Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment
Biodiversity belowground is just as important as aboveground [chemicals to boost crop yield could damage soil for years afterwards...]

09.04 Obama’s Journey: Top 10 signs of Extreme Climate Change in Alaska and why it Should Scare Us

09.04 'ExxonMobil has its head in the sand and shareholders should be worried'

09.03 Environmental groups take aim at Pat Toomey over carbon pollution [Better too late than never!]

09.03 How China Is Taking Major Steps to Control Shipping Air Pollution

09.03 Bill to divest state's public pensions from coal heads to Gov. Jerry Brown [Better too late than never!]

09.02 In Alaska: Too Many Fires, Not Enough Snow

09.01 Up to 90% of seabirds have plastic in their guts, study finds

09.01 A Lot of American Catholics Have Never Heard of Pope Francis' Most Important New Message [Why?]

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

09.04 Hillary Clinton Just Picked Sides With the Democrats’ Warren Wing Against the Rubin Wing [heart-felt or political necessity?]

09.04 Donald Trump proves Kareem Abdul-Jabbar correct with ALL CAPS, Sharpie-scrawled response to NBA legend’s editorial

09.04 The shocking truth about Donald Trump: He’s actually the least terrifying GOP candidate

09.04 Jersey City's Innovative New Affordable Housing Plan Might Actually Work

09.04 How the Federal Government Built White Suburbia

09.03 Republicans vs. the Constitution: Would-be presidents endorse Kim Davis’ brazen illegality

09.03 Selling plasma to survive: how over a million American families live on $2 per day

09.02 Bernie Sanders Lays Down 2016’s New Electoral Math

09.02 Video shows Texas officers shooting man who appears to have his hands up

09.02 Georgia police shoot man and kill his dog after responding to wrong house

09.02 ‘Hillary 2016’ Has Never Made Sense for Democrats

Justice Matters

09.02 Special report: How US police turn drivers into moving targets

09.02 Ex-police chief who shot unarmed black man avoids jail with plea deal

High Crimes?

09.03 US Special Forces May Have Gone On a Murder Spree in Afghanistan—Did the Army Cover It Up?

Economics, Crony Capitalism

09.04 The Upper Middle Class Is Ruining America

09.03 Quantitative Easing for People: The UK Labour Frontrunner’s Controversial Proposal

09.03 US Wall Street and the Military are Draining Americans High and Dry [A scary summary. We must find smart ways to minimize public costs/deficits and debt at minimum public expense. Single-payer healthcare and pensions are obviously part of the solution. And Wall Street must be made aware that they now stand on their own. Public banks are obviously required too to end paying debt interest to private banks.]

09.03 Fossil Fuel Executives Are Making Obscene Amounts of Money for Wrecking the Planet—and Their Own Companies

09.02 Robert Reich: Economic redistribution isn’t enough

International

09.04 UN calls on European Union to take 200,000 more refugees [3:49 video]

09.04 Isis’s destruction of Palmyra: ‘The heart has been ripped out of the city'

09.04 The Islamic State Diary: A Chronicle of Life in Libyan Purgatory

09.04 Migration crisis: Germany presses Europe into sharing refugees

09.04 Healing Europe’s east-west divide is central to a lasting refugee solution

09.03 Neo-Nazi Arsonists: Officials Concerned by Growing Far-Right Networks

09.03 Hengameh Golestan’s best photograph: Iranian women rebel against the 1979 hijab law

09.03 Migration crisis: Hungary PM claims Europe is in grip of 'madness' [1:00 video]

09.02 10 Responses to Iran-Deal Skeptics

09.02 Gaza could soon become uninhabitable, UN report predicts

09.02 Migration crisis: bid for united EU response fraying over quota demands [0:52 video]

09.02 Rob Ford and Canadians dismiss Scott Walker's 'off-the-wall' border idea

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Hagarism: The Story of a Book Written by Infidels for Infidels

COMMENTARY:

Hagarism: The Story of a Book Written by Infidels for Infidels

by Dr. Liaquat Ali Khan
Scholarly decency demands that the authors of the 1977 book Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people.
The book titled Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World questions just about everything Muslims believe as historical truths. It challenges the common belief that the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad over a period of 22 years (610-632) in Mecca and Medina. Instead, the book contends that the Quran was composed, possibly in Syria or Iraq, more than fifty years after the Prophet’s death, projected back in time, and attributed to the Prophet. The Quran, according to the book, was fabricated during the reign of Caliph Abdul Malik (685-705) to legitimize an expanding empire. The book also contends that the word "Muslim" was invented in the 8th century to replace the word Muhajirun (immigrants), which was the original name of the Arab community that conquered Palestine and built the Dome of the Rock. The book itself prescribes a new name for early Muslims. It calls them Hagarenes, that is, the biological descendants of Abraham by Hagar. This racial naming of early Muslims is employed to distinguish them from Jews, who are the descendants of Abraham by Sarah. Hagarism, the book’s title, is a quasi-pejorative, and possibly a racist, label to describe the historical phenomenon of early Muslims.

In the authors’ own words, the book is written “by infidels for infidels.” Attacks on the Quran’s authenticity, the Prophet’s integrity, or Islamic history are not new. The Quran itself acknowledges similar attacks the unbelievers made while the Quran was being revealed. For more than a thousand years, Western scholarship has been determined to expose what it considers to be the “fraudulent foundation” of Islam. In this sense, Hagarism is yet another book in the large dump of attack literature.

However, what distinguishes this book is the fact that its authors, Michael Cook and Patricia Crone, no longer subscribe to its critical findings. On April 3, 2006, I had a phone conversation with Michael Cook and we talked about Hagarism. He said to me the following, which he later confirmed by means of an email:"The central thesis of that book was, I now think, mistaken. Over the years, I have gradually come to think that the evidence we had to support the thesis was not sufficient or internally consistent enough." On April 6, 2006, I interviewed Patricia Crone, as well, to see what she now thinks about the book. She was even more candid in repudiating the central thesis of the book. She agrees with the critics that the book was "a graduate essay." The book was published in 1977 when the authors lived in England. "We were young, and we did not know anything. The book was just a hypothesis, not a conclusive finding," said Crone. "I do no think that the book's thesis is valid."

Many Western scholars, Christians and Jews, have dismissed Hagarism as a “thin argument” rather than “credible research.” One historian who appears to admire the book is Daniel Pipes, who has taught at Chicago and Harvard universities. Pipes, an embittered Zionist known for his ugly utterings against Islam and Muslims, argues that while Western scholars like Crone and Cook “in the role of termites” are eating away at the magnificent Islamic edifice, Muslims are “acting as though the beams and joints were as strong as ever.” Even Pipes, however, describes the book as “wild.” Notwithstanding scholarly repudiations, Internet websites continue to rely on the book to malign Islam, assuming that the book’s thesis is derived from credible research.

Even online Wikipedia features the book, citing a large quotation from Daniel Pipes. The article concludes: “Although this line of research is discounted by Islamic traditionalists, Western scholars have generally applauded Crone and Cook's advances in tracing the origins of Islam.” When I insisted that Wikipedia provide a source to support the above conclusion, the editor added “citation needed” to the conclusion. As of today, no citation to support the conclusion has been furnished.

Part of the confusion arises from the fact that Cook and Crone have made no manifest effort to repudiate their juvenile findings in the book. The authors admitted to me that they had not done it and cater no plans to do so. Repudiating scholarly work is not easy because sometimes errors are intertwined with valid findings. No scholar is obligated to rewrite books to correct errors. Scholarly decency, however, demands that the authors officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people.

It appears however that the authors do not wish to discount a book that launched their careers and brought to them contacts and fortune. Patricia Crone teaches at the Institute for Advanced Studies, the academic home of Albert Einstein, an institute that proclaims itself as “one of the world’s leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry.” Michael Cook is a chaired professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, who in 2002 (a few months after 9/11 terrorist attacks) received a $1.5 million Distinguished Achievement Award from the Mellon Foundation “for significant contribution to humanities research.”

One needs no brains to write against Islam in the Western world. After 9/11, anti-Islamic literature has become a big business that even acclaimed academics have generously exploited for self-promotion. In this milieu, repudiating even a false anti-Islamic book will be condemned as apostasy. We need not burn the book. Crone and Cook themselves must muster the courage and put out the brushfire they started three decades ago, albeit in youthful excitement.


Ali Khan is a professor of law at Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas. This excerpt is taken from his forthcoming law article, "The Externalist Scholarship on Islamic Law," which will be published in Michigan State Law Review. Send comments to ali.khan@washburn.edu.

Read more:


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on April 26, 2006.

 


Public Service Ads: