The latest issue of Mother Jones includes an article by Peter Stone on the shady dealings and inflated profits of the medical device industry. These companies make things like artificial joints and heart valves, which are often needed by older people—and paid for by Medicare.
In recent months, these companies have launched a huge lobbying blitz in response to provisions in the health care reform bills that would levy fees on their high-profit enterprise. The efforts apparently have not been wasted: In the latest versions of the legislation, the level of fees has dropped considerably (though that hasn’t stopped the manufacturers’ whining).
Compared with Big Pharma, the medical device industry has received relatively little media coverage or public attention, which makes this article worth reading in full. A few highlights:
We’ve been left jaded, after all, by the endless reports of drugmakers’ seducing physicians with golf and spa weekends, expensive gifts, and lucrative consulting contracts. Well, now that federal investigators have quietly turned their sights on the makers of medical devices—a $200 billion industry whose marketing practices have seen relatively little scrutiny—it’s becoming clear that implant companies are just as solicitous of doctors as Big Pharma has been.
Consider Minneapolis-based Medtronic, the country’s leading device maker, which hauled in nearly $15 billion in 2009 sales despite having become a repeat target for state and federal prosecutors. In 2006, Medtronic agreed to pay the feds $40 million to settle allegations that from 1998 through 2003 it had set up sham consulting and royalty agreements, trips to strip clubs in Tennessee, and other incentives to entice surgeons to use its spinal products....
Stone runs through cases that have led to hundreds of million in federal fines against medical device manufacturers in the last three years, including a $311 million settlement with the top five manufacturs of artificial hips and knees accused of giving doctors millions in kickbacks, often disguised as consulting fees.
Some effort to combat these practices has emerged from the Senate Special Committee on Aging, chaired by Wisconsin Democrat Herb Kohl, which held a “Surgeons for Sale” hearing last year, and in January introduced the Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2009. This legislation, Stone writes, “would compel makers of medical devices, drugs, vaccines, and the like to publicly disclose any payment of more than $100 to a doctor; failure to report could result in fines of up to $1 million.”
Kohl is hoping the provision will become part of the final final draft of health care reform legislation. But the medical device manufacturers, in league with Big Pharma, will do everything they can to keep that from happening.
Born in 1936, James Ridgeway has been reporting on politics for more than 45 years. He is currently Senior Washington Correspondent for Mother Jones, and recently wrote a blog on the 2008 presidential election for the Guardian online. He previously served as Washington Correspondent for the Village Voice; wrote for Ramparts and The New Republic; and founded and edited two independent newsletters, Hard Times and The Elements.
Ridgeway is the author of 16 books, including The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11, It’s All for Sale: The Control of Global Resources, and Blood in the Face: The Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, Nazi Skinheads, and the Rise of a New White Culture. He co-directed a companion film to Blood in the Face and a second documentary film, Feed, and has co-produced web videos for GuardianFilms.
Additional information and samples of James Ridgeway’s work can be found on his web site, http://jamesridgeway.net.
This article is republished in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the author.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.This story was published on November 3, 2009.