Newspaper logo  
   MD Legislators Consider Stealth Anti-Small Business Taxes


MD Legislators Consider Stealth Anti-Small Business Taxes

The State of Maryland, like all states right now, is in a tight budget squeeze, so our legislators are considering every possible way to increase the revenue stream. This week in Annapolis, matters are coming to a head in a most alarming way-but, thanks to all the war coverage blitzing most other news reporting, the public has little or no knowledge of what lies in store.

Their ideas are so idiotic, you could almost conclude they're counting on our ignorance.

Small businesses-and by that, we mean real small businesses, like so many in Baltimore: those with no more than about 20 employees-will be hosed if the following two measures pass.

IDIOTIC IDEA #1: Our running-scared stalwarts in Annapolis are considering scrapping the Personal Property Tax structure (a ridiculous system in itself, but that's another story) in favor of a flat $400 annual tax-no matter how small a business might be, and no matter how few assets it possesses. This outrageous maneuver would disproportionately place the tax burden on those least able to pay, and would allow those with lots of personal property assets to enjoy a reduction in what they're paying now.

The personal property tax itself is an extraordinary burden for all businesses. Why should businesses be forced to pay any fee or tax at all on its equipment and furnishings? John Q. Public isn't paying any personal property tax on his big-screen TV or his Ford Expedition SUV. Mary R. Highhorse isn't paying any personal property tax on her three-carat diamond ring. Why should businesses be forced to ante up taxes year after year for the 'privilege' of possessing trash cans and file cabinets and copiers and computers?

The only plus side to the flat $400 personal property tax proposal is that it appears not to be tied to a subdivision's real property tax rate, as the old method is.

Maryland's personal property tax should be reconsidered, all right. It should be eliminated altogether. Maryland should be striving to be more attractive to businesses considering locating here, or remaining here.

IDIOTIC IDEA #2: Our revenue-lusty legislators are considering increasing the annual corporate filing fee from $100 to $250-a whopping 250% increase. Again, this will adversely impact the smallest businesses the most, as $250 represents a substantial overhead cost for a corporation with, say, $100,000 in annual gross revenue, while $250 would be a mere nuisance expense for a corporation with a gross revenue of $1 million a year. A phased-in fee structure would be much more equitable-such as staying with $100 for businesses with 20 or fewer employees, and going to $150 for businesses with 21-40 employees, $200 for those with 41-60, and so on. Better still, base the fee as a percentage of gross corporate annual revenue.

Considering the lack of careful thought evidenced in the two measures discussed here, we can probably count on some dreadful surprises come tax time next year.

That is, unless we act now to keep ill-advised laws from being passed.

Get started now by e-mailing these legislators:,,,,,,,,,,,,

Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on March 28, 2003.
APRIL 2003
4.28Local Activists March to DC
4.19 The City's Neighborhoods Have Become the Poor Stepchildren
4.5 The State of Giving in Maryland 2002
4.5 No Sports Story This Time, and Here’s Why
4.4 City to Celebrate 175th Anniversary of Railroading
4.4 Letters
4.4Open Letter to U.S. District Court Judge J. Frederick Motz
3.21Open Letter to The Sun
3.19An Open Letter to Americans from a Concerned German
4.5New Book Sniffs Out Best Places to Walk Your Dog in Baltimore Region
4.4Fear, Danger, and Bravery: A Young Fighter-Pilot's Memoir of the Vietnam Experience
4.14Who's Paying for those Embedded Journalists?
4.4Major Broadcasting Company Sponsors ‘Patriotic Rallies’
4.4Fla. Court Rules It’s Legal for Press to Lie
4.10EDITORIAL: Nuremburg Principles for Others--But Not for Us?
4.29Investigative Journalist Robert Dreyfuss To Assess Risks to Activists during this Anti-Terror Age
4.11Softly, Softly: War in Black, White, and Grey
4.10On Getting Inspired (and Snubbed) by Ralph Nader
4.9Q & A with Greg Palast
4.5Words from an Iraqi Just Before the Attack
4.5The Weapons of Greatness
4.5The War President Is Waging a Multi-Faceted Battle on the Domestic Front
4.5Lessons in Foreign Policy from the Islands of Hawaii
4.5Breaking Iraqi Windows Won’t Help the Economy
4.4A Season of Protests
4.4Rumsfeld Should Resign For the Good of Our Democracy
4.4Rep. Conyers Says the US Needs a Regime Change
4.4Phony conservatives wage war on the real ones
3.19Progressive and Neo-Conservative Journalists Face Off on Iraq
4.8 Bush's Medicare proposal forces seniors to switch to private health insurance for a meaningful drug benefit
4.5 Offshore Activities Gave ‘Lifeblood’ to Enron
4.4 Charge It: The Growing Trend of Paying Taxes with Credit Cards
4.4 Black Flags
4.4 Survey Declares Two-Thirds of US Pension Plans ‘Underfunded’
4.4 After Iraq, What? Can the US Occupy and Police the Whole World?
4.4 Boycott the French?
3.13 The Administration Plays "Russian Roulette" With Our Economy
  SCREED brings you news the mainstream media ‘ignores’
  Websites We Like!
  Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: