Newspaper logo  
 
 
   Flagging Patriotism

COMMENTARY:

Flagging Patriotism

by Alexander E. Hooke, Ph.D.

To burn the American flag is not always an expression of defilement; it can be an accusation that someone has betrayed or killed the core principles it represents.
PATRIOTISM, n. Combustible rubbish ready to the torch of any one ambitious to illuminate his name.” —Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary

Putting a match to an American flag is perfectly legal. In 1976 the 94th Congress sanctioned burning the flag as the preferable manner of disposing it when no longer fit for public display. Presumably, this is a more honorable send-off than throwing it in the trash or using it to scrub floors or wash the car.

Congress wants to amend the Constitution to outlaw US flag desecration, but it’s a little late for that. The desecration of the American flag is one of the ubiquitous facts of life.

Yet today’s Congress is on the verge of passing a constitutional amendment officials are calling the flag-burning amendment. The House of Representatives has already voted for it. The final hurdle is the Senate. Illinois Representative Henry Hyde, sharing his contemporaries ignorance of their 1976 predecessors, says the flag is sacred and, "just as tombstones are not for toppling...flags are not for burning."

The proposed amendment actually does not say anything about burning. It instead reads: "Congress shall have the power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States."

Those who dispute this proposal generally focus on whether it weakens the First Amendment rights to free speech. Constitutional purists, such as ACLU representatives, tend to ignore sacred dimensions of a country’s flag.

That is an unfortunate oversight, for the desecration of the American flag is one of the ubiquitous facts of life. Around Memorial Day or Independence Day numerous merchants flash the flag when peddling their goods and wares. Walk through the mall or along a boardwalk and notice how many tee shirts or patches on jeans illustrate a replica of the stars and stripes. Watch a ballgame and see how many uniforms have a flag replica sewed on the arm. Stores now sell lounge chairs draped completely in a vinyl flag, waiting to be stained with the sweat and suntan lotion of summer vacationers.

All, according to the 1976 Congress, are examples of desecration. Only those serving in the military, police and fire departments are allowed to wear flag patches. It is otherwise disrespectful to use the flag as part of your clothing. And Section 4 of the code is explicit: "The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever." Commercial sacrilege apparently escapes the hearts of the amendment’s supporters.

Why should we worry about desecrating a piece of white cloth dyed with blue and red colors? A symbol or icon is more than its material composition. A photograph, for example, is more than photons graphed onto paper; it shows a friend or relative. When people are forced to flee their homes, invariably they pact some photos of loved ones. To rip apart a photo, toss it in the trash—even burn it—is to say that love has already died.

A flag bears similar meaning but on a much larger and historic scale. To burn it is not always an expression of defilement; it can be an accusation that someone has betrayed or killed the core principles it represents. To pledge allegiance to a flag, on the other hand, is not only a ritual that begins the school day or official ceremony. It makes public certain beliefs that citizens supposedly have in common.

Most of the controversies about the Pledge to the United States flag address the inclusion of God. More significantly, one also pledges to "liberty and justice for all." Curiously, today’s Congress ignores this point. To the extent that Republicans and Democrats are not bothered that the United States has the largest prison population in the world, or that they voted for tax cuts which reinforce the disparities among its citizenry, they conceal their disrespect with flagging patriotism.

As the epigraph from Ambrose Bierce implies, this latest stab at patriotism is little more than the grandstanding of politicians wanting their names etched sufficiently in the memories of voters to help them pull or push the right options for the next election.

If successful, legislators might diminish the 115 incidents of flag burning that have reportedly occurred since 1994—about one a month. But they will have done nothing about the flag desecration that happens every day.


Alexander E. Hooke, Ph.D., is professor of philosophy at Villa Julie College.


Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on September 16, 2003.
  
LOCAL NEWS
9.17CALENDAR
A.20Prediction: Ravens Will Win Superbowl
A.17House seeks $40 million for U.S. Naval Academy in wake of hurricane Isabel
9.19Mount Vernon Area Offers Smorgasbord of Public Events
9.19Hopkins' Odyssey Program Offers Nonprofit Courses, ranging from Hapsburgs to Frontiers of Medicine
9.18Poverty Commission Report Notes Maryland's Wealth Hides Significant Problems
9.18Veterans for Peace National President David Cline to Visit City
9.18DPW Renovates City Recreation Facilities
9.18Jones Falls Watershed Association Engages Citizens in Stream Monitoring
9.18S-L-O-W-L-Y Cycling Proves the Point that Roads are for Bicyclists, Too
9.17Electioneering Spells Littering in Baltimore
9.17REPORT ON THE 10TH ANNUAL OTAKON
9.5HOPPING MAD
9.17Response to Joan Floyd’s “Hopping Mad” Op-Ed
9.17Joan Floyd Replies to Al Barry
9.24A reply to Mr. Al Barry III
9.17Artists, Community Collaborate on Unique Tile Mural for Martha’s Place
LETTERS
9.17Letters to the Editor
Open Letters:
A.09To America From a Californian
A.03To Mayor Martin O'Malley
9.30To the American Public from Voices in the Wilderness
ART & ENTERTAINMENT
A.01Doctor Barnard's Got a Recipe for Ending Food Cravings
9.18Louella Checks Out New Cars
NEWS MEDIA CRITIQUE
A.20Media Still Lacks Minority Faces and Voices
A.20Shariah Law in Nigeria—and in Texas and Tennessee
A.07Sun's Susan Reimer Hits New Low with Schwarzenegger Endorsement
9.19Mark Crispin Miller's Operation American Freedom: He's a Stand-Up Kind of Guy
9.17Media Display Lack of Curiosity in Single Payer Health Story
9.17Many Deaths Left Out of Iraq Story
EDITORIALS & OP-EDs
A.23Where is the Outrage over Maryland's Absurd Drug Policies?
A.20America's karma: Happiness for some paid for by the misery of others
A.20Funding a Fragile Occupation of Iraq
9.18The World Is Waiting For Americans to Take Back America, To Rescue Her. But you Don't Enable Co-Dependents
9.18My Shame As American Public Sleeps
SPEAKING OUT
A.20What’s So Special About Antibiotics?
A.20To Die in Iraq
A.09Legal Plunder in Alabama
A.03Desperately Seeking WMDs
9.26A Nightmare in Iraq
9.17Bush Lie Number 1: The Tax Cut Lie
9.17Attention African-Americans: Let's Talk About Sex
9.17Flagging Patriotism
9.17WTC-7: The Improbable Collapse
9.17Big Spending Politicians Can Learn from Ireland's Reforms
(INTER)NATIONAL
A.10Rights Groups Ask Government For Proof That Detainees in U.S. Custody Are Not Being Tortured
A.06Arnold Unplugged: It's Hasta la Vista to $9 Billion if the Governator is Selected
A.02Cardin Sponsors Legislation to Extend Unemployment Benefits
9.29The Magnificent 27
9.29Vanishing Act: "Disappearing" the Republic at the Push of a Button
9.19The Cost of the Iraq War Put in Perspective
9.19Congress Begins Considering Reauthorization of TANF
9.18‘I Broke It, You Bought It’
9.18After the "Victory," the Quagmire
9.18Why Faith and Government Don't Mix
9.18Crises of Democracy
9.18Car Values Drop As Loan Amounts Stay High
9.17New Report Cites Insider-Dealing In the Rebuilding of Iraq
FROM OTHER SITES
SCREED: news major media ‘tries to hide’
Websites We Like!
Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: