Newspaper logo  
 
 
  The Iraq Constitution: And They Call This Victory?

COMMENTARY:

The Iraq Constitution: And They Call This Victory?

by Ivan Eland
The Founding Fathers realized that a majority, through an election, could gain control of government power and impose tyranny on a minority
The incompetence of the US government’s policy in Iraq was demonstrated by this weekend’s referendum on the Iraqi Constitution. The Constitution, written by the Shi’a and Kurds, has passed, over the objections of many Sunnis. Yet it symbolizes one of the U.S. government’s biggest errors in Iraq: confusing democracy with liberty.

Curiously, the United States has forgotten the wisdom of its own founders, who were more concerned with liberty than democracy. In fact, many of them regarded democracy as “mob rule.” They realized that a majority, through an election, could gain control of government power and impose tyranny on a minority. They wisely limited the jurisdiction of government, created competing branches to diffuse governmental power, and created a bill of rights so that government could not usurp the liberties of the minority. Unfortunately, over the course of US history, the American public, media, and politicians have become enamored with democracy at the expense of liberty.

The democratic process—in this case, the constitutional referendum—has conclusively demonstrated to the Sunnis that even if they vote, they are at the mercy of the alliance of Kurds and Shi’a.

Regrettably, it may take a policy failure in Iraq to refresh the American memory about the wisdom of the founders. The US government has instituted, by force, democratic processes in Iraq. However, this effort does not solve the main problem: convincing a disaffected, well-armed minority to quit fighting against the Iraqi government and the US occupation that props it up. In fact, the democratic process—in this case, the constitutional referendum—has conclusively demonstrated to the Sunnis that even if they vote, they are at the mercy of the alliance of Kurds and Shi’a. Thus, the referendum will likely fuel the rebellion, not weaken it.

The situation in Iraq has so deteriorated that a civil war is now the most likely outcome. Ironically, a rejection of the constitution might possibly have diminished the chances of such an all-out internecine bloodbath. In sharp contrast to the president’s “happy talk to victory” strategy, a constitutional defeat could have compelled a start for genuine Iraqi self-determination. A conclave of representatives from all of Iraq’s diverse tribes and ethnic and religious groups meeting on their own timetable would have allowed true consensus-building. In such a grand council, the Iraqis would have had a variety of possible governing structures to choose from, not just an imposed US-style federation. More than likely, they would have eventually chosen some type of looser confederation or even a partition.

Although the Sunnis now oppose such decentralized structures, their opposition centers more on the potential loss of oil revenues to the Kurds and Shi’a and less on regaining control of the entire country. This problem might have been solved by a negotiated arrangement to share oil revenues among the decentralized regions or by redrawing the map to give the Sunnis some of the oil fields. A myth exists that to ensure stability, decentralized regional governments would have needed to administer contiguous parcels of land. Finally, the knowledge that US forces, which protect Shi’ite and Kurdish interests, would have been withdrawing quickly would have given those groups an incentive to quickly reach an agreement on sharing oil fields or revenues with the Sunnis.

But alas, the constitution has been approved, the insurgency will continue and probably intensify, and the United States seems likely to continue to adopt policies that will make the situation in Iraq worse. For example, a congressional source informs me that Henry Hyde and Tom Lantos, the chairman and ranking minority member of the House International Affairs Committee, will surreptitiously attempt to impose further economic sanctions on Syria—ostensibly to prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but really to turn the screws for not preventing Iraqi insurgents and supplies from crossing the porous Syrian-Iraqi border.

Since Syria has provided some help to the United States in the war on terrorism, perhaps the US government should use carrots instead of sticks. Instead of imposing new sanctions, the United States could offer to remove existing sanctions if the Syrians tighten up the border. And if, by some miracle, an eventual political settlement that quelled the violence was ever reached in Iraq, a better relationship with Syria might provide the Assad government with an incentive not to undermine it. But the U.S. government keeps soldiering on with its bellicose—and counterproductive—policy toward Syria, which could put the United States on a trajectory for war with that nation.

Unfortunately, the founders’ enlightened policies that treasured liberty and presumed friendly relations with all nations are long gone. Instead, the United States is now tragically faced with a downward spiral into an Iraqi civil war.


Ivan Eland is a Senior Fellow at The Independent Institute, Director of the Institute’s Center on Peace & Liberty, and author of the books The Empire Has No Clothes and Putting “Defense” Back into U.S. Defense Policy. He may be reached at DTheroux@independent.org.



Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on October 21, 2005.

 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

05.26 Firm behind Dakota Access pipeline faces intense scrutiny for series of leaks

05.25 India cancels plans for huge coal power stations as solar energy prices hit record low

05.25 Opponents of Single Payer Think You're Stupid... But Nothing Is Dumber Than a For-Profit Healthcare System

05.24 The Other Terrorism: Toxic CO2 Gas Promoted by Trump Budget, Shell

05.23 Environmentalists Are Ignoring the Elephant In the Room: U.S. Military Is the World’s Largest Polluter [Since Trump had the EPA's records on global warming and pollution destroyed—and thus reporting world-wide has nearly stopped, let's pick on the US Military]

05.23 White House proposes slashing funds to clean up toxic sites despite EPA's pleas [far worse than just being stupid]

05.22 China and India Make Big Strides on Climate Change

News Media Matters

05.24 Roger Ailes: The Man Who Destroyed Objectivity

05.24 How Facebook flouts Holocaust denial laws except where it fears being sued [a website where rumor, gossip and hate often dominate facts and truth]

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

05.27 The Problem Isn’t Food Stamps, It’s Poverty [why is our government sociopathic?]

05.27 It’s All About Trump’s Contempt [why is our government sociopathic?]

05.27 The Four American Narratives [why is our government sociopathic?]

05.26 A New Way to Challenge the Failed "War on Drugs

05.26 'From Laughable to Inevitable': $15 Minimum Wage Hits Congress [39:40 video]

05.26 What Betsy DeVos Calls Education Transformation Is Actually Public Theft

05.26 The sick logic behind the Republican health care plan

05.26 The Mulvaney Doctrine: Sacrificing the Disadvantaged for Trump's Corporate Agenda [7:24 video]

05.25 Trump's Budget Is Immoral

05.25 How the G.O.P. Sabotaged Obamacare

05.25 Congressional Budget Office estimates GOP “fixes” to Trumpcare will leave 23 million uninsured, increase premiums

05.25 Republican candidate charged with assault after 'body-slamming' Guardian reporter [video clip]

Justice Matters

05.27 Jared Kushner discussed creating secret communications channel with Moscow – reports

05.26 Trump's Muslim Ban 2.0, "Dripping With Intolerance," Ruled Unconstitutional

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

05.23 Doughnut Economics – Grab a pencil, draw a doughnut!

05.20 Americans Are Paying $38 to Collect $1 of Student Debt

05.20 The Malta Files: How the smallest EU country became a haven for global tax avoidance [why can't we play nice together?]

International

05.27 Trump's Behavior in Europe Has Made the World Cringe. Here's What's Really on the Line at the G7.

05.27 Hopes for refugee crisis plan fall into chasm between G7 and Trump

05.27 'They kill defenceless people': thousands flee Philippine city of Marawi

05.27 Pathway to extremism: what militants across the political spectrum have in common [is rising uncertainty the driver?]

05.26 Trump set to clash with other G7 leaders over refugees, trade and climate

05.25 Fast-moving cholera outbreak in Yemen furthers the destruction of a war-torn nation [genocide via "accidental" infrastructure damage]

05.24 A Danger to the World: It's Time to Get Rid of Donald Trump

05.24 World is plundering Africa's wealth for 'billions of dollars a year'

05.23 Could an Islamic reformation prevent violent radicalisation in Egypt? [denied vital lives enmasse, angry youth rebel in the only way that has any effect]

05.23 At least 22 dead and 50 injured, in suicide bomb attack at Manchester Arena

05.23 Facebook flooded with 'sextortion' and revenge porn, files reveal [wake-up people, don't let kids 'play' here]

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: