Local Stories, Events
Ref. : Civic Events
Ref. : Arts & Education Events
Ref. : Public Service Notices
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Ref. : Letters to the editor
Health Care & Environment
09.19 Shell and Exxon's secret 1980s climate change warnings [that capitalists suppressed this for continuing profit is the most unforgivable crime ever]Trump administration rolls back methane pollution rule despite harmful health impacts [continuing in the tradition of stupid capitalism at all costs]
09.18 'I was horrified that children are breathing air this dirty inside the school' [if your government isn't working, change it!]
News Media Matters
US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'
09.18 'This Election Is Last Chance to Stop Them': Kudlow Confirms Trump and GOP Ready to Gut Safety Net After Midterms [Yes, there are far too many sociopaths]
09.19 'Killing a generation': one million more children at risk from famine in Yemen [Does America's government have empathy? Does it understand the concept of morality? The Saudi Air Force would be ineffective without U.S. military assistance...]
Economics, Crony Capitalism
International & Futurism
09.18 Racist rioting in Chemnitz has reopened Germany’s east-west split [We are all mixed-race after 10,000 generations. Helping suffering people makes us feel good, so become their friends instead.]
Terrorism discussion should address Washington's policy in Middle East, South Asia
Any attempt to understand motives and grievances doesn't mean one condones barbaric behavior visited upon innocent civilians.
I wonder how many people have noticed and wondered why al-Qaida or other Islamic terrorist groups haven't tried to blow up airliners bound for Stockholm, Cape Town, Buenos Aires or Zurich? Might it be becaise their governments are neither perceived as occupiers nor closely associated with U.S. policy in the Middle East and South Asia?
Why isn't this prickly but crucial issue ever addressed?
Perhaps it's because the answer is assumed to be self-evident. Terrorists: Bad. USA: Good. More ominously, this discussion is avoided because its airing would make it more difficult for our leaders to sell their policies to a more informed, more skeptical public.
First, it's important to grasp that any attempt to understand motives and grievances doesn't mean one condones barbaric behavior visited upon innocent civilians. Washington must do everything possible to prevent our citizens from being attacked.
But second, if U.S. policy in the Middle East and South Asia actually exacerbates terrorism, don't we have a responsibility to ourselves to openly address that possibility? Have we become so fearful, so unsure of ourselves as a people that despite accumulating doubts about our role in the world, we remain silent and obediently follow the official line?
I take no pleasure in asserting that U.S. policy could not be more advantageous to al-Qaida members if they'd drawn it up themselves. As several experts now agree, today's al-Qaida is less in need of geographical safe havens than a durable list of righteous grievances to stoke anger and attract recruits. And the historical record shows that U.S. policy is constantly churning a combustible cauldron of bitter anti-American feelings.
Eight days before the reprehensible ''underpants bomber's'' near miss on Northwest Flight 253, it was reported that 28 children had been killed in a U.S. air attack in Abyan, Yemen.
Glenn Greenwald, who blogs on Salon.com, (highly recommended) writes, ''What do we think is going to happen if we continuously invade, occupy and bomb Muslim countries and arm and enable others to do so?'' For example, eight days before the reprehensible ''underpants bomber's'' near miss on Northwest Flight 253, it was reported that 28 children had been killed in a U.S. air attack in Abyan, Yemen. Is it unthinkable that as a consequence some Yemenis might be vexed and sympathize with al-Qaida? In a post to the Islamic Forum, the failed bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab denounced the U.S. ''war on terror'' because of ''the death of thousands of innocent lives and thousands more detained illegally without trial or judgment.
Washington has long-standing overt, covert and threatened wars and occupations going on in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan and Iran—all Muslim countries. These actions are deeply resented—hated, really—by some 365 million people in the region. Include U.S. support for tyrannical regimes in places like Egypt and Saudi Arabia and unconditional complicity in Israel's brutal apartheid policy in Palestine, and the real question is why isn't there more blowback toward us?
Finally, absent any serious discussion of motives and grievances, Washington's policy will continue to enrage and engage more recruits to terrorism, swell the number of pointless U.S. combat deaths and make the world an even more dangerous place for all of us. The future isn't hopeless but unless we remove our ideological blinders and see the world as it actually exists, that future is precarious at best.
Gary Olson is a professor and chair of the political science department at Moravian College in Bethlehem. This article originally appeared in the Allentown, Pa. daily The Morning Call, and is published in the Baltimore Chronicle with the permission of the author.
Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.This story was published on January 8, 2010.