Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

03.28 It's taken seven years, but California is finally cleaning up microbead pollution

03.28 Rockefeller Brothers Fund: it is our moral duty to divest from fossil fuels

03.28 Can Aqua-Spark fund the future of aquaculture?

03.28 The California drought is a problem Silicon Valley isn't helping to solve

03.27 Large fall in UK greenhouse gas emissions of over 8% last year

03.26 Naomi Klein: Let's kick oil while the price is down – video

03.26 Leaders of European cities make pledge to tackle climate change [Statement by the Mayors]

03.26 Single-Dose Cures for Malaria, Other Diseases

03.26 Genome Study Predicts DNA of the Whole of Iceland

News Media

03.28 The Reckless Man's Case for Bombing Iran

03.27 Always Remember, the NY Times Pushed, Hard, for War in Iraq

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.27 Guess Which Ultra Liberal State Is About to Become a Hellish Place for People to Work in?

03.27 The Glaring, Brazen Hypocrisy at the Heart of American Right-Wing Christianity

03.26 Payday loan borrowers: ‘When are we going to be done paying these people?’

03.24 Nation's largest ocean desalination plant goes up near San Diego; Future of the California coast? [map of sites]

Justice Matters

03.26 Many women of color don't go to the police after sexual assault for a reason

High Crimes?

03.24 African elephants could be extinct in wild within decades say experts

03.23 Africa is centre of a ‘wildlife war’ that the world is losing

Economics, Crony Capitalism

03.26 Regulatory Capture, Captured on Video [1:21 video]

03.26 US risks epic blunder by treating China as an economic enemy

03.25 Currency concerns everywhere

03.25 California Water Wars: Another Form of Asset Stripping?

International

03.28 Amazon Robot Contest May Accelerate Warehouse Automation

03.28 The Confused Person's Guide to Middle East Conflicts [an Escher-like graphic]

03.28 Portable media players give North Koreans an illicit window on the world

03.28 Saudi planes pound Yemeni capital in second night of bombing, witnesses say

03.27 Sex parties, cartels and 'significant' risks: DEA agents stung by damning report

03.27 Back from the Brink: Spain Emerges as Model for Europe

03.27 Caliphate Under Pressure: Is Islamic State in Trouble in Iraq?

03.27 How the US Government and US Military Became Murder, Inc.

03.27 South Sudan food crisis leaves people of Ganyiel desperate for a peace deal

03.27 US defends strategy in Yemen and Iraq but diplomats admit: it's a mess

03.25 Central African Republic farmers ‘need seeds urgently to avert food shortages’

03.25 What happened to Germanwings flight 4U 9525?

03.25 Saudi Arabia moves military equipment to border with Yemen

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Don't Mention the War
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

Don’t Mention the War

by John Hickman
An analysis of Congressional web sites reveals that although Republican Members are less likely to mention the War in Iraq than their Democratic counterparts, neither party delegation appears intent on highlighting the war.
Four out of five Republican Members of the U.S. House of Representatives have taken Basil Fawlty’s admonition to heart: “Don’t mention the war!” Fawlty was that desperately twitchy character played by John Cleese in the seventies BBC television series "Fawlty Towers" and the admonition appeared in “The Germans,” the episode where parapraxis defeats every attempt to attempt to communicate with a group of visiting German VIPs. House Republicans know that the American electorate associates their president and their party with the War in Iraq, and in all but the safest districts that spells electoral danger. Unsurprisingly, their response is to avoid discussing the war. What is surprising is that it isn’t just the Republicans who are being quiet about the War in Iraq. Many House Democrats also appear reluctant to draw attention to the War in Iraq.

Evidence for this conspicuous avoidance is found in a content survey of 437 individual official House of Representatives web-sites between May 22-26, including those of 230 Republican Members, 201 Democratic Members, 4 Democratic Delegates, 1 Republican Delegate and 1 Independent Member. Five House seats are vacant. What the data reveal are similarities between Republican and Democratic House Members in the frequencies with which they mention major issues on the first pages of their web sites.

War in IraqImmigrationPresident BushPolitical Party
Republicans41 (18%)54 (23%)39 (17%)49 (21%)
Democrats47 (23%)32 (15%)31 (15%)107 (52%)
Totals88 (20%)86 (20%)70 (16%)156 (36%)


Although Republican Members are less likely to mention the War in Iraq than their Democratic counterparts, neither party delegation appears intent on highlighting the war. That doesn’t mean they are unwilling to mention foreign affairs. Numerous references to Sudan and the crisis in Darfur can be found on the web pages of the Democrats while Republicans favor Dubai and Mexico. Most of the countries on the planet are mentioned by at least one Republican: although Iraq doesn’t merit a mention from Tennessee Rep. John J. Duncan, Scotland does. To be sure, there are numerous immediate references to Veterans, and several mouse clicks into many of the official web sites old press releases about Iraq can be found, but it’s all too obvious that many Members are ready to move on even while more American soldiers become casualties every day.

Immigration doesn’t feature heavily as an issue either. Less than one-fifth of Republican and only one-sixth of Democratic web sites mention the issue on the first page. This is clearly not an issue that works well for all Republicans. The most obvious difference is that the web sites of Democrats are more likely to include a translation to Spanish button than those of Republicans. Of course, a few House Republicans are staking out strong positions on Immigration. Read Texas Republican John Culberson’s web page and you might wonder whether the United States, or at least Texas, was at war with Mexico.

Roughly the same frequency distribution exists for references to Pres. George W. Bush, with little more than one-fifth of Republican and one-sixth of Democratic web sites mentioning him on the first page. House Republicans are keeping their distance from a Republican president unable to arrest the decline in his poll numbers.

For the first time in two decades many House Democrats are presenting themselves as Democrats while House Republicans are presenting themselves as individual Members of the House of Representatives.
The big difference in the figures is that between references to political party affiliation. More than half the Democratic web sites mention membership in the Democratic Party on the first page while barely one-fifth of the Republican web sites do so. For the first time in two decades many House Democrats are presenting themselves as Democrats while House Republicans are presenting themselves as individual Members of the House of Representatives.

Just as many House Democrats once felt it necessary to disguise their party affiliation, now many House Republicans have begun to mimic those across the aisle. Connecticut Rep. Nancy L. Johnson‘s web site provides the best example. Not only has her web page been sanitized of all references to the Republican Party but it mentions an award received from the Sierra Club and a photo of Rep. Johnson and former Pres. Bill Clinton smiling at one another. When Republicans lose their majority in the House of Representatives in 2006 or 2008 Rep. Johnson and several others like her may be ready to increase the Democratic majority by switching parties.

Not mentioning the war is clearly insufficient for four out of five House Republicans. They have also decided to distance themselves from the Republican Party as the incumbent party of government voters will punish for Iraq, Katrina and other disasters. What all this suggests is a new shape to American politics in 2006 and afterward, with Democratic candidates running for office as a team against the execrable performance of the second Bush administration and its tame Republican Congresses. Unfortunately, what it doesn’t promise is any political accounting for the War in Iraq. Silence on this issue leaves Americans with an unacceptable collective burden of repressed material. Who is responsible for marching the United States into a war that it didn’t need to fight? Who will be held responsible? The only way to answer these questions is to talk about the war itself.
Dr. Hickman is Associate Professor of Government in the Department of Government and International Studies at Berry College in Georgia. He may be reached at jhickman@berry.edu.


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on May 31, 2006.
 


Public Service Ads: