Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion
Travel
Books, Arts & Education

08.05 "American Teen": A Winning Documentary about Real-Life High Schoolers

07.31 Francis Boyle's "Palestine Palestinians and International Law"

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

08.16 Out Damn Blot: A Letter to Colin Powell

Health & Environment

08.14 The End of Cheap Oil: The Future is Now

08.05 Obama is Right: It's Easy to Reduce the Nation's (and Your Own) Fuel Bill Dramatically

Media Watching

08.21 Mixed Truth of the Russia-Georgia War

08.16 John McCain's Party of Hate

08.15 Corporate Media Bashes New Chavez Enabling Law Decrees

08.15 Georgia/Russia Conflict Forced Into Cold War Frame

08.13 WPost and the Great Disconnect

08.12 WPost Admits Bungling Obama Quote

08.06 Why McCain May Well Win

08.06 Media Fall for 'Race Card' Spin

08.01 Wall Street Journalomics: The Case of the Missing Tax Facts

07.31 CNN Scoffs at White House Critics

07.31 WPost Calls Out 'Uppity' Obama

US Politics, Policy & Culture

08.21 McCain's Ties to Neocon Hard Lines

08.21 Peace Mom v. Guardian of Power

08.20 Are You Ready For Nuclear War?

08.19 A Book Written to Defeat Obama

08.19 McCain's 'Cone of Silence' Caper

08.14 Is Perpetual War Our Future?

08.12 5 Years After Blackout, Power Grid Still in 'Dire Straits'

08.12 Olympic Shame

08.12 Thinking About Intermissions

08.11 ‘Medaling’ With Free Speech at the Olympics

08.11 Targeting Immigrants - The Largest Ever US ICE Raid

08.09 A Novel Approach to Politics

08.07 The Hamdan Principle and You

08.07 McCain Adopts Cheney's Energy Plan

08.06 The Serpent's Egg: Solzhenitsyn and the Origins of America's Gulag

08.05 Mining Racism and Murder in a Northeastern Pennsylvania Coal Town

08.04 The Other Presidential Candidates

08.03 McCain, Anthrax & the Afghan Blunder

08.01 Justice Probe Still Threatens Gonzales

07.31 Obama's Surge in Berlin

07.30 War Without End, Amen: Into the Afghan Abyss with Obama

07.30 McCain's Spin on the 'Surge'

07.30 Friday's House Judiciary Hearing on Impeachment: A Victory and a Challenge

US “High Crimes” & Misdemeanors

08.20 Musharraf, Not Bush, Follows Nixon

08.18 Fear, Procurement, Profit: Permanent War and the American Way

08.17 This Time, the World Is Not Buying It

08.15 'Imminent' Threats Should Be a Belli Laugh

08.08 American Insouciance

08.07 Extra! Dog Bites Man! Read All About It!

08.05 Marching Off Into Tyranny

08.05 Follow This Dime

07.31 Wave of 'Capitol Crime' Continues

07.29 Bodyguard of Lies: The Truth Behind the 'Surge's' Smokescreen

07.28 Secret "Torture Memo" Gave Legal Cover to Interrogators Who Acted in "Good Faith"

07.28 The Bush Administration's Secret Biowarfare Agenda

07.26 The Endless Smearing of Joe Wilson

Economics & Business

08.04 Thinking About Ponzi

International

08.18 Blockades: Acts of War

08.17 Rice’s Recipe for Duck Soup

08.14 The Lawless Roads: Bluster in Georgia, Rank Tyranny at Home

08.14 Marching Through Georgia V: U.S. Forces Moving Into Putin's Powderkeg

08.14 Marching Through Georgia IV: The Butt Thumper and the Bear

08.13 Using Georgia to Target Russia

08.12 From Stupid to Moronic to Evil

08.11 Marching Through Georgia III: Reality's Rout and Cheney's Viagra

08.11 Marching Through Georgia II: The Kremlin Surge

08.08 Marching Through Georgia I: Cold War II Proxy Conflict Turns Hot

08.07 Living Death: The Eternal Now of Hiroshima

08.07 War with Iran - On, Off or Undecided?

08.04 Gaza Under Siege

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 
  The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July

by Jacob G. Hornberger

It's easy to forget that the revolutionaries in 1776 were people who took up arms against their own government.

Contrary to popular myth, the men who signed the Declaration of Independence were not great Americans. Instead, they were great Englishmen. In fact, they were as much English citizens as Americans today are American citizens. It's easy to forget that the revolutionaries in 1776 were people who took up arms against their own government.

So how is it that these men are considered patriots? Well, the truth is that their government didn't consider them patriots at all. Their government considered them to be bad guys—traitors, all of whom deserved to be hanged for treason.

Most of us consider the signers of the Declaration of Independence to be patriots because of their courage in taking a stand against the wrongdoing and tyranny of their own government, even risking their lives in the process.

Yet not even the patriotism and courage of these English citizens constitutes the foremost significance of the Fourth of July, any more than the military victory over their government's forces at Yorktown does.

Instead, the real significance of the Fourth of July lies in the expression of what is undoubtedly the most revolutionary political declaration in history: that man's rights are inherent, God-given, and natural and, thus, do not come from government.

Throughout history, people have believed that their rights come from government. Such being the case, people haven't objected whenever government officials infringed upon their rights. Since rights were considered to be government-bestowed privileges, the thinking went, why shouldn't government officials have the power to regulate or suspend such privileges at will?

Governments are called into existence by the people—and exist at their pleasure—for one purpose: to protect the exercise of their inherent fundamental and unalienable rights.

The Declaration of Independence upended that age-old notion of rights. All men—not just Americans—have been endowed by God and nature, not government, with fundamental and unalienable rights. Governments are called into existence by the people—and exist at their pleasure—for one purpose: to protect the exercise of these inherent rights.

What happens if a government that people have established becomes a destroyer, rather than a protector, of their rights? The Declaration provides the answer: It is the right of the people to alter or even abolish their government and establish a new government whose purpose is the protection, not the destruction, of people's rights and freedoms.

With the Constitution and Bill of Rights, people limited the powers of their own government in a formal, structured way, with the aim of protecting their rights and freedoms from being infringed upon by that same government.

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights must be construed in light of that revolutionary statement of rights in the Declaration of Independence. The American people used the Constitution to bring the federal government into existence but also, simultaneously, they used that document to limit the government's powers to those expressly enumerated in the Constitution. With the Constitution, people limited the powers of their own government in a formal, structured way, with the aim of protecting their rights and freedoms from being infringed upon by that same government.

Why did Americans deem it desirable and necessary to limit the powers of the federal government? Because they feared the possibility that their new government would become like their former government, against which they had had to take up arms. While they recognized the necessity for government—as a means to protect their rights—they also recognized that the federal government was the greatest threat to their rights. By severely limiting the powers of the federal government to those enumerated within the Constitution, the Framers intended to encase the federal government within a straitjacket.

Even that was not sufficient for the American people, however. As a condition for approving the Constitution, they demanded passage of the Bill of Rights, which emphasized two deeply held beliefs:

  1. that the federal government, not some foreign entity, constitutes the greatest threat to the rights and liberties of the American people; and
  2. that the enumeration of specific rights and liberties, both substantive and procedural, would better ensure their protection from federal infringement.

On the Fourth of July we celebrate the patriotism and courage of those English revolutionaries who were willing to pledge their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor in defense of the most revolutionary declaration of rights in history—that man's rights come from God and nature, not from government.


Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

Copyright © 2008 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on July 3, 2008.

 


Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland