Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

08.15 RIDE FOR THE OVERRIDE

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

01.17 Trump’s nominee to head EPA has opposed the Chesapeake Bay cleanup

01.15 Stoop stories

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

01.18 Civil Rights Advocates Concerned That Betsy DeVos Will Not Stand Up for All Children

01.18 Matt Taibbi's New Book: 'Insane Clown President'

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

01.18 500+ Groups Urge Senators: 'Use All Your Power' to Block Anti-Environment Pruitt

01.18 WYOMING IS BASICALLY TRYING TO OUTLAW CLEAN ENERGY [greed by the rich trumps health for all]

01.18 Exxon doubling Permian Basin holdings in U.S. for up to $6.6 billion [preparations are in place to quickly maximize fossil fuel extraction, pollution and life-threatening greed]

01.17 Water-energy-food: can leaders at Davos solve this global conundrum? [easy! renewable energy doesn't use any water!!!]

01.16 At Scott Pruitt’s Confirmation Hearing, Science Will Be on Trial

01.16 New studies show Rex Tillerson is wrong about climate risks

01.15 Bernie Sanders Shreds Fellow Democrats Who Voted with Big Pharma

01.14 Dow Chemical Wants Farmers to Keep Using a Pesticide Linked to Autism and ADHD [serious]

01.14 ‘The last five years have not been great at Greenpeace’

01.14 Patagonia, Black Diamond take on Utah officials over public land rights [if there is a way to screw the public, Republicans are working on it...]

01.14 All north Indian cities fail to meet air quality standards, report finds

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

01.18 Who are the three-quarters of adult Americans who didn't vote for Trump? [demographic charts]

01.18 How Barack Obama paved the way for Donald Trump

01.17 Democrats Lost in a Corporate Wilderness

01.17 Actually Mr. Trump, Turns Out Americans 'Care a Lot' About Your Tax Returns

01.17 Despite Growing Disapproval and Protest, Corporate Cash Floods Trump Inauguration

01.16 Trump, and the world, readies for a ‘leap into the dark’

01.16 Democrats sweat Clinton vs. Sanders rift

01.16 JOHN LEWIS, DONALD TRUMP, AND THE MEANING OF LEGITIMACY

01.16 Trump’s Team Is Shaping Up to Be Dangerously Incoherent

Justice Matters

01.18 Obama commutes sentence for political prisoner Oscar López Rivera

01.18 Chelsea Manning's prison sentence commuted by Barack Obama

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

01.18 Middle classes in crisis, IMF's Christine Lagarde tells Davos 2017

01.17 The economics of corporate crime [white-collar crime must be more effectively regulated, prosecuted and fined to be deterrent]

01.16 The Trump Deficit

01.16 World's eight richest people have same wealth as poorest 50%

01.12 Nation's First "For-Profit President" as Trump Refuses To Divest

01.11 The Age of Trump

01.10 Jeremy Corbyn calls for maximum wage law

International

01.18 ILO warns of rise in social unrest and migration as inequality widens

01.17 Rex Tillerson’s ExxonMobil Frequently Sought State Department Assistance, New Documents Show

01.17 Trump’s Remaking of US Foreign Policy

01.17 'Europe's fate is in our hands': Angela Merkel's defiant reply to Trump

01.17 Warning: Europe is entering a permanent state of emergency

01.17 The dark side of Britain’s gold rush: how corruption crept into our suburbs

01.17 UK counter-terror laws most Orwellian in Europe, says Amnesty

01.16 Lessons from Germany for Integrating Refugees

01.16 The world needs a new strategy to tackle the migration crisis

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  A New 9/11 Investigation in New York City? The Voters Will Decide--If the Lawyers Let Them
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

A New 9/11 Investigation in New York City? The Voters Will Decide—If the Lawyers Let Them

by James Ridgeway
First published in his blog Unsilent Generation on 10 September 2009

Truth was obviously censored and incomplete in the original 9/11 Commission's report. If anyone deserves the opportunity to press on for answers, it is the people of the City of New York. The next few weeks will tell whether they are at long last given that opportunity.

In the five years since the 9/11 Commission released its studious but timid report, Americans of all political stripes have advocated for a new investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001. Since Obama seems intent upon putatively pardoning the Bush Administration for all of its crimes and misdemenors, such an investigation will clearly not take place at the federal level. But a New-York based organization has been pursuing a local effort—and on the eve of the eighth anniversary of the attacks, it has achieved what could be an important step toward its goal. The New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), which describes itself as “a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders, and survivors,” has gathered signatures to place a referendum for a new 9/11 investigation on the November ballot in New York City.

The Bloomberg administration fought the effort by claiming that only about 26,000 of the 52,000 signatures submitted by NYC CAN were valid, leaving the group some 4,000 short of the requirement for a ballot measure. After the New York courts appointed a “referee” to review the tossed-out petitions, NYC CAN scrambled to validate thousands of signatures, and submitted 28,000 more. And just yesterday, the group announced in a press release that “in a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that [NYC CAN] indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures...The City’s concession...paves the way for lawyers for both sides to argue the legality of the petition.”

There are several more hurdles ahead: New York City has a long history of blocking citizen-generated ballot initiatives on the grounds of legal technicalities.  And all legal issues must be resolved by September 30 for the measure to make it onto the November ballot. But if the referendum were to be presented and passed, it would lead to the creation of what its authors describe as “a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks.”

Believing that such an investigation is necessary and vital doesn’t require a subscription to any particular conspiracy theory about the attacks. In my 2006 book The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11: What the 9/11 Commission Report Failed to Tell Us, I focused on straightforward, even obvious questions: Why was the airline industry, with its army of well-connected lobbyists, permitted to resist safety regulations that could have saved lives? How did our foreign policy, and “allies” like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, help pave the way for the attacks? Why did a politically driven, Iraq-obsessed administration ignore repeated warnings of the coming danger? Who was in charge as the attacks unfolded?

Rice at 9/11 hearingSome of these questions ought to practically answer themselves. Yet in its 664-page report, the 9/11 Commission managed not to answer them—in many cases, by the simple means of not asking them in the first place. The Commissioners themselves announced their limited intentions in the report’s opening pages, where they wrote: “Our aim has not been to assign individual blame. Our aim has been to provide the fullest possible accounting of the events surrounding 9/11 and to identify lessons learned.” The contradiction inherent in these stated aims is obvious: without “blame,” there can be no true accountability, and without accountability, there is nothing to ensure that the “lessons” of 9/11 will be “learned.”

In a just-released book called Ground Truth, John Farmer, senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission and now dean of Rutgers Law School, declares that at an early stage in its investigation, the Commission

discovered that what had occurred that morning — that is, what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue....At some level of the government, at some point in time ... there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened.

It should come as no surprise that the 9/11 Commission conceded to this decision and limited its investigations accordingly. As I wrote in the conclusion to my own book, when it comes to the September 11 attacks and the lies and obfuscations that followed:

It is not necessary to search for hidden conspiracies, because the conspiracy is right in front of us and all around us, and the conspirators are running the country. Those in power in government and business share a tacit agreement that the system must be preserved at all costs, and institutions such as the 9/11 Commission, by their very existence, sign on to this agreement. Political power must be preserved. Economic and business interests must be protected. Allies who serve us by providing the United States with valuable resources like oil or with strategic positions in the world balance of power must be guarded. These things must be done at all costs, even if it means leaving unanswered questions about a catastrophic attack on the level 9/11, and even if it means leaving the American people vulnerable to another such attack in the future....

Yet, realistic as we are about the intractable power of the “system,” the idea remains that this time, things should have been different. Something as enormous as the 9/11 attacks should demand accountability from those who allowed it to happen. On the morning of September 11, thousands of Americans went to work in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, in police stations and firehouses. Hundreds more boarded planes and began their quotidian journeys. Surely even the most skeptical among them must on some level have assumed that their government would protect them from the kind of attack that took place that day. And surely even the most cynical among us must believe that a betrayal of such magnitude should carry consequences. Without consequences, there is no justice for the dead, and no safety for the living. Why has no one been held accountable? This is the last unanswered question about 9/11.

If anyone deserves the opportunity to press on for answers, it is the people of the City of New York. The next few weeks will tell whether they are at long last given that opportunity.


Born in 1936, James Ridgeway has been reporting on politics for more than 45 years. He is currently Senior Washington Correspondent for Mother Jones, and recently wrote a blog on the 2008 presidential election for the Guardian online. He previously served as Washington Correspondent for the Village Voice; wrote for Ramparts and The New Republic; and founded and edited two independent newsletters, Hard Times and The Elements.

Ridgeway is the author of 16 books, including The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11, It’s All for Sale: The Control of Global Resources, and Blood in the Face: The Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, Nazi Skinheads, and the Rise of a New White Culture. He co-directed a companion film to Blood in the Face and a second documentary film, Feed, and has co-produced web videos for GuardianFilms.

Additional information and samples of James Ridgeway’s work can be found on his web site, http://jamesridgeway.net.

This article is republished in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the author.



Copyright © 2009 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on September 11, 2009.
 



Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland