|
Ref. : Local Newsbriefs
10.21 Book: The Age of Empathy Corrects Prevailing Notions About Human Behavior
Ref. : Letters to the editor
Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries
11.10 Why Lieberman Blocks a Public Option
11.10 Catholic Bishops’ Faustian Bargain: “Burn Health Care Reform” to Advance Anti-Choice Cause
11.09 Democrats Won a Health Care Battle—But Are Losing the War
11.07 House Prepares to Vote on Health Care Reform
11.03 The Incredible Shrinking Public Option
11.03 Hip to Profits: The Sleazy Business of Medical Device Manufacturing
10.30 The Golden Years in America: Can’t Work, Can’t Retire (Unless You’re a Bailed-Out Banker)
10.29 “Billionaires for Wealthcare” Serenade the Insurance Industy
10.29 Japan’s Low-Cost, High Quality Health Care System
10.28 Public Option: Insurance Industry’s Trojan Horse
10.23 AARP's Tradition of Betrayal
10.22 French Medicare-for-All System Provides Better Care at Half the Price
10.22 It Pays for Insurance Companies to Let Us Die
10.21 Another Hidden Bonus for Insurance Industry
10.21 US Health Insurers Up the Ante
10.21 Obamacare Targets Entitlements
10.20 Big Pharma Is the Big Winner in Health Care Reform
10.20 Single-Payer Or Else...
11.09 Paid Lying: What Passes for Major Media Journalism
11.07 Failing the Midterms
10.19 IF Stone: An Iconic Radical Journalist
11.10 Obama's War and Remembrance Day
11.09 Thinking about Signs
11.09 High Noon in Baltimore at CareFirst Blue Cross-Blue Shield
11.09 Blaming the 'Dithering' Obama
11.09 Saturday Night Special: "Historic" Vote Kills Health Care Reform for Another Generation
11.08 In America, Selfishness and Lack of Solidarity Know No Bounds
11.08 Government of, by and for American? Corporations
11.07 The Crazy October Surprise Debunking
11.06 Dark Glass: Hateful Echoes and Hidden Costs
11.06 2014 or Bust
11.05 Stone Walls and Steel Bars: America's War on its Own Keeps Raging
11.05 How Two Elections Changed America
11.04 2010 Looms: Democrats Crash and Burn in Virginia and New Jersey
11.03 Heeding George Kennan's Sage Advice
11.03 Country Joe, Kenny Rogers and Obama
11.02 Thinking about Accelerations
11.02 FBI Kills Islamic Cleric, Arrests Followers, for Being Muslims at the Wrong Time in America
10.30 Three Ohio Men Convicted of Being Muslims at the Wrong Time in America
10.27 Welcome to 2025
10.26 Only Unity Can Overcome All Obstacles
10.26 Tariq Mehanna: Obama's Latest Muslim Target
10.24 Debased Coinage: Centuries of Counterinsurgency – Past and Future
10.21 Scary Isn't a Kid in a Halloween Costume
11.10 Talking Blues: Gitmo Gets Harsher Under "Progressive" Rule
11.02 Cheney and the Plame-Gate Cover-up
10.28 America's Drug Crisis: Brought to You by the CIA
10.28 Depraved Indifference: Drone Wars, Whack Jobs and Imperial Terror
10.26 The Pentagon's Dirty Bombers: Depleted Uranium in the USA
10.26 Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs: An Emotional Response
10.22 Outrageous Thought of the Day: Nuclear Hypocrisy
10.20 Depleted Uranium Weapons: The Dead Babies in Iraq and Afghanistan Are No Joke
10.29 Our Out-of-Whack Economy and the Happy Talk Propagandists
10.27 Are You Ready for the Next Crisis?
10.26 Thinking about Valuations
10.22 The Rich Have Stolen the Economy
11.06 Honduran Accord Solidifies Coup D'Etat Rule
11.04 House Resolution Designates Venezuela a State Sponsor of Terrorism
11.04 Chomsky Doubts Change from Obama
10.30 Kipling Haunts Obama's Afghan War
10.29 Al-Qaeda Outwitted Bush, Neocons
WARNING:
My wake-up call: Watch for another 9/11-WMD experience
The wake-up call is unlikely to be effective, because the American attitude toward government changed fundamentally 70-odd years ago. Prior to the 1930s, Americans were suspicious of government, but with the arrival of the Great Depression, Tojo, and Hitler, President Franklin D. Roosevelt convinced Americans that government existed to protect them from rapacious private interests and foreign threats. Today, Americans are more likely to give the benefit of the doubt to government than they are to family members, friends, and those who would warn them about the government’s protection.
In the July 18 Los Angeles Times (“Bush the Albatross”), Ronald Brownstein reminds us that Bush’s behavior is disastrous for his political party. Unpopular presidents “have consistently undercut their party in the next election.” Brownstein reports that “88 percent of voters who disapproved of the retiring president’s job performance voted against his party’s nominee in past elections. . . . On average, 80 percent of voters who disapproved of a president’s performance have voted against his party’s candidates even in House races since 1986.”
Brownstein notes that with Bush’s dismal approval rating, this implies a total wipeout of the Republicans in 2008.
A number of pundits have concluded that the reason the Democrats have not brought a halt to Bush’s follies is that they expect Bush’s unpopular policies to provide them with a landslide victory next year.
There is a problem with this reasoning. It assumes that Cheney, Rove, and the Republicans are ignorant of these facts or are content for the Republican Party to be destroyed after Bush has his warmonger-police state fling. “After me, the deluge.”
Isn’t it more likely that Cheney and Rove have in mind events that will, once again, rally the people behind President Bush and the Republican Party, that is fighting the “war on terror” that the Democrats “want to lose”?
Such events could take a number of forms. As even diehard Republican Patrick J. Buchanan observed on July 17, with three US aircraft carrier battle groups in congested waters off Iran, another Tonkin Gulf incident could easily be engineered to set us at war with Iran.
If Bush’s intentions were merely to bomb a nuclear reactor, he would not need three carrier strike forces.
Lately, the administration has switched to blaming Iran for the war in Iraq. The US Senate has already lined up behind the latest lie with a 97-0 vote to condemn Iran.
Alternatively, false flag “terrorist” strikes could be orchestrated in the US. The Bush administration has already infiltrated some dissident groups and encouraged them to participate in terrorist talk, for which they were arrested. It is possible that the administration could provoke some groups to actual acts of violence.
Many Americans dismiss suspicion of their government as treasonous, and most believe conspiracy to be impossible “because someone would talk.” There is no basis in any known fact for this opinion.
According to polls, 36 percent of the American people disbelieve the 9/11 Commission Report. Despite this lack of confidence, and despite the numerous omissions and errors in the report, it has proven impossible to have an independent investigation of 9/11 or to examine the official explanation in public debate. Even experts and people with a lifetime of distinguished public service are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists,” “kooks,” and “traitors” if they question the official explanation of 9/11. This despite the fact that war in the Middle East, a long-planned goal of Bush’s neoconservative administration, could not have been initiated without a “new Pearl Harbor.”
That powerfully constructed steel buildings could suddenly turn to dust because they were struck by two flimsy aluminum airliners and experienced small fires on a few floors that burned for a short time appears unexceptionable to a majority of Americans.
Moreover, people have talked. Hundreds of them. Firefighters, police, janitors, and others report hearing and experiencing a series of explosions in upper floors and massive explosions in the underground basements. This eyewitness testimony was kept under wraps for three or more years until the official explanation had taken root. The oral histories were finally forced loose by Freedom Of Information Act suits. The eyewitness reports of explosion after explosion had no effect.
Larry Silverstein, who received billions of dollars in insurance payments for the destroyed buildings, talked. He said on public television that the order was given “to pull” building 7. His stunning admission had no effect.
The Bush administration is preparing us for more terrorist attacks. The latest intelligence report says that Al Qaeda has regrouped, rebuilt, and has the ability to come after us again. "Al Qaeda will intensify its efforts to put operatives here," says the report.
Security operatives, such as Michael Chertoff, and various instruments of administration propaganda have warned that we will be attacked before next year’s election. Chertoff is not a person who wants to be known as Chicken Little for telling us that the sky is falling.
Bush has the Republican Party in such a mess that it cannot survive without another 9/11. Whether authentic or orchestrated, an attack will activate Bush’s new executive orders, which create a dictatorial police state in event of “national emergency.” [See here.]
The UK government is hand-in-glove with the Bush administration and will provide cover or verification for whatever claim the Bush administration advances. So will the right-wing governments in Canada and Australia. That takes care of the English-speaking world from which contrary explanations might reach the American people.
It is possible that Bush is now too weak, that suspicion is too great, and that there is too much internal resistance in the federal bureaucracy and military for any such scenario. If so, then my prediction prior to the invasion that the US invasion of Iraq will destroy Bush, the Republican Party, and the conservative movement will be proven true. The Democrats’ strategy of doing nothing except making sure Bush gets his way will produce the landslide that they expect.
However, this assumes that Cheney, Rove, and their neoconservative allies have lost their cunning and their manipulative skills. It is difficult to imagine a more dangerous assumption for Democrats and the American people to make.
Once the US experiences new attacks, Bush will be vindicated. His voice will be confident as he speaks to the nation:
“My administration knew that there would be more attacks from these terrorists who hate us and our way of life and are determined to destroy every one of us. If only more of you had believed me and supported my war on terror these new attacks would not have happened. Our security efforts were impaired by the Democrats’ determined attempts to surrender to the terrorists by forcing our withdrawal from Iraq and by civil libertarian assaults on our necessary security measures. If only more Americans had trusted their government, this would not have happened.”And so on. Anyone should be able to write the script.
This commentary is republished in the Baltimore Chronicle with the permission of the author.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
This story was published on July 20, 2007.
