Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

09.21 Greed is killing Alaska's salmon habitat – but we can still save it

09.21 Trump administration poses new threat to birds in allowing ‘incidental’ killings

09.20 Al Gore Is Still Optimistic [24:06 video; rather than future Frankenstein governments, how can we better ensure having brilliantly efficient & competent governments?]

09.20 The $11 trillion question Chris Cillizza can't answer

09.20 Florence sparks pollution fears after excrement-filled 'hog lagoons' overflow

09.20 EU must end new petrol and diesel car sales by 2030 to meet climate targets – report

09.19 Air pollution linked to much greater risk of dementia

09.19 Shell and Exxon's secret 1980s climate change warnings [that capitalists suppressed this for continuing profit is the most unforgivable crime ever]Trump administration rolls back methane pollution rule despite harmful health impacts [continuing in the tradition of stupid capitalism at all costs]

09.18 'I was horrified that children are breathing air this dirty inside the school' [if your government isn't working, change it!]

09.17 For Whom the Climate Bell Tolls

News Media Matters

09.22 Progressives to DNC: It Would Be 'Insane' Not to Hand Over Twitter Account to Ocasio-Cortez

09.20 Morning Edition’s Think Tank Sources Lean to the Right

09.19 Taibbi: Bernie Sanders’ Anti-Amazon Bill Is an Indictment of the Media, Too

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

09.22 As Right-Wingers Push Trump to Fire Rosenstein, Here's What to Do If He Does

09.21 400,000 Americans in 900 Cities Ready to Take to Streets If President Trump Fires Rosenstein After NYT Bombshell

09.18 Voters Are Ready for a Green New Deal. Are Democrats?

09.18 'This Election Is Last Chance to Stop Them': Kudlow Confirms Trump and GOP Ready to Gut Safety Net After Midterms [Yes, there are far too many sociopaths]

09.18 You'll miss Trump one day

Justice Matters

09.22 Why isn't Mark Judge testifying about Kavanaugh? He is an alleged witness

High Crimes?

09.20 Trump Should Be More Worried About the Brennan Dossier

09.19 'Killing a generation': one million more children at risk from famine in Yemen [Does America's government have empathy? Does it understand the concept of morality? The Saudi Air Force would be ineffective without U.S. military assistance...]

09.19 ‘Tied to trees and raped’: UN report details Rohingya horrors

09.16 Merchants of Death Profit from the Bombing of Children as a US-Backed War Goes Largely Ignored

Economics, Crony Capitalism
International & Futurism

09.22 Which nation is 'most generous' to refugees? Certainly not the US

09.18 Racist rioting in Chemnitz has reopened Germany’s east-west split [We are all mixed-race after 10,000 generations. Helping suffering people makes us feel good, so become their friends instead.]

09.18 'Unconscionable' and 'Appalling': In Affront to Those Fleeing US-Backed Wars and Persecution, Trump Slams Door on Refugees

09.17 How to Humanely Solve Europe's Migration Crisis

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Roberts's ''Bush Moment''
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

Roberts’s “Bush Moment”

by Mark Crispin Miller
Thursday, 22 January 2009
Chief Justice Roberts screwed up Obama's oath of office because his heart just wasn’t in what he was saying—just like Bush, whose tongue broke down whenever he was forced to sound a note of altruism or idealism or inclusiveness, or any other alien notion.
With the whole world watching, Chief Justice John G. Roberts garbled up Obama’s oath of office yesterday—deliberately, some say, since the new president must speak his piece precisely, and Roberts made that quite impossible (unless Obama had decided to ignore his clumsy prompts, and do it right entirely on his own).

“I’m relatively certain they re-administered the oath out of view of the masses to make it all legit,” writes a friend. “I say he screwed it up on purpose.” That could be, although, if so, it would be a pretty brazen move. [Ed. Note: In fact, the Chief Justice did readminister the oath to President Obama at 7:35 p.m. in the White House's Map Room.]

I’d say that Roberts didn’t do it consciously, but that his screw-up was a stark bit of unconscious interference with Obama’s swearing-in. Roberts is, of course, a flaming Bush Republican—and, as such, intent on (further) disenfranchising the very citizens who voted, or tried to vote, for Obama/Biden.

For example, Roberts has been on (what we might call) the Klan side of every Supreme Court decision that pertains to voting rights since he was placed on that almighty body. He voted to uphold the Indiana photo ID law, having made some idiotic arguments defending it in open court.

The stated purpose of the law was to halt in-person “voter fraud” in Indiana. Replying to the point that there was not a single case of such fraud ever having been discovered in that state, Roberts noted that such lack of evidence was no surprise, since “voter fraud” is, by its very nature, secret, and therefore leaves no traces. (Cf. Rumsfeld’s Law: “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.”) And upon hearing that ID-less Indiana voters have to cast provisional ballots, and then travel to the county seat to get them counted, Roberts said that that was not a hardship, since county seats in Indiana aren’t so far away.

And the Roberts Court has recently decided to take up a lawsuit arguing that there’s no longer any need for Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act—a move whereby the Court could simply nullify Congress’s extension of the Act back in 2006. (Click here for more on this.)

Such moves make very clear that our Chief Justice is a faithful servant of, and true believer in, his ever-shrinking party and its racist base. Thus is he operating squarely in the un-American tradition of the Court that gave us Bush v. Gore. (He’s also following in the footsteps on his predecessor William Rehnquist, who made his bones as an anti-democratic activist way back in the early Sixties, when, as a lawyer for the GOP, he roamed the precincts of South Phoenix on Election Day, trying to block minority votes.)

In short, Roberts personifies that spirit of fanatical elitism whereby the Bush Regime, and its bad works, were forced on all the rest of us. Small wonder, then, that Roberts couldn’t make his tongue behave as he stood out there yesterday, half-trying to suppress his rage sufficiently to swear Obama in. And so he screwed it up, because his heart just wasn’t in what he was saying—just like Bush, whose tongue broke down whenever he was forced to sound a note of altruism or idealism or inclusiveness, or any other alien notion.

And this won’t be the last time that we hear the voice of Bush (or Cheney) piping up in unexpected places. Much depends on whether our new president will be polite, and let it resonate, or whether he will shut it down at last, and try instead to say—and do—what’s right.


Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media ecology at New York University, recently edited a book about voting fraud, Loser Take All, a compendium of investigative reports. Miller researches such topics as modern propaganda, history and tactics of advertising, American film, and media ownership. His recent books include The Bush Dyslexicon and Cruel and Unusual: Bush/Cheney's New World Order. This article, published in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the author, was originally published on the author's "News from Underground" blog.



Copyright © 2009 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on January 22, 2009.
 



Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland