Newspaper logo  
   New Report Cites Insider-Dealing In the Rebuilding of Iraq

Watchdog Group Calls for Senate Investigation of War Profiteering:

New Report Cites Insider-Dealing In the Rebuilding of Iraq

To avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, this report says, President Bush and all of his challengers should take a pledge that they will not accept campaign contributions from companies that have profited from the war in Iraq, or the subsequent rebuilding effort.
The New York-based World Policy Institute issued a report on August 12—"New Numbers: The Price of Freedom in Iraq and Power in Washington"—that raises questions about insider-dealing and potential conflicts-of-interest in the Bush administration's privatized approach to rebuilding Iraq.

"Unfortunately, when it comes to rebuilding Iraq, the Bush administration has been ethically challenged and politically tone-deaf," notes William D. Hartung, the director of the Institute's arms project and a co-author of the new report. "When the first major contract went to Dick Cheney's former firm, Halliburton, in a secret, no-bid deal; and the second major contract went from the U.S. Agency for International Development to Bechtel, a firm that USAID chief Andrew Natsios used to work for, it was painfully clear that the 'fix is in' when it comes to deciding who gets contracts for the rebuilding of Iraq."

The report goes into significant detail about how companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Alliant Techsystems, Halliburton, Bechtel, and Dyncorp have profited from the war in Iraq and the subsequent rebuilding process, and documents the personal and financial links between these firms and the Bush administration.

"The military-industrial complex is alive and well and thriving in George W. Bush's Washington," notes Hartung, who is at work on a book about war profiteering by Bush's inner circle, tentatively entitled, How Much Are You Making on the War, Daddy? (forthcoming, Nation/Thunder's Mouth books, January 2004).

President Eisenhower spoke of the dangers of "undue influence, whether sought or unsought,” exerted by the military-industrial complex. Under the Bush/Rove regime, charges Hartung, that influence is clearly being sought, as evidenced by the President's use of an aircraft carrier to stage a campaign-style "Top Gun" landing to mark the "cessation of hostilities," in Iraq, and his speech the next day at United Defense, a major weapons maker that is owned by the Carlyle Group, an investment firm that keeps the President's father, George Herbert Walker Bush, on its payroll.

"If President Eisenhower were with us today, he would be suffering his own case of 'shock and awe' over the lengths this administration is willing to go to in using the military-industrial complex as a political tool to help its friends and grease the path towards its re-election," Hartung noted.

Given the conflicts of interest evident in the Bush administration's prosecution of the war in Iraq and the subsequent rebuilding effort, the Institute report calls for Congressional action in a number of key areas:

Transparency and accountability—There should be a Senate investigation on war profiteering comparable to the one that Harry Truman conducted at the height of U.S. involvement in World War II, and legislation should be passed requiring all rebuilding contracts for Iraq to be subject to an open bidding process, unless the President can provide persuasive evidence of an emergency that precludes going through normal competitive processes;

Curbs on profiteering—The report calls for all contracts for the rebuilding of Iraq to be on a limited-profit basis, not the open-ended, cost-plus deals that Halliburton and other key US contractors have received thus far;

Preserve Iraq's resources for the Iraqi people—rebuilding contracts should be short-term, so as not to pre-empt the ability of a future democratic government in Iraq to make its own choices about how the country's resources should be developed;

Put the political money/favor machine on hold—To avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, President Bush and all of his challengers should take a pledge that they will not accept campaign contributions from companies that have profited from the war in Iraq, or the subsequent rebuilding effort.

For a copy of the "New Numbers: The Price of Freedom in Iraq and Power in Washington" report, email Frida Berrigan at or go online to The Price of Freedom in Iraq and Power in Washington

Frida Berrigan, a Baltimore native, is senior research associate with the World Policy Institute. The Arms Trade Resource Center was established in 1993 to engage in public education and policy advocacy aimed at promoting restraint in the international arms trade.

For more details, visit the Arms Trade Resource Center or call 212.229.5579.

Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on September 16, 2003.
A.20Prediction: Ravens Will Win Superbowl
A.17House seeks $40 million for U.S. Naval Academy in wake of hurricane Isabel
9.19Mount Vernon Area Offers Smorgasbord of Public Events
9.19Hopkins' Odyssey Program Offers Nonprofit Courses, ranging from Hapsburgs to Frontiers of Medicine
9.18Poverty Commission Report Notes Maryland's Wealth Hides Significant Problems
9.18Veterans for Peace National President David Cline to Visit City
9.18DPW Renovates City Recreation Facilities
9.18Jones Falls Watershed Association Engages Citizens in Stream Monitoring
9.18S-L-O-W-L-Y Cycling Proves the Point that Roads are for Bicyclists, Too
9.17Electioneering Spells Littering in Baltimore
9.17Response to Joan Floyd’s “Hopping Mad” Op-Ed
9.17Joan Floyd Replies to Al Barry
9.24A reply to Mr. Al Barry III
9.17Artists, Community Collaborate on Unique Tile Mural for Martha’s Place
9.17Letters to the Editor
Open Letters:
A.09To America From a Californian
A.03To Mayor Martin O'Malley
9.30To the American Public from Voices in the Wilderness
A.01Doctor Barnard's Got a Recipe for Ending Food Cravings
9.18Louella Checks Out New Cars
A.20Media Still Lacks Minority Faces and Voices
A.20Shariah Law in Nigeria—and in Texas and Tennessee
A.07Sun's Susan Reimer Hits New Low with Schwarzenegger Endorsement
9.19Mark Crispin Miller's Operation American Freedom: He's a Stand-Up Kind of Guy
9.17Media Display Lack of Curiosity in Single Payer Health Story
9.17Many Deaths Left Out of Iraq Story
A.23Where is the Outrage over Maryland's Absurd Drug Policies?
A.20America's karma: Happiness for some paid for by the misery of others
A.20Funding a Fragile Occupation of Iraq
9.18The World Is Waiting For Americans to Take Back America, To Rescue Her. But you Don't Enable Co-Dependents
9.18My Shame As American Public Sleeps
A.20What’s So Special About Antibiotics?
A.20To Die in Iraq
A.09Legal Plunder in Alabama
A.03Desperately Seeking WMDs
9.26A Nightmare in Iraq
9.17Bush Lie Number 1: The Tax Cut Lie
9.17Attention African-Americans: Let's Talk About Sex
9.17Flagging Patriotism
9.17WTC-7: The Improbable Collapse
9.17Big Spending Politicians Can Learn from Ireland's Reforms
A.10Rights Groups Ask Government For Proof That Detainees in U.S. Custody Are Not Being Tortured
A.06Arnold Unplugged: It's Hasta la Vista to $9 Billion if the Governator is Selected
A.02Cardin Sponsors Legislation to Extend Unemployment Benefits
9.29The Magnificent 27
9.29Vanishing Act: "Disappearing" the Republic at the Push of a Button
9.19The Cost of the Iraq War Put in Perspective
9.19Congress Begins Considering Reauthorization of TANF
9.18‘I Broke It, You Bought It’
9.18After the "Victory," the Quagmire
9.18Why Faith and Government Don't Mix
9.18Crises of Democracy
9.18Car Values Drop As Loan Amounts Stay High
9.17New Report Cites Insider-Dealing In the Rebuilding of Iraq
SCREED: news major media ‘tries to hide’
Websites We Like!
Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: