Newspaper logo  
   Scientists Dispute Pentagon Claims about DU


Scientists Dispute Pentagon Claims about DU

by Stephen Kent

“The Pentagon is reluctant to discuss its own laboratory studies linking DU to cancer.”
WASHINGTON, DC—A widely reprinted May 6 Associated Press wire story quoted Lt. Col. Michael Sigmon and Command Sgt. Major Kenneth O. Preston of the US Army’s V Corps saying that armor-piercing depleted uranium shells used in the 1991 Gulf War and this year in Iraq pose no health threat, and that children playing with expended DU tank shells would have to eat and then “practically suffocate on DU residue” before any health problems occurred.

But a growing number of scientists and experts are repudiating such reassurances as false. UN and other studies identify DU as a toxic hazard which can attack the kidneys and cause lung cancer if inhaled or ingested, and which risks contaminating the water supply if left unremediated.

Implying children ingesting DU contaminated soil are not at risk contradicts the UK Royal Society, the World Health Organization, and other scientific bodies who have flagged particular risk to children.

“Children playing with soil may be identified as the critical population group,” reported the peer-reviewed Journal of Environmental Radioactivity in February 2003 “with inhalation and or ingestion of contaminated soil as the critical pathway.”

Because depleted uranium is highly pyrophoric, 30-70% of the total material is converted to tiny particles when it hits a hard target, such as a tank. These particles can enter the body through breaks in skin and be inhaled or ingested by touching or disturbing contaminated equipment, drinking contaminated milk or water, or, in the case of children, playing in soil. Once internalized, the particles can cause cell damage.

Moreover, the Department of Defense’s own studies, including studies by the Armed Forces Radiobiology Institute, point to significant potential problems from DU exposure. Studies show internal DU exposure causes DNA damage, transforms cells to a precancerous phase and causes cancer in the muscles of rats.

“The Pentagon is reluctant to discuss its own laboratory studies linking DU to cancer,” says Dan Fahey, an independent researcher and veterans’ advocate. “Pentagon spokespeople have falsely claimed there are no tumors among vets in the government’s study, but a friend of mine who was wounded by DU fragments in ’91 had a bone tumor removed in 1999. Pentagon spokesmen also claimed there have been no cancers among vets in its study until we uncovered information proving one vet had lymphoma. Now they selectively deny certain cancers without presenting the whole picture.”

Army personnel quoted in the May 6 AP story also asserted that penetrating gamma radiation from DU is extremely low, and that DU emits 40% less radiation overall than uranium in its natural state.

“The US military is fond of saying that depleted uranium is less radioactive than naturally occuring uranium,” writes Dr. Helen Caldicott, author of The New Nuclear Danger. “[But] comparing DU with natural uranium is like comparing apples and oranges. It is simply not relevant.”

DU is not natural, but a man-made by-product of uranium enrichment sometimes contaminated with dangerous isotopes and fission products and especially rich in uranium 238, chemically toxic as well as radioactive.

It is true that U-238 has half the radioactivity of natural uranium, but, unlike diluted uranium ore, it is 100% pure uranium, dangerous when ingested or inhaled. Dr. Caldicott reports that external gamma radiation from DU shells can be as high as 200 milirads per hour, more than the yearly dose received from background radiation.

“Army medical regulations require testing in cases of known or suspected exposure, but those rules are simply being flouted,” said Charles Sheehan-Miles, director of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute. “It’s urgent that the Pentagon stops ducking this issue, and starts monitoring and cleaning-up now. It must heed the call of the Royal Society to reveal where and how much DU was used in Iraq. Fragments of DU penetrators and contaminated vehicles should be immediately identified, cordoned off, and removed to prevent the exposure of children and other civilians. We need immediate medical monitoring and follow-up of exposed populations and independent epidemiological studies, and environmental monitoring of water and milk in affected areas.”

For more information on depleted uranium, please call Stephen Kent, Kent Communications, at 845-758-0097.

Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on June 4, 2003.
7.23Rep. Cardin to Travel to Guantanamo Bay to Review Status of Terror Suspects
7.14Woodberry Woods Gains Second National Recognition
7.13Credit Union to Participate in the Federal Home Loan Bank First Time Homebuyers Program
7.13 New Phase of Gwynns Falls Trail Opens
7.13Presbyterians Name New Leader
7.13Hampden Showcases Youth Media
7.12Community Activists Find Their Efforts Trumped by Developers Aided by City Government
7.12Garden Center Blooming in Hampden
6.10MTA Rate Increases Go In Effect June 30
6.10Liquor: The Other Drug
6.4City Council Unanimously Condemns ‘Patriot Act’
7.12Letters to the Editor
Open Letters:
6.4To Baltimore City Comptroller Pratt
7.12Travel: Sicily, Crossroads of Invaders
7.12What happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?
7.12Bottom Floor Concert Series Moves to Patterson Arts Center
7.12Anonymous Words of Wisdom
7.12Books: Sports Figures and Race: Overcoming Obstacles
7.12Book: Author Takes the High Road in JFK Bio
7.24NYT Flaks for Government by Omitting Three Critical Words
7.15France Bashers Ignorant of American History
7.12Hugo Chavez Is Crazy!
7.12Poll Finds Major Polls Distort Results by How They Frame Questions
7.12Human Rights Watch Calls on Saudi Government to Make Real Reforms Instead of Mounting a Media Image Campaign
7.25"Winning the War on Credibility"
7.22Even with Weapons, Hussein Was No Threat
7.16Is Fraud a High Crime or Misdemeanor?
7.14Lawlessness in Iraq and the Failure of Unilateralism
7.12To an American Friend
7.14Local Bar Abruptly Cancels Palestinian Aid Concert
7.14Charm City's Revolution Zone
7.14Baltimore Hosts ‘Peace Palace for Collective Meditation’
7.12Powell Denies Intelligence Failure In Buildup To War, But Evidence Doesn’t Hold Up
7.12It’s Not That College Students Are Stupid; They’re Willfully Ignorant
7.12Conservative Conundrum
7.12Nader Blasts Plutocrats, Bush & Iraq War: Calls for ‘Congress Watch Locals’
7.12Religious and Advocacy Organizations Establish ‘Global Benchmarks’ for Corporations Worldwide
7.2Of Mice and (Con) Men
6.22The 'Crime' of Exercising Free Speech at Baltimore's Inner Harbor
7.31Greens to Run Presidential Candidate in 2004, But Who?
7.23Daniel Pipes nomination stalled in committee
7.23Congress Takes Aim At USA PATRIOT Act
7.14Bush's Wasted Trip to Africa
7.12“The Matrix,” a French Philosopher, and the Events of September 11
7.13The Bi-national State: The Wolf Shall Dwell With The Lamb
7.12Ballot-Tampering in the 21st Century
7.12Why Bioterrorism is America’s Greatest Threat
7.12Cardin Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Eliminate Medicare Late Enrollment Penalty
7.12Weapons of Mass Deception
6.27Dean or Kucinich: Which is Better for Progressives?
SCREED: news major media ‘tries to hide’
Websites We Like!
Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: