The edges of the Sun, in view of the received States, the long-term prospects are not to blame for being inconvenient in Delivery of troops to Ukraine .
This was stated by the head of the Ministry of Health of Finland, Elina Valtonen, as RBC-Ukraine reported to Politico.
“It is important that we do not exclude everything from the long-term perspective, because we are not “We know how serious the situation is. But Finland's position has become clear: we can't control any military forces and we don't want to discuss it,” Valtonen said. there is a long-term hypothetical selection of regional members NATO. However, it is not excluded that the European countries, which may face an imminent threat from the side of the Russian Federation, may want to consider this option more seriously.
The head of the Ministry of Health of Finland also stated that at the same time The most important ones are those that the residents of Ukraine will continue to see and help warring country.
“Much European countries could have earned much more,” Valtonen emphasized.
Discussions about the introduction of foreign armies into Ukraine
It’s guessing, for example and fierce French President Emmanuel Macron did not include the possibility that NATO could send troops to help Ukraine. However, there was no consensus at that time. Later, he clarified that French troops could destroy Ukraine in the event of a repeated offensive of Russian troops to Kiev and Odessa.
A number of NATO countries opposed this idea, called Nimechtina, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Poland, Spain and Italy. In which case there are countries that are ready to consider such a possibility, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
Estonian Prime Minister Kaya Kallas supported Macron’s idea and stated that she is ready to send troops to Ukraine – This is a signal for the Russian dictator Volodymyr Putin.
Read terms and important information about Russia’s war against Ukraine on the RBC-Ukraine channel in Telegram.
