Local Stories, Events
Ref. : Civic Events
Ref. : Arts & Education Events
Ref. : Public Service Notices
Books, Films, Arts & Education
12.11 This For-Profit College Is Leaving Students With Lots of Debt and No Degrees [It's a Trump University World]
Ref. : Letters to the editor
Health Care & Environment
12.11 The will of the people is to halt climate change, what about politicians? [Excellent!]
12.11 'We live in a lobstocracy': Maine town is feeling the effects of climate change [Do you care?]
12.11 Protesters disrupt pro-fossil fuel event at COP24 – video [Do you care?]
12.11 'It's a sad reality': a troubling trend sees a 97% decline in monarch butterflies [Do you care?]
News Media Matters
US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'
12.12 Trump reportedly flicked a folder and scattered papers in anger after his fiery debate with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer [His obsession for a $6 billion border wall is childish, considering all the better uses for such investment.]
12.12 How the IRS Was Gutted
12.12 The Sanders Institute's Gathering Was About Saving the World, But It Was Not About Bernie Sanders [a more detailed account]
Economics, Crony Capitalism
International & Futurism
12.13 The Honduran Nightmare
12.10 US and Russia ally with Saudi Arabia to water down climate pledge [The Oil Mafias lobby for more insanity]
The US Supreme Court: Vanguard of Friendly American Fascism?
The US Supreme Court has ignominiously promoted economic oppression against the poor, favoring inhuman and soulless corporate entities in a multitude of decisions that benefited their interests instead of what was best for humanity.
The US Supreme Court has finally, without any sign of shame, revealed to everybody its true anti-democracy/pro-corporate colors in their recent ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The granting of unlimited funding of elections to wealthy, highly political corporations, may be the death knell for true democracy. It was a giant step toward totalitarian control over what is already a corrupted electoral process. Pay no attention to the heavily advertised fact that the labor unions will have the same rights. The unions have already been virtually emasculated by corporatism. There is no money any more to compete against the 800-pound gorillas in the funding of political campaigns. Even Republican John McCain joins President Obama in expressing disgust with the Supreme Court ruling.
In what should be a clear rallying cry for massive protests in the streets, the corporate lapdog/cheerleader Chief Justice Roberts and his four fellow right-wingers (who are self-professed “Christians”) on the Court have made another giant stride toward achieving, through legal but unethical means, their corporate puppeteers' goal of what could accurately be described as an “American-style Friendly Fascist” national governing model. These five “friendlies” of the cunning, smiling “Captains of Industry” have been described by any number of democracy-loving observers as exhibiting characteristics of what could be described as having “Christofascist” traits.
The term “christofascism” seems an appropriate label for these five justices because of 1) their obvious belief in a vengeful, punitive god (as opposed to Jesus’ revelation of god as a merciful, compassionate, forgiving and all-loving deity); 2) their anti-democracy leanings; 3) their support of homicidal wars to defend their nation-state against those who have been fingered as enemies by the corporate elite; 4) their trust in totalitarian forms of religion and government; and 5) their far right-wing political and theological ideologies that meet most of the criteria of the definition of fascism (see summary below and also learn more at fascistic.net). Finally, 6) their theologies seem to be in total opposition to the highly ethical, non-punitive, compassionate teachings of the pacifist Jesus Christ.
The US judiciary (and not just Supreme Court justices) has been peopled throughout its history by professed Christians, and has a shameful history of those very "justices" being overt racists, slave-holders, segregationists, Ku Klux Klan supporters, sexists, imperialists, torturers, ruthless militarists, gun-runners and war-profiteers. These were courts that did nothing to overthrow slavery in a timely fashion; nor did it stop the genocide of the Native American population. It consistently allowed the US Congress to break the treaties of the few traumatized and sickened survivors of the Native American genocide. These pro-corporate Supreme Courts typically did whatever was good for business, even if the actions got America into messes that the government then “resolved” by compelling taxpayers to fund bailouts for the criminal companies that were “too big to fail."
The US Supreme Court has ignominiously promoted economic oppression against the poor, favoring inhuman and soulless corporate entities in a multitude of decisions that benefited their interests instead of what was best for humanity. Whatever shadow government makes Supreme Court nominations (usually not the president, with a few exceptions) have usually tried to stack it with anti-democratic pro-Big Business types who would have made the Founding Fathers, pretty pro-business themselves, blush.
There were a few exceptions to the courts' support for tyrants, and once in a while true democracy was upheld. Occasionally there would be a decision that reversed a monopoly or two, or a decision reluctantly giving women the right to vote, or reluctantly freeing the slaves, or reluctantly giving labor the power to negotiate with their Pinkerton thug-defended bosses. But the power to give also implies the power to take away, and the cunning corporate think tanks were always figuring out ways to subvert the court’s decisions—which they have invariably succeeded at doing.
The ideology of the Cheney/Bush-era Supreme Courts should have been obvious to every thinking person nine years ago, with the pre-Roberts court’s infamous anti-democratic 5-4 usurpation of the probably stolen presidential election of 2000.
The anti-democracy, pro-torture, obscenely wealthy and war-profiteering vice president, Dick Cheney, and his figurehead president both meet the criteria that demands that they be indicted as international war criminals for 1) their illegal invasion of Iraq, 2) the subsequent genocide of the Iraqi people and their homeland [90% of Iraqi casualties were unarmed civilians!] and 3) the war for oil in the mid-east. They shredded the US Constitution that they were sworn to uphold. They clearly met the criteria for high treason and should both have been impeached while in office, tried in a court of law and appropriately punished. Following that, they should have been placed on trial at the International Court of Justice for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against the peace, the criteria for which are also met. None of this happened because the judicial branch of this nation is broken.
American Friendly Fascism is a critically important topic, but it is one that is outside the capacity of this single essay to deal with thoroughly. So, for educational purposes, I will end with a number of quotes from various famous fascists of history, preceded by scholar Lawrence Britt’s useful and eye-opening summary about fascism. Any similarity between what went on in other fascist societies and what has been creeping in on us—almost invisibly—in America over several decades, but with a rapid acceleration during the Cheney/Bush years, is not unintentional. It is a call to resistance.
(all regarded as heroes in their police state and corporate-controlled nations)
"Fascism should rightly be called corporatism, as it is a merger of state and corporate power"
Dr. Kohls is a physician who, before his retirement, provided holistic (non-drug) mental health care to his patients. He is also a student of the numerous crazy-making fascist political systems that seem to always be financed by major corporations.
Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.This story was published on February 4, 2010.