Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

08.03 Obama's clean power plan hailed as strongest ever climate action by US

08.03 Solar Desalination Could be a Game Changer for California Farms

08.02 ‘I drank the water and ate the fish. We all did. The acid has damaged me permanently’

08.01 Obamacare is (still) working: California puts the lie to right-wing horror stories

07.31 Climate models are even more accurate than you thought

07.31 Bernie Sanders: We Need Medicare for All, Not Cutbacks That Will Kill Our Seniors [Total spending can be cut 30-40% while increasing both quality and coverage]

07.31 Warren Buffett’s Family Secretly Funded a Birth Control Revolution [Thank you, Warren and Susan]

07.31 Obama will use veto to defend climate change plan if necessary

07.31 Hillary Clinton's climate change plan 'just plain silly', says leading expert

07.31 World Bank rejects energy industry notion that coal can cure poverty

News Media

08.01 Fox News’ biggest deception: Definitive proof that Bill O’Reilly doesn’t care about the preservation of life

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

08.03 Planned Parenthood: Rand Paul resists call for shutdown in defunding fight

08.03 Accident waiting to happen: the Ohio village that's built on a crumbling dam

08.03 Donald Trump backlash intensifies within GOP ahead of first 2016 debate

08.03 We’re Making Life Too Hard for Millennials [graphs]

08.02 All eyes on Trump as Republican debate nears, but Fox will be the real winner

08.02 Sorry, Hillary Clinton fans: her email errors are definitely newsworthy

08.02 Our Sex-Crazed Congress

08.01 Clinton and Bush take competing views on race inequality to Florida conference

08.01 Yes, I said it: Donald Trump supporters are living in a childlike fantasy land

08.01 The Koch Brothers’ twisted beauty pageant: The disturbing way they’re choosing which GOP candidate to buy

08.01 Secrets of the extreme religious right: Inside the frightening world of Christian Reconstructionism [Whatever furthers a Master-Slave Economy & Culture is just fine for them—including women without choices]

Justice Matters

08.03 Doctor becomes second American named in African lion-killing investigation: Pittsburgh gynecologist who has posed with dead elephants, hippos, zebras and ostriches 'killed lion in illegal hunt'

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

07.31 The Greek Coup: Liquidity as a Weapon of Coercion

07.31 IMF will refuse to join Greek bailout until debt relief demands are met

07.30 Lies, Damned Lies, and Greek Statistics

International

08.03 The Voyage of the Golden Rule

08.03 Erdogan's Cynical Game: Is Turkey Creeping Toward Civil War?

08.03 Inside the complicated world of online wildlife trafficking

08.02 Do Chinese People Lead More Nuanced Emotional Lives?

08.02 Yes, Racism Is Rooted in Economic Inequality

08.02 A new way to fight modern day slavery

08.02 A new way to fight modern day slavery

08.02 Global population set to hit 9.7 billion people by 2050 despite fall in fertility

08.02 Africa wealth report 2015: rich get richer even as poverty and inequality deepen

08.02 People smuggling: how it works, who benefits and how it can be stopped

08.02 The truth about the people and numbers in loud and furious migration debate [Aren't wars a stationary alternative to migration? To fix dysfunctional, corrupt governments without delay, we need to promote outsourcing of government functions to accountable (non-profit?) professional organizations w/ suite of best computer applications.]

08.02 Church attacks David Cameron’s lack of compassion over asylum crisis [1:04 video]

08.02 How to Live Wisely

08.01 Ascendant Kurds emerge from Syrian civil war as major power player

08.01 Canada's Liberals face bleak future – is it too late for Justin Trudeau to save them?

08.01 Obama's call to end female genital mutilation yet to reach Ethiopia's villages

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Print view: Why We Can't Trust the WSJ's ''Opinion'' Section
MEDIA CRITICISM:

Why We Can't Trust the WSJ's "Opinion" Section

The Wall Street Journal's failure to edit Karl Rove's misleading column on taxes is a case in point.

by Alice Cherbonnier
Sunday, 5 December 2010
Does the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics' first principle, that "deliberate distortion is never permissible," apply to writers, but not editors?

Where can the public turn today for accurate reporting? It used to be said that the Wall Street Journal's news reporting was impeccable because the power elite who read it would never forgive it for providing false information. Even those not among that exalted universe also once counted on the WSJ, especially during the pre-Murdoch era. This is not to say that the WSJ's editorial and opinion pages were similarly stellar back then, but since it was understood the paper had a certain viewpoint (pro-business, anti-tax, laissez-faire), one expected the articles on those pages to contain cherry-picked facts; after all, that's what such sections are for. At the least, though, one could believe the facts themselves—however they may have been twisted or misinterpreted to make a point—were solid, not squishy.

The Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists lays out a journalist's responsibilities. Among them: " Deliberate distortion is never permissible." Admittedly this Code of Ethics is voluntary, as there is no licensing or policing of journalists or columnists, nor is there any requirement for a particular sort of education or experience. Journalists must police themselves, and the public's job is to slam them when they don't.

Consider this column as such a slam, then. Let us take as a case in point the column by Karl Rove called "Nancy Pelosi's Unwelcome Christmas Gift," published on page A17 of the WSJ's opinion section on Thurs., Dec. 2. We've come to expect Karl Rove's writings to be unsatisfactory, but this one breaks new ground for disingenuousness. What were the WSJ's editors thinking when they published this? Did they even read it before they sent it out to millions of readers? Someone did: there's a "teaser" highlighting one of Rove's absurd assertions: "A couple earning $80,000 could lose hundreds per month if the Bush tax rates aren't extended."

Rove's beef is that Nancy Pelosi is insisting that the Obama tax cuts for those who earn under $250,000 a year should stay in place, but wants to see a rate hike on the portion of a taxpayer's taxable income that exceeds that amount. Rove leaves out the italicized information. He darkly warns us that "Congress could go home [for the holidays] without stopping the largest tax increase in the nation's history." Say what? The "increase" would be for only the top bracket, and it still would come nowhere near the top rate paid earlier in our history (up to 91%; now it's only 35%).

Rove fails to include essential facts needed to understand the U.S. Tax Code (contrary to the SPJ Code of Ethics: "[Journalists] should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.") He omits the fact that every single taxpayer pays the same tax rate at every step in the Tax Code. The Tax Rate Tables at the end of the link show clearly that every other taxpayer—including Rupert Murdoch, George Soros and Karl Rove—is subject to a mere 10% tax on the first $8,350 of taxable income (if filing as a single person). We're all subject to the same rates every step of the way. We all benefited from the Obama tax cuts, and under the Pelosi plan we will all retain all of them, except for the taxable income over the highest income threshhold.

Rove also omits mention of a huge tax benefit given to all taxpayers, but which disproportionately benefits the wealthy: capital gains income is subject to a piddling 15% tax rate.

Where were the WSJ editors in all this? Surely they have access to telephones, e-mail and fax machines so that they can query Rove and other op-ed contributors about their omissions, misstatements and flat-out lies. Or are these editors (Paul A. Gigot is the WSJ editorial page editor and Daniel Henninger is deputy editor) following the trend of their peers at other U.S. newspapers—of publishing op-ed submissions and syndicated material without providing any editorial input? The reader is then left to figure out whether the information is worthy, because the editors have abdicated their responsibility. Does the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics' first principle, that "deliberate distortion is never permissible," apply to writers, but not editors?

Look at what happens when the gate-keepers and vetters of information—editors—fail to edit: opinion pieces that should never have been published are circulated world-wide, and quoted by others as if they're fact.

Rove's "Christmas Gift" column got 564 comments (as of Dec. 3) on the WSJ website, but no one can post a comment unless he or she is a WSJ subscriber. Readers of the web version of Rove's column may wade through these comments, and in so doing they may be able to ferret out the full facts from among some wild assertions—tamed somewhat by the WSJ's laudable requirement that those posting comments must use their real names.

But what about the rest of the public? Why, they get served Rove's disingenuous tripe for breakfast on the cable and radio talk shows--with much hype and derision and incivility thrown in for entertainment value.

Anyone who wonders why this country appears to be an intellectual and brutal wasteland needs to trace the "supply chain" of information to the source: the editors at the Wall Street Journal and other "mainstream" media.


Alice Cherbonnier is the Managing Editor of the Baltimore Chronicle.



Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on December 5, 2010.
 


Public Service Ads: