Newspaper logo  
 
 
   Mainstream Media Supports Israel's Occupation

Israel Gets Protection, and You Have To Wonder Why:

Mainstream Media Supports Israel's Occupation

by Scott Loughrey
For the Israeli Occupation to end, it will be necessary for the conquered and nearly vanquished to have the same spotlight for their grievances as their tormentors have had for decades in the US media.

Planet Earth is approaching the 35-year mark for Israel's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Golan Heights. This is the longest military occupation in modern history. The lost human potential arising from Israel's policy for that region is incalculable.

Israel has taken advantage of the lurch to the hard right the US has taken since the 9/11/01 attacks to attack the Palestinians continually under the name of "fighting terrorism." In early March Israel went on a vicious spree, terrorizing Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Now, terrorism against civilians can never be justified. However, the mainstream US media seems determined to extend the occupation by maximizing attention to the terror created by suicide bombers and looking away from the state-sponsored violence which is provoking it.

For example, in a recent issue (Washington Post, 3/10/02) there was a front-page photograph of a pretty Israeli woman in serious pain being helped away from the carnage resulting from a Palestinian suicide bomber, who killed 13 in a Jerusalem caf». The article was entitled, "Israel suffers 2 more attacks." Only when you turned the page did the Post reveal that the suicide bombing came "hours after Israeli tanks and troops stormed into a Palestinian refugee camp near Bethlehem, pressing ahead with a fierce military offensive that has killed more than 100 Palestinians this month„including more than 40 on [3/8/02] aloneš" In other words, while major Israeli aggression was followed by a suicide bomber, the photograph, headline and front-page commentary each emphasized the response.

A few days prior to this ,the Washington Post ran a front page story with the headline "A Magnet for Palestinian 'Martyrs'/Al-Aqsa Brigades Lead New Wave of Attacks on Israeli Civilians." The photograph showed armed Palestinian gunmen wearing ski masks walking menacingly down the street in the Balata refugee camp. The article represented the al-Aqsa Brigades as extremely dangerous individuals, as no doubt they are. Very quietly the Post reported, "But at night, when Israel customarily invades Palestinian-run territories, [Abu Wadya's] followers operate in the shadows." So, the Aqsa Brigades are trying to protect their fellow Palestinians from the frequent Israeli military incursions in their area. Yet, instead of a front-page article portraying the Israeli military as fierce and scary, instead we have one that incites hatred for the guerrilla fighters resisting the occupation.

On Sunday, March 17, 2002, the Washington Post and the New York Times each mysteriously ran articles depicting Israeli's Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, as multi-faceted. The Times emphasized their article with eight headshots of Sharon with different expressions on his face. The Post subtitled their article "The Three Faces of Sharon, a Man Alone." Both articles were highly complimentary. They each required that you turn the page before any mention was made of Sharon's infamous complicity in the Sabra and Shatila massacres of Palestinian civilians, where thousands were killed. Both newspapers glossed over this internationally condemned atrocity, which rivaled the 9/11/01 attacks in bloodshed: the Post gave it one sentence, and the Times only two.

Sharon is multifaceted to the two principal organs of the US government, the Washington Post and the New York Times. However, to the international media he is a leader who is unable to do anything but kill and provoke Palestinians. He's a one-trick pony to the rest of the world outside of the US.

The 35-year occupation of the Palestinians is an enormous tragedy, and it is largely being financed by US taxpayers. It is being perpetuated largely because the US mainstream media continue to maximize attention on Israel's grievances while marginalizing the viewpoints of the Palestinians. For the occupation to end, it will be necessary for the conquered and nearly vanquished to have the same spotlight for their grievances as their tormentors have had for decades.


Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on April 4, 2002.
  
APRIL 2002
LOCAL NEWS
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
ART & ENTERTAINMENT
·
·
·
·
SPEAKING OUT
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
NEWS MEDIA CRITIQUE
·
·
·
·
·
NATION & WORLD
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
CITIZENS REFERENCE: BLUE CROSS PRIVATIZATION ISSUES
·
·
·
FROM OTHER SITES
·
·

Public Service Ads: