Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

08.15 RIDE FOR THE OVERRIDE

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

12.01 What Trump Really Means When He Talks About "Government Schools" [stupid is as stupid does: private prisons worked so badly, they want to privatize schools too]

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

12.03 Veterans Arrive at Standing Rock to Act as 'Human Shields' for Water Protectors

12.03 Kinder Morgan pipeline: Canadians intensify huge opposition to expansion

12.03 Five ways to take action on climate change

12.03 New blow for Hinkley Point contractor EDF after French safety checks

12.03 Nikola One hydrogen-powered semi is tall, different and zero-emission [Embrace science, Donald. It's the only way to save your presidency]

12.03 Scientific Knowledge Sorely Lacking at Breitbart-Tweeting House Science Committee ["Stupid is as stupid does." – Forrest Gump]

12.02 After 60 years, is nuclear fusion finally poised to deliver?

12.02 The government's report on the Great Barrier Reef is a 'dog ate my homework' moment

12.02 Martin Shkreli branded an 'attention seeker' as Sydney student hits back [0:49 video]

12.02 LOOKING AT HOW ABORTION RESTRICTIONS ENDANGER WOMEN’S LIVES

12.02 Climate Change and the Coming 'Humanitarian Crisis of Epic Proportions'

12.02 Congress Nears a Breakthrough on Medical Research Funding [welfare for the most profitable companies in the world]

12.01 30 Years of Oil and Gas Pipeline Accidents, Mapped

12.01 Siemens' £310m Hull plant will take windfarm technology to new level

News Media Matters

12.02 Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem

12.02 SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF FAKE NEWS'

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

12.03 Senate Responds to Trump-Inspired Anti-Semitism By Targeting Students Who Criticize Israel

12.03 Keith Ellison and the Battle for the Democratic Party

12.02 TRUMP WARNS THAT COMPANIES SHIPPING JOBS OVERSEAS WILL BE SLAPPED WITH ENORMOUS BRIBES [Fact that only looks like parody]

12.02 Carrier Just Showed Corporations How to Beat Donald Trump

12.02 Lawrence Lessig: The Electoral College Is Constitutionally Allowed to Choose Clinton over Trump

12.01 Trump Saved Jobs at Carrier by Making the Same Deal American Politicians Always Make

12.01 Trump Treasury pick made millions after his bank foreclosed on homeowners

12.01 The Clintons’ Dominance of Democratic Politics Is Over—And They Will Not Be Remembered Fondly

12.01 Elizabeth Warren Proposes to Strengthen Democratic Spines With a Powerful New Tool: Math

Justice Matters
High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

12.03 Hillary Clinton’s “Corrupt Establishment” Is Now Advising Donald Trump

12.03 TRUMP’S WOLVES OF WALL STREET

12.01 How to Hide $400 Million ["Ideal," thinks Trump. This tax-shelter system using deregulation loopholes in many tax-havens enables vast worldwide corruption]

11.29 Donald Trump: Be ‘Big Marco’ or Set His Own Path?

11.28 The liberal elite’s Marie Antoinette moment

11.27 Here’s Why the Defense Industry Is Ecstatic About a President Trump

11.26 Capitalism in One Family

International

12.02 Possible French presidential candidates from the left

12.02 This is the most dangerous time for our planet

11.30 Reach out, raise money or remove: how should cities deal with street begging? [an unresolved public health care opportunity...?]

11.30 German spy chief says Russian hackers could disrupt elections

11.30 Tearing up US deal with Iran would be disastrous, says CIA chief

11.29 Hungary looks to the past for its future

11.29 Poland’s great leap backwards

11.29 Germany Prepares for Trade Conflict with Trump

11.29 The Man Who Could Shake Up German Politics

11.29 Merkel Must Change to Meet Germany's Challenges

11.29 Jimmy Carter: America Must Recognize Palestine

11.28 Britons could pay for EU citizenship after Brexit, says top negotiator [Let's get rid of nation states and allow everyone to be Earth Union (EU) citizens instead!]

11.28 'Holocaust on ice' dance by wife of Putin official causes uproar [8:08 video; an excellent performance]

11.28 'The only two powerful cartels left': rivals clash in Mexico's murder capital

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Print view: Pulling Back the Curtain on Wind Power
ENVIRONMENT VIEWPOINT:

Pulling Back the Curtain on Wind Power

by Ajax Eastman
Tuesday, 1 February 2011
Because wind turbines are minimally productive more than half the time, fossil fuel power plants will be needed as backups and will contribute to greenhouse gases.

Ever wonder why sailing ships no longer ply the oceans with goods and passengers? It’s a question wind energy advocates might ask themselves. They ignore the fact that the wind doesn’t blow consistently, even though its intermittent nature makes wind an undependable source of power and restricts wind generators from consistently reaching their potential.

The relative effectiveness of a generation facility to produce electricity is called its c"apacity factor," or CF for short. It is the ratio of what a generating plant actually produces compared to what it nominally could produce at full capacity. The annual average CF for wind turbines located offshore is about 40 percent, but that falls to about 25 percent during the summer, when the winds are weakest. For wind turbines located onshore the annual average CF is about 30 percent, and can drop to 13 percent in the summer.

Proponents of wind power argue it is a good choice because, among other things, it reduces greenhouse gasses. They compare industrial wind energy with power plants fueled by oil, coal, and natural gas that generate tons of carbon dioxide. However, they fail to recognize that because of the unpredictable nature of wind, carbon-fueled plants will continue to underpin the load. This is particularly true in the summer, when the winds are at their lowest and the demand for power is highest.

Proponents of wind almost never compare industrial wind to nuclear power, probably because in every aspect of electricity generation nuclear beats wind by a long shot. The following are informative comparisons.

Capacity factors:

The capacity factor of the 104 nuclear reactors operating in the United States is 90 percent. In other words, nuclear facilities crank out electricity around the clock, 365 days of the year, at pretty near their total capacity. Compare that to the results of a study from a group of wind power advocates at the University of Delaware that modeled data from off shore meteorological stations from Maine to the Florida Keys. Their results show that a large offshore turbine array would attain a 90 percent capacity factor only 2.2 days a year. Their numbers show that 20,000 five megawatt turbines would be needed to equal the full generating capacity of those 104 reactors. Even 1,200 turbines would not supply electricity as dependably as a new reactor like the one proposed at Calvert Cliffs in Maryland.

Greenhouse gas reduction:

Neither wind turbines nor nuclear reactors emit carbon dioxide. But because wind turbines are minimally productive more than half the time, fossil fuel power plants will be needed as backups and will contribute to greenhouse gases. Note that no coal-fired facility has been closed due to the installation of wind turbines.

Electricity rates and costs:

The proponents of wind use the high cost of building nuclear reactors to argue that the electricity they produce will be costly. They’re wrong because they fail to account for the low efficiency of wind; for the need for carbon-fired backup plants to compensate; for the much shorter working lives of wind turbines; and for the enormous subsidies, grants, tax incentives, and tax breaks from federal, state, and local governments. In fact, the expensive wind turbines, especially offshore, would never be built without these subsidies that in some cases pay for 50 percent of the project’s cost.

After coal, nuclear is the least costly generator of electricity for the rate payer. After solar, wind is the most expensive.

In Maryland, Governor Martin O’Malley has introduced legislation that will mandate Maryland’s public utilities to commit to long-term contracts to purchase offshore wind-generated electricity in order to guarantee a market for offshore wind, even though it will increase costs to ratepayers. In Massachusetts millions of ratepayers can expect a two percent hike in their electric bills due to the planned Cape Wind project.

Environmental impacts:

The proposed Calvert Cliffs 3 nuclear reactor would be sited on about 350 acres. The 1,200 offshore wind turbines needed to produce the same amount of energy would require 74,000 acres. Onshore, 2,400 turbines would be needed and would require 8,500 acres. This is a lot of land or water and a big impact on the rich mountain ecosystems and habitats or ocean ecosystems about which we know little.

There are numerous reasons why nuclear energy should be seriously pursued. But the question here is: should inefficient industrial wind be pushed blindly given its potential for greatly increasing our energy bills, requiring up to 50 percent taxpayer investment, and causing enormous environmental damage?

We should rewrite state laws, like Maryland’s Renewable Portfolio Standard or Pennsylvania’s Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard, as Clean Energy Portfolio Standards that include new nuclear reactors. Such a change would greatly expand clean, non-carbon emitting solutions for future electricity demands.


Reader response

Ajax Eastman has served on the board of the Maryland Environmental Trust, as past President of the Maryland Conservation Council, Co-chairman of the Maryland Wildlands Committee, and on numerous other State boards and commissions. Her love of the natural world began early at a summer camp in Maine where today she teaches nature to young campers. Distributed by Bay Journal News Service.



Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on February 1, 2010.
 

Public Service Ads: