Home BaltimoreMaryland AG demands full environmental review of proposed Hagerstown ICE facility

Maryland AG demands full environmental review of proposed Hagerstown ICE facility

Hagerstown ICE facility plans face opposition as Maryland demands a full environmental review covering water, health and infrastructure risks.

by Jake Harper
Hagerstown ICE facility plans face opposition as Maryland demands a full environmental review covering water, health and infrastructure risks.

Hagerstown ICE facility plans face renewed opposition from Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown over unresolved environmental and public health risks. Brown urged federal officials to suspend the project and consider selling the property, as reported by the Baltimore Chronicle.

The dispute concerns a vacant warehouse at 16220 Wright Road near Williamsport in Washington County. ICE purchased the 54-acre property for $102.4 million in January 2026. Federal authorities have considered converting it into a facility holding up to 1,500 immigration detainees.

Maryland seeks a broader environmental impact statement

Brown submitted formal comments to the Department of Homeland Security on July 1. He argued that ICE’s proposed Environmental Assessment would not provide sufficient scrutiny.

Maryland wants a full Environmental Impact Statement covering water, transportation, infrastructure and public health. The request was supported by leaders from 4 state agencies.

Their concerns include:

  • possible pollution affecting nearby streams and the Potomac River;
  • insufficient water and sewer infrastructure;
  • transportation pressures around the warehouse;
  • unavailable studies referenced by ICE;
  • limited information for meaningful public participation.

The state argues that missing technical records prevent agencies from assessing the project’s complete environmental footprint.

Maryland AG demands full environmental review of proposed Hagerstown ICE facility

Court order continues to block detention center conversion

Maryland sued DHS and ICE in February, alleging violations of federal environmental law. A judge later issued a preliminary injunction preventing the warehouse’s conversion while litigation continues.

The court allowed only limited work, including fencing, security equipment and certain building repairs. ICE attorneys said the agency would not immediately begin detention-related retrofitting.

Key eventDateStatus
ICE purchased the warehouseJanuary 16, 2026Property acquired
Maryland filed its lawsuitFebruary 23, 2026Federal case opened
Construction contract awardedMarch 6, 2026Major work later blocked
Preliminary injunction issuedApril 2026Conversion remains paused
Brown submitted new objectionsJuly 1, 2026Full review requested

The latest filing places additional pressure on DHS before any final decision. ICE must now address whether its narrower review meets federal requirements.

Why Maryland says the public lacks essential information

Brown said ICE has not released several studies used when developing the proposal. He also questioned whether the purchase could influence the environmental review’s outcome.

The warehouse was designed for commercial operations, not long-term detention. State officials want detailed projections for wastewater, drinking water, medical services and vehicle traffic.

Brown maintains that ICE committed substantial resources before completing the legally required public review. Maryland is asking the agency to pause all conversion plans until those concerns are resolved.

Earlier we wrote about Where to Celebrate Independence Day in Baltimore 2026: Fireworks, Parking and Transport

You may also like