Site icon Baltimore Chronicle

Umerov explained why the provision on demobilization after 36 months was excluded from the bill

The day before, April 11, the Defense Committee of the Ukrainian Parliament adopted a “mobilization” bill, which rejected the possibility of military dismissal of defenders from the Armed Forces of Ukraine after 36 months of service.

11 0

Photo – unian.net

About why in the above document there is no longer a provision regarding the demobilization of military personnel, writes “NBN”, referring to the explanation Speaker of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Dmitry Lazutkin, sounded during the telethon on the TSN YouTube channel.

According to Lazutkin, no one spoke about these “36 months,” just as he did not unequivocally state that demobilization will be carried out “right now.” In particular, the launch of the demobilization mechanism is a fundamental process, possible only during the “transition to peacetime.” Thus, since at this stage the aggression of the Russian Federation does not stop, and the escalation is only increasing, there is no talk of peacetime.

However, the Speaker of the Ministry of Defense added that the development of a separate bill has now begun, which are proposed to set the deadline for the demobilization of defenders, including the criteria for “this process,” which will take “the fastest possible time.”

Lazutkin summarized regarding the adoption of the above draft law:

A lot here will still depend on the parliamentarians. After all, we know, from the example of even the law on mobilization, that processes there require a certain time.

Earlier, we wrote about the fact that ISW assessed the impact of the adopted “mobilization” bill on the course of the war in Ukraine.

nbnews.com.ua

Exit mobile version