Newspaper logo  
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education

11.29 The scientists whose garden unlocked the secret to good health

Open Letters:

12.01 Open Letter: Man’s impact on Pale Blue Dot is Undeniable

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

12.01 The Most Ambitious Emissions Pledges on the Table in Paris Would Still Result in Catastrophic Warming

12.01 No plan B for climate change without forests, Prince Charles tells Paris summit [plants use solar to absorb the C from CO2 and oxygenate our atmosphere...]

12.01 Unsafe Climates

12.01 Money to Burn

11.30 Gauging a warming world [interactive & animated graphics]

11.30 The greenest city mayors take home the fight against climate change

11.30 Smarter renewable power: six innovations

11.30 World Pollutionwatch: Pain in Spain

11.30 Obama calls Paris climate talks an 'act of defiance' in wake of recent attacks [video]

11.30 Major powers pledge $20bn for green energy research [videos]

11.29 The Paris climate summit is a real test of humanity

11.29 Planned Parenthood on shooting: we will 'never back away' from mission

11.29 Contaminating Our Bodies With Everyday Products

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

12.01 The Terrorists Among Us

12.01 Ralph Nader on 2016, Wall Street, and Our Broken Political System

12.01 Every Female Democratic Senator Is Backing Clinton—With One Notable Exception

12.01 The Planned Parenthood Shooting and the Republican Candidates’ Responses

11.30 Fiorina: I Will Not Be Bullied Into Telling Truth

11.30 Only three states score higher than D+ in State Integrity Investigation; 11 flunk [interactive map]

11.30 A Wealthy Governor and His Friends Are Remaking Illinois

11.29 GOP’s hell-bent on tearing us apart: A decades-long strategy to win by divisiveness now leads to President Donald Trump [fighting to continue a racist culture...]

Justice Matters

11.30 Trials of officers in Freddie Gray case begin amid skepticism over process

11.28 The Corrupt System That Killed Laquan McDonald [1:40 video]

High Crimes?

11.30 Japanese whaling fleet to set sail for Antarctic

Economics, Crony Capitalism

11.27 Paris climate talks: powerful business lobbies seek to undermine deal

11.25 Fossil fuel companies risk wasting $2tn of investors' money, study says


12.01 Ex-US Intelligence Chief on Islamic State's Rise: 'We Were Too Dumb'

12.01 EU Parliament President Schulz: 'The Situation in Europe Is Extremely Concerning'

11.30 Philippe-Joseph Salazar: the philosopher whose essay on Isis has shocked and enlightened

11.30 Europe split over refugee deal as Germany leads breakaway coalition

11.29 The world wants more 'porous' cities – so why don't we build them?

11.29 This Composer Wants You To Know Who Syrian Refugees Really Are [her music]

11.29 Poll: Muslims actually HATE ISIL/ Daesh

11.29 Turkey reels as Putin imposes Stiff Economic Sanctions

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
This site Web
  Don't Mention the War
Newspaper logo


Don’t Mention the War

by John Hickman
An analysis of Congressional web sites reveals that although Republican Members are less likely to mention the War in Iraq than their Democratic counterparts, neither party delegation appears intent on highlighting the war.
Four out of five Republican Members of the U.S. House of Representatives have taken Basil Fawlty’s admonition to heart: “Don’t mention the war!” Fawlty was that desperately twitchy character played by John Cleese in the seventies BBC television series "Fawlty Towers" and the admonition appeared in “The Germans,” the episode where parapraxis defeats every attempt to attempt to communicate with a group of visiting German VIPs. House Republicans know that the American electorate associates their president and their party with the War in Iraq, and in all but the safest districts that spells electoral danger. Unsurprisingly, their response is to avoid discussing the war. What is surprising is that it isn’t just the Republicans who are being quiet about the War in Iraq. Many House Democrats also appear reluctant to draw attention to the War in Iraq.

Evidence for this conspicuous avoidance is found in a content survey of 437 individual official House of Representatives web-sites between May 22-26, including those of 230 Republican Members, 201 Democratic Members, 4 Democratic Delegates, 1 Republican Delegate and 1 Independent Member. Five House seats are vacant. What the data reveal are similarities between Republican and Democratic House Members in the frequencies with which they mention major issues on the first pages of their web sites.

War in IraqImmigrationPresident BushPolitical Party
Republicans41 (18%)54 (23%)39 (17%)49 (21%)
Democrats47 (23%)32 (15%)31 (15%)107 (52%)
Totals88 (20%)86 (20%)70 (16%)156 (36%)

Although Republican Members are less likely to mention the War in Iraq than their Democratic counterparts, neither party delegation appears intent on highlighting the war. That doesn’t mean they are unwilling to mention foreign affairs. Numerous references to Sudan and the crisis in Darfur can be found on the web pages of the Democrats while Republicans favor Dubai and Mexico. Most of the countries on the planet are mentioned by at least one Republican: although Iraq doesn’t merit a mention from Tennessee Rep. John J. Duncan, Scotland does. To be sure, there are numerous immediate references to Veterans, and several mouse clicks into many of the official web sites old press releases about Iraq can be found, but it’s all too obvious that many Members are ready to move on even while more American soldiers become casualties every day.

Immigration doesn’t feature heavily as an issue either. Less than one-fifth of Republican and only one-sixth of Democratic web sites mention the issue on the first page. This is clearly not an issue that works well for all Republicans. The most obvious difference is that the web sites of Democrats are more likely to include a translation to Spanish button than those of Republicans. Of course, a few House Republicans are staking out strong positions on Immigration. Read Texas Republican John Culberson’s web page and you might wonder whether the United States, or at least Texas, was at war with Mexico.

Roughly the same frequency distribution exists for references to Pres. George W. Bush, with little more than one-fifth of Republican and one-sixth of Democratic web sites mentioning him on the first page. House Republicans are keeping their distance from a Republican president unable to arrest the decline in his poll numbers.

For the first time in two decades many House Democrats are presenting themselves as Democrats while House Republicans are presenting themselves as individual Members of the House of Representatives.
The big difference in the figures is that between references to political party affiliation. More than half the Democratic web sites mention membership in the Democratic Party on the first page while barely one-fifth of the Republican web sites do so. For the first time in two decades many House Democrats are presenting themselves as Democrats while House Republicans are presenting themselves as individual Members of the House of Representatives.

Just as many House Democrats once felt it necessary to disguise their party affiliation, now many House Republicans have begun to mimic those across the aisle. Connecticut Rep. Nancy L. Johnson‘s web site provides the best example. Not only has her web page been sanitized of all references to the Republican Party but it mentions an award received from the Sierra Club and a photo of Rep. Johnson and former Pres. Bill Clinton smiling at one another. When Republicans lose their majority in the House of Representatives in 2006 or 2008 Rep. Johnson and several others like her may be ready to increase the Democratic majority by switching parties.

Not mentioning the war is clearly insufficient for four out of five House Republicans. They have also decided to distance themselves from the Republican Party as the incumbent party of government voters will punish for Iraq, Katrina and other disasters. What all this suggests is a new shape to American politics in 2006 and afterward, with Democratic candidates running for office as a team against the execrable performance of the second Bush administration and its tame Republican Congresses. Unfortunately, what it doesn’t promise is any political accounting for the War in Iraq. Silence on this issue leaves Americans with an unacceptable collective burden of repressed material. Who is responsible for marching the United States into a war that it didn’t need to fight? Who will be held responsible? The only way to answer these questions is to talk about the war itself.
Dr. Hickman is Associate Professor of Government in the Department of Government and International Studies at Berry College in Georgia. He may be reached at

Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on May 31, 2006.

Public Service Ads: