Newspaper logo  
 
 
  'Intelligent Design' Is a Placeholder for any Religion

REPLY:

'Intelligent Design' Is a Placeholder for any Religion

by Jozsef Ludvig

"There is absolutely no hint of a proof in Darwin's work or biography for the idea that Darwin used an atheist premise."
Mr. David Plyler presents an inconsistent view in his letter. He says:
"Intelligent Design does not postulate a God and is not about religion."
But in reality, by leaving the name and identity of the designer unknown, ID becomes a placeholder for any religion while narrowly escaping the definition of a religion itself. But it can still not pose for science because it starts with the premise that a supernatural force had to be involved in the creation of life from inorganic matter. In order to prove this premise it then invents the non-empirical device of irreducible complexity which is just a typical God-Of-The-Gaps and cannot explain anything by itself. The resulting negative inference of a supernatural force from empirical ignorance is, by definition, neither a scientific subject nor consistent with the scientific method. Thus ID is not science.

The only scientific version of ID possible would involve a natural designer, but such a space alien hypothesis fails to have any attributes that could be of interest for anyone but members of the Raelian sect.

After having set up such a transparent deception, he continues with with an obvious lie:

"Darwinism begins with a premise of atheism....Darwin began his concept of naturalistic explanations in order to refute religion with atheism."
There is absolutely no hint of a proof in Darwin's work or biography for the idea that Darwin used an atheist premise. Maybe Mr. Plyler could point us to his historical evidence?

And even if he had such proof, it would not make the least of a difference for the modern theory of evolution, which is a perfectly scientific theory supported by overwhelming evidence. But he conveniently fails to mention that. To him, an invented historical lie extinguishes any trace of physical evidence.

Darwin, in his work as a scientist, was a naturalist. At the heart of Mr. Plyler's split tongue argument is the notion of many religious people that naturalism, simply because it fails to mention God, is an atheist construct. But this is absolutely incorrect.

Naturalism is the belief that nature is completely self-contained and self-consistent. Where atheism makes an explicit statement about gods, naturalism does not. If one logically negates any possible statement of naturalism, it will still not contain anything about super-natural beings. But if one negates atheism, one has to end up with the basic tenet of any religion that there are supernatural beings, thus where atheism is essentially anti-religion, naturalism is simply logically disjoint.

Ultimately, the inconsistency in his argument lies in the belief of ID not being religious because it does not mention ANY PARTICULAR supernatural being, while he accuses Darwinism, which does not mention God at all, of being atheist.

His other musings about micro- vs. macro- evolution and the missing fossil record are desperate fantasies to keep his belief in his own inconsistent premises alive. They are hardly worthy of a reply.


Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on August 30, 2005.

 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

06.26 German government agrees to ban fracking after years of dispute

06.26 Coal-Plant Retirements in New England Have ‘Opened the Door’ for Alternatives

06.24 UK's out vote is a 'red alert' for the environment

06.24 66 million dead trees in California could fuel 'catastrophic' wildfires, officials say

06.22 Republicans Offer a Plan to Replace Obamacare

06.22 Women Take Over the Family Farm

06.22 Our new alliance unites 600m city dwellers in fight against climate change

06.22 California's last nuclear plant to close amid longstanding earthquake concerns

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

06.26 Mapping the Rise of Anti-LGBT Legislation on the First Anniversary of Nationwide Marriage Equality

06.26 Draft of Dems' policy positions reflects Sanders' influence

06.24 What It Will Take to Gain My Support in 2020

06.22 THE WOMAN CARD

06.22 How American Politics Went Insane

06.22 MAKING A KILLING

06.22 America's gun problem is so much bigger than mass shootings

06.22 Insult, provoke, repeat: how Donald Trump became America's Hugo Chávez

06.21 Con vs. Con

06.21 Clinton's Wall Street Donors Revolt After Warren Emerges as VP Contender

06.21 The Issues the Candidates Aren’t Talking About

06.20 People's Summit Offers Hope for a Movement Bigger Than Bernie

Justice Matters

06.24 Experts ask for new investigation into disappearance of 43 Mexican students

High Crimes?

06.21 THE SHADOW DOCTORS

Economics, Crony Capitalism

06.26 Coal Industry on the Brink in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah

06.21 The Growing Case for Massive Taxes on the Rich

06.21 George Soros: EU exit risks 'black Friday'

International

06.26 What's the British Equivalent of 'Moving to Canada'?

06.26 BREXIT MAKES THE U.S. THE LAST, BEST HOPE FOR LIBERALISM

06.24 Britain has voted to leave the EU – what happens next?

06.24 More than 1,200 die of starvation and illness at Nigeria refugee camp

06.24 Beijing has fallen: China's capital sinking by 11cm a year, satellite study warns

06.24 Nicola Sturgeon prepares for second Scottish independence poll

06.24 European far right hails Britain's Brexit vote

06.24 European far right hails Britain's Brexit vote

06.24 David Cameron resigns after UK votes to leave European Union [videos]

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: