Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

03.24 Robert Reich Demolishes Myth that College Is Gateway to the Middle Class

03.23 9 Billionaires Are About to Remake New York’s Public Schools—Here’s Their Story

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment
Naomi Klein: Let's kick oil while the price is down – video

03.26 Leaders of European cities make pledge to tackle climate change [Statement by the Mayors]

03.26 Single-Dose Cures for Malaria, Other Diseases

03.26 Genome Study Predicts DNA of the Whole of Iceland

03.25 Stop Making Us Guinea Pigs

03.25 AP Investigation: Slavery taints global supply of seafood

03.25 We’re treating soil like dirt. It’s a fatal mistake, as our lives depend on it

03.25 Climate denial is immoral, says head of US Episcopal church

03.25 US coal sector in 'terminal decline', financial analysts say

03.25 20 Obamacare Stats Republicans Don't Want You to See [detailed outline, graphs]

03.25 My Stake In the 2016 Election Is Way More Personal Than Usual

03.24 The $6.8 Billion Great Wall Of Japan: Fukushima Cleanup Takes On Epic Proportion

03.24 Global warming is now slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences [video]

03.24 Florida's unspeakable issue leaves climate change official tongue-tied [funny video clip]

News Media

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.26 Payday loan borrowers: ‘When are we going to be done paying these people?’

03.24 Nation's largest ocean desalination plant goes up near San Diego; Future of the California coast? [map of sites]

03.23 Mitt Romney's Email Hypocrisy

03.23 Trillion Dollar Fraudsters

Justice Matters

03.26 Many women of color don't go to the police after sexual assault for a reason

03.23 Executing the Insane Is Against the Law of the Land. So Why Do We Keep Doing It?

High Crimes?

03.24 African elephants could be extinct in wild within decades say experts

03.23 Africa is centre of a ‘wildlife war’ that the world is losing

Economics, Crony Capitalism

03.26 Regulatory Capture, Captured on Video [1:21 video]

03.26 US risks epic blunder by treating China as an economic enemy

03.25 Currency concerns everywhere

03.25 California Water Wars: Another Form of Asset Stripping?

03.23 Let John Oliver Explain How Petty Municipal Fines Destroy the Lives of Our Most Vulnerable [17:45 video]

03.23 Why Not Utopia?

International

03.25 Central African Republic farmers ‘need seeds urgently to avert food shortages’

03.25 What happened to Germanwings flight 4U 9525?

03.25 Saudi Arabia moves military equipment to border with Yemen

03.24 Nazi Extortion: Study Sheds New Light on Forced Greek Loans

03.24 'The Fourth Reich': What Some Europeans See When They Look at Germany

03.24 Syria's war-scarred citadel of Aleppo: a history of cities in 50 buildings, day 2

03.24 Yemeni implosion pushes southern Sunnis into arms of al-Qaida and Isis [map]

03.24 Pentagon loses track of $500 million in weapons, equipment given to Yemen

03.24 Israel denies spying on US over Iran nuclear talks

03.23 Russia warns Denmark its warships could become nuclear targets

03.23 Ruins found in remote Argentinian jungle 'may be secret Nazi hideout'

03.23 Okinawa governor blocks controversial marine base

03.23 Two Women, Opposite Fortunes

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Print view: Pulling Back the Curtain on Wind Power
ENVIRONMENT VIEWPOINT:

Pulling Back the Curtain on Wind Power

by Ajax Eastman
Tuesday, 1 February 2011
Because wind turbines are minimally productive more than half the time, fossil fuel power plants will be needed as backups and will contribute to greenhouse gases.

Ever wonder why sailing ships no longer ply the oceans with goods and passengers? It’s a question wind energy advocates might ask themselves. They ignore the fact that the wind doesn’t blow consistently, even though its intermittent nature makes wind an undependable source of power and restricts wind generators from consistently reaching their potential.

The relative effectiveness of a generation facility to produce electricity is called its c"apacity factor," or CF for short. It is the ratio of what a generating plant actually produces compared to what it nominally could produce at full capacity. The annual average CF for wind turbines located offshore is about 40 percent, but that falls to about 25 percent during the summer, when the winds are weakest. For wind turbines located onshore the annual average CF is about 30 percent, and can drop to 13 percent in the summer.

Proponents of wind power argue it is a good choice because, among other things, it reduces greenhouse gasses. They compare industrial wind energy with power plants fueled by oil, coal, and natural gas that generate tons of carbon dioxide. However, they fail to recognize that because of the unpredictable nature of wind, carbon-fueled plants will continue to underpin the load. This is particularly true in the summer, when the winds are at their lowest and the demand for power is highest.

Proponents of wind almost never compare industrial wind to nuclear power, probably because in every aspect of electricity generation nuclear beats wind by a long shot. The following are informative comparisons.

Capacity factors:

The capacity factor of the 104 nuclear reactors operating in the United States is 90 percent. In other words, nuclear facilities crank out electricity around the clock, 365 days of the year, at pretty near their total capacity. Compare that to the results of a study from a group of wind power advocates at the University of Delaware that modeled data from off shore meteorological stations from Maine to the Florida Keys. Their results show that a large offshore turbine array would attain a 90 percent capacity factor only 2.2 days a year. Their numbers show that 20,000 five megawatt turbines would be needed to equal the full generating capacity of those 104 reactors. Even 1,200 turbines would not supply electricity as dependably as a new reactor like the one proposed at Calvert Cliffs in Maryland.

Greenhouse gas reduction:

Neither wind turbines nor nuclear reactors emit carbon dioxide. But because wind turbines are minimally productive more than half the time, fossil fuel power plants will be needed as backups and will contribute to greenhouse gases. Note that no coal-fired facility has been closed due to the installation of wind turbines.

Electricity rates and costs:

The proponents of wind use the high cost of building nuclear reactors to argue that the electricity they produce will be costly. They’re wrong because they fail to account for the low efficiency of wind; for the need for carbon-fired backup plants to compensate; for the much shorter working lives of wind turbines; and for the enormous subsidies, grants, tax incentives, and tax breaks from federal, state, and local governments. In fact, the expensive wind turbines, especially offshore, would never be built without these subsidies that in some cases pay for 50 percent of the project’s cost.

After coal, nuclear is the least costly generator of electricity for the rate payer. After solar, wind is the most expensive.

In Maryland, Governor Martin O’Malley has introduced legislation that will mandate Maryland’s public utilities to commit to long-term contracts to purchase offshore wind-generated electricity in order to guarantee a market for offshore wind, even though it will increase costs to ratepayers. In Massachusetts millions of ratepayers can expect a two percent hike in their electric bills due to the planned Cape Wind project.

Environmental impacts:

The proposed Calvert Cliffs 3 nuclear reactor would be sited on about 350 acres. The 1,200 offshore wind turbines needed to produce the same amount of energy would require 74,000 acres. Onshore, 2,400 turbines would be needed and would require 8,500 acres. This is a lot of land or water and a big impact on the rich mountain ecosystems and habitats or ocean ecosystems about which we know little.

There are numerous reasons why nuclear energy should be seriously pursued. But the question here is: should inefficient industrial wind be pushed blindly given its potential for greatly increasing our energy bills, requiring up to 50 percent taxpayer investment, and causing enormous environmental damage?

We should rewrite state laws, like Maryland’s Renewable Portfolio Standard or Pennsylvania’s Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard, as Clean Energy Portfolio Standards that include new nuclear reactors. Such a change would greatly expand clean, non-carbon emitting solutions for future electricity demands.


Reader response

Ajax Eastman has served on the board of the Maryland Environmental Trust, as past President of the Maryland Conservation Council, Co-chairman of the Maryland Wildlands Committee, and on numerous other State boards and commissions. Her love of the natural world began early at a summer camp in Maine where today she teaches nature to young campers. Distributed by Bay Journal News Service.



Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on February 1, 2010.
 


Public Service Ads: