Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

08.15 RIDE FOR THE OVERRIDE

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

12.01 What Trump Really Means When He Talks About "Government Schools" [stupid is as stupid does: private prisons worked so badly, they want to privatize schools too]

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

12.03 Veterans Arrive at Standing Rock to Act as 'Human Shields' for Water Protectors

12.03 Kinder Morgan pipeline: Canadians intensify huge opposition to expansion

12.03 Five ways to take action on climate change

12.03 New blow for Hinkley Point contractor EDF after French safety checks

12.03 Nikola One hydrogen-powered semi is tall, different and zero-emission [Embrace science, Donald. It's the only way to save your presidency]

12.03 Scientific Knowledge Sorely Lacking at Breitbart-Tweeting House Science Committee ["Stupid is as stupid does." – Forrest Gump]

12.02 After 60 years, is nuclear fusion finally poised to deliver?

12.02 The government's report on the Great Barrier Reef is a 'dog ate my homework' moment

12.02 Martin Shkreli branded an 'attention seeker' as Sydney student hits back [0:49 video]

12.02 LOOKING AT HOW ABORTION RESTRICTIONS ENDANGER WOMEN’S LIVES

12.02 Climate Change and the Coming 'Humanitarian Crisis of Epic Proportions'

12.02 Congress Nears a Breakthrough on Medical Research Funding [welfare for the most profitable companies in the world]

12.01 30 Years of Oil and Gas Pipeline Accidents, Mapped

12.01 Siemens' £310m Hull plant will take windfarm technology to new level

News Media Matters

12.02 Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem

12.02 SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF FAKE NEWS'

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

12.03 Senate Responds to Trump-Inspired Anti-Semitism By Targeting Students Who Criticize Israel

12.03 Keith Ellison and the Battle for the Democratic Party

12.02 TRUMP WARNS THAT COMPANIES SHIPPING JOBS OVERSEAS WILL BE SLAPPED WITH ENORMOUS BRIBES [Fact that only looks like parody]

12.02 Carrier Just Showed Corporations How to Beat Donald Trump

12.02 Lawrence Lessig: The Electoral College Is Constitutionally Allowed to Choose Clinton over Trump

12.01 Trump Saved Jobs at Carrier by Making the Same Deal American Politicians Always Make

12.01 Trump Treasury pick made millions after his bank foreclosed on homeowners

12.01 The Clintons’ Dominance of Democratic Politics Is Over—And They Will Not Be Remembered Fondly

12.01 Elizabeth Warren Proposes to Strengthen Democratic Spines With a Powerful New Tool: Math

Justice Matters
High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

12.03 Hillary Clinton’s “Corrupt Establishment” Is Now Advising Donald Trump

12.03 TRUMP’S WOLVES OF WALL STREET

12.01 How to Hide $400 Million ["Ideal," thinks Trump. This tax-shelter system using deregulation loopholes in many tax-havens enables vast worldwide corruption]

11.29 Donald Trump: Be ‘Big Marco’ or Set His Own Path?

11.28 The liberal elite’s Marie Antoinette moment

11.27 Here’s Why the Defense Industry Is Ecstatic About a President Trump

11.26 Capitalism in One Family

International

12.02 Possible French presidential candidates from the left

12.02 This is the most dangerous time for our planet

11.30 Reach out, raise money or remove: how should cities deal with street begging? [an unresolved public health care opportunity...?]

11.30 German spy chief says Russian hackers could disrupt elections

11.30 Tearing up US deal with Iran would be disastrous, says CIA chief

11.29 Hungary looks to the past for its future

11.29 Poland’s great leap backwards

11.29 Germany Prepares for Trade Conflict with Trump

11.29 The Man Who Could Shake Up German Politics

11.29 Merkel Must Change to Meet Germany's Challenges

11.29 Jimmy Carter: America Must Recognize Palestine

11.28 Britons could pay for EU citizenship after Brexit, says top negotiator [Let's get rid of nation states and allow everyone to be Earth Union (EU) citizens instead!]

11.28 'Holocaust on ice' dance by wife of Putin official causes uproar [8:08 video; an excellent performance]

11.28 'The only two powerful cartels left': rivals clash in Mexico's murder capital

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Bush Administration Health Care Policy in Three Rules
Newspaper logo

Health Care:

Bush Administration Health Care Policy in Three Rules

by John Hickman

Unfortunately, knowing these three rules is merely palliative care. A cure would require rebuilding our health care system to make meeting the needs of all Americans its central purpose.
Do you ever experience dizziness or nausea when thinking about the current administration’s health care policy? You are not alone. Millions of your fellow Americans are similarly afflicted. The reason you and they have that sea-sick feeling is that the ground really does shift depending on which part of the health care policy domain one observes. Although it won’t make the administration’s various decisions and pronouncements about health care any more reasonable or consistent, the following treatment may help to reduce the symptoms. All you have to do is remember the following three rules.

Rule 1: If sexual reproduction or pleasure is implicated or if the individuals most affected are relatively few or relatively powerless, then the decision-making mode is moralistic and the value to be maximized is ‘dignity.’ For example, when President Bush proclaimed January 21, 2007 to be National Sanctity of Human Life Day, he stated that the “dignity and humanity of every person should be respected” and that we should “value human life in all forms, not just those considered healthy, wanted, or convenient.” He wasn’t talking about reducing the infant mortality rate in the United States to that of the other OECD countries but was instead rewarding the anti-abortion movement with yet another largely symbolic gesture in return for their tireless mobilization of voters for Republican candidates. Protecting ‘dignity’ was also the rationale offered for Bush’s April 11, 2007 threat to veto the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007, which he did on June 20, 2007.

The obvious problem with using ‘dignity’ to justify a health policy decision, or any public policy decision for that matter, is that it is a religious-philosophical abstraction.
The obvious problem with using ‘dignity’ to justify a health policy decision, or any public policy decision for that matter, is that it is a religious-philosophical abstraction. The empirical evidence for ‘dignity’ is no better than that for the ‘soul’ or the ‘sacred.’ Conservatives deploy ‘dignity’ when they want to avoid difficult discussions about the assumptions and interests underlying their policy preferences. The less obvious problem with ‘dignity’ is that whatever it means, everyone must deserve it in equal measure. That’s a problem because society values individual human lives unequally. The priorities assigned to waiting transplant recipients or the quality of medical care given the insured and uninsured leave no doubt that some human lives are valued more than others.

Rule 2: If most of the population is involved and the profitability of the medical industry is at stake, then the decision-making mode is economic and the value to be maximized is ‘capitalism.’ Of course that word isn’t used to identify the favored value. Nor is the word ‘socialism’ used much to describe its opposite. Both words carry too much ideological mana* to be used. Instead the administration prefers the safer words ‘private’ and ‘government.’ For example, in his struggle to under-fund the State Children's Health Insurance Program or SCHIP, Bush complained on September 21, 2007 that legislation passed by Democrats would transfer “millions of American children who now have private health insurance into government-run health care; and is an incremental step toward a government-run health care system.”

That is the sort of language the medical insurance companies and private hospital chains, entities that have grown enormously rich parasitizing American health care consumers, love to hear. And it ought to be the sort of language loathed by those same consumers. Although medical care comprises a larger part of the economy of the United States than that of the other advanced industrial societies, our national medical statistics are actually often poorer. According to the OECD, health care provision was 15.3% of total gross domestic product in the United States in 2005, while the average among 26 OECD countries was only 9%. If that extravagance actually bought Americans better health care outcomes then it might be understandable. Unfortunately it does not. Life expectancy is lower and the infant mortality rate higher in the United States than the OECD averages. What explains this economic inefficiency? The ironic answer is that much more of the health care provision in the United States is provided by profit-making firms than in the other OECD countries. Our more capitalist health care system delivers typically mediocre health care less efficiently than the more socialist health care systems of the other OECD countries.

The Department of Health and Human Services issued a document on Oct. 17 that presents the formulae for bureaucratic allocation of vaccine in the event of a serious pandemic. The bottom line is that, in the event of a deadly outbreak, some of us will be valued more than others.
Rule 3: If the state itself is threatened then the decision-making mode is bureaucratic and values to be maximized are the continuity of government and the safety of its elites. Rarely invoked, at least so publicly, this rule is evident in the "Draft Guidance on Allocating and Targeting Pandemic Influenza Vaccine" issued on October 17, 2007 by the Department of Health and Human Services. Dispensing with ‘dignity’ or the ‘private’ sector health care, this document presents the formulae for bureaucratic allocation in the event of a serious pandemic. The bottom line is that, in the event of a deadly outbreak, some of us will be valued more than others and their chances of survival enhanced by being treated from available vaccine stocks and the rest will have to take their chances. The document discusses influenza, but it is easy to see this as the basic blueprint for a pathogen much nastier.

In the five-tier "severe pandemic" scenario, government leaders, those serving in deployed units of the military and security services (including its private sector components), police, fire and rescue services, and critical healthcare personnel would be given the highest priority. So too would pregnant women, infants and toddlers. In the second tier would be the rest of the military, the National Guard, intelligence services, and people working to maintain communications and utilities. In the third tier would be people working in critical infrastructure such as the post office and the food, drug, and banking industries. The elderly and those with high-risk health conditions would comprise the fourth tier and the remaining population of healthy people 19 to 64 years of age would be last in line.

Although it makes sense that priority would be given to military, police, fire, rescue and medical personnel who might serve on the front lines of a pandemic that would threaten the social order, the categories appear generously broad when it comes to the personnel of the state and its best friends. Would White House speechwriters, FEMA officials, and Blackwater USA executives have tickets in the first tier? Would Comcast and Eli Lilly executives find themselves in the second tier and Fannie Mae accountants in the third? Picture what would happen if political appointees of the Bush administration were given discretionary authority to interpret membership in the tiers.

Note that these three rules are not like rock, paper and scissors. Should they ever come into conflict, capitalism would trump dignity and the continuity of government and the safety of elites would trump capitalism. But dignity trumps nothing. Unfortunately, knowing these three rules is merely palliative care. A cure would require rebuilding our health care system to make meeting the needs of all Americans its central purpose.


John Hickman is associate professor of comparative politics at Berry College in Rome, Georgia. His published work on electoral politics, media, and international affairs has appeared in Asian Perspective, American Politics Research, Comparative State Politics, Contemporary South Asia, Contemporary Strategy, Current Politics and Economics of Asia, East European Quarterly, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Jouvert, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Political Science, Review of Religious Research, Women & Politics, and Yamanashigakuin Law Review. He may be reached at jhickman@berry.edu.


Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on November 5, 2007.
 

Public Service Ads: