If Ukraine’s membership in NATO is being deprived, we will criticize and think about the prospects for peace negotiations with Russia in the Alliance.
NATO Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, in an interview with RBC-Ukraine, voiced his thoughts on the future of Ukraine and the role of NATO, making his main statement – read the material below.
Key theses:
- A stronger Europe favors America and makes NATO less important.
- All decisions in NATO are always praised in coordination with all members.
- In general, the position of streamlining and defense of NATO's “confinement” with Russia is low, although not turned off.
- It is our responsibility to discourage any potential ambitions of Russia or any other adversary to act against the Alliance.
- NATO had no immediate plans to change the US military presence in Europe.
- The main guarantee of security for Ukraine will be deprived of the ZSU.
- A frozen conflict in Ukraine is the worst-case scenario.
We are still at the beginning stage of peace negotiations
Behind Dragone's words, at the beginning of the stage of peace negotiations, diplomats are working 24/7, and the key goal is to achieve justice and what the world needs as soon as possible.
“It is extremely important for Ukraine to approach the negotiation process from a position of strength. Therefore, NATO itself continues to provide support to Ukraine, focusing on the development of the situation. This is not about stimulating the war, but about guaranteeing that “Ukraine can be kidnapped either now or in the future,” he says, meaning that a strong Ukraine has a better chance of benefiting a stable world.
As for Russia, the NATO admiral said that it is an aggressor and has repeatedly destroyed its lands.
“It is necessary for you to carefully analyze whatever mental states have been formed. Ukraine is already ready for the fire – now it’s coming for Russia,” he added.
The admiral also said that the rotten world could be bitter for his absence, and the worst-case scenario is a frozen conflict.
Ukraine's membership in NATO is not part of peace negotiations
According to Dragone, the support of Ukraine’s membership in NATO is not part of ongoing peace negotiations and there is no concern about the country’s automatic accession to the Alliance after the completion of peace negotiations.
“Proteus in the future, as all the necessary minds will be eliminated, while the confinement of Ukraine itself and the uniform support of all allies will be eliminated, it is impossible to turn off the possibility of beginning the process of change connections between Ukraine and NATO,” he added.
Speaking about the deployment of European troops in Ukraine, as a guarantee of security, Dragone noted that this could be useful, but for the minds:
- absolute fire,
- the obviousness of the pressing mandate, “under the auspices of the UN”,
- This may be no less than the European armies, and the stink may be sufficiently numerous for the presence of the ever-present Russian-Ukrainian cordon.
In this case, we have said that the main guarantee of security for Ukraine will be deprived of its Protective Forces.
“Ukraine will continue to provide important assistance in the form of low edges in the appearance of the restoration, beginning and ensuring mutual cooperation. To allow it to renew the opportunities that were emerging war, and reorganize their Armed Forces to ensure the necessary flow to fend off a new aggression,” sings the singer.
NATO's main threats – Russia and terrorist groups
Dragone calls Russia and terrorist groups the main threats to the Alliance. At the same time, when talking about a possible conflict with the Russian Federation, we respect low riks.
“We are obliged to streamline any potential ambitions of Russia or any other adversary against the Alliance. We may work, first of all, in a diplomatic way, otherwise negotiations are to blame “Be supported by our position of strength. Supporting this kind of hard power is a unique feature of NATO,” he says.
Peace negotiations on Ukraine: what is currently known
Apparently, in Saudi Arabia there were several rounds of negotiations between the United States and Ukraine and Russia, the main topic being a truce. The format of the negotiations is called “official diplomacy.” The American side is aligned with the Ukrainian and Russian sides. Between these rounds of head-to-head confrontations, there was also the rise of US President Donald Trump and Russian dictator Volodymyr Putin.
In general, the results of re-movings are ambiguous. The remnants of the first siege of the United States and Ukraine were able to regain control of the fire for 30 days: at sea, in the sky and along the entire front line. Ukraine was good, but so was Russia. After whom Putin declared that he was ready for a truce, but he had no idea. Zokrema, the dictator, was eager for Ukraine to stop mobilizing for the hour of truce, and the allies began to strengthen the border.
After the war between the United States and Ukraine and Russia this year, a new version of the truce has emerged – a fence against shelling of the energy sector. There was talk about security in the Black Sea, but then the Russian Federation showed its brains and imposed sanctions.
Varto noted that yesterday the enemy attacked Kherson, the place was often left without light, and the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky stated that he was monitoring the US reaction to this attack.