Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

05.22 Robert Reich: Bernie Sanders could save higher education [2:55 video]

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

05.23 Air Pollution Reduces Cognition, & Not Just Via The Lungs

05.23 Study Finds Possible Association Between Autism and Air Pollution

05.22 Exclusive: The CIA Is Shuttering a Secretive Climate Research Program

05.22 California’s getting desperate: Unprecedented water restrictions target previously immune farmers

05.21 California drought: What would Israel do?

05.21 'Air pollution causes 8m deaths/yr'

05.20 Wales launches £25m underwater kite-turbine scheme [9:58 video]

05.20 From Kansas to Copenhagen: clean energy beacons around the world

05.20 The doomsday vault: the seeds that could save a post-apocalyptic world

05.20 Faeces, bacteria, toxins: welcome to the chicken farm

05.20 White House makes bid to save honeybees but ignores toxic pesticides [Are Monsanto's potential political donations so important to risk mass death of bee colonies and no crop pollination. And what about our butterflies!]

05.19 Indian Ocean storing up heat from global warming, says study

05.19 Fracking: Texas governor stops cities and towns banning hydraulic gas mining

05.19 Global businesses must lead the way on climate action

05.19 Fossil fuels subsidised by $10m a minute, says IMF

News Media

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

05.22 Kansas keeps on bleeding: Sam Brownback’s tax-cut miracle still hasn’t arrived, and won’t any time soon

05.22 7 Things People Who Say They're 'Fiscally Conservative But Socially Liberal' Don't Understand

05.21 After the Waco Shootout, Texas Lawmakers Debate Gun Laws

05.21 1,000 weapons found in Waco restaurant – including one in a bag of tortilla chips

05.20 Unlike Congress, Majority of Americans Oppose NSA Spying

05.20 Here's What People Are Saying About The Waco Shootout And Race

05.20 Hillary Clinton breaks media silence and insists: 'I want those emails out'

05.20 LA becomes largest US city to increase minimum wage to $15 an hour

05.19 A Typology of Corruption for Campaign 2016 and Beyond

05.19 Hillary Clinton emails to be released in January 2016, says US State Department

05.19 Democrats clash over TPP fair trade deal [Sen. Warren's “Broken Promises” report]

Justice Matters

05.21 Columbia student protesting rape brings mattress to graduation

05.18 CONGRESS TELLS COURT THAT CONGRESS CAN’T BE INVESTIGATED FOR INSIDER TRADING

High Crimes?

05.22 Matt Taibbi: World’s Largest Banks Admit to Massive Global Financial Crimes, But Escape Jail (Again)

05.22 Gaza economy 'on verge of collapse', with world's highest unemployment

05.21 Elephant Watch

05.18 Amnesty International: Whitewashing Another Massacre

Economics, Crony Capitalism

05.21 Seven Years Later, Wall Street Hasn't Learned Anything

05.21 Obama’s Trade War Against Warren Wounds His Party – and His Legacy

05.20 Derailing Amtrak: Tracking the Latest Disaster in the Infrastructure Crisis

05.19 People have no idea what inequality actually looks like [graphic]

International

05.22 Israel should defy the world over West Bank, says new deputy foreign minister [0:30 video]

05.22 Bin Laden documents reveal a paranoid family man fixated on the west

05.21 Jeb Bush Says His Brother Was Misled Into War by Faulty Intelligence. That's Not What Happened.

05.20 Israel scraps scheme to ban Palestinians from buses

05.20 USA Freedom Act: Senate set to vote on first surveillance restrictions in decades

05.19 Most of the world's workers have insecure jobs, ILO report reveals

05.19 A united Europe is closer than you think

05.19 What a Creative Neighborhood Looks Like

05.19 What If Everybody Didn't Have to Work to Get Paid?

05.19 Italian coastguards: military action will not solve Mediterranean migrant crisis

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Hagarism: The Story of a Book Written by Infidels for Infidels

COMMENTARY:

Hagarism: The Story of a Book Written by Infidels for Infidels

by Dr. Liaquat Ali Khan
Scholarly decency demands that the authors of the 1977 book Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people.
The book titled Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World questions just about everything Muslims believe as historical truths. It challenges the common belief that the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad over a period of 22 years (610-632) in Mecca and Medina. Instead, the book contends that the Quran was composed, possibly in Syria or Iraq, more than fifty years after the Prophet’s death, projected back in time, and attributed to the Prophet. The Quran, according to the book, was fabricated during the reign of Caliph Abdul Malik (685-705) to legitimize an expanding empire. The book also contends that the word "Muslim" was invented in the 8th century to replace the word Muhajirun (immigrants), which was the original name of the Arab community that conquered Palestine and built the Dome of the Rock. The book itself prescribes a new name for early Muslims. It calls them Hagarenes, that is, the biological descendants of Abraham by Hagar. This racial naming of early Muslims is employed to distinguish them from Jews, who are the descendants of Abraham by Sarah. Hagarism, the book’s title, is a quasi-pejorative, and possibly a racist, label to describe the historical phenomenon of early Muslims.

In the authors’ own words, the book is written “by infidels for infidels.” Attacks on the Quran’s authenticity, the Prophet’s integrity, or Islamic history are not new. The Quran itself acknowledges similar attacks the unbelievers made while the Quran was being revealed. For more than a thousand years, Western scholarship has been determined to expose what it considers to be the “fraudulent foundation” of Islam. In this sense, Hagarism is yet another book in the large dump of attack literature.

However, what distinguishes this book is the fact that its authors, Michael Cook and Patricia Crone, no longer subscribe to its critical findings. On April 3, 2006, I had a phone conversation with Michael Cook and we talked about Hagarism. He said to me the following, which he later confirmed by means of an email:"The central thesis of that book was, I now think, mistaken. Over the years, I have gradually come to think that the evidence we had to support the thesis was not sufficient or internally consistent enough." On April 6, 2006, I interviewed Patricia Crone, as well, to see what she now thinks about the book. She was even more candid in repudiating the central thesis of the book. She agrees with the critics that the book was "a graduate essay." The book was published in 1977 when the authors lived in England. "We were young, and we did not know anything. The book was just a hypothesis, not a conclusive finding," said Crone. "I do no think that the book's thesis is valid."

Many Western scholars, Christians and Jews, have dismissed Hagarism as a “thin argument” rather than “credible research.” One historian who appears to admire the book is Daniel Pipes, who has taught at Chicago and Harvard universities. Pipes, an embittered Zionist known for his ugly utterings against Islam and Muslims, argues that while Western scholars like Crone and Cook “in the role of termites” are eating away at the magnificent Islamic edifice, Muslims are “acting as though the beams and joints were as strong as ever.” Even Pipes, however, describes the book as “wild.” Notwithstanding scholarly repudiations, Internet websites continue to rely on the book to malign Islam, assuming that the book’s thesis is derived from credible research.

Even online Wikipedia features the book, citing a large quotation from Daniel Pipes. The article concludes: “Although this line of research is discounted by Islamic traditionalists, Western scholars have generally applauded Crone and Cook's advances in tracing the origins of Islam.” When I insisted that Wikipedia provide a source to support the above conclusion, the editor added “citation needed” to the conclusion. As of today, no citation to support the conclusion has been furnished.

Part of the confusion arises from the fact that Cook and Crone have made no manifest effort to repudiate their juvenile findings in the book. The authors admitted to me that they had not done it and cater no plans to do so. Repudiating scholarly work is not easy because sometimes errors are intertwined with valid findings. No scholar is obligated to rewrite books to correct errors. Scholarly decency, however, demands that the authors officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people.

It appears however that the authors do not wish to discount a book that launched their careers and brought to them contacts and fortune. Patricia Crone teaches at the Institute for Advanced Studies, the academic home of Albert Einstein, an institute that proclaims itself as “one of the world’s leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry.” Michael Cook is a chaired professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, who in 2002 (a few months after 9/11 terrorist attacks) received a $1.5 million Distinguished Achievement Award from the Mellon Foundation “for significant contribution to humanities research.”

One needs no brains to write against Islam in the Western world. After 9/11, anti-Islamic literature has become a big business that even acclaimed academics have generously exploited for self-promotion. In this milieu, repudiating even a false anti-Islamic book will be condemned as apostasy. We need not burn the book. Crone and Cook themselves must muster the courage and put out the brushfire they started three decades ago, albeit in youthful excitement.


Ali Khan is a professor of law at Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas. This excerpt is taken from his forthcoming law article, "The Externalist Scholarship on Islamic Law," which will be published in Michigan State Law Review. Send comments to ali.khan@washburn.edu.

Read more:


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on April 26, 2006.

 


Public Service Ads: