Newspaper logo  
   Nagging Questions About Iraq


Nagging Questions About Iraq

by Sheldon Richman

When an audiotape of someone claiming to be Osama bin Laden was released recently, all the discussion was about whether it was really bin Laden. No one cared about what the voice actually said.
Some things have been bugging me about President Bush's efforts to plunge us into full-scale war against Iraq: if Saddam Hussein's program to develop weapons of mass destruction is so secret, how did Mr. Bush get aerial photos of all those large above-ground buildings that allegedly house Iraq's nuclear program? Why isn't Saddam afraid that those expensive facilities could easily be reduced to splinters by Israel or the United States?

Is Mr. Bush preparing to forcibly thwart the secessionist movements that his attack on Iraq might stimulate? In his speech in Cincinnati, he promised to rebuild “a unified Iraq” after the war. But many Iraqis don't want a unified Iraq. The administration has assured Turkey, which fears that the Iraqi Kurds will secede and invite the Turkish Kurds to do the same, that the U.S. will hold Iraq together. Could the U.S. end up suppressing rebellious Kurds and Shiites who no longer wish to be part of Iraq?

When and how did Iraq graduate from being merely a member of the Axis of Evil (with Iran and North Korea) in January to being “unique” in October? In his Cincinnati speech Mr. Bush said, “Iraq is unique,” but offered no explanation for the change in status.

Why is Iraq's activation of radar and anti-aircraft weapons in the U.S.-declared no-fly zones considered threatening and provocative, but flying U.S. warplanes and dropping bombs over sovereign Iraqi territory is not?

If U.S. war planners are counting on Hussein to rationally abstain from using chemical and biological weapons for fear of the consequences during the coming war, why don't they count on him to do so without a war?

Why was it wrong for Iraq allegedly to wiretap the UN weapons inspectors, but not wrong for the U.S. to load the inspection teams with spies?

Was Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) relaying an administration position when he assured an Israeli politician that the U.S. will install a “pro-Western dictator” in Iraq after the war?

On a related subject, did anyone notice that when an audiotape of someone claiming to be Osama bin Laden was released recently, all the discussion was about whether it was really bin Laden. No one cared about what the voice actually said. That is curious, because it said, in part, “That's why I tell you, as God is my witness, whether America increases or reduces tensions, we will surely answer back in the same manner....”

To my ears, this sounds as though this person is saying that if the U.S. quit harming Arabs, he'll quit trying to harm Americans. That's a far cry from his wanting to destroy us because we are free, rich, and democratic. Maybe my interpretation is wrong, but why isn't the statement worthy of discussion?

The voice also said to the American people, “I'm inviting you to understand the message of my attack against New York and D.C., which came as an answer to your crimes. Evil brings evil.”

Again, this seems to mean that the attacks had nothing to do with our way of life. It's also an acknowledgment that the attacks on 9/11 were “evil.” Why didn't that rate some attention? Because it conflicts with the official story?

When Mr. Bush said the congressional resolution he seeks “does not mean that military action is imminent or unavoidable,” did he realize he was confessing that it violates the Constitution, which delegates the war-declaring power exclusively to Congress?

When the administration released the new Bush doctrine calling for preemptive war and U.S. global domination, did the president's handlers mean to let the curtain be pulled aside so far? Or did they assume we wouldn't notice because we're as dumb as they think we are?

Can all of those who voted for Bush because of his promise of a “humble” foreign policy get their votes back?

Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of Ideas on Liberty magazine.

Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on December 4, 2002.
· Colleges & Kids Seek Ways to Bring Peace on Earth
· City Council Holds Hearing on Anti-War Resolution
· Forum at City Hall Allows Airing of Views on War vs. Iraq
· Status of Benefits District Goes to Circuit Court
· Costly Play: Ravens Stadium
· Economists Say City Faces ‘Employment Mismatch’
· SPORTS: Championship Basketball Returns to Maryland
· Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against War with Iraq
· OPEN LETTER: Say It Ain’t So, Nancy
· Open letter denouncing Trent Lott
·OPEN LETTER:‘The U.S. Is Not America’
· OPEN LETTER: A Palestinian Father’s Grief
·Nicole Bailey-Williams Writes to Make You Think
·A Fresh Perspective on Carson McCullers
·See “The Trials of Henry Kissinger” While You Can
· Impertinent Remarks from H.L. Mencken
·The Curse of a Monopolized Press
·Where’s ‘Democracy Now’?
·Here’s The Missing Part of the Gore Transcript from Barbara Walters’ “20/20”
·Be Careful What You Wish For
·Three-Strikes Law: Only the Poor Need Apply
·What the Democrats Need to Accept
·PERSPECTIVE: ‘May You Live in Exciting Times’
·Putting the 'Great' into a 'Great Nation'
·Phil Berrigan's Final Warning, "The Times are Ominous!"
· Nicaraguan Lawyer Fights for Rights of Indigenous Peoples
· The Elections and the War
· National Economic Trends
· Nagging Questions About Iraq
· BAD MEAT: The Scandal of Our Food Safety System
· How a Progressive Approach Could Improve the Economy
· In The News...
· Websites We Like!
· Outstanding Analysis & Perspective

Public Service Ads: