Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

08.15 RIDE FOR THE OVERRIDE

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

09.24 Talking with Strangers: A Journey to the Heart of the Right

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

09.24 How to reduce the risks of carmageddon

09.24 Existing coal, oil and gas fields will blow carbon budget – study

09.24 Dutch parliament votes to close down country's coal industry

09.24 Trump to Fossil Fuel Execs: 'You Will Like Me So Much'

09.24 Earth Could Reach Critical Climate Threshold in Decade, Scientists Warn [we'll all die if denial idiocracy prevails]

09.23 Soil carbon storage not the climate change fix it was thought, research finds

09.23 The New, New Climate Math: 17 Years to Get Off Fossil Fuels, Or Else

09.23 Tribes Across North America Unite in 'Wall of Opposition' to Alberta Tar Sands

09.23 Air Pollution Is Linked to a Diabetes Marker

09.23 Ratifiying the Paris agreement will be a major step but must be the first of many

09.23 Farming on the edge: the Indian salt producers coping with 48C heat

09.23 100 countries push to phase out potentially disastrous greenhouse gas

09.23 Burger King and KFC called out for lagging behind on antibiotic-free meat

09.21 Drugmaker raises price of acne cream to $10,000 a tube [Only in America, land of opportunity...]

09.21 The devastating insulin scandal big pharma is hiding from you [Only in America, land of opportunity...]

09.21 375 top scientists warn of 'real, serious, immediate' climate threat

09.21 UN agrees to fight 'the biggest threat to modern medicine': antibiotic resistance

News Media Matters

09.22 What Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton aren’t talking about: Policy discussion is missing from the campaign

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

09.24 Channeling Sanders, Clinton Proposes Whopping Billionaire Estate Tax [worldwide normalization of taxes—with full visibility of income and wealth for fairest taxation—must be achieved. Automation is capable of eliminating 45% of jobs NOW, and it will happen rapidly to realize profits.]

09.24 Thousands of Verizon customers are battling data over-limit fees: Money Matters

09.24 HILLARY CLINTON: DEAD-ON COMIC, DULL POLITICIAN

09.22 IACP developed a 10 question survey on pressing criminal justice issues for the 2016 U.S. presidential nominees

09.22 Lies and Lapses on the US Campaign Trail

09.22 Mike Pence, a heartbeat away from the presidency? Now that’s frightening

09.22 Bernie Sanders: The ‘Nation’ Interview

09.22 Whom Should We Blame for Our Deranged Democracy?

09.22 Make the Public Health Insurance Option Central to the 2016 Campaign

09.22 Trump's Giant Conflict of Interest Just Got Bigger

09.22 Meet the Horde of Neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and Other Extremist Leaders Endorsing Donald Trump

09.22 Clinton hasn't won over millennials. And no, sexism isn't to blame

09.22 The Trump Foundation: what's known is shocking. We need to know more

09.21 Campaign Was Not Radical, Says Sanders, Just 'What Most Americans' Want

09.21 Top Six US Problems worse than Terrorism

09.21 Millennials Arrested at Paul Ryan's Office Denouncing GOP's Politics of Hate

09.21 Calling Syrian refugees like me Skittles would be funny if it weren't so cruel

09.21 Trump's plan to seize Iraq's oil: 'It's not stealing, we're reimbursing ourselves' [giggle giggle]

Justice Matters

09.21 SEC Probe Called Possible 'Moment of Reckoning' for Exxon's Climate Crimes

09.21 Warren Skewers Wells Fargo CEO for Greed and 'Gutless Leadership' [8:57 C-Span video]

High Crimes?

09.22 Stopping the War on Children

09.21 Russian planes dropped bombs that destroyed UN aid convoy, US officials say

Economics, Crony Capitalism

09.23 Carney backs green finance to cut emissions and boost growth

09.23 Helicopter money is back in the air

09.23 Wells Fargo's toxic culture reveals big banks' eight deadly sins

09.21 The Coming European Debt Wars

09.21 TTIP 2.0? New Leak Exposes Threats of Lesser-Known TISA Trade Deal

International

09.24 Syria bombings leave 1.75 million without running water in Aleppo [videos]

09.24 Larry Sanders, Bernie's Brother, to Fight for David Cameron's MP Seat

09.24 THE COMING CRISIS IN MOSUL

09.23 Eugene V. Debs and the Urgent Need for a New Anti-War Movement

09.23 A Single Migration From Africa Populated the World, Studies Find [we're all distant cousins]

09.23 Obama Puts Syria at Arm’s Length as Carnage Drags On

09.23 The Best News You Don’t Know

09.22 "Indifferent to Yemen's Misery," Senate Approves Massive Saudi Arms Deal [Cardin and Mikulski voted “Yea”]

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Print view: Why We Can't Trust the WSJ's ''Opinion'' Section
MEDIA CRITICISM:

Why We Can't Trust the WSJ's "Opinion" Section

The Wall Street Journal's failure to edit Karl Rove's misleading column on taxes is a case in point.

by Alice Cherbonnier
Sunday, 5 December 2010
Does the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics' first principle, that "deliberate distortion is never permissible," apply to writers, but not editors?

Where can the public turn today for accurate reporting? It used to be said that the Wall Street Journal's news reporting was impeccable because the power elite who read it would never forgive it for providing false information. Even those not among that exalted universe also once counted on the WSJ, especially during the pre-Murdoch era. This is not to say that the WSJ's editorial and opinion pages were similarly stellar back then, but since it was understood the paper had a certain viewpoint (pro-business, anti-tax, laissez-faire), one expected the articles on those pages to contain cherry-picked facts; after all, that's what such sections are for. At the least, though, one could believe the facts themselves—however they may have been twisted or misinterpreted to make a point—were solid, not squishy.

The Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists lays out a journalist's responsibilities. Among them: " Deliberate distortion is never permissible." Admittedly this Code of Ethics is voluntary, as there is no licensing or policing of journalists or columnists, nor is there any requirement for a particular sort of education or experience. Journalists must police themselves, and the public's job is to slam them when they don't.

Consider this column as such a slam, then. Let us take as a case in point the column by Karl Rove called "Nancy Pelosi's Unwelcome Christmas Gift," published on page A17 of the WSJ's opinion section on Thurs., Dec. 2. We've come to expect Karl Rove's writings to be unsatisfactory, but this one breaks new ground for disingenuousness. What were the WSJ's editors thinking when they published this? Did they even read it before they sent it out to millions of readers? Someone did: there's a "teaser" highlighting one of Rove's absurd assertions: "A couple earning $80,000 could lose hundreds per month if the Bush tax rates aren't extended."

Rove's beef is that Nancy Pelosi is insisting that the Obama tax cuts for those who earn under $250,000 a year should stay in place, but wants to see a rate hike on the portion of a taxpayer's taxable income that exceeds that amount. Rove leaves out the italicized information. He darkly warns us that "Congress could go home [for the holidays] without stopping the largest tax increase in the nation's history." Say what? The "increase" would be for only the top bracket, and it still would come nowhere near the top rate paid earlier in our history (up to 91%; now it's only 35%).

Rove fails to include essential facts needed to understand the U.S. Tax Code (contrary to the SPJ Code of Ethics: "[Journalists] should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.") He omits the fact that every single taxpayer pays the same tax rate at every step in the Tax Code. The Tax Rate Tables at the end of the link show clearly that every other taxpayer—including Rupert Murdoch, George Soros and Karl Rove—is subject to a mere 10% tax on the first $8,350 of taxable income (if filing as a single person). We're all subject to the same rates every step of the way. We all benefited from the Obama tax cuts, and under the Pelosi plan we will all retain all of them, except for the taxable income over the highest income threshhold.

Rove also omits mention of a huge tax benefit given to all taxpayers, but which disproportionately benefits the wealthy: capital gains income is subject to a piddling 15% tax rate.

Where were the WSJ editors in all this? Surely they have access to telephones, e-mail and fax machines so that they can query Rove and other op-ed contributors about their omissions, misstatements and flat-out lies. Or are these editors (Paul A. Gigot is the WSJ editorial page editor and Daniel Henninger is deputy editor) following the trend of their peers at other U.S. newspapers—of publishing op-ed submissions and syndicated material without providing any editorial input? The reader is then left to figure out whether the information is worthy, because the editors have abdicated their responsibility. Does the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics' first principle, that "deliberate distortion is never permissible," apply to writers, but not editors?

Look at what happens when the gate-keepers and vetters of information—editors—fail to edit: opinion pieces that should never have been published are circulated world-wide, and quoted by others as if they're fact.

Rove's "Christmas Gift" column got 564 comments (as of Dec. 3) on the WSJ website, but no one can post a comment unless he or she is a WSJ subscriber. Readers of the web version of Rove's column may wade through these comments, and in so doing they may be able to ferret out the full facts from among some wild assertions—tamed somewhat by the WSJ's laudable requirement that those posting comments must use their real names.

But what about the rest of the public? Why, they get served Rove's disingenuous tripe for breakfast on the cable and radio talk shows--with much hype and derision and incivility thrown in for entertainment value.

Anyone who wonders why this country appears to be an intellectual and brutal wasteland needs to trace the "supply chain" of information to the source: the editors at the Wall Street Journal and other "mainstream" media.


Alice Cherbonnier is the Managing Editor of the Baltimore Chronicle.



Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on December 5, 2010.
 

Public Service Ads: