| ||||||||||||||
|
Local News & Opinion
Travel
Books, Arts & Education
08.05 "American Teen": A Winning Documentary about Real-Life High Schoolers 07.31 Francis Boyle's "Palestine Palestinians and International Law" Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Open Letters: 08.16 Out Damn Blot: A Letter to Colin Powell Health & Environment
08.14 The End of Cheap Oil: The Future is Now 08.05 Obama is Right: It's Easy to Reduce the Nation's (and Your Own) Fuel Bill Dramatically Media Watching
08.21 Mixed Truth of the Russia-Georgia War 08.16 John McCain's Party of Hate 08.15 Corporate Media Bashes New Chavez Enabling Law Decrees 08.15 Georgia/Russia Conflict Forced Into Cold War Frame 08.13 WPost and the Great Disconnect 08.12 WPost Admits Bungling Obama Quote 08.06 Why McCain May Well Win 08.06 Media Fall for 'Race Card' Spin 08.01 Wall Street Journalomics: The Case of the Missing Tax Facts 07.31 CNN Scoffs at White House Critics 07.31 WPost Calls Out 'Uppity' Obama US Politics, Policy & Culture
08.21 McCain's Ties to Neocon Hard Lines 08.21 Peace Mom v. Guardian of Power 08.20 Are You Ready For Nuclear War? 08.19 A Book Written to Defeat Obama 08.19 McCain's 'Cone of Silence' Caper 08.14 Is Perpetual War Our Future? 08.12 5 Years After Blackout, Power Grid Still in 'Dire Straits' 08.12 Olympic Shame 08.12 Thinking About Intermissions 08.11 ‘Medaling’ With Free Speech at the Olympics 08.11 Targeting Immigrants - The Largest Ever US ICE Raid 08.09 A Novel Approach to Politics 08.07 The Hamdan Principle and You 08.07 McCain Adopts Cheney's Energy Plan 08.06 The Serpent's Egg: Solzhenitsyn and the Origins of America's Gulag 08.05 Mining Racism and Murder in a Northeastern Pennsylvania Coal Town 08.04 The Other Presidential Candidates 08.03 McCain, Anthrax & the Afghan Blunder 08.01 Justice Probe Still Threatens Gonzales 07.31 Obama's Surge in Berlin 07.30 War Without End, Amen: Into the Afghan Abyss with Obama 07.30 McCain's Spin on the 'Surge' 07.30 Friday's House Judiciary Hearing on Impeachment: A Victory and a Challenge US High Crimes & Misdemeanors
08.20 Musharraf, Not Bush, Follows Nixon 08.18 Fear, Procurement, Profit: Permanent War and the American Way 08.17 This Time, the World Is Not Buying It 08.15 'Imminent' Threats Should Be a Belli Laugh 08.08 American Insouciance 08.07 Extra! Dog Bites Man! Read All About It! 08.05 Marching Off Into Tyranny 08.05 Follow This Dime 07.31 Wave of 'Capitol Crime' Continues 07.29 Bodyguard of Lies: The Truth Behind the 'Surge's' Smokescreen 07.28 Secret "Torture Memo" Gave Legal Cover to Interrogators Who Acted in "Good Faith" 07.28 The Bush Administration's Secret Biowarfare Agenda 07.26 The Endless Smearing of Joe Wilson Economics & Business
08.04 Thinking About Ponzi International
08.18 Blockades: Acts of War 08.17 Rice’s Recipe for Duck Soup 08.14 The Lawless Roads: Bluster in Georgia, Rank Tyranny at Home 08.14 Marching Through Georgia V: U.S. Forces Moving Into Putin's Powderkeg 08.14 Marching Through Georgia IV: The Butt Thumper and the Bear 08.13 Using Georgia to Target Russia 08.12 From Stupid to Moronic to Evil 08.11 Marching Through Georgia III: Reality's Rout and Cheney's Viagra 08.11 Marching Through Georgia II: The Kremlin Surge 08.08 Marching Through Georgia I: Cold War II Proxy Conflict Turns Hot 08.07 Living Death: The Eternal Now of Hiroshima 08.07 War with Iran - On, Off or Undecided? 08.04 Gaza Under Siege We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
|
LEGAL ANALYSIS:Why Impeachment, Sadly, Is a Non-StarterThe most compelling reason why double impeachment of Bush and Cheney is not realistic lies in the fact that, given the order of Presidential succession, it would be perceived—and spun—as a Democratic attempt to seize the White House without an election.
With the election over, many progressives are vigorously pressing for Bush and Cheney to be impeached. I have a great deal of empathy for this position; certainly, if anyone deserved to be impeached and removed from office, it is Bush and Cheney. But, on reflection, I think impeachment of both a President and Vice President who are members of one party, while the Congress is controlled by the opposite party, is a non-starter.If Holtzman is correct, what is the point of impeaching Bush if we wind up with Cheney? At the very least, it would likely take longer to paper a case against Cheney than it would Bush. And that brings me to the second point why impeachment is probably not doable--there are only two years left to this Administration. As 2008 is a Presidential election year, realistically there is only one year for the impeachment process to work itself through; nothing controversial happens in Congress in a Presidential election year. It took over two years from the Watergate break-in to Nixon's resignation at a time when the Democrats (and more than a few Republicans) were open to the possibility of impeachment. Now, we'd be starting from scratch in convincing a reluctant Congress to act. But the most compelling reason why double impeachment is not realistic lies in the fact that, given the order of Presidential succession, an attempt at a double impeachment would be perceived--and spun--as a Democratic attempt to seize the White House without an election. I find myself particularly sensitive to Nancy Pelosi’s dilemma. Because she is next in line for the Presidency after Cheney, Pelosi really cannot lead, or even be seen to support, a movement to impeach Bush and Cheney. It has been twelve years since the Democrats controlled the Congress and Pelosi will be the first female Speaker ever; all eyes are on her as to how she will act. The moment she signs on to an impeachment drive, her credibility takes a big hit because of her perceived naked self-interest. This will become the issue instead of Bush's crimes. She will not risk her political reputation and Democratic gains after so many years of being in the political wilderness for an impeachment drive that would be over politically the moment she signed on to it. Granted, Pelosi could take the issue off the table by renouncing any interest in the Presidency. But Robert Byrd, as President Pro Tempore of the Senate, is next in line. Given his position in the Democratic leadership and his passionate opposition to Bush, he is open to much the same charge of political grandstanding as is Pelosi. And his advanced age alone would make a few Congressmen and Senators reluctant to vote to impeach when Bush will be gone in no more than two years. And what if Byrd also renounces any interest in the Presidency? Under the Constitution, Condoleeza Rice is next in line; hardly a satisfactory candidate to correct the multiple constitutional abuses of the Bush Administration in which she personally participated. The fundamental problem is that impeachment doesn't work well if the President, the Vice President, and the Secretary of State (all of whom are in the line of presidential succession) are all guilty of impeachable offenses and the Congress is controlled by the other party.
The fundamental problem is that impeachment doesn't work well if the President, the Vice President, and the Secretary of State (all of whom are in the line of presidential succession) are all guilty of impeachable offenses and the Congress is controlled by the other party. Impeachment is really designed to remove one bad apple and otherwise leave the status quo unchanged, pending the next election. In 1974, Republican Ford replaced Republican Nixon. In all other respects, the Watergate-purged Nixon Cabinet stayed in place. Even the Republican moral police in 1999 acted with the understanding that Gore would replace Clinton if Clinton were removed from office. This time, just replacing Bush with Cheney accomplishes nothing. But seeking to replace both opens the Democrats up to charges that they would be attempting a coup d’état. We will have to look elsewhere for justice, such as the criminal case just filed in Germany by the Center for Constitutional Rights. And the judgment of history. Sheldon Laskin is a Baltimore attorney.
A petition of support to the German prosecutor may be signed here. Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on November 15, 2006. |
| ||||||||||||