Newspaper logo  
 
 
  The Iraq Constitution: And They Call This Victory?

COMMENTARY:

The Iraq Constitution: And They Call This Victory?

by Ivan Eland
The Founding Fathers realized that a majority, through an election, could gain control of government power and impose tyranny on a minority
The incompetence of the US government’s policy in Iraq was demonstrated by this weekend’s referendum on the Iraqi Constitution. The Constitution, written by the Shi’a and Kurds, has passed, over the objections of many Sunnis. Yet it symbolizes one of the U.S. government’s biggest errors in Iraq: confusing democracy with liberty.

Curiously, the United States has forgotten the wisdom of its own founders, who were more concerned with liberty than democracy. In fact, many of them regarded democracy as “mob rule.” They realized that a majority, through an election, could gain control of government power and impose tyranny on a minority. They wisely limited the jurisdiction of government, created competing branches to diffuse governmental power, and created a bill of rights so that government could not usurp the liberties of the minority. Unfortunately, over the course of US history, the American public, media, and politicians have become enamored with democracy at the expense of liberty.

The democratic process—in this case, the constitutional referendum—has conclusively demonstrated to the Sunnis that even if they vote, they are at the mercy of the alliance of Kurds and Shi’a.

Regrettably, it may take a policy failure in Iraq to refresh the American memory about the wisdom of the founders. The US government has instituted, by force, democratic processes in Iraq. However, this effort does not solve the main problem: convincing a disaffected, well-armed minority to quit fighting against the Iraqi government and the US occupation that props it up. In fact, the democratic process—in this case, the constitutional referendum—has conclusively demonstrated to the Sunnis that even if they vote, they are at the mercy of the alliance of Kurds and Shi’a. Thus, the referendum will likely fuel the rebellion, not weaken it.

The situation in Iraq has so deteriorated that a civil war is now the most likely outcome. Ironically, a rejection of the constitution might possibly have diminished the chances of such an all-out internecine bloodbath. In sharp contrast to the president’s “happy talk to victory” strategy, a constitutional defeat could have compelled a start for genuine Iraqi self-determination. A conclave of representatives from all of Iraq’s diverse tribes and ethnic and religious groups meeting on their own timetable would have allowed true consensus-building. In such a grand council, the Iraqis would have had a variety of possible governing structures to choose from, not just an imposed US-style federation. More than likely, they would have eventually chosen some type of looser confederation or even a partition.

Although the Sunnis now oppose such decentralized structures, their opposition centers more on the potential loss of oil revenues to the Kurds and Shi’a and less on regaining control of the entire country. This problem might have been solved by a negotiated arrangement to share oil revenues among the decentralized regions or by redrawing the map to give the Sunnis some of the oil fields. A myth exists that to ensure stability, decentralized regional governments would have needed to administer contiguous parcels of land. Finally, the knowledge that US forces, which protect Shi’ite and Kurdish interests, would have been withdrawing quickly would have given those groups an incentive to quickly reach an agreement on sharing oil fields or revenues with the Sunnis.

But alas, the constitution has been approved, the insurgency will continue and probably intensify, and the United States seems likely to continue to adopt policies that will make the situation in Iraq worse. For example, a congressional source informs me that Henry Hyde and Tom Lantos, the chairman and ranking minority member of the House International Affairs Committee, will surreptitiously attempt to impose further economic sanctions on Syria—ostensibly to prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but really to turn the screws for not preventing Iraqi insurgents and supplies from crossing the porous Syrian-Iraqi border.

Since Syria has provided some help to the United States in the war on terrorism, perhaps the US government should use carrots instead of sticks. Instead of imposing new sanctions, the United States could offer to remove existing sanctions if the Syrians tighten up the border. And if, by some miracle, an eventual political settlement that quelled the violence was ever reached in Iraq, a better relationship with Syria might provide the Assad government with an incentive not to undermine it. But the U.S. government keeps soldiering on with its bellicose—and counterproductive—policy toward Syria, which could put the United States on a trajectory for war with that nation.

Unfortunately, the founders’ enlightened policies that treasured liberty and presumed friendly relations with all nations are long gone. Instead, the United States is now tragically faced with a downward spiral into an Iraqi civil war.


Ivan Eland is a Senior Fellow at The Independent Institute, Director of the Institute’s Center on Peace & Liberty, and author of the books The Empire Has No Clothes and Putting “Defense” Back into U.S. Defense Policy. He may be reached at DTheroux@independent.org.



Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on October 21, 2005.

 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

04.23 US business schools failing on climate change

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

04.25 Pollution From Canada’s Oil Sands May Be Underreported

04.25 High court orders UK government to explain clean air plan delay

04.25 Matt Damon: ‘Children are drinking water so dirty it looks like chocolate milk’

04.24 Disney, the Gap and Pepsi urged to quit US Chamber of Commerce ["Its a small world after all..." – Disney]

04.24 Why we joined the March for Science

04.23 The trees that make Southern California shady and green are dying. Fast. [video]

04.23 March for Science puts Earth Day focus on global opposition to Trump [videos]

04.22 Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Threat of Science Denial [4 videos]

04.22 These Images Carry a Dire Warning About Climate Change

04.22 Nearly 40 million people live in UK areas with illegal air pollution [rather than maximizing profit from fossil fuels, better policy embracing science could dramatically improve life on earth]

04.22 Bill Nye the Science Guy on Trump: 'We are in a dangerous place' [we need the opposite of Trump to advance the country and world]

04.22 Electric flying car that takes off vertically could be future of transport [videos; new solid-state lithium battery technolgy—led? by Dr. Goodenough—may double performance and recharge speed while eliminating risk of lithium battery fire]

04.22 Global 'March for Science' protests call for action on climate change

04.21 Sale Of Seawater Desalination Technology In China

04.21 Britain set for first coal-free day since the industrial revolution [Hurrah!]

04.20 How to Stop Drug Price Gouging [and why hasn't the U.S. Government done this?]

04.20 East Chicago Needs More than "Basics" from Scott Pruitt's EPA

04.20 The Monsanto Tribunal’s Legal Opinion Reinforces Movements’ Struggle for Basic Human Rights

04.20 Pollution is killing our children. Here’s how we can save them

News Media Matters

04.25 The Media Bubble Is Worse Than You Think

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

04.25 The Democrats delivered one thing in the past 100 days: disappointment

04.25 Can Donald Trump better renegotiate Nafta? Yes, by bringing back TPP04.25 Trump signals delay on border wall funding to avoid government shutdown

04.25 Would Trump supporters elect him again now?

04.25 There’s no such thing as a blue or red state. Let’s talk about real life instead

04.24 Donald Trump Has Made Socialism Cool Again

04.24 Nearing 100 Days In, Trump is Least Popular President in Modern History

04.24 Comey Tried to Shield the F.B.I. From Politics. Then He Shaped an Election.

04.23 Trump’s Organized Crime Ties Bring Blackmail to the White House

04.23 Trump: 100 days that shook the world – and the activists fighting back

Justice Matters
High Crimes?

04.25 The Palestine Exception

Economics, Crony Capitalism

04.25 The Right’s Green Awakening

04.25 Trump's Corporate Takeover Detailed 100 Days into 'For-Profit Presidency'

04.23 Elizabeth Warren on Big Banks and Their (Cozy Bedmate) Regulators

04.23 The evidence is piling up — Silicon Valley is being destroyed

04.22 THE REAL TRUMP AGENDA: HELPING BIG BUSINESS

04.22 In Latest Populist Betrayal, Trump Executive Order Unchains Wall Street Greed [misfeasance, nonfeasance, and malfeasance]

International

04.25 Two wildlife rangers killed by poachers in Democratic Republic of the Congo

04.25 Ontario plans to launch universal basic income trial run this summer

04.24 Life in Africa’s Last Colony

04.24 Trump push for border wall threatens to cause government shutdown [since inexpensive electric flying cars are about to be sold, building any wall is just stupid]

04.24 Chinese leader urges restraint over North Korea in call with Trump

04.24 Trump Thinks This Is Pro-Life?

04.24 How France Voted

04.24 Asking for Trouble on Iran

04.23 The Observer view on the French presidential election

04.23 French election 2017: voters go to the polls in wide-open contest [videos]

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: