Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

11.16 Scotland was first Industrialized Country to Run wholly on Wind in October

11.16 How pesticide bans can prevent tens of thousands of suicides a year [how many thousands more die early from eating pesticide-laced food?]

11.15  The long read:  The plastic backlash: what's behind our sudden rage – and will it make a difference? [the world wants to throw-up...]

11.15 Claws out: crab fishermen sue 30 oil firms over climate change [workers are waking-up...]

11.15 Trump administration to cut air pollution from heavy-duty trucks

11.14 Backed by Ocasio-Cortez, Youth Climate Activists Arrested in Pelosi's Office Demanding Democrats Embrace 'Green New Deal'

11.13 What would a smog-free city look like?

11.13 Global report highlights Australia’s renewables potential amid mixed signals for coal

11.13 Interior department whistleblower: Ryan Zinke hollowed out the agency

11.12  This Land is Your Land:  The Zinke effect: how the US interior department became a tool of industry [behaving ignorantly again...]

11.12 Planned Parenthood's new president warns of 'state of emergency' for women's health

11.11 Trump responds to worst fires in California’s history by threatening to withhold federal aid [behaving ignorantly again...]

11.11 Interior department sued for ‘secretive process’ in at-risk species assessment [behaving ignorantly again...]

11.11 Keystone XL pipeline: judge rules government 'jumped the gun' and orders halt [behaving ignorantly again...]

News Media Matters

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

11.16 As 'Green New Deal' Demand Grows, Democrats Have Choice: Confront and Defeat Fossil Fuel Industry or Take Credit for 'Doomed' Planet [Two choices: Save life-on-Earth or help Republicans let it die?]

11.16 Trump’s latest interview shows a president who’s in way over his head

11.16 Why the political fight in Georgia is far from over

11.16 Florida judge sides with Democrats, giving thousands a second chance to fix their ballots

11.15 Democrats Won Big. Can They Go Bold, Too? [it's about suppressing the influence and leadership by Republican-like Democrats who counsel 'íncremental' (no) change, such as Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Shumer and Joe Biden]

11.15 Pentagon Officials Forced to Make Fewer Public Appearances to Avoid Provoking Trump [...by revealing Trump's huuuge ignorance]

11.15 REPUBLICANS USED A BILL ABOUT WOLVES TO AVOID A VOTE ON YEMEN WAR [if there are 'defense industry' profits to be made—including congress-critter insider-trading—and political 'donations' to be had, we mustn't stop killing innocent civilians!]

11.15 Big Oil v the planet is the fight of our lives. Democrats must choose a side

11.14 The Real Florida Recount Fraud

11.14 Telling NRA #ThisIsOurLane, Doctors' Photos Show Blood-Soaked Reality of America's Gun Madness

11.14 At Freshman Orientation, Young and Growing Progressive Caucus Makes Clear It Will 'Fight Like Hell' for Bold Democratic Agenda

Justice Matters
High Crimes?

11.14 The Guardian view on Yemen’s misery: the west is complicit [WAR CRIMES]

Economics, Crony Capitalism

11.16 Amazon’s HQ2 Will Get a Tax Break Designed to Help the Poor [a Republican program that directly helps participating wealthy companies—but only helps workers if and when 'trickle-down' occurs.]

11.16 Trump doesn’t want to punish Saudi Arabia over Khashoggi. His new sanctions prove it. [George W. Bush made a similar immoral decision for the same oily reasons after 9-11, protecting Saudi defense contracts while facilitating the slaughter of poorer Arab "terrorists" in the region.]

11.15 The Earth is in a death spiral. It will take radical action to save us [fossil fuel burning, un-recyclable plastic production/use and methane gas release must cease ASAP.]

11.14 Brexit: May tells her cabinet, this is the deal – now back me

International & Futurism

11.15 Cuba to pull doctors out of Brazil after President-elect Bolsonaro comments [terms must be negotiated for fairness to Cuba's health professionals without disruption of healthcare for Brazil's poor]

11.14 'Appalling' Khashoggi audio shocked Saudi intelligence – Erdogan [Exposing a psychopath?]

11.14 Israel and Hamas launch hundreds of attacks in Gaza clash

11.14 Mueller seeking more details on Nigel Farage, key Russia inquiry target says

11.13 Austin's Fix for Homelessness: Tiny Houses, and Lots of Neighbors

11.13 Portugal Dared to Cast Aside Austerity. It’s Having a Major Revival.

11.13 Caravan marks one month on the road: ‘We keep on going, laughing or crying’

11.13 Letter Shows Einstein’s Prescient Concerns About ‘Dark Times’ in Germany

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Bogus Washington-Proposed Financial Reform

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:

Bogus Washington-Proposed Financial Reform

by Stephen Lendman
Thursday, 1 April 2010
Proposed financial reform is just camouflage for Wall Street's latest power play, leaving ordinary people sitting ducks to be scammed again with the full faith and blessing of Washington.

In Washington, the more things change, the more they stay the same, or usually get worse. It's true each election cycle, and when Congress enacts "reform," watch out.

Exhibit A:

Obamacare: legislation that rations care and enriches corporate providers.

Exhibit B:

Financial reform, shaping up to be more business as usual, masquerading as change, and leaving what's needed unaddressed and papered over.

What Real Reform Looks Like - Abolish or Nationalize the Fed

For many years, Ron Paul waged a lonely struggle to abolish the Fed, trying and failing in the 106th, 107th, 108th, and 110th Congresses. Numerous times he explained what he said on the House floor on September 10, 2002, namely:

"Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and working-class Americans have been victimized by a boom-and-bust monetary cycle. In addition, most Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people," a 1913 dollar (when the Fed was created) today worth about a nickel and continues to erode.

Under the Fed, we've also had rising consumer debt; record budget and trade deficits; an unsustainable national debt; a high level of personal and business bankruptcies; millions of lost homes; high unemployment; loss of the nation's manufacturing base; soaring poverty levels; an unprecedented wealth gap between the rich and most others; and a hugely unstable economy lurching from one crisis to another, the current one near-catastrophic with years more pain and suffering ahead for growing millions.

Yet the 1913 Federal Reserve Act violates the Constitution's Article I, Section 8 giving Congress sole power to coin (create) money and regulate the value thereof. In 1935, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress can't constitutionally delegate it to another body.

Yet, as financial writer Ellen Brown explains, Federal Reserves Notes comprise about 3% of the money supply, the remainder created by private banks through loans. When made, the money supply expands. When repaid it contracts unless equal or greater loan amounts are made. Today, they're not, so credit is contracting precipitously.

The founders wanted gold and silver as legal tender, not fiat money or a central bank, President Andrew Jackson calling the Bank of the United States (the Fed's equivalent in his day) a "hydra-headed monster."

Under the Fed, America's monetary system combines money, credit and debt into a dishonest system of empty promises in exchange for future ones, new generations forced to pay increasingly greater amounts for today's excesses, a process designed to suck maximum public wealth into elitist private hands.

Privatized money control is the single greatest threat to democracy. Since 1913, Wall Street bankers have incrementally stolen it in collusion with corrupted officials, modern day ones crafting fake financial reform to end the little that's left and extract as much more public wealth as possible.

On July 8, 2009, the House introduced HR 3126: Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009:

"To establish the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, and for other purposes."

On October 22, 2009, it was reported to Committee but not passed.

On December 2, 2009, the House introduced HR 4173: Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009:

"To provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for other purposes."

It was rushed through committees, then passed on December 11.

On December 16, 2009, the Senate introduced S. 2886: Banking Integrity Act of 2009:

"A bill to prohibit certain affiliations (between commercial banking and investment banking companies), and for other purposes."

It was referred to committed and not voted on.

On March 15, the Senate introduced the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010:

"To promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system, to end 'too big to fail,' to protect American taxpayers by ending bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive financial services practices, and for other purposes."

In a March 15 MSNBC The Ed Show interview, Congressman Ron Paul said the following:

  • House (and Senate bills) give "more power to the Fed and (don't) do the job;"
  • regulatory power "should be independent and out of the Federal Reserve;" the Fed is the problem, not the solution;
  • everything in House (and Senate bills) has loopholes, so "won't do the job;"
  • Paul supports "regulation of the Federal Reserve;"
  • as the lender of last resort, it "causes moral hazard," investors believing it "will be there to pick up the pieces," but people end up getting stuck;
  • "I'm sympathetic with the Volker rule," Paul said, requiring bank and nonbank financial institution regulatory measures over their affiliates and holding companies, prohibiting proprietary trading, investments in and sponsorship of hedge and private equity funds, and limiting hedge fund - private equity fund relations;
  • when banks get in trouble, "we shouldn't have to have taxpayers liable to bail out all these people;"
  • real financial reform involves changing the Fed; "when you allow a secret bank like the Fed to create money out of thin air, you" encourage irresponsibility; the House and Senate bills do precisely that and won't work.

They're essentially old wine in new bottles, masquerading as reform. If enacted, the public again will be scammed.

On March 22, the Senate Banking Committee passed the Financial Stability Act 13 - 10 (along party lines), and sent it to the floor for debate.

Obama's "Financial Regulatory Reform, A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Supervision and Regulation"

Announced on June 17, 2009, it's a plan to create new government agencies, more greatly empower the Fed, and address major problems problems. Its objectives include:

  • "promot(ing) robust supervision and regulation of financial markets;
  • establish(ing) comprehensive regulation of financial markets;
  • protect(ing) consumers and investors from financial abuse;
  • provid(ing) the government with the tools it needs to manage financial crises; (and)
  • rais(ing) international regulatory standards and improv(ing) international cooperation."

Its proposed reforms include:

  • a new regulatory 'Financial Services Oversight Council;"
  • more greatly empowering the Fed over "all firms that could pose a threat to financial stability, even those that do not own banks" like insurance companies;
  • establish a new "National Bank Supervisor" over all federally chartered banks;
  • register hedge fund advisors;
  • new regulation of securitization and derivatives markets;
  • increased market transparency and more effective credit rating agencies;
  • originators of securitized loans to retain some of the credit risk;
  • broker and loan originator compensation changes away from income up front to spreading it over time and making it performance dependent;
  • a new "Consumer Financial Protection Agency;"
  • new ways to "resolve nonbank financial institutions whose failure could have serious system effects;"
  • establishing "wind down authority to take over large financial firms like AIG, Fannie and Freddie;" and
  • international reforms through G-20 cooperation.

America has a legacy of failed public agencies as well as regulatory and legislative reform for familiar reasons - no teeth or real oversight, mostly because financial and other industries end up self-regulating, consolidating, and growing at the expense of the public interest - smaller firms then crowded out, bought up, or eliminated. Giving the Fed more power lets banking giants make their own rules, decide how and whether to enforce them, and operate the way they wish because no one in government dares challenge them.

It's no surprise why Obama's 2009 plan, House enacted legislation, and what the Senate will now debate capitulate to Wall Street. Their lawyer/lobbyists wrote the bills to give them more, not less, power, masquerading as reform.

If enacted, banks will get congressional cover to self-regulate, continue past fraudulent practices, inflate new bubbles, transfer more public wealth to themselves, crush competition, wreck the economy further, and be bailed out again to buy more assets at cheap prices, then start the whole process over again.

On December 30, moneymorning.com's contributing editor Shah Gilani put it this way:

"in a testament to (Wall Street's) power, what's on the table is what works for bankers and the Street. (Congressional legislation) is nothing more than Wall Street's secret agenda to eliminate competition, grow bigger profit engines and rely on the perception of a socialized system to support cheap funding....the truth is not being told. Big banks are leaning on legislators to facilitate and perpetuate the concentration of banking interests (to let them) eliminate competition and fatten margins."

House legislation especially props up failed banks, more than ever empowers them, and insures the full faith and credit of Washington to bail them out whenever needed.

As for consumer protection, current and past agencies serve bankers, not the public - notably the SEC, Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the private banking cartel Federal Reserve, wholly owned by its member banks, Wall Street giants holding controlling interest.

The so-called credit rating agencies are part of the scheme. Ones like Moody's, Standard & Poor's, Fitch and others bogusly assessing toxic securitizations and other financial alchemy in return for large fees and big profits. The House bill does nothing to correct this, the final Senate one not likely to either. Instead, they'll give enforcement power to the notoriously corrupt SEC, staffed with officials that move to high-paying industry jobs, so refrain from future slapping hands that may feed them.

Other House (and likely Senate) bill problems include:

  • failure to address "too-big-to-fail" (TBTF) institutions that are too big to exist;
  • numerous loopholes letting derivatives speculators game the system without regulatory restraining authority;
  • enacting no deterrent to securitization process abuses;
  • not reforming government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) like Fannie, Freddie, and others; and
  • letting bankers self-regulate by keeping the Fed in charge - the ultimate conflict of interest assuring no change in business as usual, just cover to paper over flawed policy.

If the final Senate bill resembles HR 4173 as appears likely, Wall Street shenanigans will be green-lighted. A future greater financial crisis is assured. Giant banks will get bigger. Trillions more in public wealth will be looted. Current financial reform debate will be revisited, but nothing will be resolved now or then unless grassroots outrage forces it.

Dean Baker, Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, said the House bill:

"does little to change the current structure of the financial system. The 'too-big-to-fail' banks will be left in place, even bigger and less accountable than before. There will be nothing done to separate commercial and investment banking," so giants like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, and Bank of America will be able to game the system for even greater profits.

"The bottom line is that this bill is almost certain to leave the taxpayers holding the bag for future bailouts."

On March 25, writing for the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC - nlpc.org), Carl Horowitz called the Senate bill "the equivalent of a revolving bailout for failing Wall Street and banking institutions."

Its provisions still a work in progress, ones in it, unless amended, include:

  • greater than ever Fed empowerment;
  • establishing a Fed-controlled Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), putting bankers in charge of consumer protection;
  • creating a Treasury-run Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to include representatives of the Fed, the new CFPA, FDIC, SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), FHA, and an official monitoring insurers;
  • requiring over-the-counter derivatives be traded on exchanges or clearinghouses but doing nothing to curtail speculative abuses;
  • letting the Fed regulate bank holding companies with $50 billion or more assets as well as "systemically important nonbank financial institutions;"
  • having smaller banks overseen by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) or FDIC;
  • letting shareholders vote on executive pay and nominate directors, but with too few shares to matter;
  • acknowledging Volker rule merits by only requiring its implementation at some unspecified future time; and
  • providing a revolving emergency loan fund (like TARP) to assure more public wealth for giant banks.

Both House and Senate bills empower existing authorities, lets them run newly established ones, so reform amounts to old wine in new bottles, leaving bankers in charge and the public as vulnerable as before to a certain future crisis they'll have to pay for again. Shah Gilani's December 30 moneymorning.com article explained it up nicely, saying:

Proposed "financial reform (is) just camouflage for Wall Street's latest power play," leaving ordinary people sitting ducks to be scammed again with the full faith and blessing of Washington.


Stephen Lendman

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His blog is sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to Lendman's cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

Mr. Lendman's stories are republished in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the author.



Copyright © 2010 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on April 1, 2010.
 



Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland