Newspaper logo  
Local Gov’t Stories, Events


Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education

10.19 NAACP Calls for No More Charters Until Privatized Schools Face Same Standards as Public Schools


Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

10.21 Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump on science, energy, and the climate

10.21 That's 4 straight debates without a single question on climate change. Good job, everyone.

10.21 Bottled Water or Tap: How Much Does Your Choice Matter?

10.21 We are approaching the Trumpocene, a new epoch where climate change is just a big scary conspiracy

10.21 Global warming continues; 2016 will be the hottest year ever recorded

10.21 Onshore windfarms more popular than thought, UK poll finds

10.21 Europe's offshore wind industry booming as costs fall

10.20 Climate Change Got Exactly 2 Seconds of Time in the Final Debate


10.20 Toxic products cost the US $340 billion a year

10.20 Air pollution more deadly in Africa than malnutrition or dirty water, study warns

10.19 Hottest September on Record Basically "Locks In" 2016 as Hottest Year: NASA

10.18 The past two weeks are a perfect illustration of what “solving” climate change will look like

10.17 This new technology could save the troubled nuclear power industry

10.17 Neoliberalism is creating loneliness. That’s what’s wrenching society apart

10.17 Planned Parenthood is 100 years old, but the fight for reproductive rights goes on

10.17 Use of strongest antibiotics rises to record levels on European farms

News Media Matters

10.21 Naomi Klein and Glenn Greenwald Tackle Ethics of WikiLeaks' Podesta Emails [32:21 audio clip]

10.21 Foreign journalists on 2016: ‘Is this the demise of objective American journalism?’

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

10.21 Will 2016 Mark the Return of the Blue Dog Democrat? [Dems willing to do anything but look left for support]

10.20 Seven races that could flip the Senate: Trump’s impending defeat may lead to a down-ballot massacre

10.20 Donald Trump refuses to say if he will accept election result in final debate [videos]

10.19 The Popular Populist

10.19 How the 'Losers' in America’s Trade Policies Got Left Behind

10.19 Paul Ryan: If Republicans Lose the Senate, Bernie Sanders Wins

10.19 To Build the Political Revolution, Grassroots Group Endorses 22 "People's Candidates"

10.19 Sanders Champions Colorado Single Payer Effort as Model for Nation

10.19 'Unforgivable': Women Blockade Trump Campaign Offices Nationwide

10.19 With No Illusions, Says Climate Leader, Clinton Must Be Elected—Then Fiercely Confronted

10.19 Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton face fear and loathing at third debate

10.18 Ascendance of Paul Ryan and Hillary Clinton Equals Big Win for Big Business

10.18 In Town for Pramila Jayapal, Bernie Sanders Booed at Mentions of Hillary

10.18 How Trump's Casino Bankruptcies Screwed His Workers out of Millions in Retirement Savings

10.18 Sanders and Warren: First Vanquish Trump, Then Mobilize for 'Political Revolution' [1:12:25 video]

Justice Matters


10.20 Mass incarceration in America, explained in 22 maps and charts

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

10.21 Capitalism Is Doomed — Without Alternatives, So Are We

10.21 Debate Moderators Under the Spell of Deficit-Obsessed Billionaire Pete Peterson

10.20 Here’s the Trade Policy That Progressives Should Get Behind

10.19 Prop. 51 Versus a State-Owned Bank: How California Can Save $10 Billion on a $9 Billion Loan

10.18 The privilege of being privileged


10.20 Elon Musk says fully self-driving Tesla cars already being built

10.19 Everything You Need to Know About the Momentous Habitat III

10.17 Break the Silence: Hillary Clinton’s Role in the 2009 Military Coup in Honduras [sadly, we believe Trump would have done even worse for a bigger bribe]

10.17 India's comic-book superheroine trains her powers on acid attacks

10.17 An insider's guide to Beijing: caged birds, smog and internet satire [1:15 audio clip]

10.17 'A bus in a traffic jam? It's as unjust as it once was not to allow women to vote'

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
This site Web
  A New 9/11 Investigation in New York City? The Voters Will Decide--If the Lawyers Let Them
Newspaper logo


A New 9/11 Investigation in New York City? The Voters Will Decide—If the Lawyers Let Them

by James Ridgeway
First published in his blog Unsilent Generation on 10 September 2009

Truth was obviously censored and incomplete in the original 9/11 Commission's report. If anyone deserves the opportunity to press on for answers, it is the people of the City of New York. The next few weeks will tell whether they are at long last given that opportunity.

In the five years since the 9/11 Commission released its studious but timid report, Americans of all political stripes have advocated for a new investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001. Since Obama seems intent upon putatively pardoning the Bush Administration for all of its crimes and misdemenors, such an investigation will clearly not take place at the federal level. But a New-York based organization has been pursuing a local effort—and on the eve of the eighth anniversary of the attacks, it has achieved what could be an important step toward its goal. The New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), which describes itself as “a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders, and survivors,” has gathered signatures to place a referendum for a new 9/11 investigation on the November ballot in New York City.

The Bloomberg administration fought the effort by claiming that only about 26,000 of the 52,000 signatures submitted by NYC CAN were valid, leaving the group some 4,000 short of the requirement for a ballot measure. After the New York courts appointed a “referee” to review the tossed-out petitions, NYC CAN scrambled to validate thousands of signatures, and submitted 28,000 more. And just yesterday, the group announced in a press release that “in a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that [NYC CAN] indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures...The City’s concession...paves the way for lawyers for both sides to argue the legality of the petition.”

There are several more hurdles ahead: New York City has a long history of blocking citizen-generated ballot initiatives on the grounds of legal technicalities.  And all legal issues must be resolved by September 30 for the measure to make it onto the November ballot. But if the referendum were to be presented and passed, it would lead to the creation of what its authors describe as “a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks.”

Believing that such an investigation is necessary and vital doesn’t require a subscription to any particular conspiracy theory about the attacks. In my 2006 book The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11: What the 9/11 Commission Report Failed to Tell Us, I focused on straightforward, even obvious questions: Why was the airline industry, with its army of well-connected lobbyists, permitted to resist safety regulations that could have saved lives? How did our foreign policy, and “allies” like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, help pave the way for the attacks? Why did a politically driven, Iraq-obsessed administration ignore repeated warnings of the coming danger? Who was in charge as the attacks unfolded?

Rice at 9/11 hearingSome of these questions ought to practically answer themselves. Yet in its 664-page report, the 9/11 Commission managed not to answer them—in many cases, by the simple means of not asking them in the first place. The Commissioners themselves announced their limited intentions in the report’s opening pages, where they wrote: “Our aim has not been to assign individual blame. Our aim has been to provide the fullest possible accounting of the events surrounding 9/11 and to identify lessons learned.” The contradiction inherent in these stated aims is obvious: without “blame,” there can be no true accountability, and without accountability, there is nothing to ensure that the “lessons” of 9/11 will be “learned.”

In a just-released book called Ground Truth, John Farmer, senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission and now dean of Rutgers Law School, declares that at an early stage in its investigation, the Commission

discovered that what had occurred that morning — that is, what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue....At some level of the government, at some point in time ... there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened.

It should come as no surprise that the 9/11 Commission conceded to this decision and limited its investigations accordingly. As I wrote in the conclusion to my own book, when it comes to the September 11 attacks and the lies and obfuscations that followed:

It is not necessary to search for hidden conspiracies, because the conspiracy is right in front of us and all around us, and the conspirators are running the country. Those in power in government and business share a tacit agreement that the system must be preserved at all costs, and institutions such as the 9/11 Commission, by their very existence, sign on to this agreement. Political power must be preserved. Economic and business interests must be protected. Allies who serve us by providing the United States with valuable resources like oil or with strategic positions in the world balance of power must be guarded. These things must be done at all costs, even if it means leaving unanswered questions about a catastrophic attack on the level 9/11, and even if it means leaving the American people vulnerable to another such attack in the future....

Yet, realistic as we are about the intractable power of the “system,” the idea remains that this time, things should have been different. Something as enormous as the 9/11 attacks should demand accountability from those who allowed it to happen. On the morning of September 11, thousands of Americans went to work in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, in police stations and firehouses. Hundreds more boarded planes and began their quotidian journeys. Surely even the most skeptical among them must on some level have assumed that their government would protect them from the kind of attack that took place that day. And surely even the most cynical among us must believe that a betrayal of such magnitude should carry consequences. Without consequences, there is no justice for the dead, and no safety for the living. Why has no one been held accountable? This is the last unanswered question about 9/11.

If anyone deserves the opportunity to press on for answers, it is the people of the City of New York. The next few weeks will tell whether they are at long last given that opportunity.

Born in 1936, James Ridgeway has been reporting on politics for more than 45 years. He is currently Senior Washington Correspondent for Mother Jones, and recently wrote a blog on the 2008 presidential election for the Guardian online. He previously served as Washington Correspondent for the Village Voice; wrote for Ramparts and The New Republic; and founded and edited two independent newsletters, Hard Times and The Elements.

Ridgeway is the author of 16 books, including The Five Unanswered Questions About 9/11, It’s All for Sale: The Control of Global Resources, and Blood in the Face: The Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, Nazi Skinheads, and the Rise of a New White Culture. He co-directed a companion film to Blood in the Face and a second documentary film, Feed, and has co-produced web videos for GuardianFilms.

Additional information and samples of James Ridgeway’s work can be found on his web site,

This article is republished in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the author.

Copyright © 2009 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on September 11, 2009.

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland