Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

08.29 10 Years After Katrina, New Orleans’ All-Charter School System Has Proven a Failure

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

09.01 A Lot of American Catholics Have Never Heard of Pope Francis' Most Important New Message [Why?]

08.31 Nature's last refuge: climate change threatens our most fragile ecosystem

08.31 Citi report: slowing global warming would save tens of trillions of dollars

08.31 Young Hands in Mexico Feed Growing U.S. Demand for Heroin

08.31 Why a Mediterranean diet is good for your brain

08.31 Why a Mediterranean diet is good for your brain

08.31 Eni discovers largest known gas field in Mediterranean [will encourage replacing coal power plants faster]

08.30 When his father had Alzheimer’s, Jonathan Kozol learned how bleak gerontological care can be: “Good god, what happens to people who don’t have the advantages we had?”

08.30 Case proven: ivory trafficking funds terrorism

08.30 5 Ways That Black Women Suffered Due To Katrina

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

09.01 Bernie Sanders’s Surge in Iowa from Attractiveness of His Ideas: Poll [3:42 video]

09.01 The West Point Professor Who Contemplated a Coup

09.01 Republicans are digging themselves a hole over immigration

09.01 Paranoid history of the GOP: How conspiracy theories poisoned the Republican Party

09.01 Walmart Decides to Drop Sale of AR-15 Assault Rifles [sanity happens!]

09.01 Sen. Warren's Criticism Of Joe Biden Complicates Vice President's 2016 Plans

08.31 Two-thirds of Iowa Republicans want a president from outside of government

08.31 “We’re now back to being at least as polarized as ever”: Why the gun control tipping point hasn’t happened yet

08.30 Jeb Bush declares war on American labor: “People should work longer hours”

08.30 Shock poll shows Bernie Sanders nipping at Hillary Clinton’s heels in Iowa

08.30 Evangelicals love Donald Trump: How a thrice-married New York braggart won them over — and why it’s so scary

08.30 Why Bernie Sanders Will Win This Election—Even If He Doesn’t Win the White House

08.30 Sarah Palin showers Donald Trump with adoration in 'interview of the year' [video, have some more Jim Jones' Kool-Aid]

08.29 Donald Trump and the shadow of Europe’s far-right

Justice Matters

09.01 Murder Rates Rising Sharply in Many U.S. Cities

08.29 Phone hacking: CPS may bring corporate charges against Murdoch publisher

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

08.31 Rise of the imperial plutocracy: New research is exposing the stunning domination of global super-elites

08.30 CalPERS’ Private Equity, Exposed: Executive Summary

International

09.01 Dark Germany, Bright Germany: Which Side Will Prevail Under Strain of Refugees? [Atheists more welcome]

09.01 Dark Germany, Bright Germany: Which Side Will Prevail Under Strain of Refugees?

09.01 What the Arrest of Two Journalists Tells Us About Turkey—and Vice

09.01 Republicans are digging themselves a hole over immigration

09.01 How Christchurch used the earthquake to return the city to its cycling roots

09.01 Mr. Erdogan’s War Against the Kurds

08.31 Migrant crisis: Merkel warns of EU 'failure' [2:36 video explains every country has a different migrant strategy]

08.31 Inside the Most Expensive Nuclear Bomb Ever Made [that's scarily more plausible to actually use...]

08.30 Canada government suspends scientist for folk song about prime minister [5:47 video]

08.29 Europe [and America] shouldn’t worry about migrants. It should worry about creeping fascism

08.29 Paris prepares to rid its streets of cars for one day

08.29 A manifesto for conscious cities: should streets be sensitive to our mental needs?

08.29 'Nazi gold train': deathbed confession may have revealed location

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Print view: Why We Can't Trust the WSJ's ''Opinion'' Section
MEDIA CRITICISM:

Why We Can't Trust the WSJ's "Opinion" Section

The Wall Street Journal's failure to edit Karl Rove's misleading column on taxes is a case in point.

by Alice Cherbonnier
Sunday, 5 December 2010
Does the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics' first principle, that "deliberate distortion is never permissible," apply to writers, but not editors?

Where can the public turn today for accurate reporting? It used to be said that the Wall Street Journal's news reporting was impeccable because the power elite who read it would never forgive it for providing false information. Even those not among that exalted universe also once counted on the WSJ, especially during the pre-Murdoch era. This is not to say that the WSJ's editorial and opinion pages were similarly stellar back then, but since it was understood the paper had a certain viewpoint (pro-business, anti-tax, laissez-faire), one expected the articles on those pages to contain cherry-picked facts; after all, that's what such sections are for. At the least, though, one could believe the facts themselves—however they may have been twisted or misinterpreted to make a point—were solid, not squishy.

The Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists lays out a journalist's responsibilities. Among them: " Deliberate distortion is never permissible." Admittedly this Code of Ethics is voluntary, as there is no licensing or policing of journalists or columnists, nor is there any requirement for a particular sort of education or experience. Journalists must police themselves, and the public's job is to slam them when they don't.

Consider this column as such a slam, then. Let us take as a case in point the column by Karl Rove called "Nancy Pelosi's Unwelcome Christmas Gift," published on page A17 of the WSJ's opinion section on Thurs., Dec. 2. We've come to expect Karl Rove's writings to be unsatisfactory, but this one breaks new ground for disingenuousness. What were the WSJ's editors thinking when they published this? Did they even read it before they sent it out to millions of readers? Someone did: there's a "teaser" highlighting one of Rove's absurd assertions: "A couple earning $80,000 could lose hundreds per month if the Bush tax rates aren't extended."

Rove's beef is that Nancy Pelosi is insisting that the Obama tax cuts for those who earn under $250,000 a year should stay in place, but wants to see a rate hike on the portion of a taxpayer's taxable income that exceeds that amount. Rove leaves out the italicized information. He darkly warns us that "Congress could go home [for the holidays] without stopping the largest tax increase in the nation's history." Say what? The "increase" would be for only the top bracket, and it still would come nowhere near the top rate paid earlier in our history (up to 91%; now it's only 35%).

Rove fails to include essential facts needed to understand the U.S. Tax Code (contrary to the SPJ Code of Ethics: "[Journalists] should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.") He omits the fact that every single taxpayer pays the same tax rate at every step in the Tax Code. The Tax Rate Tables at the end of the link show clearly that every other taxpayer—including Rupert Murdoch, George Soros and Karl Rove—is subject to a mere 10% tax on the first $8,350 of taxable income (if filing as a single person). We're all subject to the same rates every step of the way. We all benefited from the Obama tax cuts, and under the Pelosi plan we will all retain all of them, except for the taxable income over the highest income threshhold.

Rove also omits mention of a huge tax benefit given to all taxpayers, but which disproportionately benefits the wealthy: capital gains income is subject to a piddling 15% tax rate.

Where were the WSJ editors in all this? Surely they have access to telephones, e-mail and fax machines so that they can query Rove and other op-ed contributors about their omissions, misstatements and flat-out lies. Or are these editors (Paul A. Gigot is the WSJ editorial page editor and Daniel Henninger is deputy editor) following the trend of their peers at other U.S. newspapers—of publishing op-ed submissions and syndicated material without providing any editorial input? The reader is then left to figure out whether the information is worthy, because the editors have abdicated their responsibility. Does the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics' first principle, that "deliberate distortion is never permissible," apply to writers, but not editors?

Look at what happens when the gate-keepers and vetters of information—editors—fail to edit: opinion pieces that should never have been published are circulated world-wide, and quoted by others as if they're fact.

Rove's "Christmas Gift" column got 564 comments (as of Dec. 3) on the WSJ website, but no one can post a comment unless he or she is a WSJ subscriber. Readers of the web version of Rove's column may wade through these comments, and in so doing they may be able to ferret out the full facts from among some wild assertions—tamed somewhat by the WSJ's laudable requirement that those posting comments must use their real names.

But what about the rest of the public? Why, they get served Rove's disingenuous tripe for breakfast on the cable and radio talk shows--with much hype and derision and incivility thrown in for entertainment value.

Anyone who wonders why this country appears to be an intellectual and brutal wasteland needs to trace the "supply chain" of information to the source: the editors at the Wall Street Journal and other "mainstream" media.


Alice Cherbonnier is the Managing Editor of the Baltimore Chronicle.



Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on December 5, 2010.
 


Public Service Ads: