't cover these costs, it was the government that took the hit. On the 1994 World Cup Tournament coins, for example, the government lost over $4 million, while the sponsor received over $9 million. Current law requires that the mint ensure that it will not lose any money before transferring any surcharges to the recipient organization, and limits commemorative coin programs to two per year.
The Unconstitutionality of Issuing a Commemorative Coin for the Boy Scouts
This should be obvious, but apparently it isn't to the overwhelming majority in our House of Representatives, who just passed H.R. 5872 by a vote of 403 to 8. [Kudos to Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Barney Frank (D-MA), Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Pete Stark (D-CA), and Lynn Woolsey (D-CA)—the eight who voted no.] While much has been written about the disputes and court cases resulting from establishment clause issues raised by government support of the Boy Scouts, the organization's actual statements and policies are usually only vaguely described or briefly quoted. To leave no doubt as to why Congress, without question, should be prohibited from passing legislation to raise money for this organization, here are some of the statements and policies from official Boy Scout publications and websites. First, there's the "Declaration of Religious Principle," found in the organization's bylaws. This declaration must be subscribed to by every member of the Boy Scouts, from the youngest scout to the adult leaders, volunteers, and employees.
Then there are the policies governing volunteers and employees.
And, according to http://BSALegal.org, a website "created on behalf of the Boy Scouts of America to inform the public about the legal issues that confront Scouting," religious beliefs and activities are required for every level of advancement from Cub Scouts through Eagle Scouts.
"All levels of advancement in the Scouting program have requirements recognizing 'duty to God': On the FAQ page of BSALegal.org, the discriminatory policies of the Boy Scouts are defended through questions and answers like the following.
This is absolutely correct. A private organization can have whatever beliefs and religious requirements it chooses to. That's their constitutional right. But Congress can absolutely not financially aid the Boy Scouts in the promotion of their beliefs and enforcement of their religious requirements by legislating a fundraiser for them! Chris Rodda is the senior research director for the nonprofit government watchdog organization The Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and author of the book Liars For Jesus. She can be reached liarsforjesus@aol.com. This article was originally published on the Public Record web site and appears in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission.
Copyright © 2008 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own. This story was published on May 19, 2008. |
| ||||||||||||