THE ROLE OF RELIGION IN U.S. POLITICS:
Crises of Democracy
Since God is more elusive than government, the likelihood of outrageously subjective interpretations of “God’s will” can only run rampant. This has been amply demonstrated in pronouncements by such divinely inspired political stalwarts as John Ashcroft and Tom DeLay. The US government assuredly doesn’t want an Islamic state in Iraq, yet DeLay has openly stated that God has assigned him to promote “a biblical worldview” in how he goes about his political responsibilities as House Majority Leader. Meanwhile, John Ashcroft tells us that “Jesus is our only King,” and Commerce Secretary Don Evans reveals to us that God told George Bush to wage war on Iraq.
Republican strongholdIn May, the New York Times told us that the Republican National Committee—or GOP—is striving for “an Era of Dominance”. It is hardly news anymore, but it is disconcerting nonetheless. The Republican Party is in a buoyant mood since the ‘War on Terrorism,’ as we portentously describe it, is likely to persist indefinitely (if sporadically) and the GOP allegedly is the best equipped to engage with such a challenge. Meanwhile, a sputtering Democratic Party is quickly devolving toward extended minority status.
For the first time in 50 years, Republicans constitute a majority of state legislatures. They dominate no less than three branches of the federal government. In the newspapers we read that the male scions of “boomer” parents are enthusiastically gung-ho about the military establishment. They nearly equate it with the Republican-dominated federal government. Hence, both party and government are deemed to be one: efficient, upright and trustworthy—meriting a 75% approval rating roughly coinciding with that of the president himself.
At the end of May, President Bush signed off on another economically unnecessary tax cut—$350 billion worth—which of course is also a politically pre-emptive act, with the 2004 elections being just 17-18 months away. Mr. Bush also sanctioned an almost trillion-dollar increase in the government’s borrowing capacity, thus adding the same amount to the national debt on which interest is to be paid. Deficits, we are assured, don’t matter anymore, and I dare say, might well outlast the war on terror.
Fueling that conflict is the assumed notorious “axis of evil,” according to Bush. He intoned the phrase against Iraq, Iran and North Korea in a nationally televised address on 20 September, 2001, little more than a week after 9/11.
The first Puritans to arrive on American shores would have approved.
A nation born of PuritanismIn 1630, Massachusetts’ first Royal Governor, John Winthrop, evoked a lasting biblical image, “We shall be as a City upon a Hill, the eyes of all people upon us.” These Puritan immigrants from England soon faced an outbreak of “evil” they felt had to be subdued; in 1636 they launched a war against local “devil worshippers”—the Pequot Indians, who resented the Puritans’ intrusion onto their land.
Clearly possessed by Satan, the natives had to be eliminated, and they were. The Indians’ village was set ablaze; hundreds were killed—either shot, drowned, or sold into slavery.
According to the organiser of the Mayflower expedition, William Bradford, this constituted “a sweet sacrifice to God.” Evildoers, in short, must be either summarily punished or killed. Both would come to pass in Salem in 1692, when fanatical judges saw to it that 19 innocent people were hanged for being possessed by the Devil.
The most Hebraic of the original Protestant sects, the early Puritans—control freaks extraordinaire—believed that church and state should be separate but closely associated and led by the same types of people in either case.
The Puritans’ wars against Native Americans spawned frightful delusions throughout New England. The Puritans’ theology of choice was Calvinism—the elect few predestined by God to success and wealth versus the many predestined to perdition, misery and hell on earth; everyone in effect lived in a state of unrelieved anxiety that consequently instigated a kind of nervous activism. Beginning with the infamous Salem witch-trials of the 1690s, we’ve had periodic political witch-hunts ever since.
In the 1970s Reverend Jerry Falwell publicly concluded, “Satan has mobilized its forces to destroy America.” Such born-again religious fervor ihas been on the rise ever since.
Demonizing the oppositionWars propagate an us-versus-them mentality. Bush’s aforementioned proclamation on 20 September included his statement that you are either with “us” or with “the terrorists of the world.” No wonder Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor off-handedly commented at the time that, “We’re likely to experience more restrictions on personal freedom than has ever been the case in our country.” Did O’Connor suspect or know something the rest of us did not?
No wonder Ralph Waldo Emerson once remarked, in a letter to Thomas Carlyle in the 1830s, about the emerging American character: “We are a little wild here.” Indeed we are. Welcome to Redneck America.
To be “born again” is an evangelical legacy of the Puritan tradition; to be born again is to be an adamant “true believer,” such as that described by author Eric Hoffer. All of which puts me in mind of those secular true believers, the Jacobins of the French Revolution.
When Jacobin leader Robespierre hijacked the people’s Revolution in their name, he corrupted it totally, ushering in a prolonged period of massacres and slaughter—an early symptom of what Alexis de Tocqueville would later term, with his usual uncanny prescience, “a virus of a new and unknown kind”: what in Western culture would morph into genocidal inclination—evil committed in the name of an insane nationalism, ethnic cleansing, or ideology—or, as is increasingly the case these days, in the name of some intolerant, absolutist religious fundamentalism. (Surely Hitlerism and the Holocaust exemplify the first most horrific “virus of a new and unknown kind” in modern times.)
The French revolutionaries were not unlike the English Puritans in one respect. In their mad zeal, they rendered themselves incapable of conceiving the validity of a loyal opposition. None who thought otherwise could be their equal; therefore those who disagreed with them were deemed traitors who had to be eliminated. One could only be 100% for the Jacobins or 100% against them, which prepared the ground for their Reign of Terror in 1793-1794 during which thousands were executed.
Is anything more fatal to humanity than ‘either/or’ thinking? If all who disagree with you are, by definition, irredeemable traitors then no real democracy is possible! Such a state of affairs, by extension to our own day and time, is what ultimately concerns me about those on the religious and political Right. They typically present themselves as knowing, better than anyone else in the world what we as a nation need to do, impetuously brushing aside questions from, or discussion with, those who differ with them in the slightest.
Democracy anewThe original Puritan settlers of this country in the 1620s were true believers: not radicals but revolutionaries who proved to be religious—and political—killers, among other less lethal attributes. Today’s religious Right are in effect their doctrinal descendants.
It was in the name of a fervent nationalism that the French revolutionaries finally declared war on all of Europe’s great powers. After years of Napoleon’s spectacular victories, France nonetheless collapsed from its imperial reach.
It is in the name of national security, a euphemism for nationalism, that the present administration in Washington is preparing for war without end—in our name, and presumably for our own protection. Our consent is absent, except for that which the Bushies manufacture. Shall we be so naïve as to trust the ethics of their intentions? Yet, it is not their intentions that are at issue, but the likely fatal consequences of the actions that these holy warriors—most of whom have never been in battle—have in mind.
Of late, I’ve been quoting James Madison in public, perhaps the most far-seeing of the founders of what we nostalgically refer to as the American Republic. The American imperium, in Gore Vidal’s view, was born the day the National Security Act was enacted in 1947. Here are Madison’s amazing words, expressed in a letter to Jefferson in 1788 as the Constitution was nearing completion: “There may be a certain degree of danger that a succession of artful and ambitious rulers, may by gradual and well–timed advances, finally erect an independent Government on the subversion of liberty.”
I believe we are moving toward that end at a fast clip. What was essentially a political vision of presidential dominance in Watergate became quasi-religious with Reagan, and now, insistently, evangelically fundamentalist with the current administration in Washington. This situation cannot be tolerated much longer. We cannot remain constantly worried and/or somnolent until unpleasant things somehow blow over, allowing us to “return to normal”—an understandable but naïve hope.
Right now, therefore, we have to think anew, strategize anew, and act anew on behalf of the entire spectrum of the democratic prospect. We cannot afford to behave like the good Germans of the Nazi Reich.
This article is based on a panel presentation at the New York Society for Ethical Culture on May 28, 2003. Dr. Khoren Arisian is Senior Leader of the New York Society for Ethical Culture. A graduate of Tufts University, he has been director and co-founder of the Ethical Culture School of Adult Education, a member of the Chaplaincy Task Force for the New York Board of Corrections, and a founder of the New York Society’s Prison Reform Task Force.
Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
This story was published on September 18, 2003.
Local Stories, Events
Health Care & Environment
09.16 Common pesticide makes migrating birds anorexic [Neonicotinoids, again...]
09.16 $1m a minute: the farming subsidies destroying the world [Important]
09.14 Not Just the Bees, First-of-Its-Kind Study Shows Neonics May Be Killing Birds Too [A GESTALT: Like happened at Boeing, deregulation has displaced scientific and engineering professionalism in many companies and governments to focus on profits/economics almost exclusively. But after similar failure of scientific rigor, die-off reports of bees, worms and sea-life, generally, there must be a moritorium on production, sale and use of all potentially dangerous chemicals!]
09.13 Dolphins in Channel carry 'toxic cocktail' of chemicals [What is safe to eat?]
09.10 Who’s Ready for the Electric Moped Moment? [Uses car lanes instead of sidewalks!]
News Media Matters
09.14 Sanders Campaign Hits Back Against 'Dishonest' Biden Attack on Medicare for All [The facts don't lie, but America's media totally does lie when paid by advertisers to distort single-payer as more expensive: 1:35 video]
09.12 Media bias is OK – if it's honest [‘It should be obvious that there can’t be such a thing as a neutral journalist.’]
US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'
09.18 Why Trump Can’t Learn: An Educated Guess by a Veteran Teacher [Might dyslexia explain the Republican party, generally?]
09.18 'Heartless and Unconscionable': Outrage as General Motors Cuts Off Healthcare for 50,000 Striking Workers [Hideous corporate behavior putting 50,000 families at greater health and bankruptcy risk.]
09.18 Whole Foods Will Cut Health-Care Benefits for Nearly 2,000 Employees [Hideous corporate behavior putting 2,000 families at greater health and bankruptcy risk.]
09.14 California church leaders 'used homeless as forced labour' [A coarsening of public behavior...]
09.14 Taco Bell customer who was treating homeless group to meals says she was kicked out of restaurant [A coarsening of public behavior...]
09.09 The great break-up of Big Tech is finally beginning [Facebook and Google effectuate the evil of data analytics]
High Crimes vs. Human Rights
Economics & Corrupt Capitalism
International & Futurism