Newspaper logo  
 
 
   EDITORIAL: Sorry, You Fed Employees

EDITORIAL:

Sorry, You Fed Employees

ON THE FRIDAY AFTER THANKSGIVING, with Congress in recess, the White House sent a letter to congressional leaders saying that civilian federal employees living in high cost-of-living areas who were due for substantial wage increases to bring them more in line with prevailing wages would not be receiving those raises after all. George W. Bush explained, “Such cost increases would threaten our efforts against terrorism or force deep cuts in discretionary spending or federal employment to stay within budget.”

There’s that word again: “TERRORISM.” It’s becoming a blanket excuse for doing any old thing George W. Bush wants to do as he goes about dismantling our government.

Well, we feel some terror, too—the terror of the middle class that doesn’t see raises coming and wonders if there’s even going to be a job this time next year. The terror that too few good new jobs are being created for a broad sector of our population. The terror of going without health insurance because our government will not act on this problem. The terror that our food supply is tainted and there’s not enough money in the government’s budget to pay for qualified inspectors. The terror that rank-and-file federal employees, whose job security makes them relatively immune to political games and therefore less likely to cut corners, might be replaced by “contract employees” whose allegiance to public service would be secondary to making sure their bosses make a handsome profit at the public’s expense.

The federal employees will be receiving their anticipated across-the-board 3.1 percent pay raise. But our bet is this increase (actually only 1 percent, due to the 2.1 percent inflation rate) will be more than paid for by the “savings” that will be effectuated by federal employee layoffs in the Homeland Security Department.


Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on December 4, 2002.
  
DECEMBER 2002
LOCAL NEWS
·NEWS BRIEFS
·CALENDARS:
· Colleges & Kids Seek Ways to Bring Peace on Earth
· City Council Holds Hearing on Anti-War Resolution
· Forum at City Hall Allows Airing of Views on War vs. Iraq
· Status of Benefits District Goes to Circuit Court
· Costly Play: Ravens Stadium
· Economists Say City Faces ‘Employment Mismatch’
· SPORTS: Championship Basketball Returns to Maryland
· Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against War with Iraq
LETTERS
·LETTERS
· OPEN LETTER: Say It Ain’t So, Nancy
· Open letter denouncing Trent Lott
·OPEN LETTER:‘The U.S. Is Not America’
· OPEN LETTER: A Palestinian Father’s Grief
ART & ENTERTAINMENT
·Nicole Bailey-Williams Writes to Make You Think
·A Fresh Perspective on Carson McCullers
·See “The Trials of Henry Kissinger” While You Can
· Impertinent Remarks from H.L. Mencken
NEWS MEDIA CRITIQUE
·The Curse of a Monopolized Press
·Where’s ‘Democracy Now’?
·Here’s The Missing Part of the Gore Transcript from Barbara Walters’ “20/20”
SPEAKING OUT
·EDITORIALS:
·Be Careful What You Wish For
·Three-Strikes Law: Only the Poor Need Apply
·What the Democrats Need to Accept
·PERSPECTIVE: ‘May You Live in Exciting Times’
·Putting the 'Great' into a 'Great Nation'
·Phil Berrigan's Final Warning, "The Times are Ominous!"
NATION & WORLD
· Nicaraguan Lawyer Fights for Rights of Indigenous Peoples
· The Elections and the War
· National Economic Trends
· Nagging Questions About Iraq
· BAD MEAT: The Scandal of Our Food Safety System
· How a Progressive Approach Could Improve the Economy
· In The News...
FROM OTHER SITES
· Websites We Like!
· Outstanding Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: