Newspaper logo  
 
 
   Shariah Law in Nigeria--and in Texas and Tennessee

MEDIA CRITICISM:

Shariah Law in Nigeria—and in Texas and Tennessee

by David Flores

Will the freeing of Nigeria’s Amina Lawal—ta token gesture of humanity and compassion—cause Americans to reconsider their own obsession with capital punishment?
BALTIMORE, 10/17/03—On September 26, the newspapers brought us the joyful news that Amina Lawal, the Nigerian woman who was sentenced to death for giving birth out of wedlock, has been cleared of all charges and allowed to go home. The original sentence had been imposed in March of 2002 by an Islamic court, acting in accordance with its reading of "Shariah," a very strict interpretation of Islamic law.

Lawal's legal victory was also a victory for global human rights. The young Nigerian mother had become something of a cause célèbre since the original verdict and penalty were handed down, and the Islamic court's reversal in the face of nearly universal condemnation gives fresh hope to those activists and organizations around the planet who would seek to better our world by shinning a bright spotlight upon its injustices.

Who can deny that the Shariah court's sensible reversal is a welcome and needed victory for humanity and common decency, coming as it did just six months after the depressing spectacle of our own President's steadfast refusal to back down from an illegal war against Iraq--a crime that was carried out in the face of even more widespread popular condemnation? It is true that, in the latter case, thousands of good people lost their lives, while in the former, only one was spared. Nonetheless, men and women of conscience are grateful whenever popular indignation manages to soften the hearts of the powerful and effect the correction of even one injustice.

With Lawal spirited away to the safety of her father's house, the question that remains now is whether this token gesture of humanity and compassion will cause Americans to reconsider their own obsession with capital punishment. Will we undertake a rethinking of our deeply ingrained culture of revenge, our overwhelming support for the state-sanctioned taking of another person's life, our wholehearted embrace of the primitive and simplistic justice embodied in the extracting of an eye for an eye? Or will we, instead, persist in holding to the myth that the "just" and "righteous" death sentences that are meted out in our own courtrooms bear little, if any, similarity to the barbarous judgment that nearly cost Lawal her life, and almost rendered her two-year-old son an orphan.

Unfortunately, given the pathetic state of America's fourth estate, it is unlikely that the press will take this joyful turn of events as the point of departure for a campaign to educate the people about the racial and economic injustices that are inherent in the practice of capital punishment. It remains unlikely that our nation’s editors, producers, reporters and anchors will begin a national dialogue and reconsideration of the morality of the death penalty. Most people in America will almost certainly continue to labor under the false pretense that the killing of a man or woman in a Texas prison is just and fair in the way that the near killing of Amina Lawal in a Nigerian prison was not.

America is not Nigeria, after all, and is it not self-evident that only a barbarous people would think it just to sentence a nursing mother to death? Is it not plain to see that only a people wholly lacking in compassion would choose to carry out a young mother’s execution the minute her child no longer required suckling?

Given the pathetic state of America's fourth estate, it is unlikely that the press will take this joyful turn of events in Nigeria as the point of departure for a campaign to educate the people about the racial and economic injustices that are inherent in the practice of capital punishment in the US.

Yes, it is self-evident, and it is plain to see. But unfortunately, it is also precisely what George W. Bush and Albert Gore (to take two representative American legislators) would have done had they found themselves in the same position as the Nigerian jurists. I realize this claim may seem far-fetched, but one need only review Bush and Gore’s statements to the press to find this conclusion borne out quite explicitly. One need only examine the death penalty debate (the death penalty monologue, actually, there was no debate) as it played itself out in the 2000 presidential campaign to confirm this ugly fact. At that time, both men were routinely questioned about their position vis à vis the death penalty and both candidates unfailingly proclaimed themselves staunch promoters of the practice.

But a willingness, even eagerness, to send human beings off to the death chamber was apparently not, in itself, good enough, and so the press turned the heat up a notch. Each man was then asked whether he would carry out the execution of a pregnant woman who had been sentenced to die. In both cases the men produced answers that betrayed no compromise of their unwavering support for capital punishment.

In answering the question of whether he would order the execution of a pregnant woman, George W. Bush merely preempted the logic of the Nigerian Shariah court. Our current President explained, as reported on July 17, 2000, that he would stay the execution until after her baby had been born, "because there's a second life involved." . [He did not, to my knowledge, say whether he would have her whisked off to the gas chamber the very next day, or allow her some time to recover.]

Yet, as distasteful and un-compassionate as the compassionate conservative's answer was, its hideousness paled in comparison with candidate Gore's incredible remarks. Initially the Democratic presidential hopeful responded to interviewer Tim Russert's hypothetical by proclaiming himself perplexed: "Well, I don't know what the circumstances would be in that situation. I would, you know, it's an interesting fact situation. I'd want to think about it..." (“Meet the Press,” 07/16/00) And one would have hoped that Gore would leave it at that, go home, and rethink his commitment to capital punishment. But instead, the very next day, having enjoyed the benefit of an entire evening to meditate on the question, to discuss it with his advisers, and to concoct an answer that might best satisfy the concerns of both pro-death penalty and pro-choice voters, Gore amended his original remarks by issuing a statement of truly Kafkaesque absurdity and unbelievably macabre logic: "the principle of a woman's right to choose governs in that case."

In other words, in contrast to Bush, who responded to the aforementioned query by proclaiming that he would show Republican pro-life compassion and wait for the child to be born before shuttling his mother off to the gas chamber, Albert Gore reassured the public of his Democratic commitment to abortion rights by proclaiming that he would allow the prisoner herself to choose whether to put off the execution until after the birth of her baby, or, if she so preferred, to march right on in to the death chamber and get it over with forthwith.

Incredibly, and inexplicably, the mere notion that this distasteful and extreme hypothetical might tend to undermine the case for the death penalty itself was never broached by the candidates or by the mainstream press. As far as America and her Republican and Democratic candidate for President were concerned, it was not a question even worth considering. It simply didn't fit in to the equation at all. And that, dear reader, is justice, sanity, and compassion in contemporary America.

It’s hard to say at what point the death penalty joined the Cuban embargo, corporate farm subsidies, and unfettered economic and military aid to Israel as "third rail," untouchable issues in American politics—and in American media. It is even more difficult to understand why it did. But what is certain is that, just as with those other three abominations, our unquestioning reverence for the death penalty weakens this nation, it corrupts us, and it robs us of our moral standing and authority in the world.


David Flores works in the language department at Loyola College. He maintains a blog of his work.


Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on October 20, 2003.
  
Local Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education

03.14 It's Magic! Betsy DeVos' Department of Education allows Grand Canyon University to call itself non-profit while its parent company reports profit margin of 27 percent

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

03.18 Energy analysts forecast 'the end of coal' in Asia as Japanese investors back renewables

03.17 Deadly air in our cities: the invisible killer

03.17 Our oceans broke heat records in 2018 and the consequences are catastrophic [Meanwhile, "conservatives" like Trump just make shit up...]

03.15 Rural America is ready for some sort of a New Deal, preferably green [Due to our ignorantly anti-science, capitalism-obsessed government, we have an out-of-control catastrophe]

03.15 Capitalism is destroying the Earth. We need a new human right for future generations [11:04 video]

03.15 US official reveals Atlantic drilling plan while hailing Trump’s ability to distract public [“Stupid is as stupid does.” –Forrest Gump]

03.14 New Mexico Jumps At Chance For 100% Clean Electricity

03.14 Whales are dying along East Coast—and scientists are racing to understand why

03.14 Climate study warns of vanishing safety window—here’s why

03.13 Air pollution deaths are double earlier estimates: study

03.13 'Almost certain extinction': 1,200 species under severe threat across world

03.12 Surge in chemical use ‘a threat to health and environment’ [Business as usual KILLS]

03.12 'We won't stop striking': US students taking a stand over climate change

03.12 'Monumental step backwards' – the $1bn gas pipeline project dividing New York

03.11 It's 2050 And This Is How We Stopped Climate Change

03.11 Greta Thunberg, schoolgirl climate change warrior: ‘Some people can let things go. I can’t’

03.11 The Other Kind of Climate Denialism

03.09 Trump to Divert Up to $385 Million From Crucial Health Programs To Pay for 'Government-Sanctioned Child Abuse'

03.08 'They chose us because we were rural and poor': when environmental racism and climate change collide

03.08 What the Green New Deal will mean for your hamburger

03.07 Why Do We Need Sleep? Israeli Scientists Solve the Mystery [Might insomnia-caused lack of neuronal DNA repair also cause political extremism and criminality?]

News Media Matters

03.18 Under Pressure, Donald Trump Begs, Cajoles and Threatens Fox News

03.17 Trump's media attacks are an abuse of power. We're holding him to account

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

03.18 ‘One chance at survival’: Jay Inslee is running for president to fight climate change

03.17 Trump is cornered, with violence on his mind. We must be on red alert

03.16 Beto O'Rourke, friend of the fossil fuel industry, is no climate hero

03.15 De Blasio unveils $10bn scheme to build new chunk of Manhattan to combat climate change [Why subsidize the richest companies on the planet? “Stupid is as stupid does.” –Forrest Gump]

03.15 House votes 420-0 for Mueller report to be made public

03.15 When a Bill to Revive Democracy Is Called an Ode to Socialism

03.15 Meritocracy is a myth invented by the rich

03.14 Beto vs. Democrats: Texas Lawmaker Frequently Voted to Help Trump and GOP

03.14 The Real Theft of American Democracy

03.14 'Extraordinary': GOP heads for unprecedented clash with Trump

03.14 Senate passes resolution to end US support for Saudi war in Yemen

03.14 Oakland Teachers Strike Enters Day Seven

03.14 Both Parties Are Addicted to Dark Money. Only One Is Trying to Quit.

03.14 WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO WILL SUPPORT THE GREEN NEW DEAL | OPINION

03.14 George Conway Urges ‘Serious Inquiry’ Into Trump’s Mental Health After Latest Lie

Justice Matters

03.12 Election Watchdog Hits Jeb Bush’s Super-PAC With Massive Fine for Taking Money From Foreign Nationals [Russia backed Trump & China backed Bush...]

03.12 New York Attorney General Opens Investigation of Trump Projects

High Crimes

03.16 'Change your course!': Pompeo threatens ICC over US war crimes probe [1:55 video]

Economics & Corrupt Capitalism

03.18 Why are millennials burned out? Capitalism.

03.10 Ocasio-Cortez Blasts Capitalism as an ‘Irredeemable’ System

International & Futurism

03.18 US and Saudi Arabia blocking regulation of geoengineering, sources say

03.18 Jacinda Ardern says cabinet agrees New Zealand gun reform 'in principle'

03.16 Global Climate Strike in Pictures: Millions of Students Walk Out to Demand Planetary Transformation

03.16 Pollutionwatch: China shows how political will can take on air pollution

03.16 Who ordered Marielle Franco's murder?

03.16 To prevent another Christchurch we must confront the right’s hate preachers

03.16 Thank you, climate strikers. Your action matters and your power will be felt

03.15 Britain is in crisis – and Theresa May is blocking the only solution

03.15 Youth climate strikes to take place in more than 100 countries

03.15 Irish PM brings partner to meet Mike Pence and delivers pointed remarks on sexuality

03.14 Two Women, Heroes for Our Age

03.14 Who are the private contractors fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan? An inside look at this invisible military force [What could go wrong with for-profit war? Is Erik Prince involved?]

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: