Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion
Travel
Books, Arts & Education

08.05 "American Teen": A Winning Documentary about Real-Life High Schoolers

07.31 Francis Boyle's "Palestine Palestinians and International Law"

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

08.16 Out Damn Blot: A Letter to Colin Powell

Health & Environment

08.14 The End of Cheap Oil: The Future is Now

08.05 Obama is Right: It's Easy to Reduce the Nation's (and Your Own) Fuel Bill Dramatically

Media Watching

08.21 Mixed Truth of the Russia-Georgia War

08.16 John McCain's Party of Hate

08.15 Corporate Media Bashes New Chavez Enabling Law Decrees

08.15 Georgia/Russia Conflict Forced Into Cold War Frame

08.13 WPost and the Great Disconnect

08.12 WPost Admits Bungling Obama Quote

08.06 Why McCain May Well Win

08.06 Media Fall for 'Race Card' Spin

08.01 Wall Street Journalomics: The Case of the Missing Tax Facts

07.31 CNN Scoffs at White House Critics

07.31 WPost Calls Out 'Uppity' Obama

US Politics, Policy & Culture

08.21 McCain's Ties to Neocon Hard Lines

08.21 Peace Mom v. Guardian of Power

08.20 Are You Ready For Nuclear War?

08.19 A Book Written to Defeat Obama

08.19 McCain's 'Cone of Silence' Caper

08.14 Is Perpetual War Our Future?

08.12 5 Years After Blackout, Power Grid Still in 'Dire Straits'

08.12 Olympic Shame

08.12 Thinking About Intermissions

08.11 ‘Medaling’ With Free Speech at the Olympics

08.11 Targeting Immigrants - The Largest Ever US ICE Raid

08.09 A Novel Approach to Politics

08.07 The Hamdan Principle and You

08.07 McCain Adopts Cheney's Energy Plan

08.06 The Serpent's Egg: Solzhenitsyn and the Origins of America's Gulag

08.05 Mining Racism and Murder in a Northeastern Pennsylvania Coal Town

08.04 The Other Presidential Candidates

08.03 McCain, Anthrax & the Afghan Blunder

08.01 Justice Probe Still Threatens Gonzales

07.31 Obama's Surge in Berlin

07.30 War Without End, Amen: Into the Afghan Abyss with Obama

07.30 McCain's Spin on the 'Surge'

07.30 Friday's House Judiciary Hearing on Impeachment: A Victory and a Challenge

US “High Crimes” & Misdemeanors

08.20 Musharraf, Not Bush, Follows Nixon

08.18 Fear, Procurement, Profit: Permanent War and the American Way

08.17 This Time, the World Is Not Buying It

08.15 'Imminent' Threats Should Be a Belli Laugh

08.08 American Insouciance

08.07 Extra! Dog Bites Man! Read All About It!

08.05 Marching Off Into Tyranny

08.05 Follow This Dime

07.31 Wave of 'Capitol Crime' Continues

07.29 Bodyguard of Lies: The Truth Behind the 'Surge's' Smokescreen

07.28 Secret "Torture Memo" Gave Legal Cover to Interrogators Who Acted in "Good Faith"

07.28 The Bush Administration's Secret Biowarfare Agenda

07.26 The Endless Smearing of Joe Wilson

Economics & Business

08.04 Thinking About Ponzi

International

08.18 Blockades: Acts of War

08.17 Rice’s Recipe for Duck Soup

08.14 The Lawless Roads: Bluster in Georgia, Rank Tyranny at Home

08.14 Marching Through Georgia V: U.S. Forces Moving Into Putin's Powderkeg

08.14 Marching Through Georgia IV: The Butt Thumper and the Bear

08.13 Using Georgia to Target Russia

08.12 From Stupid to Moronic to Evil

08.11 Marching Through Georgia III: Reality's Rout and Cheney's Viagra

08.11 Marching Through Georgia II: The Kremlin Surge

08.08 Marching Through Georgia I: Cold War II Proxy Conflict Turns Hot

08.07 Living Death: The Eternal Now of Hiroshima

08.07 War with Iran - On, Off or Undecided?

08.04 Gaza Under Siege

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 
  Why Impeachment, Sadly, Is a Non-Starter
Newspaper logo

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Why Impeachment, Sadly, Is a Non-Starter

by SHELDON H. LASKIN
The most compelling reason why double impeachment of Bush and Cheney is not realistic lies in the fact that, given the order of Presidential succession, it would be perceived—and spun—as a Democratic attempt to seize the White House without an election.
With the election over, many progressives are vigorously pressing for Bush and Cheney to be impeached. I have a great deal of empathy for this position; certainly, if anyone deserved to be impeached and removed from office, it is Bush and Cheney. But, on reflection, I think impeachment of both a President and Vice President who are members of one party, while the Congress is controlled by the opposite party, is a non-starter.

Elizabeth Holtzman was on “Democracy Now” the other day. She is an eloquent advocate of impeachment. But in answering one of Amy Goodman's questions, Holtzman ironically gave the most convincing argument against impeachment. Amy asked her about the possibility of impeaching Cheney as well as Bush. Holtzman replied that that would be much more difficult, because as Vice President, Cheney has in all probability created little or no paper trail of having committed an impeachable offense. After all, it was Bush that signed the wiretap order, the torture statute, etc.

If Holtzman is correct, what is the point of impeaching Bush if we wind up with Cheney? At the very least, it would likely take longer to paper a case against Cheney than it would Bush. And that brings me to the second point why impeachment is probably not doable--there are only two years left to this Administration. As 2008 is a Presidential election year, realistically there is only one year for the impeachment process to work itself through; nothing controversial happens in Congress in a Presidential election year. It took over two years from the Watergate break-in to Nixon's resignation at a time when the Democrats (and more than a few Republicans) were open to the possibility of impeachment. Now, we'd be starting from scratch in convincing a reluctant Congress to act.

But the most compelling reason why double impeachment is not realistic lies in the fact that, given the order of Presidential succession, an attempt at a double impeachment would be perceived--and spun--as a Democratic attempt to seize the White House without an election. I find myself particularly sensitive to Nancy Pelosi’s dilemma. Because she is next in line for the Presidency after Cheney, Pelosi really cannot lead, or even be seen to support, a movement to impeach Bush and Cheney. It has been twelve years since the Democrats controlled the Congress and Pelosi will be the first female Speaker ever; all eyes are on her as to how she will act. The moment she signs on to an impeachment drive, her credibility takes a big hit because of her perceived naked self-interest. This will become the issue instead of Bush's crimes. She will not risk her political reputation and Democratic gains after so many years of being in the political wilderness for an impeachment drive that would be over politically the moment she signed on to it.

Granted, Pelosi could take the issue off the table by renouncing any interest in the Presidency. But Robert Byrd, as President Pro Tempore of the Senate, is next in line. Given his position in the Democratic leadership and his passionate opposition to Bush, he is open to much the same charge of political grandstanding as is Pelosi. And his advanced age alone would make a few Congressmen and Senators reluctant to vote to impeach when Bush will be gone in no more than two years. And what if Byrd also renounces any interest in the Presidency? Under the Constitution, Condoleeza Rice is next in line; hardly a satisfactory candidate to correct the multiple constitutional abuses of the Bush Administration in which she personally participated.

The fundamental problem is that impeachment doesn't work well if the President, the Vice President, and the Secretary of State (all of whom are in the line of presidential succession) are all guilty of impeachable offenses and the Congress is controlled by the other party.
The fundamental problem is that impeachment doesn't work well if the President, the Vice President, and the Secretary of State (all of whom are in the line of presidential succession) are all guilty of impeachable offenses and the Congress is controlled by the other party. Impeachment is really designed to remove one bad apple and otherwise leave the status quo unchanged, pending the next election. In 1974, Republican Ford replaced Republican Nixon. In all other respects, the Watergate-purged Nixon Cabinet stayed in place. Even the Republican moral police in 1999 acted with the understanding that Gore would replace Clinton if Clinton were removed from office.

This time, just replacing Bush with Cheney accomplishes nothing. But seeking to replace both opens the Democrats up to charges that they would be attempting a coup d’état. We will have to look elsewhere for justice, such as the criminal case just filed in Germany by the Center for Constitutional Rights. And the judgment of history.
Sheldon Laskin is a Baltimore attorney.

A petition of support to the German prosecutor may be signed here.


Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on November 15, 2006.
 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland