Newspaper logo  
 
 
   War with Iraq: What's in It for Us?

Local Perspective:

War with Iraq: What’s in It for Us?

“Only in [an oil-dominated] capitalistic society can energy derived from the sun and wind be regarded as ‘alternative energy sources.’ In that one term,” said Bill Harvey, “you can read what this whole society is about.”

by William Hughes

BALTIMORE, MD.—Bill Harvey’s topic for discussion at the Progressive Action Center on January 12, 2003, was entitled, “War—What’s in it for us?” His answer to that key question, after a wide-ranging analysis of twenty specific ways a war with Iraq would affect Americans, and of the possible economic, social and cultural impact on the country, rang out loud and clear. He declared, “Nothing, but bad news!”

Harvey, a Green Party activist, author, and Labor historian, urged the anti-war movement to appeal “directly to the self-interest of the American people—moving their interests about any possible war with Iraq to the center of the national debate.

“We already live in a war-ravaged nation,” he said. “Since World War II we haven’t had any so-called ‘declared wars,’ because warfare is the norm in our society. The bloated military budget is at $400 billion and rising. We are also subjected to a parade of lies. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. We need enemies, too, to maintain this warfare state. This is why they [the War Party] have created terms like ‘rogue states’ and ‘axis of evil.’ The perception of ‘over there,’ in many important respects, turns out to be right here.”

He continued, “Today, civil liberties are a swamp,” citing the recently enacted draconian USA Patriot Act and the creation of the Homeland Security Agency. “As for race relations, well, just take a look at what is happening to the Arab-American community,” he said. “Arab people in this country are the most degraded and dehumanized people in our public culture. It is everywhere. For example, Jay Leno, the NBC ‘Tonight Show’ host, regularly cracks jokes at their expense, as do other shows and movies. Leno recently featured on his program a comedian whose main spiel was an insulting rant against Arabs.”

On another topic, Harvey pondered, “Wouldn’t it be great if people would start to raise questions about the effect that our wars have had on their own lives and to hear someone say, ‘War really made a mess of this neighborhood and my family’?” Harvey pointed out how a high percentage of the US veterans of the first Gulf War, in 1991, almost 28 percent—160,000 personnel—ended up with “service-related medical problems, three times higher than the Vietnam War era rate.” Harvey continued, “Let’s also put the spotlight on the energy industry. We, the people of the U.S., don’t really need Iraq’s oil or the oil from the Middle East for that matter. It only supplies about 15 percent, or less, of our present needs. They, the U.S. and British oil companies, do need the oil, in order to maintain a measure of control over the economies of Japan and some countries in Europe, and to some extent China and Russia, too.

“A war with Iraq will mean a huge increase in energy costs in the short term for Americans,” Harvey said. “And, in the long term, if the war is successful, by their requirements, it will mean continuous control of prices by the energy industry. So, what would be the point of us fighting a war for them [the oil industry], thus allowing their firm control over such key decisions?

“Back in the 70s,” he said, “an alternative energy source was a major public issue, until the oil and automobile companies maneuvered it out of the public eye. Only in [an oil-dominated] capitalistic society can energy derived from the sun and wind be regarded as ‘alternative energy sources.’ In that one term,” he emphasized, “you can read what this whole society is about.”

Shifting to the security issues, Harvey said, “They [the War Party] are rolling the dice with our safety. A U.S. war with Iraq, and who knows what else might come up on their agenda in the very near future, like: the mass expulsion of the Palestinians; or a move on Iran, which I would say is likely; a move on Saudi Arabia, a possibility; or even attacks on Syria or Kuwait. All of these things, if they do go down, will mean that a lot of outraged people will be even more outraged at us. I think we can only realistically expect the result from that to be increased terrorist activity in the U.S. And, all of this also goes to increasing fear and insecurity among the people, which serves, too, the interest of the power structure.

“They tell us we are in a ‘war without end’ and the cost of that war shows up in many unrecognized ways, too, like in US aid to countries in preparing for war,” Harvey continued. “Topping that list are Israel and Columbia, among others. There is also the interest on the military’s percentage of the the national debt. Just recently, too, the War Party bought out some members of the UN Security Council, who were on the fence about joining us in the war against Iraq. And, then, there are also the enormous clean-up cost and occupation cost that come after a conflict.

“War doesn’t occur in isolation,” said Harvey, who was speaking under the auspices of the Coalition Against Global Exploitatio” (CAGE). “War, and threats of war, is just one aspect of a full-court press. Financial, economic and military imperialism go hand in hand. When Karl von Clausewitz said, ‘War is a continuation of politics by other means,’ he was onto the scent. Though he would be amazed by the ingenuity of the guys that we are up against today.

“Nevertheless, people are kicking back,” Harvey concluded. “People of faith are raising questions. There have been growing demonstrations around the country, activism on college campuses is up, the labor movement is stirring, and many in strategically placed groups are raising their voices.”


© William Hughes 2002. Hughes is the author of Andrew Jackson vs. New World Order (Authors Choice Press) and Baltimore Iconoclast (Writer’s Showcase), which are available online. He can be reached at liamhughes@mindspring.com.


Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on February 10, 2003.
  
FEBRUARY 2003
LOCAL NEWS
·NEWS BRIEFS
·CALENDARS:
· Curran Calls for End to Executions
· Maryland Ranked 20th Nationwide in Toxic Pollution Linked to Respiratory Disease
· Beleaguered Center Determined to Remain a ‘Funnel to the Poor’
· Grantmaking Soars Despite Down Economy
· SPORTS: O’s Change Front Office, But Not Much Else
· Can Exercising Eminent Domain Be Justifiable?
· The Future of “Smart Growth”
LETTERS
· Letters
·OPEN LETTERS:
 ·  Another Open Letter To America from a Canadian
 ·  To France: We Know Your ‘No’ to Bush Doesn’t Make You Liars
 ·  To Bush: Use Wisdom Statesmanship
 ·  To Limbaugh Advertisers: Don’t Support Those Who Support Racism
 ·  To Peter Jennings & ABC: Your Double Standards Are Showing
 ·  To Wolf Blitzer: Good Thing CNN Is Not Our Only News Source
 ·  To Senator Kyl: Beware Phony Conservatives
 ·  To the US Ambassador to New Zealand
 ·  (01/16) An Appeal to Bill Gates, Ted Turner, or Some Other Billionaire
ART & ENTERTAINMENT
·Book Review: New Koufax Biography Depicts Jewish Pitcher’s ‘Pursuit of Excellence’
·Baltimore Poets Join National Day of Poetry Against the War on February 12
NEWS MEDIA CRITIQUE
·The Great Deregulator
·“Light for all”? Only if you connect the dots.
·Ad Copy Received by Email Shows How Search Engines Can Skew Results to Make Profit
·Does White House Have a ‘Fetish for Secrecy’?
·Why the Public Needs to Check Out These “Best 9/11 Sites”
·“Astroturf” Letters to the Editor
·Brit Vets Say Anthrax Vaccine May Have Been Thrown Overboard
·NPR’s “Justice Talking” Takes on Yucca Mountain & More
·The Curious Timing of Ashcroft’s Scott Ritter Investigation
SPEAKING OUT
·EDITORIALS:
 ·  Later
·(01/19) Massive Anti-War Rally Rocks Nation's Capital
·(1/17) Will the White House Please Slow Down and Listen to Reason about Iraq before It's Too Late?
·MLK, Jr. Isn’t the Only Black Achiever Worthy of Recognition
·Bush and Decison Making
·Physician Details Horrors To Come in a War against Iraq
· Multilateralist Cowards Turn to UN When They Should Govern Themselves
· America: Wake Up!
·Eyewitness in Iraq: It’s Not Enough
·Local Pastor’s Speech on Martin Luther King, Jr. Stresses Having Courage, Mastering Fears, and Overcoming Oppression
·What Makes People Believe Bush Lies? Could It Be Media Repetition?
·What Can the Average Citizen Do in the War on Terrorism?
·The Real State of the Union
·There Is No War on Terrorism
·War with Iraq: What’s in It for Us?
·“Corporations Are Not People,” Says Pennsylvania Town
· Crowd in DC says, "Give Peace a Chance"; Activists Not Swayed by Powell’s UN Address
NATION & WORLD
· The Water Barons: A Handful of Corporations Seek to Privatize the World’s Water
· Brazil’s President Picks Butter Over Guns
· Text of the October 11, 2002 National Security Resolution
· The Cause of the Corporate Collapse—and Its Cure
· Bush Administration Causes Damage on Many Fronts
· Nukes-in-Space in Columbia's Wake
· Humanitarian Group Fined for Taking Medicine to Iraq
FROM OTHER SITES
· Websites We Like!
· Outstanding Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: