Newspaper logo  
 
 
  The Iraq Constitution: And They Call This Victory?

COMMENTARY:

The Iraq Constitution: And They Call This Victory?

by Ivan Eland
The Founding Fathers realized that a majority, through an election, could gain control of government power and impose tyranny on a minority
The incompetence of the US government’s policy in Iraq was demonstrated by this weekend’s referendum on the Iraqi Constitution. The Constitution, written by the Shi’a and Kurds, has passed, over the objections of many Sunnis. Yet it symbolizes one of the U.S. government’s biggest errors in Iraq: confusing democracy with liberty.

Curiously, the United States has forgotten the wisdom of its own founders, who were more concerned with liberty than democracy. In fact, many of them regarded democracy as “mob rule.” They realized that a majority, through an election, could gain control of government power and impose tyranny on a minority. They wisely limited the jurisdiction of government, created competing branches to diffuse governmental power, and created a bill of rights so that government could not usurp the liberties of the minority. Unfortunately, over the course of US history, the American public, media, and politicians have become enamored with democracy at the expense of liberty.

The democratic process—in this case, the constitutional referendum—has conclusively demonstrated to the Sunnis that even if they vote, they are at the mercy of the alliance of Kurds and Shi’a.

Regrettably, it may take a policy failure in Iraq to refresh the American memory about the wisdom of the founders. The US government has instituted, by force, democratic processes in Iraq. However, this effort does not solve the main problem: convincing a disaffected, well-armed minority to quit fighting against the Iraqi government and the US occupation that props it up. In fact, the democratic process—in this case, the constitutional referendum—has conclusively demonstrated to the Sunnis that even if they vote, they are at the mercy of the alliance of Kurds and Shi’a. Thus, the referendum will likely fuel the rebellion, not weaken it.

The situation in Iraq has so deteriorated that a civil war is now the most likely outcome. Ironically, a rejection of the constitution might possibly have diminished the chances of such an all-out internecine bloodbath. In sharp contrast to the president’s “happy talk to victory” strategy, a constitutional defeat could have compelled a start for genuine Iraqi self-determination. A conclave of representatives from all of Iraq’s diverse tribes and ethnic and religious groups meeting on their own timetable would have allowed true consensus-building. In such a grand council, the Iraqis would have had a variety of possible governing structures to choose from, not just an imposed US-style federation. More than likely, they would have eventually chosen some type of looser confederation or even a partition.

Although the Sunnis now oppose such decentralized structures, their opposition centers more on the potential loss of oil revenues to the Kurds and Shi’a and less on regaining control of the entire country. This problem might have been solved by a negotiated arrangement to share oil revenues among the decentralized regions or by redrawing the map to give the Sunnis some of the oil fields. A myth exists that to ensure stability, decentralized regional governments would have needed to administer contiguous parcels of land. Finally, the knowledge that US forces, which protect Shi’ite and Kurdish interests, would have been withdrawing quickly would have given those groups an incentive to quickly reach an agreement on sharing oil fields or revenues with the Sunnis.

But alas, the constitution has been approved, the insurgency will continue and probably intensify, and the United States seems likely to continue to adopt policies that will make the situation in Iraq worse. For example, a congressional source informs me that Henry Hyde and Tom Lantos, the chairman and ranking minority member of the House International Affairs Committee, will surreptitiously attempt to impose further economic sanctions on Syria—ostensibly to prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but really to turn the screws for not preventing Iraqi insurgents and supplies from crossing the porous Syrian-Iraqi border.

Since Syria has provided some help to the United States in the war on terrorism, perhaps the US government should use carrots instead of sticks. Instead of imposing new sanctions, the United States could offer to remove existing sanctions if the Syrians tighten up the border. And if, by some miracle, an eventual political settlement that quelled the violence was ever reached in Iraq, a better relationship with Syria might provide the Assad government with an incentive not to undermine it. But the U.S. government keeps soldiering on with its bellicose—and counterproductive—policy toward Syria, which could put the United States on a trajectory for war with that nation.

Unfortunately, the founders’ enlightened policies that treasured liberty and presumed friendly relations with all nations are long gone. Instead, the United States is now tragically faced with a downward spiral into an Iraqi civil war.


Ivan Eland is a Senior Fellow at The Independent Institute, Director of the Institute’s Center on Peace & Liberty, and author of the books The Empire Has No Clothes and Putting “Defense” Back into U.S. Defense Policy. He may be reached at DTheroux@independent.org.



Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on October 21, 2005.

 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education

09.15 Missing aid millions deny Syrian kids education and fuel 'lost generation' fears

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

09.19 Canadian Doctor to U.S.: Try Single-Payer Health Care Instead Of Trashing It

09.18 China to buy $300 mn. in Lab-Grown Meat from Israel

09.18 Women of childbearing age around world suffering toxic levels of mercury

09.17 China to send over 100 pollution inspection teams to cities around Beijing

09.16 The Health Care Debate We’re Not Having [we need to fully expose and root-out America's profit-obsessed, mafia-like healthcare practices]

09.16 Conflicts and Climate Change Fueling Rise in World Hunger

09.16 Driving force: are electric cars crowding out traditional engines?

09.15 'Alarm bells we cannot ignore': world hunger rising for first time this century

09.15 California’s big battery experiment: a turning point for energy storage?

09.15 EU report on weedkiller safety copied text from Monsanto study

09.15 Half of Canada's monitored wildlife is in decline, major study finds [would the Koch brothers like to make a comment?]

09.14 On The Road To Extinction, Maybe It's Not All About Us [all of us—but especially oil & gas companies—need to know the harm and death we've caused to all life as we know it, and we must undo that damage]

09.14 The entrepreneurs turning carbon dioxide into fuels [end-products later burned and polluting aren't helpful]

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

09.19 Single-Payer Movement Shows: Life After Trump May Not Suck

09.19 Gone Baby Gone

09.18 'Red Alert' Sounded: Trumpcare Is Back, More Brutal and Deadly Than Ever

09.16 Dawn of the Berniecratic Party

09.16 Sen. Warren Introduces Legislation to Save Consumers From 'Equifax Exploitation'

09.15 Why Bernie Sanders' Single-Payer Push Is Great Policy and Even Better Politics

09.15 Sen. Warren Rips Anthem for Sending 'Bigger Tax Cuts or Else' Ransom Note

09.13 Bernie Sanders unveils universal healthcare bill: 'We will win this struggle' [assuming typical cost-controls and efficiencies, ongoing total savings will be at least a $Trillion per year with government paying a larger portion of over-all costs]

Justice Matters

09.16 UK legal claims grow over exposure at work to toxic diesel fumes

09.15 'Inviting Bribes' as Legal Fees Soar, Trump Ethics Office Lifts Anonymous Gift Ban

High Crimes?

09.18 When Is a Genocide a Genocide?

09.17 The Forgotten Victims of Agent Orange [why was there no war crime trial and punishment for this?]

Economics, Crony Capitalism

09.18 GOVERNMENT BY GOLDMAN

09.18 The Growing Danger of Dynastic Wealth

09.18 College in the U.S. Is More Expensive Than in Any Other Country in the World [our 'mafia capitalism' is the best in the world!]

09.18 We need to make democracy work in the fight to save the planet

09.16 Capitalism and Poverty [as disemployment from automation and offshoring increases the population at risk of poverty will grow, so we'll have to help them or society will become more suicidal and violent]

09.15 Equifax Isn’t A Data Problem. It’s A Political Problem.

International & Futurism

09.18 The billionaires investing in Cyprus in exchange for EU passports

09.16 Alienation Is Killing Americans and Japanese

09.16 US foreign policy as bellicose as ever

09.15 Bill Gates: Don't expect charities to pick up the bill for Trump's sweeping aid cuts

09.15 The UN is failing – states must back off and give its leader the power to act

09.15 Migrants stuck on endless ferry journey as countries refuse entry [like the Jews on the Voyage of the St. Louis in 1939]

09.15 Moscow flaunts might against fading Isis as it alters balance of power in Syria [endless war cultivates a cavalier attitude]

09.15 Tillerson on North Korea: Russia and China must take 'direct action' over missile launch

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: