ECONOMICS:

Biggest Defense Contractors Raise CEOs' Pay 200% Since 9/11

Ratio of CEO-to-Worker Pay Shoots Up to 431:1

SOURCES: Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy
If the minimum wage had risen as fast as CEO pay, the lowest-paid workers in the US would be earning $23.03 an hour today
2004 was a banner year for CEOs and a dismal year for workers, according to a new report from the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy, "Executive Excess 2005: Defense Contractors Get More Bucks for the Bang."

The ratio of average CEO pay (now $11.8 million) to worker pay (now $27,460) spiked up from 301-to-1 in 2003 to 431-to-1 in 2004.

If the minimum wage had risen as fast as CEO pay since 1990, the lowest-paid workers in the US would be earning $23.03 an hour today, not $5.15 an hour.

The report found that CEOs are individually profiting from the Iraq War, with huge average raises at the biggest defense contractors.

At the 34 publicly traded US corporations among the 2004 top 100 defense contractors with 10% or more of their revenues from defense contracts—companies such as United Technologies, Textron, and General Dynamics—average CEO pay increased 200% from 2001 to 2004, versus 7% for all CEOs.

For example, David H. Brooks, CEO of bulletproof vest maker DHB Industries, earned $70 million in 2004, 3,349% more than his 2001 compensation of $525,000. Brooks also sold company stock worth about $186 million last year, spooking investors who drove DHB’s share price from more than $22 to as low as $6.50. In May 2005, the US Marines recalled more than 5,000 DHB armored vests after questions were raised about their effectiveness. By that time, Brooks had pocketed over $250 million in war windfalls.

Since September 11, the ratio between median pay for defense CEOs and pay for military generals has nearly doubled to 23-to-1, up from 12-to-1 just three years earlier. The pay ratio between defense CEOs and army privates soared to 160-to-1, up from just 89-to-1 in 2001.

The report reviewed trends in CEO pay and gave CEO "Hall of Shame" awards to executives who have exemplified five types of excessive pay:

US tax law allows companies to deduct executive compensation as a “reasonable business expense,” but no standard limit to the deductions has been established.
These disproportionate CEO salaries are often subsidized by American taxpayers. US tax law allows companies to deduct executive compensation as a “reasonable business expense,” but no standard limit to the deductions has been established. The report suggests implementing legislation such as the Income Equity Act, introduced by Rep. Martin Olav Sabo (D-MN), which would cap these deductions at no more than 25 times the salary of the lowest-paid worker. The report also favors making corporate boards, which approve CEO compensation, more accountable to shareholders.

Authored by Sarah Anderson, John Cavanagh, Scott Klinger, and Liz Stanton, "Executive Excess 2005" is the twelfth annual CEO pay study by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) and United for a Fair Economy (UFE). The IPS is an independent center for progressive research and education in Washington, DC. UFE is a national organization based in Boston that spotlights growing economic inequality.


To see the whole study, visit United for a Fair Economy's website. United for a Fair Economy is an independent national organization that raises awareness of the damaging consequences of concentrated wealth and power.



Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on October 3, 2005.