Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

04.21 Glyphosate is a 'probably carcinogenic' pesticide. Why do cities still use it?

04.21 Sustainable development goals: all you need to know [The SDGs: changing the world in 17 steps – interactive]

04.21 What will the chief sustainability officer of the future look like?

04.21 Australia could source 100% of power from renewables by 2050, report finds

04.20 Republicans who limit what medical students can learn doom us to stupid doctors

04.20 Turning Ethiopia's desert green

04.20 There's a Place That's Nearly Perfect for Growing Food. It's Not California. [map graphics]

04.20 Carbon reserves held by top fossil fuel companies soar

04.20 Revealed: government knew of farm poisoning risk but failed to act

04.19 How America Reduced Its Healthcare Spending by $2 Trillion

04.19 Seven things you need to know about sustainable smart technology

04.19 'Mysterious' disease kills 18 in Nigeria

04.18 Litigation Instead Of Leadership

04.18 4 surprising reasons why clean energy is gaining on fossil fuels

04.18 Sustainable development must prioritise women's sexual health

04.18 Price on carbon key to Canada tackling global warming, say researchers

04.18 Circular economy could bring 70 percent cut in carbon emissions by 2030

News Media

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & Culture

04.21 Six Baltimore officers suspended over police-van death of Freddie Gray [1:02 video]

04.21 1.5 Million Missing Black Men

04.20 Former Lehman Bros executive Kasich eyes 2016 and knocks Wall Street 'greed'

04.19 The Dangerous Myth of Appomattox

04.18 “The Ron Paul of the left”: Why Bernie Sanders is the cranky socialist 2016 needs

04.18 Texas lawmakers poised to allow the open carrying of handguns

Justice Matters

04.21 The American Nightmare: Debbie Milke Recounts Life on Death Row

04.20 CSI Is a Lie

04.20 Ex-IMF president Rodrigo Rato arrested on criminal charges

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

04.20 Iceland looks at ending boom and bust with radical money plan

04.18 Supply-Side Doom in Kansas

International

04.21 Buying Better: The Impossible Challenge of Ethical Shopping

04.21 The Terror Strategist: Secret Files Reveal the Structure of Islamic State

04.21 Opinion: Europe Should Protect People, Not Borders

04.21 The silence about Europe right now makes me nervous

04.21 Japan's maglev train breaks world speed record with 600km/h test run [0:51 video]

04.21 Art in Iraq: ‘Baghdad is happening! It’s like New York...’

04.20 Faith vs. Facts

04.20 700 Dead: Is Europe’s Neglect of Mediterranean Migrants a form of Genocide?

04.20 Democratic Differences

04.19 Nice Downtowns: How Did They Get That Way?

04.19 Refugees don’t need our tears. They need us to stop making them refugees

04.19 700 migrants feared dead in Mediterranean shipwreck

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Hagarism: The Story of a Book Written by Infidels for Infidels

COMMENTARY:

Hagarism: The Story of a Book Written by Infidels for Infidels

by Dr. Liaquat Ali Khan
Scholarly decency demands that the authors of the 1977 book Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people.
The book titled Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World questions just about everything Muslims believe as historical truths. It challenges the common belief that the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad over a period of 22 years (610-632) in Mecca and Medina. Instead, the book contends that the Quran was composed, possibly in Syria or Iraq, more than fifty years after the Prophet’s death, projected back in time, and attributed to the Prophet. The Quran, according to the book, was fabricated during the reign of Caliph Abdul Malik (685-705) to legitimize an expanding empire. The book also contends that the word "Muslim" was invented in the 8th century to replace the word Muhajirun (immigrants), which was the original name of the Arab community that conquered Palestine and built the Dome of the Rock. The book itself prescribes a new name for early Muslims. It calls them Hagarenes, that is, the biological descendants of Abraham by Hagar. This racial naming of early Muslims is employed to distinguish them from Jews, who are the descendants of Abraham by Sarah. Hagarism, the book’s title, is a quasi-pejorative, and possibly a racist, label to describe the historical phenomenon of early Muslims.

In the authors’ own words, the book is written “by infidels for infidels.” Attacks on the Quran’s authenticity, the Prophet’s integrity, or Islamic history are not new. The Quran itself acknowledges similar attacks the unbelievers made while the Quran was being revealed. For more than a thousand years, Western scholarship has been determined to expose what it considers to be the “fraudulent foundation” of Islam. In this sense, Hagarism is yet another book in the large dump of attack literature.

However, what distinguishes this book is the fact that its authors, Michael Cook and Patricia Crone, no longer subscribe to its critical findings. On April 3, 2006, I had a phone conversation with Michael Cook and we talked about Hagarism. He said to me the following, which he later confirmed by means of an email:"The central thesis of that book was, I now think, mistaken. Over the years, I have gradually come to think that the evidence we had to support the thesis was not sufficient or internally consistent enough." On April 6, 2006, I interviewed Patricia Crone, as well, to see what she now thinks about the book. She was even more candid in repudiating the central thesis of the book. She agrees with the critics that the book was "a graduate essay." The book was published in 1977 when the authors lived in England. "We were young, and we did not know anything. The book was just a hypothesis, not a conclusive finding," said Crone. "I do no think that the book's thesis is valid."

Many Western scholars, Christians and Jews, have dismissed Hagarism as a “thin argument” rather than “credible research.” One historian who appears to admire the book is Daniel Pipes, who has taught at Chicago and Harvard universities. Pipes, an embittered Zionist known for his ugly utterings against Islam and Muslims, argues that while Western scholars like Crone and Cook “in the role of termites” are eating away at the magnificent Islamic edifice, Muslims are “acting as though the beams and joints were as strong as ever.” Even Pipes, however, describes the book as “wild.” Notwithstanding scholarly repudiations, Internet websites continue to rely on the book to malign Islam, assuming that the book’s thesis is derived from credible research.

Even online Wikipedia features the book, citing a large quotation from Daniel Pipes. The article concludes: “Although this line of research is discounted by Islamic traditionalists, Western scholars have generally applauded Crone and Cook's advances in tracing the origins of Islam.” When I insisted that Wikipedia provide a source to support the above conclusion, the editor added “citation needed” to the conclusion. As of today, no citation to support the conclusion has been furnished.

Part of the confusion arises from the fact that Cook and Crone have made no manifest effort to repudiate their juvenile findings in the book. The authors admitted to me that they had not done it and cater no plans to do so. Repudiating scholarly work is not easy because sometimes errors are intertwined with valid findings. No scholar is obligated to rewrite books to correct errors. Scholarly decency, however, demands that the authors officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people.

It appears however that the authors do not wish to discount a book that launched their careers and brought to them contacts and fortune. Patricia Crone teaches at the Institute for Advanced Studies, the academic home of Albert Einstein, an institute that proclaims itself as “one of the world’s leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry.” Michael Cook is a chaired professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, who in 2002 (a few months after 9/11 terrorist attacks) received a $1.5 million Distinguished Achievement Award from the Mellon Foundation “for significant contribution to humanities research.”

One needs no brains to write against Islam in the Western world. After 9/11, anti-Islamic literature has become a big business that even acclaimed academics have generously exploited for self-promotion. In this milieu, repudiating even a false anti-Islamic book will be condemned as apostasy. We need not burn the book. Crone and Cook themselves must muster the courage and put out the brushfire they started three decades ago, albeit in youthful excitement.


Ali Khan is a professor of law at Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas. This excerpt is taken from his forthcoming law article, "The Externalist Scholarship on Islamic Law," which will be published in Michigan State Law Review. Send comments to ali.khan@washburn.edu.

Read more:


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on April 26, 2006.

 


Public Service Ads: